Silverlight to be in half of all Internet devices by 2010
By Sam Symons, 12 July 2009 - 22:47 59 comments
With the release of Silverlight 3.0 not long ago, Microsoft has shown a bit more detail on the plans it has for the technology in the future. According to CNET, Abu-Hadba (leader of Microsoft's developer and platform evangelism division) has said that half of all Internet-connected devices will be packing Silverlight by next year.
Microsoft plans to expand their product to many different devices, including Apple's iPhone, and to do so they want to make sure that they don't have to create 'lite' versions of it. Scott Guthrie, Abu-Hadba's fellow developer unit executive, said, "We want to make sure people have a 'wow' experience," though they admit it's taken them longer than they'd have liked so far. As we speak, Microsoft is in beta testing stages of Silverlight for Android and Windows Mobile, and CNET expects announcements to be made at the Professional Developer Conference this fall, with Guthrie saying, "You are going to hear a lot more details about it later this year."
Interestingly, Abu-Hadba doesn't wonder if Silverlight will be with us in 10 years time... more, he brings up the uncertainty that Microsoft's rival will be, Adobe (due to their Flash software). He notes that Adobe is now a company that maintains a web platform for general purpose, rather than aiming at just being a design company, something that they can't keep up forever. "I don't think they will exist in 10 years in the form they are today," he said, but to quote CNET, "[imagine how] unthinkable it would have been to predict in 2000 that Sun Microsystems would go away."
Regardless, we'll see how far Silverlight has progressed by the year's end.

Comments (59)
Neoauld - 12 July 2009 - 22:49
i hope to see it everywhere, given how superior it is over flash
+TCLN Ryster - 12 July 2009 - 23:06
+1
M_Lyons10 - 12 July 2009 - 23:17
Agreed. Silverlight has truly been given a great deal of thought and planning. It leaves Flash in the dust.
artfuldodga - 12 July 2009 - 23:43
it is pretty slick, functions better than flash by far
master2k27 - 12 July 2009 - 23:46
yea i hope so.
GP007 - 13 July 2009 - 01:50
The fact MS is moving fast on it is big, and if they can get it on Android which is just more or less a "lite" version of Linux etc, would that mean it's from Mono as well? Or are they going to do it themselves?
FoxieFoxie - 13 July 2009 - 07:37
The day youtube uses sl will be the day I uninstall flash
Bhav - 12 July 2009 - 22:52
Could anyone explain how/why it's superior to flash?
I'm not denying that it is...just wondering.
AgentGray - 12 July 2009 - 22:56
lots of reasons... it's written with software development in mind, and hasn't had to have that kind of functionality shoehorned into it. It's running onto of .net which results in takng full advantage of your system hardware making it far faster then flash's software handling of just about everyhting. .. there are a lot of reasons to like silverlight, especially when compared to the utter-crash-filled mess that is flash 10.
this is coming from someone that devs in flash ~50 hours a week as a career and hobby... and I dont expect to be switching to silverlight anytime soon, but maybe with it we'll see adobe stop releasing shoddy products.
m-p{3} - 13 July 2009 - 01:00
I'm not denying that it is...just wondering.
I know that since Silverlight 3.0, it now support GPU acceleration for video content (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverlight#Silverlight_3.0 ), allowing better performance for HD content.
However most web developers know it is easy to create a flash animation, which might not be the case with Silverlight.
toadeater - 13 July 2009 - 04:51
Windows only. Flash runs on everything.
JonathanMarston - 13 July 2009 - 05:50
Windows, MacOSX, Linux, and soon Android and Windows Mobile. Check your facts.
mormat - 13 July 2009 - 07:40
I don't understand why Silverlight is faster than Flash... They both run a VM with JIT compiler (Flash runs Tamarin, Silverlight runs kind of shortened .NET) , so the speed should be almost the same. For me (as a SL developer) silverlight doesn't work with graphics as fast as I would expect or want. Or you meant something else?
FoxieFoxie - 13 July 2009 - 07:41
There is linux version as well, don't remember name though, silverwolf or whatever
Minimoose - 13 July 2009 - 11:50
Smooth streaming is another reason.
MightyJordan - 13 July 2009 - 12:33
Moonlight.
LaP - 13 July 2009 - 16:03
Last time i checked Linux version of SL was features behind the one for Windows.
Julius Caro - 14 July 2009 - 12:31
I'm not denying that it is...just wondering.
I want it on linux. Flash should just die.
+cabron - 12 July 2009 - 23:09
I don't know why but to develop Silverlight animation you need to know programming. With Adobe Flash software, anyone can do an simple animation without applying any single programming code.
GreyWolf - 13 July 2009 - 01:27
You can use the Expression tools and never look at a piece of code.