cmd vs Powershell  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Which would you like to see in Windows 8?

    • Powershell default, cmd alternative
    • cmd default, Powershell alternative (Currently in Windows 7)
    • Powershell default, no cmd at all
    • cmd default, no Powershell at all


Recommended Posts

With Powershell now released 4 years ago, I think it has come time to completely replace cmd in Windows 8. AFAIK, it does 99% of the things cmd does and alot more so why not?

So Windows 8: cmd or Powershell?

I pick Powershell default, no cmd at all. If someone trys to call cmd, it automatically starts Powershell (cmd being a new alias for Powershell) and/or (again cmd being a alias for Powershell) it again automatically starts Powershell but, since it has been called thru a cmd alias, it starts out in a "cmd compatibility mode"

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1035585-windows-8-cmd-or-powershell/
Share on other sites

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

  • Like 1

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

I know that and I agree with you, Cmd should be removed, Microsoft only left it in Windows 7 for the old time users that won't advance themselves with the new technology.

I just assumed Powershell was a just a more powerful shell extension of CMD, and not a successor. If it runs everything CMD did, then what's the purpose of keeping CMD? Just for familiarity for those who continue to make heavy use of cli?

Maybe should have posted this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_PowerShell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_Prompt

It depends. I won't use Powershell to just check connectivity in my network, cmd is much faster to do it, windows + r -> cmd and voi la. IMO Powershell is designed for System Administration and scripting.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

The version included with some addon to XP from back in the day.

But I still don't see why you're anal on trying to get rid of cmd?

McDonalds uses thin clients with DOS, do you think instead they should scrap the thin client idea, get new workstations with core i5s, guis, windows 7 and a load of rubbish that isn't needed, just because they could?

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

Powershell really doesn't get the attention it deserves. It really can replace the old command prompt if more developers and users were willing to try it.

But they need to keep cmd for compatibility. Aren't logon scripts still .bat files, many of which won't work without modification in Powershell?

Yes I know that, but I won't invoke powershell just to ping an asset. And this is just ridiculous.

Why invoke cmd just to ping an asset?

And the link you posted to........is that really a reason to use cmd over Powershell? :rolleyes: come on....

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

Powershell, as I have stated, includes everything CMD does and more.

CMD isnt also made for "everyday use by all users". You can do everything in Powershell that you can in CMD. I think people are missing that point...

This is the same arguement about people that stay on Windows XP and dont want to upgrade to Windows 7. The even worse part of this is that Powershell is free....

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

Thats why I also made a comment that if something calls cmd, Powershell can be ran in a "cmd compatibility mode" which allows it to run exactly the same as regular cmd. Powershell with backwards compatibility which wouldnt break anything :)

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

It will :) It comes installed with Windows 7 already

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

Exactly. Not only do all CMD commands work, but they have actually made aliases for most unix command lines such as bash. What more can you want?

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

DOS/Windows 3.1/Windows 95/Windows 98/Windows ME (yes I said ME)/Windows 2000/Windows XP/Windows Vista/etc were all faster in a loading sense than Windows 7. Point of yours is?

It seems many people here don't understand what CMD is.

Short explanation: CMD is a console window that provides basic functionality for changing the current directory (cd), showing the files and folders (dir) and a few other things (copy, auto-completion, command history...). The most important thing it does is to enable you to open files, give arguments to executables, and provide input and output for console applications.

What you're doing by calling "robocopy C:\SomeFolder C:\SomeOtherFolder" is launching robocopy.exe using "C:\SomeFolder" and "C:\SomeOtherFolder" as parameters. "tree C:\" just calls tree.com with "C:\" as a parameter. "ping google.com" calls ping.exe with "google.com" as parameter. And so on.

These programs (not commands - check your C:\Windows\System32 folder) can be used exactly the same way in PowerShell, and their output will look exactly the same.

In fact, if Microsoft set the default background color to black in PowerShell and removed the "PS" at the beginning of each line, most people wouldn't notice the difference. You would still be able to use the programs you use now.

I want bash

So install Bash. You can do that.

cmd and Powershell are like kids toys by comparison

Cmd maybe, but don't think you've actually tried PowerShell or you wouldn't be saying that. It's quite powerful. Bash is good yes,but looking over what Bash has built in, nothing really jumps out as being something that others can't do or just doesn't apply.. most of it's goodies come from external programs or scripting languages, most of which are available to other shells.

cmd can't be removed as it would break existing scripts and applications that call cmd.

Though PowerShell has aliases for many cmd built-in commands, the cmdlets for which the aliases are mapped do not support the switches of the cmd commands (e.g., you can't do "dir /w" in PowerShell). Variable syntax is also different (e.g., %windir% in cmd vs $env:windir in PowerShell).

PowerShell is getting ever increasing usage as the underpinning for Windows administration and troubleshooting functionality. While it should see greater exposure, such as adding it to the Ribbon and the context menu ("Open PowerShell here"), cmd should not be removed to elevate PowerShell unless the use cases for cmd are covered by PowerShell. It's not like cmd is the only shell besides PowerShell that currently ships with Windows. Its presence doesn't diminish PowerShell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
    • Write to your MP 😄 Like believing in Santa. Total surveillance IS the goal. Wake up.
    • This whole dumb age verification thing needs to die and be replaced by giving parents tools to control devices. Why am I required to plaster my ID all over the internet to prove I'm old enough when parents should be the ones dictating what their kids are doing on their phones. Apple released great set of tools for iPhones coming to iOS 27 that do just that. Why are governments not mandating that kind of control to phone makers to built them into phones. This whole thing is so absolutely idiotic it's wild.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      220
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!