Nikon 1


Recommended Posts

Argote

Well it is nice, but why would anyone buy this over the similarly priced M4/3s or Sony NEX cameras? They have bigger sensors, better IQ, more features, better viewfinder/screens, more lenses and so on... This is basically the Pentax Q and you don't see many of those being sold...

Link to post
Share on other sites
threetonesun

I don't get it. Is it fully automatic?

Link to post
Share on other sites
neufuse

looks like a 80's camera :blink:

Link to post
Share on other sites
guru

meh.. expensive lenses and arent much smaller either...

Link to post
Share on other sites
crazzy88ss

Well it is nice, but why would anyone buy this over the similarly priced M4/3s or Sony NEX cameras?

The same reason people buy the M4/3s & NEX & Leica cameras?

You can mount your normal f-mount lenses to this, though.

It's got some nifty features... but I don't know if it's really worth it at that price.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Argote

The same reason people buy the M4/3s & NEX & Leica cameras?

You can mount your normal f-mount lenses to this, though.

Are you sure? I read the exact opposite. THough given the low flange distance an adapter of some sort would be possible. The question is... do you WANT to use F-mount lenses with a 2.7x crop factor?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Andre

8T4Ak.jpg

Why? For the same reason people use tele lenses on 1.5x crop - more zoom range. If it's possible to begin with, why the heck not. Surely, you wouldn't walk around with such an unbalanced setup.

Link to post
Share on other sites
guru

Nikon would have had a hit if they had smaller lenses to go along with the small sensor (which imo is decent enough), They missed the ball completely with their lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Slammers

Pointless camera. A prosumer camera can be had so cheap these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TAZMINATOR

I just saw a Sony commercial on the TV about their new camera like the one mentioned above.

Link to post
Share on other sites
guru
Using a retractable design and sporting internal Vibration Reduction technology, they look to be smaller and more compact than comparable offerings from Sony, Samsung, Panasonic or Olympus. Even the 30-110mm f3.8-5.6 telephoto zoom just about folds down enough to fit inside a (large) jacket pocket ? quite some feat when you consider it offers the equivalent of 70-297mm in 35mm terms.

wooo missed that part..

Link to post
Share on other sites
crazzy88ss

Nikon would have had a hit if they had smaller lenses to go along with the small sensor (which imo is decent enough), They missed the ball completely with their lenses.

Wait.. what? Am I missing something... they ARE smaller lenses...

Pointless camera. A prosumer camera can be had so cheap these days.

Not if size is super important to you. There's tons of people that still have old rebel xti cameras cuz they just wanted something that was a bit better than a P&S. Now it's here.

Is this a main camera for anybody serious about photography? Nope. But the world's population is made up more of people who want to take decent snap shots while at parties/traveling/etc than people who are serious about photography as a profession/hobby.

Will I be buying one? Hell no. Will they sell a decent number? I bet they will.

Surely, you wouldn't walk around with such an unbalanced setup.

Why not? I see people w/ D40s to D7000s on big lenses. Even a D3 on a 400mm lens looks awkward!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Chasethebase

Here's what Engadget had to say about it.

We really wanted to like the Nikon J1 -- we've certainly waited long enough for it. So can you blame us for building up some great expectations? Sadly, this isn't the camera we were hoping for. From a range of colorful body options to the cutesy marketing video playing at in-store displays, it's clear that the company is aiming to make the mirrorless category more mainstream, while perhaps overlooking the wants and needs of its loyal professional and advanced amateur customer base. That said, we can still see the J1 being a big hit, and would even consider recommending it to a few select friends and family members, if it weren't for that $650 price tag. This camera would be a more reasonable option at, say, $499 -- especially if Nikon opted to throw in two lenses -- but until that happens, it's difficult to suggest the J1 as a top pick even for beginners. For now, we're just going to have to accept that the Nikon ILC of our dreams has yet to arrive, as we hold on to our credit cards and keep on waiting.

Edit: This is for the J1, not the V1 as pictured at the beginning of the thread. They are two different cameras, but both use the same system.

Edited by Chasethebase
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.