cmd vs Powershell  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Which would you like to see in Windows 8?

    • Powershell default, cmd alternative
    • cmd default, Powershell alternative (Currently in Windows 7)
    • Powershell default, no cmd at all
    • cmd default, no Powershell at all


Recommended Posts

With Powershell now released 4 years ago, I think it has come time to completely replace cmd in Windows 8. AFAIK, it does 99% of the things cmd does and alot more so why not?

So Windows 8: cmd or Powershell?

I pick Powershell default, no cmd at all. If someone trys to call cmd, it automatically starts Powershell (cmd being a new alias for Powershell) and/or (again cmd being a alias for Powershell) it again automatically starts Powershell but, since it has been called thru a cmd alias, it starts out in a "cmd compatibility mode"

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1035585-windows-8-cmd-or-powershell/
Share on other sites

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

  • Like 1

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

I know that and I agree with you, Cmd should be removed, Microsoft only left it in Windows 7 for the old time users that won't advance themselves with the new technology.

I just assumed Powershell was a just a more powerful shell extension of CMD, and not a successor. If it runs everything CMD did, then what's the purpose of keeping CMD? Just for familiarity for those who continue to make heavy use of cli?

Maybe should have posted this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_PowerShell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_Prompt

It depends. I won't use Powershell to just check connectivity in my network, cmd is much faster to do it, windows + r -> cmd and voi la. IMO Powershell is designed for System Administration and scripting.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

The version included with some addon to XP from back in the day.

But I still don't see why you're anal on trying to get rid of cmd?

McDonalds uses thin clients with DOS, do you think instead they should scrap the thin client idea, get new workstations with core i5s, guis, windows 7 and a load of rubbish that isn't needed, just because they could?

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

Powershell really doesn't get the attention it deserves. It really can replace the old command prompt if more developers and users were willing to try it.

But they need to keep cmd for compatibility. Aren't logon scripts still .bat files, many of which won't work without modification in Powershell?

Yes I know that, but I won't invoke powershell just to ping an asset. And this is just ridiculous.

Why invoke cmd just to ping an asset?

And the link you posted to........is that really a reason to use cmd over Powershell? :rolleyes: come on....

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

Powershell, as I have stated, includes everything CMD does and more.

CMD isnt also made for "everyday use by all users". You can do everything in Powershell that you can in CMD. I think people are missing that point...

This is the same arguement about people that stay on Windows XP and dont want to upgrade to Windows 7. The even worse part of this is that Powershell is free....

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

Thats why I also made a comment that if something calls cmd, Powershell can be ran in a "cmd compatibility mode" which allows it to run exactly the same as regular cmd. Powershell with backwards compatibility which wouldnt break anything :)

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

It will :) It comes installed with Windows 7 already

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

Exactly. Not only do all CMD commands work, but they have actually made aliases for most unix command lines such as bash. What more can you want?

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

DOS/Windows 3.1/Windows 95/Windows 98/Windows ME (yes I said ME)/Windows 2000/Windows XP/Windows Vista/etc were all faster in a loading sense than Windows 7. Point of yours is?

It seems many people here don't understand what CMD is.

Short explanation: CMD is a console window that provides basic functionality for changing the current directory (cd), showing the files and folders (dir) and a few other things (copy, auto-completion, command history...). The most important thing it does is to enable you to open files, give arguments to executables, and provide input and output for console applications.

What you're doing by calling "robocopy C:\SomeFolder C:\SomeOtherFolder" is launching robocopy.exe using "C:\SomeFolder" and "C:\SomeOtherFolder" as parameters. "tree C:\" just calls tree.com with "C:\" as a parameter. "ping google.com" calls ping.exe with "google.com" as parameter. And so on.

These programs (not commands - check your C:\Windows\System32 folder) can be used exactly the same way in PowerShell, and their output will look exactly the same.

In fact, if Microsoft set the default background color to black in PowerShell and removed the "PS" at the beginning of each line, most people wouldn't notice the difference. You would still be able to use the programs you use now.

I want bash

So install Bash. You can do that.

cmd and Powershell are like kids toys by comparison

Cmd maybe, but don't think you've actually tried PowerShell or you wouldn't be saying that. It's quite powerful. Bash is good yes,but looking over what Bash has built in, nothing really jumps out as being something that others can't do or just doesn't apply.. most of it's goodies come from external programs or scripting languages, most of which are available to other shells.

cmd can't be removed as it would break existing scripts and applications that call cmd.

Though PowerShell has aliases for many cmd built-in commands, the cmdlets for which the aliases are mapped do not support the switches of the cmd commands (e.g., you can't do "dir /w" in PowerShell). Variable syntax is also different (e.g., %windir% in cmd vs $env:windir in PowerShell).

PowerShell is getting ever increasing usage as the underpinning for Windows administration and troubleshooting functionality. While it should see greater exposure, such as adding it to the Ribbon and the context menu ("Open PowerShell here"), cmd should not be removed to elevate PowerShell unless the use cases for cmd are covered by PowerShell. It's not like cmd is the only shell besides PowerShell that currently ships with Windows. Its presence doesn't diminish PowerShell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I do trust Apple probably more than these other companies with certain data, but I also do think (and it has been demonstrated that) Apple pulls a lot of shenanigans and always has for a long time.
    • Does your iPhone support the latest iOS version? Here's the iOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari It's that time of year when we get to know about the latest operating system updates for Apple devices. For iPhone, Apple previewed the iOS 27 update at WWDC 2026, where the company finally introduced an upgraded version of Siri. Apple typically supports iPhone models for up to five years. But it has been making exceptions in recent years (read iPhone 11). If you're wondering whether your iPhone is compatible with the iOS 27 update, here is the official list of devices: iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17, iPhone 17e, iPhone Air iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16e iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 iPhone 14 Pro Max, iPhone 14 Pro, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 iPhone 13 Pro Max, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 mini iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 12, iPhone 12 mini iPhone 11 Pro Max, iPhone 11 Pro, iPhone 11 iPhone SE (2nd generation), iPhone SE (3rd generation) So, you can download the iOS 27 developer beta on up to 31 different iPhone models. There has been no change to the list of supported iPhones since iOS 26. However, it will expand to include more devices when the iPhone 18 series arrives later this year. To download the developer beta on your iPhone, go to Settings > General > Software Update > Beta Updates. Here, select "iOS 27 Developer Beta" from the list of choices to get the new update. In addition to iOS 27, you can try the developer beta versions of macOS 27, iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, tvOS 27, and HomePod software 27 on your supported devices. iOS 27 comes with improved Liquid Glass, which you can adjust using a new transparency slider. Apple said during the keynote that iPhone apps now launch up to 30% faster, new photos appear in the Photos app up to 70% faster, and AirDrop transfers work up to 80% faster. The new update promises to improve performance on older iPhones by introducing a new CPU Scheduler that supports devices all the way back to the iPhone 11. While iOS 27 is supported on older iPhones, it goes without saying that they'll lack several features due to hardware differences. For instance, iPhone 14/14 Plus and older models come with a notch instead of the Dynamic Island. Similarly, Apple Intelligence features are supported on iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max and later models.
    • The Radeon RX 9070 XT is right up there with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
    • I don't know why someone said useless, but it does have that pesky kernel driver bundled, and it's in perennial turmoil. When it goes bad, it goes very bad, and it's impossible to predict when it will due to system differences. I know that they're in the middle of development for a major new version that will include a completely new driver, one that they expect will largely solve the problem, but that's a ways out and it's unproven at this point.
    • doesn't AdGuard let ads through that pay to be let through?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      132
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!