US and Antigua Battle Over Online Betting

Antigua, the smallest country to ever win a World Trade Organization case, is seeking the right to impose $3.4 billion in commercial sanctions against the U.S. for its failure to comply with a ruling on its online betting ban; if succesful, this will be the second highest sanction in the WTO's history. Last year, Washington stopped U.S. banks and credit card companies from processing payments to online gambling businesses outside the country, a decision which closed off nearly half of the world's online gamblers in a market worth $15.5 billion.

While the WTO supported this decision on moral grounds, it also ruled that it was illegal to target online gambling, without equally applying the rules to American operators offering remote betting on horse and dog racing. As a result of the loss, the US declared its intention to explicitly remove Internet gambling from its obligations under the WTO's treaty on trade in services, causing Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, India, Macau, Japan, and the entire EU to file compensation claims in kind. EU online gambling sites in particular - which largely bankrolled Antigua's legal efforts - have claimed the U.S. owes the European Union a jackpot of up to $100 billion in trade concessions to compensate for its illegal ban on foreign gambling companies. The US denies all these claims and is preparing to go into arbitration in Geneva next month.

View: Full Story on SiliconValley.com

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Novell credits Microsoft for soaring Linux sales

Next Story

Emerson to Buy Motorola's Embedded Computing Business

3 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

The ban on Internet gambling by the US is just another example of its pro-religious-right hypocrisy. Gambling is mostly illegal in the US because it's some kind of "sin". Yet the backbone of the global economy is the stock market.

Is there anyone out there who won't acknowledge that "playing" the stock market is gambling on a global scale, pure and simple? :mad:

I think the compensation is reasonable because this legal battle started way back in 2003 when the U.S. announced it was officially making online gambling illegal for americans.


http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articl...NLINE000618.htm


Lawyers and industry groups representing the gaming industry said European companies have lost billions of dollars in revenues and market value while U.S. companies such as Yahoo Inc. (YHOO) and the Sands Corp. were free to offer Internet games to Europeans.

Yahoo and Sands are not blocked from other countries....but the u.s. block everyone else.

Isn't it funny that parties that claim to support freedom and "personal choice/responsibility" ban gambling and parties who don't support banning on moral grounds, ban things like smoking ... seems both heads of the coin enjoy banning whatever they want.

Not suprising the US banned foreign gambling companies, the state supported lotteries and casinos could loose money ... its only immoral if the money leaves their state I guess.