• 0

Populate JS Variable With Data from AJAX Request


Question

Is it possible to put some data from an AJAX Post request into a JavaScript variable?

Consider the following example:

var
myVar
= "Hello World";

alert(
myVar
);

Modifying the example above, I'd like to retrieve the text "Hello World" from a page on my server (http://localhost/text.txt).

Can I do something like, assuming I'm using jQuery:

var
myVar
;

$.post(
"/text.txt"
, function(data){

myVar
= data;

},"html");

alert(
myVar
);

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The callback you made is correct, the var'll be populated at the end of the call. If you need to process the var after it's been populated you must assure the order of execution of your code. Making the ajax request synchronous is "ugly", the best way is to make proper use of the callback functions.

But if you really want you must simply put:


$.ajaxSetup({
async:false})
[/CODE]

before the $.post.

  • 0

Try running this bit of code.

<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.1.js"></script>

<script>

$(function(){

var
myVar
=
"
xxx
"
;

$.ajaxSetup({async:false});

$.post(
"./text.txt"
, function(data){

myVar
= data},
"html"

);

alert(
myVar
);

});

</script>

I see the "XXX" text in the alert, and not the content from my "text.txt" file.

The content of my "text.txt" file is as follows:

Hello World

  • 0

Yeah because the alert is shown before the $.post completed. Try this:


$.post("text.txt", function(data) {
myVar = data;
alert(myVar);
});
[/CODE]

And you'll have the alert with "Hello World" (or a connection/timeout error).

Edit:

I tried the syncronous version (with a get method and jquery 1.6.2) and it works. My simple hfs http server doesn't like post :)

  • 0
  On 30/11/2011 at 10:38, Brian Miller said:

But how do I populate that global var with the Ajax data? That's all I want.

I'm only using alert() to show the variable is populated.

Like I (and AdamLC) said your code is fine to populate the value. At the very end of the ajax request you'll have your value ("Hello World") in the global variable. I just wanted to add that IF you must do something with your value you must assure that you wait for the ajax post to complete. Your alert doesn't wait, that's why it shows "xxx"

  • 0
  On 30/11/2011 at 10:43, Killer_Z said:

Like I (and AdamLC) said your code is fine to populate the value. At the very end of the ajax request you'll have your value ("Hello World") in the global variable. I just wanted to add that IF you must do something with your value you must assure that you wait for the ajax post to complete. Your alert doesn't wait, that's why it shows "xxx"

That will only happen with Asynchronous calls correct? Meaning, it behaves that way because the processing of the rest of your code continues while it grabs the data in the background right? :)

  • 0

Yes :) , quoting from: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/

  Quote

The first letter in Ajax stands for "asynchronous," meaning that the operation occurs in parallel and the order of completion is not guaranteed. The async option to $.ajax() defaults to true, indicating that code execution can continue after the request is made. Setting this option to false (and thus making the call no longer asynchronous) is strongly discouraged, as it can cause the browser to become unresponsive.

  • 0
  On 30/11/2011 at 10:53, winlonghorn said:

Thank you. Just checking. It is never safe to make assumptions. lol. :)

You're welcome. Javascript is quite tricky :) it is supposed to be single threaded but often there're some fun situations, that's one of the reason jquery use callback for everything (like the immediate events).

  • 0

Thanks guys. I think I see the problem. The Global Var does get populated, but in FireFox only. It doesn't on Chrome.

Here's some new code:


<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.1.js"></script>
<script>
var globalVar = "xxx";

alert(
"STARTING:\n\n" +
"Global Var: " + globalVar
);

$(document).ready(function(){
$.ajaxSetup({async:false});

$.post(
'./text.txt',
function(data){
showVar(data)
},
"html"
);

function showVar(localVar){
alert(
"AFTER AJAX REQUEST:\n\n" +
"Global Var: " + globalVar + "\n" +
"Local Var: " + localVar
);
}
});
</script>
[/CODE]

Anyone want to hazard a guess why Chrome is not wanting to play nice?

  • 0

Where exactly are you assigning the results of the AJAX request to "globalVar"? I don't see such an assignment in your snippet. Also, this is not a browser issue: you're just doing it wrong.

Seriously though, you need to grasp the concept of asynchronous programming in JavaScript.

&lt;script type="text/javascript" src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.1.js"></script>;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
$(function(){
// 1) Declare the variable
var myVar = "xxx";
// myVar === "xxx"

// 2) Fire up the AJAX request
//   This call returns immediately (hence "asynchronous")
$.post("./text.txt", function(data) {
   // 4) The request has completed and the results are retrieved
   //	 This callback gets called
   // 5) The variable gets overwritten
   myVar = data;
   // myVar === "Hello world"
   // 6) This is the point where you can do stuff
   //	 with the new data in the variable
   doStuff();
}, "html");

// 3) Continue after firing the request
//   The request is still running at this point
alert("Right after firing the request, myVar is still "+myVar);
// myVar === "xxx"
});

function doStuff() {
	alert("Now that the request has completed, the new value of myVar is "+myVar);
}
&lt;/script&gt;

Yes, you can make synchronous AJAX requests by setting "async" to false. I've never come across a need to do this: you can always use callbacks (or the new deferred object in jQuery) as the next part of your program flow.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the political nature of Elon musk aside. AI Chat bots still have issues that is still a bit of a black box they are still trying to figure and are still not trust worthy to do what they say at this time. This is an area of “go fast and break things” mantra with tech is a very bad idea.
    • Electron sucks. I was much happier when Teams moved off it.
    • iOS 27 will focus on features for Apple's first foldable phone coming 2026 by Taras Buria Foldable smartphones are hardly a novel thing anymore. The form factor has been around for a while, and Samsung, the pioneer of the idea, is already at the seventh generation. Now, with the concept and tech being plenty mature, Apple is joining the party with its first foldable, rumored to arrive in 2026. According to Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, Apple's next iOS 27 update will prioritize new features for the rumored foldable iPhone. The development of iOS 27 is starting soon, and Apple wants to put a lot of focus on the folding experience. With the first foldable iPhone, Apple is entering a well-developed market, and the company is not expected to bring major innovations, unlike the original Apple Vision Pro. Apple is reportedly focusing on a design similar to the Galaxy Z Fold7 with an inward-folding display. Still, the first iPhone is rumored to feature some notable improvements for the inner display crease and the hinge. Foldable phones are becoming increasingly popular in China, and Apple can no longer ignore the market. Offering an expensive foldable iPhone will help the company boost revenue and reignite interest in its main product. There are plenty of users who are interested in giving a book-like foldable a try, but having Android as the only platform choice is a big turn-off for many. With Apple joining the party, the form factor will become much more interesting to many users. Still, those users will have to make sure their pockets are plenty deep. The first foldable iPhone is not expected to cost less than $2,000, so the sticker shock of the original iPhone X from 2017 and Apple Vision Pro from 2023 is coming next year. Source: Bloomberg
    • Hmmm, my fiber still falls under CenturyLink and not Quantum. I am also in Tucson.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Snake Doc went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      nobody9 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Ricky Chan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      205
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      201
    4. 4
      Xenon
      138
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      117
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!