European carriers: Lumia phones are 'not good enough' to compete


Recommended Posts

c3ntury
They say everyone's a critic these days, but here's a group whose critique matters: European carriers. Reuters has been asking questions at four major European telecom operators and reports that they're all dissatisfied with the company's current range of Lumia handsets. Describing the Windows Phone devices as overpriced due to their lack of real innovation, glitchy due to early battery life issues, and inadequately supported by Nokia's own marketing, the carriers seem to be in consensus about the new phones' failure to put up real competition to iOS and Android. Put in starker terms, they don't believe that Nokia's Lumia phones are "good enough" to compete. An executive in charge of mobile phones at one of the big Euro carriers is cited as saying, "no one comes into the store and asks for a Windows Phone," placing at least some of the blame for the tepid start to Nokia's reboot on Microsoft's shoulders.

"IF THE LUMIA WITH THE SAME HARDWARE CAME WITH ANDROID IN IT AND NOT WINDOWS, IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER TO SELL."

Source - http://www.theverge...._medium=twitter

Link to post
Share on other sites
watchthisspace

Microsoft need to give the Euro carries a boost up the a** for saying that crap. Windows Phone is genuine competitor to iOS and Android.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
CronicHazel
Hold on, since when did having a highly optimised OS (requiring less hardware to have the same performance) be a *negative* thing.

well sadly, that's how the markets buy their stuff. It's all about the big numbers on paper.

Hence why the Neon SRT-4 was such a popular buy amongst the general public that didn't know much else about car quality

Link to post
Share on other sites
psionicinversion

Its **** like this that makes ppl think WP isn't good. The lumia line is a top notch piece of kit, polycarbonate body clear black amoled screen, polarized gorilla glass. For build quality its the one of the best out there. The OS runs smooth as butter considering its apparent "inadequate" hardware as most put it. Also it hasn't taken MS 3years to add copy and paste *cough* apple *cough*. If ppl aren't coming into a shop and ask about it why don't they show it to then, the attitude sucks on these carriers.

Lets see how the mighty android and iOS compete with wp8. No more plain text tiles, can use pic for it. A plethora of other features more screen resolutions maybe 720 hd display?? Can always hope. Snapdragon S4 dual core, adreno 320 gpu which could be 10x faster than the 205 seeing as each revision is 2x faster than the last.

Last thing he says put android in a lumia and it would sell. Yeah sure it'll sell but you'll have taken a top notch piece of kit and turned it into a bargain basement pile of crap cus we all know how android runs on single core devices.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
MΛNTIS BLΛDES

Its **** like this that makes ppl think WP isn't good. The lumia line is a top notch piece of kit, polycarbonate body clear black amoled screen, polarized gorilla glass. For build quality its the one of the best out there. The OS runs smooth as butter considering its apparent "inadequate" hardware as most put it. Also it hasn't taken MS 3years to add copy and paste *cough* apple *cough*. If ppl aren't coming into a shop and ask about it why don't they show it to then, the attitude sucks on these carriers.

Lets see how the mighty android and iOS compete with wp8. No more plain text tiles, can use pic for it. A plethora of other features more screen resolutions maybe 720 hd display?? Can always hope. Snapdragon S4 dual core, adreno 320 gpu which could be 10x faster than the 205 seeing as each revision is 2x faster than the last.

Last thing he says put android in a lumia and it would sell. Yeah sure it'll sell but you'll have taken a top notch piece of kit and turned it into a bargain basement pile of crap cus we all know how android runs on single core devices.

We also know how android runs on dual-core devices. Still like crap.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
starbearer

We also know how android runs on dual-core devices. Still like crap.

Oh, don't say that. I'm just about to purchase the Xperia S.

Would've preferred a Windows phone, sadly, SONY doesn't make one.

So here in India you're limited to just the 3 Lumia phones, Omnia W and one HTC.

Liked the 800 when it came out, but like the Xperia S even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AbandonedTrolley

Oh, don't say that. I'm just about to purchase the Xperia S.

Would've preferred a Windows phone, sadly, SONY doesn't make one.

So here in India you're limited to just the 3 Lumia phones, Omnia W and one HTC.

Liked the 800 when it came out, but like the Xperia S even better.

Xperia S runs great, had one since launch and it's smooth as anything. Much better then previous Desire and Arc. Also currently Gingerbread doesn't use hardware acceleration which ICS does so things will get smoother still.

Link to post
Share on other sites
UndergroundWire

Its **** like this that makes ppl think WP isn't good. The lumia line is a top notch piece of kit, polycarbonate body clear black amoled screen, polarized gorilla glass. For build quality its the one of the best out there. The OS runs smooth as butter considering its apparent "inadequate" hardware as most put it. Also it hasn't taken MS 3years to add copy and paste *cough* apple *cough*. If ppl aren't coming into a shop and ask about it why don't they show it to then, the attitude sucks on these carriers.

Lets see how the mighty android and iOS compete with wp8. No more plain text tiles, can use pic for it. A plethora of other features more screen resolutions maybe 720 hd display?? Can always hope. Snapdragon S4 dual core, adreno 320 gpu which could be 10x faster than the 205 seeing as each revision is 2x faster than the last.

Last thing he says put android in a lumia and it would sell. Yeah sure it'll sell but you'll have taken a top notch piece of kit and turned it into a bargain basement pile of crap cus we all know how android runs on single core devices.

People don't think that WP is not good. They just don't ask for it like the article stated. The either want an iOS or an Android phone. It's pretty clear cut. As for the "Put Android on a Lumia" statement, they were talking about today's standard. Can you give me an example of how the Lumia 900 is better than any other Windows Phone? Please don't mention 4G LTE.

I'll patiently wait for your reply before I go any further.

Link to post
Share on other sites
deleted_acc

People don't think that WP is not good. They just don't ask for it like the article stated. The either want an iOS or an Android phone. It's pretty clear cut. As for the "Put Android on a Lumia" statement, they were talking about today's standard. Can you give me an example of how the Lumia 900 is better than any other Windows Phone? Please don't mention 4G LTE.

I'll patiently wait for your reply before I go any further.

unibody, design and name, and of course there's NO 4,3 screen WP in Europe - Titan is more, Omnia 7 is less and 1st gen - and that's not Lumia 900 but Lumia specific but the Nokia Drive/Maps/Transport apps are a large appeal

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
123456789A

People don't think that WP is not good. They just don't ask for it like the article stated. The either want an iOS or an Android phone. It's pretty clear cut. As for the "Put Android on a Lumia" statement, they were talking about today's standard. Can you give me an example of how the Lumia 900 is better than any other Windows Phone? Please don't mention 4G LTE.

I'll patiently wait for your reply before I go any further.

Build quality, design, call quality, Nokia's outstanding support, Nokia apps, the screen.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
the better twin

People don't think that WP is not good. They just don't ask for it like the article stated. The either want an iOS or an Android phone. It's pretty clear cut. As for the "Put Android on a Lumia" statement, they were talking about today's standard. Can you give me an example of how the Lumia 900 is better than any other Windows Phone? Please don't mention 4G LTE.

I'll patiently wait for your reply before I go any further.

Ill answer for him.

  • Build quality - an area most Android manufacturers neglect.
  • Camera- Carl Ziess lens
  • Nokia apps - They are great
  • Nokia clear black display. The polarised glass Nokia use make a huge difference when viewing in sunlight. Its one of the most important features imo.

These are just a few off the top of my head.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
George P

Some people overstate the needs of the average consumer. They care more about how a phone/device looks than how many cores it has. As far as specs go they really just look at screen size, camera and storage, 3 areas the Lumia 900 isn't lacking in.

Besides, since we're talking the EU, before the Lumia 800 and 710 hit you barely heard anything about a WP device. Now I've heard average people who don't know about OS's talking about the Lumia phones, people in the EU know Nokia so what they see is another Nokia phone and not just a Windows phone.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
neo1911

I recommended my uncle a Nokia Lumia 710. He is not happy with the phone for 3 reasons

1. Sound from speakers is not loud enough

2. He hates WP7.5 OS on it. He asked me the reason for things to be hidden in menus (Its a hit and miss with OS. Microsoft will not alter the fundamental design. So unfixable)

3. Battery life lasts him less than a day and after updating to latest version (I highly doubt it can be fixed in software update if original battery is of lower capacity to begin with)

The overall WP7 experience does not wow us like ICS or even iOS. Nokia comes up with does not help anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dot Matrix

Bunch of Windows fanboys in this thread. I recommended my uncle a Nokia Lumia 710. He is not happy with the phone for 3 unfixable reasons

1. Sound from speakers is not loud enough

2. He hates WP7.5 OS on it. He asked me the reason for things to be hidden in menus (Its a hit and miss with OS. Microsoft will not alter the fundamental design. So unfixable)

3. Battery life lasts him less than a day and after updating to latest version (I highly doubt it can be fixed in software update if original battery is of lower capacity to begin with)

The overall WP7 experience does not wow us like ICS or even iOS. Top that with lame fake advertising (the Indian chick ad) Nokia comes up with does not help anything.

There's hidden menus in any OS. That's just a design element he'll have to learn to put up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
George P

Argument 1 is subjective at best, some people like the volume, some want it lauder, that's a hardware issue and nothing to do with the OS itself.

As for #2, you think the layer after layer of menus in the other OS's is better? Really? I don't even know if you're trying to be serious with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Majesticmerc

If ppl aren't coming into a shop and ask about it why don't they show it to then, the attitude sucks on these carriers.

Why should they? For most people a "smartphone" is synonymous with Android or iOS, and the customer has a pretty good idea of what they want when they go into the phone store. Android manufacturers have the same problem with people that "want an iPhone". A salesperson that comes along and says "Hey, the Nokia Lumia will probably suit you better" will appear pushy and lose the sale, so what benefit is it to them to try and force WP7 on people who already know what they want?

I think that the carriers bring up valid points here. Windows Phone is barely advertised here in the UK (when compared to the iPhone and Android), and Microsoft being the minority share in the mobile space can't simply expect to switch to WP7 if they haven't heard of it. Nokia's marketing is OK, but to me the Lumia adverts advertise it as a feature phone rather than a smart phone. At the end of the day, Microsoft need to spend out the ass to market WP7, they're the minority here, and Android and iOS basically sell themselves because of their popularity. This isn't to say that WP is a bad OS, far from it, it's a great OS, but marketing is everything, and Microsoft isn't putting enough effort in over here in the EU.

It's worth remembering that here on Neowin, WP7 is well known, and as popular as iOS and Android, but this is a very pro-Microsoft site, and this is to be expected. In the real world, the number of WP7 phone owners in my circle of friends recently dropped from 2 down to 1 as one of them opted for a Galaxy Nexus. Nobody has heard of Windows Phone, and many of those that have are still butthurt about Windows Mobile.

Link to post
Share on other sites
the better twin

Bunch of Windows fanboys in this thread. I recommended my uncle a Nokia Lumia 710. He is not happy with the phone for 3 unfixable reasons

1. Sound from speakers is not loud enough

2. He hates WP7.5 OS on it. He asked me the reason for things to be hidden in menus (Its a hit and miss with OS. Microsoft will not alter the fundamental design. So unfixable)

3. Battery life lasts him less than a day and after updating to latest version (I highly doubt it can be fixed in software update if original battery is of lower capacity to begin with)

The overall WP7 experience does not wow us like ICS or even iOS. Top that with lame fake advertising (the Indian chick ad) Nokia comes up with does not help anything.

Oh noes! Your uncle has a different opinion. Everyone else must be a fanboi.

Worst post I've seen in a while congrats.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Ently

If Windows Phones had a better app store I think they would take a nice slice out of the Android/iOS pie easily. My last Windows Phone (which was about a year and a half ago) from what I remember had a very expensive app store. The same apps on Android and hell even iOS were cheaper than the WP Marketplace counter parts.

I'm not a developer but I also heard that developers have to pay to submit apps (80 dollars or something?) whereas iOS/Android you don't (I could be completely wrong on this so someone please correct me if I am).

I would say that's why Microsoft are struggling. Because as far as the phone was concerned it was brilliant, very fast and the interface was beautiful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
George P

If Windows Phones had a better app store I think they would take a nice slice out of the Android/iOS pie easily. My last Windows Phone (which was about a year and a half ago) from what I remember had a very expensive app store. The same apps on Android and hell even iOS were cheaper than the WP Marketplace counter parts.

I'm not a developer but I also heard that developers have to pay to submit apps (80 dollars or something?) whereas iOS/Android you don't (I could be completely wrong on this so someone please correct me if I am).

I would say that's why Microsoft are struggling. Because as far as the phone was concerned it was brilliant, very fast and the interface was beautiful.

MS can't keep up with the flood of apps coming into the marketplace to pass certification, so no, I doubt that developer interest is a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AbandonedTrolley

Why should they? For most people a "smartphone" is synonymous with Android or iOS, and the customer has a pretty good idea of what they want when they go into the phone store. Android manufacturers have the same problem with people that "want an iPhone". A salesperson that comes along and says "Hey, the Nokia Lumia will probably suit you better" will appear pushy and lose the sale, so what benefit is it to them to try and force WP7 on people who already know what they want?

I think that the carriers bring up valid points here. Windows Phone is barely advertised here in the UK (when compared to the iPhone and Android), and Microsoft being the minority share in the mobile space can't simply expect to switch to WP7 if they haven't heard of it. Nokia's marketing is OK, but to me the Lumia adverts advertise it as a feature phone rather than a smart phone. At the end of the day, Microsoft need to spend out the ass to market WP7, they're the minority here, and Android and iOS basically sell themselves because of their popularity. This isn't to say that WP is a bad OS, far from it, it's a great OS, but marketing is everything, and Microsoft isn't putting enough effort in over here in the EU.

It's worth remembering that here on Neowin, WP7 is well known, and as popular as iOS and Android, but this is a very pro-Microsoft site, and this is to be expected. In the real world, the number of WP7 phone owners in my circle of friends recently dropped from 2 down to 1 as one of them opted for a Galaxy Nexus. Nobody has heard of Windows Phone, and many of those that have are still butthurt about Windows Mobile.

Been saying this about the UK for months now, we have barely seen a WP launch in all honesty. They haven't broken this market at all. I have now seen 4 WPs out in the wild in the UK. That's pretty poor if you ask me and I don't see how one phone will make it any better when people already know what phones they are looking for in the first place. There really isn't anything spectacular that the Nokia brings to the table to put it above an iPhone or a top end Android phone. I'm not denying it's a good phone, but without the marketing here in the UK it's not going to sell.

Link to post
Share on other sites
neo1911

Oh noes! Your uncle has a different opinion. Everyone else must be a fanboi.

Worst post I've seen in a while congrats.

Most people here are automatically assuming that EU carriers are thinking wrong. But since all carriers are having unanimous opinion of Nokia Lumia line, there has to be a common problem somewhere.

I just pointed out the possible areas of problem for Lumia line: Sub par Marketing, a year old hardware in terms of CPU and GPU, WP7 Os still not as friendly as it seems with app store apps consistently $1-2 costlier than android or iOS ones.

Thanks for pointing out that it was the worst post without even mentioning why. I am saddened by this attitude. After seeing my uncle dumping the new Lumia and using it as his 2nd emergency phone, I kinda started to loose some faith in Lumia.

Link to post
Share on other sites
the better twin

Most people here are automatically assuming that EU carriers are thinking wrong. But since all carriers are having unanimous opinion of Nokia Lumia line, there has to be a common problem somewhere.

I just pointed out the possible areas of problem for Lumia line: Sub par Marketing, a year old hardware in terms of CPU and GPU, WP7 Os still not as friendly as it seems with app store apps consistently $1-2 costlier than android or iOS ones.

Thanks for pointing out that it was the worst post without even mentioning why. I am saddened by this attitude. After seeing my uncle dumping the new Lumia and using it as his 2nd emergency phone, I kinda started to loose some faith in Lumia.

It was the worst post because you posted your uncles opinion and then just dismissed the opinions of everyone else as fanboys.

In contrast to your uncle, everyone who has seen my Lumia 800 has been impressed. 4 people I know have gone out and got one themselves because they thought it was great and others are just waiting out their contracts to upgrade to a Nokia windows phone.

Nokia have kept it up to date with frequent updates and apps, mine lasts at least a day on one charge and wp7 is a joy to use.

I have seen quite a bit of marketing. Lumia displays in every store, ads at the cinema, ads on tv. Sure they could probably do more in terms of marketing, but Nokia's efforts have been above and beyond anything else any other manufacturer has brought to the table with WP7.

The cost of apps is a nuisance but they do weekly deals so if you dont want to spend much wait for these and im sure if wp becomes more popular the increased competition would lead to a fall in prices.

Link to post
Share on other sites
neo1911

It was the worst post because you posted your uncles opinion and then just dismissed the opinions of everyone else as fanboys.

In contrast to your uncle, everyone who has seen my Lumia 800 has been impressed. 4 people I know have gone out and got one themselves because they thought it was great and others are just waiting out their contracts to upgrade to a Nokia windows phone.

Nokia have kept it up to date with frequent updates and apps, mine lasts at least a day on one charge and wp7 is a joy to use.

I have seen quite a bit of marketing. Lumia displays in every store, ads at the cinema, ads on tv. Sure they could probably do more in terms of marketing, but Nokia's efforts have been above and beyond anything else any other manufacturer has brought to the table with WP7.

The cost of apps is a nuisance but they do weekly deals so if you dont want to spend much wait for these and im sure if wp becomes more popular the increased competition would lead to a fall in prices.

Again the same problem. I am myself a fanboy of WP7. Because of that, I recommended it to my uncle in first place. It just leaves me wondering what could be wrong which leaves elder persons repulsed by it?

Are we so afraid to discuss what might be the acutal problem of these carriers who are openly dissing WP7 platform along with Lumia line?

Does that suddenly make sense to you or are you still annoyed because I called everyone including myself as fanboys?

Link to post
Share on other sites
ichi

cus we all know how android runs on single core devices.

Going by my Nexus S with a stock Android ROM I'd say that it runs perfectly fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

Again the same problem. I am myself a fanboy of WP7. Because of that, I recommended it to my uncle in first place. It just leaves me wondering what could be wrong which leaves elder persons repulsed by it?

Are we so afraid to discuss what might be the acutal problem of these carriers who are openly dissing WP7 platform along with Lumia line?

Does that suddenly make sense to you or are you still annoyed because I called everyone including myself as fanboys?

So your faith in Windows Phone is dependent on whether your uncle likes it? And if your uncle doesn't like it, it automatically means he's right about what he's saying?

If anything, you suddenly made even less sense than before. There are problems with WP that need fixing, but honestly, the complaints you listed are not among them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Jay Bonggolto
      Nokia 8.3 5G is going for a $120 discount on Amazon
      by Jay Bonggolto

      Amazon is offering the Nokia 8.3 5G with a $120 discount right now. The phone is going for $579, down from its original retail price of $699.

      For that price, you'll get 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. The device comes in Polar Night and it is unlocked for all carriers.

      Announced in March of last year alongside the Nokia 5.3 and Nokia 1.3, the Nokia 8.3 5G was the first device to use Qualcomm's 5G RF Front end module. It's powered by a Snapdragon 765 SoC and sports a 6.81-inch FullHD+ PureDisplay.

      On its back, it has a PureView quad-camera setup with a 64MP main sensor and ZEISS branding. The camera module is housed in a circular bump with Nokia's logo to its south. It's backed up by a 4,500mAh battery.

      The device was launched in the U.S. in the fall of 2020 a few months after its debut in Europe, where it is available with 6GB of RAM and 64GB of storage in addition to the higher memory configuration. If you want to snap up the phone today, the Nokia 8.3 5G is available to purchase for $579 via Amazon.



      As an Amazon Associate, Neowin may earn commission from qualifying purchases.



    • By indospot
      Nokia 5.4 is HMD's latest mid-ranger, packing a Snapdragon 662 for €189
      by João Carrasqueira

      After introducing the entry-level Nokia C1 Plus just yesterday, HMD Global is now back with a new mid-range model, the Nokia 5.4. The Finnish company has been refreshing some of its smartphones multiple times throughout the year, with the Nokia 5.3 announced just a few months ago.

      The Nokia 5.4 curiously packs a Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset, which is an apparent downgrade from the Snapdragon 665 of its predecessor. Based on Qualcomm's spec sheet, though, the Snapdragon 662 does have a better image signal processor, promising zero shutter lag and support for 48MP cameras.

      That's exactly what HMD is promising for the Nokia 5.4, which is likely to be an advantage for most users. There's also support for 60FPS recording, as well as a 24FPS cinematic mode, which can record video in the typical 21:9 format of theater movies, plus "professional color grading". The rest of the camera setup includes a 5MP ultra-wide camera, a 2MP depth sensor, and a 2MP macro camera. Over on the front, there's a 16MP camera.

      The 6.53-inch display comes in at HD+ resolution in the 19.5:9 aspect ratio, and it has a punch-hole front-facing camera. The Nokia 5.4 also has a 4,000mAh battery, which HMD says should last up to two days on a charge or, as the company puts it, 42 commutes (assuming an average 67-minute commute). The battery only charges at 10W, however. In terms of software, the phone is running Android 11, and as usual, the company promises two years of major software updates and three years of security updates.

      The Nokia 5.4 is available now in select markets for €189. It comes with Polar Night (blue) and Dusk (pink) colors.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia announces affordable Nokia C1 Plus for €69
      by Paul Hill

      Nokia has announced its lowest cost 4G smartphone, the C1 Plus. For the low €69 cost, users get a 2,500mAh battery, 4G, and a large, crisp HD+ screen. The device is ideal for those on a budget want a modern Android experience, free of bloatware.

      The specifications for the new device are as follows:

      Operating system: Android 10 (Go edition) RAM: 1GB DDR3 CPU: Quad-Core 1.4GHz SIM card: Dual and Single SIM models available, Nano SIM Sensors: Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer (G-sensor) Rear camera: 5MP with flash Front camera: 5MP with flash Battery: 2,500 mAh, removable Storage: 16GB, MicroSD card slot supports up to 128GB Display: 5.45” HD+ in-cell, 18:9 Connectors: 3.5mm headphone jack, Micro USB charging Connectivity: Bluetooth 4.2, GPS/AGPS, Wifi 802.11 b/g/n The Nokia C1 Plus comes with a solid polycarbonate body that the Finnish firm says makes the device more durable. To further boost the security and convenience of the device, users can enable face unlock which lets you get past the lock screen just by letting the phone see your face. As the device ships with Android 10 (Go edition), there is more space reserved for your content but you’ll still probably want to be careful as 16GB of storage is not very much.

      Commenting on the new product, Juho Sarvikas, Chief Product Officer and Vice President of North America, HMD Global, said:

      The device isn’t available to purchase just yet but will go on sale at some point this month and will be available in just two colours; red and blue. Nokia didn’t mention whether it'll provide further OS updates for this device as it does with some of its others but it’s probably a lower priority than their more expensive products.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia to lead EU's 6G research project Hexa-X
      by Paul Hill

      Nokia has announced that it has been selected as the project leader for Hexa-X, the European Union’s main 6G research project. 6G is probably about a decade away from commercial availability but the creation of Hexa-X is a big step towards that end.

      Nokia and the rest of the Hexa-X consortium, which includes Ericsson, have identified six research challenges that need to be addressed to create the technical foundation of 6G, they include:

      The Hexa-X project was awarded funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and has been described by Nokia as a “significant step toward bringing together key industry stakeholders in Europe to take the lead in advancing 6G.” The new project is expected to begin its work on January 1, 2021, and will run until the middle of 2023.

      In addition to Hexa-X, Nokia is also involved with other European 6G research projects such as 6Genesis and Horizon Europe Smart Networks and Services. The latter project is very important for the EU as it will help the bloc get ahead with regards to the development and deployment of 6G networks.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia research says 5G is 90% more energy-efficient than 4G
      by Paul Hill



      A new study conducted by Nokia and Telefonica has found that 5G networks are up to 90% more efficient than 4G networks. The findings were the result of a three-month study which looked at the power consumption of the Radio Access Network (RAN) in Telefonica’s network.

      The two firms were keen to highlight that although 5G networks will dramatically increase network traffic, it will not lead to a rise in energy consumption at the same rate, which they say shows their commitment to climate change.

      Despite the positive results, Nokia admits that 5G networks still require further action to make them more energy-efficient and to reduce their CO2 emissions. It said existing energy-saving features at the radio base station and network levels like 5G power-saving features, small cell deployments, and new 5G architecture and protocols can “significantly improve” energy efficiency of wireless networks when they’re combined.

      The study used solutions from Nokia’s AirScale portfolio including AirScale Base Stations and AirScale Massive MIMO Active Antenna solutions. Commenting on the hardware and study President of Mobile Networks at Nokia Tommi Uitto said:

      Both of the firms say they’re committed to limiting global warming to 1.5C. Nokia, in particular, said that it will be decreasing its emissions from its operations by 41% by 2030 and that it has helped customers who modernised their base stations to use 46% less energy. Last year, the firm said that it delivered zero-emission products to over 150 customers worldwide; this should help cut a lot of CO2 emissions that would have otherwise been produced.