All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Jim K

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    You sure about that? I said "It requires a CPU with an integrated GPU which the Ryzen 1400 doesn't have." Why would you say a "CPU with an APU"? That makes zero sense. /fin My best guess. You've tried the clear CMOS route (by removing the battery), you aren't getting any beeps regardless of configuration ... so it is either the motherboard or PSU in my opinion. If one of them are still under warranty...I would RMA. If you have an extra PSU laying around (or could borrow one) you could try it ... though I'm inclined to believe your motherboard went to silicon heaven. Obviously, I wouldn't take my word for it as others here may offer additional suggestions which may help solve your issue.
  3. hi there - good day dear friends, found a solution - this i want to share with you... cf https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51990613/getting-a-list-of-all-plugins There is a plugin API which we can query for plugins like this: $api = plugins_api( 'query_plugins', $args ); developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/plugins_api – we can make use of plugins_api('hot_tags'), array('page' => 90000000000, 'number' => 90000000000). It returns some plugins but not all. we can go this way: $api = plugins_api( 'query_plugins', [ 'per_page' => - // get the current "page", or if the option not exists, set page to 1. $page = get_option( 'plugins_page' ) ? (int)get_option( 'plugins_page' ) : 1; // get the plugin objects $plugins = plugins_api( 'query_plugins', [ 'per_page' => 100, 'page' => $page, 'fields' => [ //......... ] ] ); // increment the page, or when no results, reset to 1. update_option( 'plugins_page', count( $plugins ) > 0 ? ++ $page : 1 ); // build up the data array $newData = []; foreach ( $plugins as $plugin ) { foreach ( $plugin as $key => $p ) { if ( $p->name != null ) { $newData[ $p->name ] = [ 'slug' => $p->slug ]; } } } // get plugin data already in file. // The last argument (true) is important. It makes json objects into // associative arrays so they can be merged with array_merge. $existingData = json_decode( file_get_contents( 'plugins.json' ), true ); // merge existing data with new data $pluginData = array_merge( $existingData, $newData ); file_put_contents( 'plugins.json', json_encode( $pluginData ) ); Getting a list of plugins: This will not return ALL plugins but it will return the top rated ones: $plugins = plugins_api('query_plugins', array( 'per_page' => 100, 'browse' => 'top-rated', 'fields' => array( 'short_description' => false, 'description' => false, 'sections' => false, 'tested' => false, 'requires' => false, 'rating' => false, 'ratings' => false, 'downloaded' => false, 'downloadlink' => false, 'last_updated' => false, 'added' => false, 'tags' => false, 'compatibility' => false, 'homepage' => false, 'versions' => false, 'donate_link' => false, 'reviews' => false, 'banners' => false, 'icons' => false, 'active_installs' => false, 'group' => false, 'contributors' => false ))); we can save the data as JSON Since the data that we get is huge and it will be bad for performance, we can try to get the name and the slug out of the array and then we write it in a JSON file: $plugins_json = '{' . PHP_EOL; // Get only the name and the slug foreach ($plugins as $plugin) { foreach ($plugin as $key => $p) { if ($p->name != null) { // Let's beautify the JSON $plugins_json .= ' "'. $p->name . '": {' . PHP_EOL; $plugins_json .= ' "slug": "' . $p->slug . '"' . PHP_EOL; end($plugin); $plugins_json .= ($key !== key($plugin)) ? ' },' . PHP_EOL : ' }' . PHP_EOL; } } } $plugins_json .= '}'; file_put_contents('plugins.json', $plugins_json); Now we have a slim JSON file with only the data that we need. To keep updating the JSON file, we run that script to create a JSON file every 24 hours by setting up a Cron Job. just wanted to share this with you have a great day... 😉
  4. NotsoTechy

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    I am not getting any beeps at all, and the fans are all spinning, is it really the motherboard? How do I know if the motherboard is dead or faulty? The 1 in is connected through a molex pin, the other exhaust fan is connected in the board and the other is through a molex pin
  5. Mindovermaster

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    Actually, you don't say "A CPU with a GPU" So, "A CPU with an APU" is the correct term. I'm not trying to be annoying, I'm just correcting you on terminology.
  6. Mindovermaster

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    With the Stealth cooler, it shouldn't touch your RAM slots... Well, with no RAM, your board doesn't even get past POST. So, no, there wouldn't be any beeps. Saying you have 3 fans, how are they connected? there's only 2 headers on your board. (nothing to do with this, just curious)
  7. Jim K

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    Actually, an APU is a CPU with integrated graphics....right? Your petty "corrections" get annoying FYI. ...and you aren't getting any beeps regardless of the configuration ... with everything plugged in? Basically, you're getting fans spinning but no beeps or anything else? I believe that motherboard has a three year warranty. Have you passed the three years yet? If it is still under warranty, I would RMA the board. I
  8. Exactly what censorship are you referring to? Is it really censorship is a tweet goes against Twitter's TOS?
  9. NotsoTechy

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    Yes, the fans are spinning(the CPU fan and case fans) but no beep or anything, I've got a case speaker plugged in also and when i remove the RAM and powered it on it doesn't give a beep error. My motherboard only have 2 DIMM slots
  10. The new URL bar was added in Firefox 75, though I don't like it either. Fortunately there are about:config tweaks that will disable it. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1283831" rel="external nofollow">https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1283831 Those tweaks no longer work, which is the main issue with this release. The only change I noticed was the urlbar gets bigger when you click on it again, but the tweaks that turn off all the other new stuff still seem to work. I found a userchrome.css tweak that turns off the bar embiggening feature though. https://bit.ly/2XZ5Wxa
  11. The thing is, other than a few people outside the US who inexplicably decided to protest about this, this is only really a big issue in the US. I'm not suggesting what happened isn't tragic but it definitely isn't a worldwide issue, and this event was aimed at the entire world, not just the US. The rest of the world doesn't need to go on pause until the US figures this out and I don't think anyone (even people in the US) would have thought Sony was "insensitive" if they'd just said nothing and held the event. I don't know; I've seen news of plenty of people and countries outside of the US getting involved with the situation. Plus it's not really about just the death of the 1 person at this point but racism and police brutality and such as a whole. Virtue signalling/jumping on the bandwagon for the most part. And whilst racism is still a problem worldwide, many countries just don't really have an issue with their police forces like the US does. There really isn't much of a reason for anyone outside the US to really get involved with all this, although it's not really surprising that some people are. Either way, as I said, Sony could have just held the event and I doubt anyone would have batted an eyelid.
  12. Mindovermaster

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    Actually, an APU, but yeah... What Jim said above, basically. Also, you should get dual channel RAM, not just one stick...
  13. Today
  14. Jim K

    PC no post, no display, no beep, fans spinning

    For clarification....because I'm a little confused on the power situation. 🙂 So, when you push the power button does it power up (fans spinning)? I'm assuming you have a case speaker hooked up (since you mentioned "still no beep")... but you aren't getting any beeps? If it isn't getting power ... or the motherboard isn't powering up ... I would agree with your friend that it is either the motherboard or PSU. Which one though...that is kinda hard to tell. If it was the GPU, CPU or RAM .. the motherboard should throw angry error beeps at you. Side note: You won't get ANY video out from the motherboard itself. It requires a CPU with an integrated GPU which the Ryzen 1400 doesn't have.
  15. You're welcome to your opinion, just not your own facts. Twitter adding a notation about voter fraud and mail-in ballots to Trump's false tweet is not expressing an opinion but simply providing actual context to what Trump was referring to. As for where does Twitter get off doing whatever they want to do with their own platform should be obvious but they also have the law on their side to that backs that up. Section 230 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 So yes they actually can and do restrict content when it goes against the TOS, again they have the legal right to do so. And no, that's not how communism works. Except they actually violated section 230... Trump gave an opinion on a future event, they "fact checked" his opinion with other opinions... no actual facts! Even Jack has come out and admitted what they did was wrong! Plus there are countless articles, "evidence", that mail-in ballots have been compromised. Even the NAACP has claimed it... and using leftest logic, if you don't believe them then you must be a racist! https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...amid-fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...amid-fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...amid-fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/ What specifically did they violate, cause their labeling does no such thing. Here is the 2 tweets that were labeled. https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald...status/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald...status/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/realDonald.../status/1265255845358645254 and here is the page the label takes you to https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384 On Tuesday, President Trump made a series of claims about potential voter fraud after California Governor Gavin Newsom announced an effort to expand mail-in voting in California during the COVID-19 pandemic. These claims are unsubstantiated, according to CNN, Washington Post and others. Experts say mail-in ballots are very rarely linked to voter fraud. What Trump tweeted was an unsubstantiated claim, not an opinion. California does not send out millions of ballots to anyone in the state no matter who they are or how they got there as Trump claimed. They are mailed out to registered voters. And who are these so called professionals telling everyone else who to vote for? Trump made a number of claims in his tweets and offers noting to back up said claim. All Twitter did was tweet out what I already provided and linked above. So please show me where twitter violated section 230? Also where did Dorsey say they were wrong? Just yesterday he said they'ed continue to flag incorrect info. https://www.blackenterprise.co" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.blackenterprise.co...-about-elections-globally/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.blackenterprise.co" rel="external nofollow">https://www.blackenterprise.co" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.blackenterprise.co...n-about-elections-globally/ Lastly don't confuse a local NAACP head with a national view or that what happened there is a national problem in general. If you value the "opinion articles twitter posted, then I'll just leave these two examples to the contrary here then... https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...ould-impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...ould-impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...could-impact-elections.html https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...mail-in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...mail-in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...-mail-in-voting-11586557667 Give me a break, there is no way you could be thinking that NO fraud could occur, where in some cases districts are won by thousands or even hundreds of votes! The article I posted had to do with your claim that " Jack has come out and admitted what they did was wrong!", which was not the case. It did not have to do with mail in vote fraud. At no point in my post did I deny that fraud existed. What I said was that Trump made an unsubstantiated claim, which based on Trump's own words, is still true. So it took you two days to come up with a reply that not only doesn't address what you quoted me on but you still have failed to support your own claims that Jack admitted they did wrong and that there was a violation of section 230. You may check this website every day, I however do not... I was reading between the lines on Jack's post, that he is ultimately responsible and the people that censored Trump's quote should not be blamed. They are hiding the tweets made, which is a form of censorship. You stated the claims were unsubstantiated that future elections could have voter fraud, I gave links showing other people agree that future elections can have fraud. How can you fact-check a future possibility? That's my point! A statement can either be an opinion or a fact, if a statement is made about the future, it MUST be an opinion, and hence can not be fact-checked! It'd be as stupid as if Trump tweeted "Tonight I am going to eat hamburgers for dinner and they'll be delicious" TWITTER Fact-Check ref: WaPo-Hamburgers are terrible and can not be referred to as delicious So by "reading between the lines" you filled in your own blanks that fit your narrative, even though Jack's own words and actions are a complete 180 to your thinking. FYI the original two tweets Trump put out were never censored. You might want to read up on what censoring actually means cause with those 2 tweets, neither of them were censored or hided. They are are still up for anyone to read. Here is the actual link to his un-hidden tweets https://twitter.com/realDonald.../status/1265255845358645254 Now that isn't to say another tweet wasn't hidden by twitter. That being the one where Trump called for violence days after his original tweets were marked with additional information. Obviously the tweet hidden went against Twitter's TOS. My question to you, is that given his tweet violated Twitter's TOS on violence, are you ok with them hiding it? If not, please explain why. Here is an image of the tweet https://i.imgur.com/A8yBJji.jpg You also seem to be having some reading comprehension issues as I never claimed future elections could not have fraud. Literally nothing in my post suggested that. I even said "At no point in my post did I deny that fraud existed". That is not the same as saying fraud could not happen. Your "reading between the lines" skills could use some work. What I said was Trump's claims were unsubstantiated, which is still true, what he said in those tweets, which I linked above, do not have substantial evidence to support them. There is no evidence of mass fraud of robbing mail boxes, ballots being forged or illegally printed and signed. Does it happen on a smaller scale, sure, but there has never been a case where mass fraud has happened during a national election for which Trump is referring to. The other false claim Trump made was that millions of ballots were mailed out to anyone living in the state no matter who they are and how they got there. Ballots are mailed out to registered voters. You know, those people who have established residency and who have the legal right to vote. He then went on to claim that "professionals", no clue who that is supposed to be, would be telling others whom to vote for. Again, like so many times before, Trump offers up no supporting evidence to his claims. The opinion in his tweet is that this upcoming election will be rigged. You can argue semantics all you want about his prediction of what in his mind will happen but the fact is, he's making claims that don't support reality. What's odd is that you seem more upset that Twitter posted a label regarding his tweets but don't seem to have a care in the world that the POTUS is lying, on almost a daily basis at that. Seems odd you wouldn't hold the POTUS to the higher standard then some internet platform. As for twitter's "fact check" here is the actual wording and link to it. https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384 "On Tuesday, President Trump made a series of claims about potential voter fraud after California Governor Gavin Newsom announced an effort to expand mail-in voting in California during the COVID-19 pandemic. These claims are unsubstantiated, according to CNN, Washington Post and others. Experts say mail-in ballots are very rarely linked to voter fraud" That's it, that's all it was. That's what you're arguing against, seems very silly to get so worked up over.
  16. The new URL bar was added in Firefox 75, though I don't like it either. Fortunately there are about:config tweaks that will disable it. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1283831 Those tweaks no longer work, which is the main issue with this release.
  17. Bruinator

    Phone dialer app

    I have been using truecaller for a well now and it's been ok. Just curious what app you guys use? TIA
  18. The Samsung XCover Pro looks like a great mid-range phone. It has a swappable battery so no more waiting an hour to recharge your phone
  19. I think that Russia is more likely to not book flights simply because it being so much cheaper and convenient would make their own space program look bad. Maybe here or there if scheduling conflicts but outside I imagine they'll want to keep their Soyuz system alive as long as possible to feel competitive.
  20. People seem to be more interested in reading/hearing what they want to hear rather than what's actually said. Losing battle to try and point that out, cause all it does is get you shunned and facepalmed. Being a moderate on Neowin is no better than being a right wing anarchist to the most active political posters. And I see no attempt by anyone here to try and stop it. Politics on Neowin is a one-sided ****-show at this point. Especially when people criticize someone for posting irrelevant gifs then posts one themselves immediately after (both of which serve to only be more divisive).
  21. Hey guys! While using my PC, the monitor suddenly turns off (no display), then i checked my system and it was still running but the power button switch is not responding to switch off the computer so i just turned off the power supply. I thought it was the RAM, so I unplugged the power cord and removed the RAM and cleaned it but still nothing happens. I then removed the CMOS Battery, let it rest for a couple of minutes and plugged it back, still nothing happens. I removed the GPU then use the mobo as my display, but still nothing. I've tried to remove the ram and gpu, still no beep and no display. I've called a colleague to checked it, he suspects it's either the mobo or the PSU. I've also unplugged and replugged all the cords from the power supply. My PC is 2 years old, bought it on 2017. My Specs: Ryzen 5 1400 3.2 ghz (Wraith Stealth cooler) Gigabyte ga-a320m-ds2 ddr4 Micro ATX 1x8 gb ram ddr4 2144mhz Zotac GTX 1050 ti OC 4gb GDDR5 Deepcool DE600 600 watts 3 case fans (1 in, 2 exhaust) PS. My mouse LED is on but my keyboard LED is off when i'm turning on my computer I've noticed something strange when I powered my computer with the RAM in place I can't shutdown my PC through the power button, but when my RAM is removed I can shutdown it through the power button.
  22. You're welcome to your opinion, just not your own facts. Twitter adding a notation about voter fraud and mail-in ballots to Trump's false tweet is not expressing an opinion but simply providing actual context to what Trump was referring to. As for where does Twitter get off doing whatever they want to do with their own platform should be obvious but they also have the law on their side to that backs that up. Section 230 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230" rel="external nofollow">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 So yes they actually can and do restrict content when it goes against the TOS, again they have the legal right to do so. And no, that's not how communism works. Except they actually violated section 230... Trump gave an opinion on a future event, they "fact checked" his opinion with other opinions... no actual facts! Even Jack has come out and admitted what they did was wrong! Plus there are countless articles, "evidence", that mail-in ballots have been compromised. Even the NAACP has claimed it... and using leftest logic, if you don't believe them then you must be a racist! https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...amid-fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...amid-fraud-claims/2435162/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nbcnewyork.com/new...-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/ What specifically did they violate, cause their labeling does no such thing. Here is the 2 tweets that were labeled. https://twitter.com/realDonald...status/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald...s/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/realDonald...status/1265255845358645254" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/realDonald.../status/1265255845358645254 and here is the page the label takes you to https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384" rel="external nofollow">https://twitter.com/i/events/1265330601034256384 On Tuesday, President Trump made a series of claims about potential voter fraud after California Governor Gavin Newsom announced an effort to expand mail-in voting in California during the COVID-19 pandemic. These claims are unsubstantiated, according to CNN, Washington Post and others. Experts say mail-in ballots are very rarely linked to voter fraud. What Trump tweeted was an unsubstantiated claim, not an opinion. California does not send out millions of ballots to anyone in the state no matter who they are or how they got there as Trump claimed. They are mailed out to registered voters. And who are these so called professionals telling everyone else who to vote for? Trump made a number of claims in his tweets and offers noting to back up said claim. All Twitter did was tweet out what I already provided and linked above. So please show me where twitter violated section 230? Also where did Dorsey say they were wrong? Just yesterday he said they'ed continue to flag incorrect info. https://www.blackenterprise.co...-about-elections-globally/" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.blackenterprise.co" rel="external nofollow">https://www.blackenterprise.co...n-about-elections-globally/ Lastly don't confuse a local NAACP head with a national view or that what happened there is a national problem in general. If you value the "opinion articles twitter posted, then I'll just leave these two examples to the contrary here then... https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...ould-impact-elections.html" rel="external nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2012/1...could-impact-elections.html https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow" style="user-select: auto;">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...mail-in-voting-11586557667" rel="external nofollow">https://www.wsj.com/articles/h...-mail-in-voting-11586557667 Give me a break, there is no way you could be thinking that NO fraud could occur, where in some cases districts are won by thousands or even hundreds of votes! The article I posted had to do with your claim that " Jack has come out and admitted what they did was wrong!", which was not the case. It did not have to do with mail in vote fraud. At no point in my post did I deny that fraud existed. What I said was that Trump made an unsubstantiated claim, which based on Trump's own words, is still true. So it took you two days to come up with a reply that not only doesn't address what you quoted me on but you still have failed to support your own claims that Jack admitted they did wrong and that there was a violation of section 230. You may check this website every day, I however do not... I was reading between the lines on Jack's post, that he is ultimately responsible and the people that censored Trump's quote should not be blamed. They are hiding the tweets made, which is a form of censorship. You stated the claims were unsubstantiated that future elections could have voter fraud, I gave links showing other people agree that future elections can have fraud. How can you fact-check a future possibility? That's my point! A statement can either be an opinion or a fact, if a statement is made about the future, it MUST be an opinion, and hence can not be fact-checked! It'd be as stupid as if Trump tweeted "Tonight I am going to eat hamburgers for dinner and they'll be delicious" TWITTER Fact-Check ref: WaPo-Hamburgers are terrible and can not be referred to as delicious
  23. Facebook makes it easier to manage and hide old posts..... fixed
  24. Marujan

    T-Mobile now has 5G in all 50 U.S. states

    VZW network has better coverage
  25. I agree with you, and that's why I have a widget on my home screen to control my light. Its one thing that ios has had for ages. Nice to see android catchup. Where is that feature? I can't see it on my (admittedly old) iPhone 6s. I tried the widgets on Android years ago and never found them very reliable at the time (Lifx about 4 years back). Google Home does the job now days. I'd still prefer switches, it would be great to have some universal basic low cost and low power wifi switch you could physically have over the top of the existing light switch or something! I think Melfster was trying to be funny. IOS still can't have widgets on the home screen. BTW you can get physical switches to control smart lights. Here's an example: https://www.ikea.com/au/en/p/t...ri-remote-control-00443125/
  26. When I get "you have history to look back on", I just delete everything. If it's been online for a year, those that wanted to see it, saw it, so I just delete it.
  27. RNDM_STRNGR

    MSI announces new desktops with 10th-generation Intel CPUs

    Has to be. I see no other reason someone would buy it otherwise
  1. Load more activity
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up