European carriers: Lumia phones are 'not good enough' to compete


 Share

Recommended Posts

(Spork)

We also know how android runs on dual-core devices. Still like crap.

lol WUT ! my evo3d when i had it run great after i rooted it even better sorry if you have a phone that just plain sucks but dont lump all the phones together

Link to post
Share on other sites

(Spork)

Bunch of Windows fanboys in this thread. I recommended my uncle a Nokia Lumia 710. He is not happy with the phone for 3 unfixable reasons

1. Sound from speakers is not loud enough

2. He hates WP7.5 OS on it. He asked me the reason for things to be hidden in menus (Its a hit and miss with OS. Microsoft will not alter the fundamental design. So unfixable)

3. Battery life lasts him less than a day and after updating to latest version (I highly doubt it can be fixed in software update if original battery is of lower capacity to begin with)

The overall WP7 experience does not wow us like ICS or even iOS. Top that with lame fake advertising (the Indian chick ad) Nokia comes up with does not help anything.

good god just how much battery life is needed i get a full days charge from my phones ... less than a day i LoL @ this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Muhammad Farrukh
"IF THE LUMIA WITH THE SAME HARDWARE CAME WITH ANDROID IN IT AND NOT WINDOWS, IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER TO SELL."

Well that just goes to show they know nothing about the optimization of Windows Phone and Android. They can't differentiate it.

Pfffttt

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

CentralDogma

Microsoft faces a plethora of problems breaking into the mobile market.

They?ve come in late to the game with Windows Phone 7, when Android and iOS were already well established. So, now there are many potential buyers that have gotten used to those competitors and have bought into their respective digital market places. Those customers will be very hard, if not impossible, for Microsoft to court over to Windows Phone.

What?s worse, there was more than a year before there was a flagship product (the Lumia). Now that it?s out so late in the Windows Phone 7 cycle, those in the know will be waiting for Windows Phone 8. Something Microsoft has not guaranteed to run on the Lumia.

What can Microsoft do?

Windows Phone 8 having compatibility with Windows 8 is a start, leveraging Window?s market share to Windows Phone?s advantage.

They?re going to have to through a lot of money at the problem. Every phone is subsidized now a days, you have a wide select of free or near free phones. But no one is subsidizing the real money hog: plans. Dropping the data plan to $10 or $5 from the $30 most charge would be huge and help them pick up the shrinking segment of the population not on smartphones.

If they want to pick up people already invested in Android or iOS, and like I said this is something they probably shouldn?t even bother with, they?re going to have to find some way to refund peoples investment in those other market place. If someone has invested $100 in the App Store, you?re unlikely to get them to switch to Windows Phone, but if you offer them $100 towards the Windows Phone Marketplace, it makes a better proposition.

And, as always, Kinect level advertising wouldn?t hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vice

If the phone had Android I'd recommend it to people and I'd buy one myself. But with Windows Phone I'm not interested in it in the slightest. I'm european btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

techbeck

Thats to bad. Hoping WP7 does well so competition gets better. Shall have to wait and see how the public minus the carriers review the phone. Could be MS was to late, they need to advertise more, or WP7 will just take a little while to catch on. Who knows at this point.

I do think MS/Nokia needs to ditch the smoked commercials and focus more on why someone would want a WP7 phone over anything else. A few second faster upload speeds to FB are not going to cut it with the majority of the people out there. IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UndergroundWire

unibody, design and name, and of course there's NO 4,3 screen WP in Europe - Titan is more, Omnia 7 is less and 1st gen - and that's not Lumia 900 but Lumia specific but the Nokia Drive/Maps/Transport apps are a large appeal

Build quality, design, call quality, Nokia's outstanding support, Nokia apps, the screen.

Ill answer for him.

  • Build quality - an area most Android manufacturers neglect.
  • Camera- Carl Ziess lens
  • Nokia apps - They are great
  • Nokia clear black display. The polarised glass Nokia use make a huge difference when viewing in sunlight. Its one of the most important features imo.

These are just a few off the top of my head.

So the OS operates exactly the same. You get the Nokia collection and a bigger screen. So why is the Lumia getting all this attention? It doesn't change the experience of Windows Phone at all? It is basically the name. You are also getting more apps on it. Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps?

You see Windows Phone can't differentiate itself from any other Windows Phone. Nokia is allowed to do it by having the Nokia Collection in the market.

But one thing is for sure, the Lumia 900 hardware design (external) is really nice. Too bad for the OS. I even like the Cyan color over the black or white design. If and when the app developers come to Windows Phone, you will see better specs on Windows Phone. Right now the OS and the apps that it has doesn't need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

xeleraph

So the OS operates exactly the same. You get the Nokia collection and a bigger screen. So why is the Lumia getting all this attention? It doesn't change the experience of Windows Phone at all? It is basically the name. You are also getting more apps on it. Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps?

You see Windows Phone can't differentiate itself from any other Windows Phone. Nokia is allowed to do it by having the Nokia Collection in the market.

But one thing is for sure, the Lumia 900 hardware design (external) is really nice. Too bad for the OS. I even like the Cyan color over the black or white design. If and when the app developers come to Windows Phone, you will see better specs on Windows Phone. Right now the OS and the apps that it has doesn't need it.

You're talking as though the Lumia series is supposed to change the experience and fragment WP before it deserves any attention. You asked for differences and you got your answer. Yet all you do is ignore them completely and claim that the Lumia series doesn't deserve attention because it doesn't offer fragmentation.

I thought Eric Schmidt was kidding when he argued that Android fragmentation is a good thing because it's not actually fragmentation, it's differentiation. But apparently it looks like there are actually people who bought his sales pitch.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

simplezz

"IF THE LUMIA WITH THE SAME HARDWARE CAME WITH ANDROID IN IT AND NOT WINDOWS, IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER TO SELL."

Wow. That's pretty damning. I guess it proves what many have been saying all along. Nokia should have gone Android, or multi-OS like other vendors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UndergroundWire

You're talking as though the Lumia series is supposed to change the experience and fragment WP before it deserves any attention. You asked for differences and you got your answer. Yet all you do is ignore them completely and claim that the Lumia series doesn't deserve attention because it doesn't offer fragmentation.

I thought Eric Schmidt was kidding when he argued that Android fragmentation is a good thing because it's not actually fragmentation, it's differentiation. But apparently it looks like there are actually people who bought his sales pitch.

- Actually I wasn't talking about fragmentation. But everyone did say Nokia Collection. That tells me the other handsets lack apps.

- Bigger Screen is not fragmentation since the resolution is still crappy. So that doesn't break any apps.

- 4G LTE is not really fragmentation since it is only the data speed. I suppose it can be fragmentation if Skype was finalized and said you can only make calls over 4G LTE or WiFi. But I actually did say to keep LTE out of this since world-wide it isn't available.

Where did you get fragmentation from when I posed the question, Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps? That is how Nokia is really differentiating themselves. Either that or it is purely the Nokia name that is giving this phone attention. How did you miss that? Why are you making up stuff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vice

Where did you get fragmentation from when I posed the question, Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps? That is how Nokia is really differentiating themselves. Either that or it is purely the Nokia name that is giving this phone attention. How did you miss that? Why are you making up stuff?

Although Nokia has made some apps for their Lumia phones I don't think the volume of those apps is in anyway going to sway someone from buying a Android or iOS device. Instead it merely sways someone from buying a HTC or Samsung Windows Phone to buying a Nokia Windows Phone. Basically Nokia isn't stealing marketshare from the market leaders, only from within their own very tiny ecosystem of Windows Phones.

And I would say the only reason that Lumia is selling is due to the beautiful industrial design of the Lumia 800 and 900. Had these phones looked like any other Android device or one of Nokias earlier Symbian phones they would not sell anywhere near as well as they do. It is that striking design that tempted me to buy one but I decided against it due to Windows Phone.

I think had Nokia launched the Lumia 800 with Android it would be one of the best selling smart phones on the market right now. But unfortunately they decided to go against the grain and choose a loss leader operating system to "be different". There is a good reason Windows Phone isn't the market leader, it sucks. They should have definitely gone with Android instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

xeleraph

- Actually I wasn't talking about fragmentation. But everyone did say Nokia Collection. That tells me the other handsets lack apps.

- Bigger Screen is not fragmentation since the resolution is still crappy. So that doesn't break any apps.

- 4G LTE is not really fragmentation since it is only the data speed. I suppose it can be fragmentation if Skype was finalized and said you can only make calls over 4G LTE or WiFi. But I actually did say to keep LTE out of this since world-wide it isn't available.

Where did you get fragmentation from when I posed the question, Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps? That is how Nokia is really differentiating themselves. Either that or it is purely the Nokia name that is giving this phone attention. How did you miss that? Why are you making up stuff?

What stuff am I making up? You asked what made the Lumia series different, completely ignored the answers you got, then asked why is the Lumia series getting so much attention when they don't offer fragmentation. You're not making sense at all. If you wanted to argue that people aren't buying WP because it "lacks apps", why not just say so?

The Nokia Collection is just one way the Lumia series is different. It's not "how Nokia is really differentiating themselves", which is simply something you made up. There have been at least three posts answering your question of how Nokia is really differentiating themselves, all of which you simply ignored to push your made-up argument.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BajiRav

You see Windows Phone can't differentiate itself from any other Windows Phone. Nokia is allowed to do it by having the Nokia Collection in the market.

All OEMs can have their own section in the marketplace, it's not specific to Nokia (not sure if you meant that). A Windows Phone can differentiate itself and Nokia Lumia phones are a good example and Samsung to some extent. On the other hand, HTC and LG completely ****ed up by just tacking it on lackluster Android models.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

xeleraph

I think had Nokia launched the Lumia 800 with Android it would be one of the best selling smart phones on the market right now. But unfortunately they decided to go against the grain and choose a loss leader operating system to "be different". There is a good reason Windows Phone isn't the market leader, it sucks. They should have definitely gone with Android instead.

Really? Going by your argument, there's a good reason Firefox/Chrome aren't the market leader instead of IE, it's because they suck.

Market share often has little to do with quality, this has been proven time and time again. The reason Android is so popular is simply because there are so many models selling at bargain bin prices everywhere, which is why you see Froyo still having 25% of Android's usage stats, and the same will still keep happening with Gingerbread for at least 1-2 years from now. Windows Phone is an alternative to that; a chance for Nokia to attack the budget smartphone market that made Android so successful, but without putting the user through the crap experience that Android offers on low-end hardware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UndergroundWire

Although Nokia has made some apps for their Lumia phones I don't think the volume of those apps is in anyway going to sway someone from buying a Android or iOS device. Instead it merely sways someone from buying a HTC or Samsung Windows Phone to buying a Nokia Windows Phone. Basically Nokia isn't stealing marketshare from the market leaders, only from within their own very tiny ecosystem of Windows Phones.

And I would say the only reason that Lumia is selling is due to the beautiful industrial design of the Lumia 800 and 900. Had these phones looked like any other Android device or one of Nokias earlier Symbian phones they would not sell anywhere near as well as they do. It is that striking design that tempted me to buy one but I decided against it due to Windows Phone.

I think had Nokia launched the Lumia 800 with Android it would be one of the best selling smart phones on the market right now. But unfortunately they decided to go against the grain and choose a loss leader operating system to "be different". There is a good reason Windows Phone isn't the market leader, it sucks. They should have definitely gone with Android instead.

You are 100% right on that. That design is nice. Too bad for the OS. But the Nokia collection offers Nokia Drive and that I believe is the thing that draws people (if they want a WP).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Gibs

Do you really blame people now if they don't get Windows Phone because they want apps?

That depends? Are their some missing apps, sure. But then you have news articles that claim WP7 doesn't have Pandora, doesn't have dropbox etc.

Well yes it does, it has unofficial apps and they work just fine. Added benefit of the unofficial Pandora app? I get 0 ads, and I can skip as many songs as I want (and no I don't have a paid account).

And a lot of carriers seem pleased with WP7, so I'm going to take this article with a grain of salt. AT&T and Amazon have had the lumia 900 on their best selling list for a few days now. T-Mobile (USA) is pleased with how their 710 is selling. Canadian carriers seem pleased with the lumia series ( http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/03/27/canadian-carriers-and-dealers-happy-with-nokia-lumia-sales/#comments ). It's selling well in Finland (well Nokia's home country). WP7 has been doing well in Germany and in Denmark.

And honestly, everyone said the same **** when Android was released. "Oh god it will fail, the iPhone 2G is a billion times better and there's absolutely no way Android can compete." Well look where we are 4 years later, pretty sure Android is outselling the iPhone (for a variety of reasons).

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

CentralDogma

I think had Nokia launched the Lumia 800 with Android it would be one of the best selling smart phones on the market right now. But unfortunately they decided to go against the grain and choose a loss leader operating system to "be different". There is a good reason Windows Phone isn't the market leader, it sucks. They should have definitely gone with Android instead.

Nokia didn't choose Windows Phone to "be different". They were money hat'ed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Melfster

I think I don't agree. Right now Samsung is the leader in android phones. All the other android manufactures are are not doing terrible well. Spec wise Nokia phone would be behind there is no way could compete hardware wise with Samsung...so they have to differentiate on industrial design ... kind of like what Sony Erikson are doing. However the android market is to crowded. I think they did the best they could do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BajiRav

Nokia didn't choose Windows Phone to "be different". They were money hat'ed.

If they had chosen Android instead then that's because GOOG was also offering them moniez. ;) Not to mention MSFT is getting a few good things in return that benefit all WPs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vice

Really? Going by your argument, there's a good reason Firefox/Chrome aren't the market leader instead of IE, it's because they suck.

Market share often has little to do with quality, this has been proven time and time again. The reason Android is so popular is simply because there are so many models selling at bargain bin prices everywhere, which is why you see Froyo still having 25% of Android's usage stats, and the same will still keep happening with Gingerbread for at least 1-2 years from now. Windows Phone is an alternative to that; a chance for Nokia to attack the budget smartphone market that made Android so successful, but without putting the user through the crap experience that Android offers on low-end hardware.

Firefox isn't as good as it used to be and is losing Market Share. Chromes share is very high and in some metrics beats IE. For example the latest Chrome beats the latest IE in usage. But when you add all the IE versions together they beat Chrome. The reason for this is simple. Many consumers use whatever comes with their PC. Most PC's run Windows and Windows comes with IE.

And I would disagree with you that Market Share has little to do with Quality otherwise Windows Mobile 6.5 and Rims Blackberry would hold 90% of the market. Instead Android and iOS (much better operating systems) are dominating.

People buy new phones all the time and they want to buy the best phone at that time. That is why they aren't buying Windows Phones, they aren't the best.

Nokia didn't choose Windows Phone to "be different". They were money hat'ed.

I'm just going by what Nokia themselves said. They chose Windows Phone because everyone else was using Android and they felt they could be different by using Windows Phone. But we all now really know Microsoft paid them a billion dollars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UndergroundWire

You are 100% right on that. That design is nice. Too bad for the OS.

What stuff am I making up? You asked what made the Lumia series different, completely ignored the answers you got, then asked why is the Lumia series getting so much attention when they don't offer fragmentation. You're not making sense at all. If you wanted to argue that people aren't buying WP because it "lacks apps", why not just say so?

The Nokia Collection is just one way the Lumia series is different. It's not "how Nokia is really differentiating themselves", which is simply something you made up. There have been at least three posts answering your question of how Nokia is really differentiating themselves, all of which you simply ignored to push your made-up argument.

Nokia drive specifically. No other WP manufacturer has anything close to that. Also I did answer that question, it only comes down to the build quality and Nokia's name. The camera, as someone mentioned, is not a compelling enough to bring someone to choose this phone.

What you are failing to see is that in the end, it doesn't really matter which phone you get. You still get the same experience.

If I said Windows Phone sucks. Oh by the way I have the Trophy. Can you sway me to get another Windows Phone today?

How about this, if I said Android sucks. By the way I have the HTC Hero. Can I sway somebody back to Android? Absolutely. The hardware was to slow for the OS. However when I had a single core Droid Incredible with Sense, the phone operated nice.

Same thing with the iPhone 3GS vs 4S, you can sway someone to come back to iOS because it is a different experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BajiRav

I think I don't agree. Right now Samsung is the leader in android phones. All the other android manufactures are are not doing terrible well. Spec wise Nokia phone would be behind there is no way could compete hardware wise with Samsung...so they have to differentiate on industrial design ... kind of like what Sony Erikson are doing. However the android market is to crowded. I think they did the best they could do.

Spec wise they are "behind" because of WP's stringent requirements and not because they couldn't put a multi-core processors in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BajiRav

Firefox isn't as good as it used to be and is losing Market Share. Chromes share is very high and in some metrics beats IE. For example the latest Chrome beats the latest IE in usage. But when you add all the IE versions together they beat Chrome. The reason for this is simple. Many consumers use whatever comes with their PC. Most PC's run Windows and Windows comes with IE.

And I would disagree with you that Market Share has little to do with Quality otherwise Windows Mobile 6.5 and Rims Blackberry would hold 90% of the market. Instead Android and iOS (much better operating systems) are dominating.

People buy new phones all the time and they want to buy the best phone at that time. That is why they aren't buying Windows Phones, they aren't the best.

Actually wrong on two counts:

Chrome hasn't beaten IE (there was some explanation, look up if you have to)

All Dell, Sony PCs come with Chrome as default(last I checked) so your IE bundling argument doesn't stand.

Edit: **** why is neowin not merging comments? :huh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vice

Actually wrong on two counts:

Chrome hasn't beaten IE (there was some explanation, look up if you have to)

All Dell, Sony PCs come with Chrome as default(last I checked) so your IE bundling argument doesn't stand.

Edit: **** why is neowin not merging comments? :huh:

Neither Dell nor Sony are the market leading OEM's - Their competitors make up more than the market than they do. And even if they do come with Chrome bundled they still also come with Internet Explorer. People see the word Internet and know what they are doing. Chrome doesn't give an idea of what it is by just the name and I'd doubt many consumers who buy those computers with it bundled even use it, I mean for starters they are buying a Dell or a Sony notebook so they are obviously not all there mentally.

And no I disagree with you about IE beating Chrome. The latest Chrome does beat the latest IE in market share. http://www.tomshardw...sers,15053.html

Quote the article: "The most popular browser version was Chrome 17 with 29.51 percent. IE9 was a distant second with just 15.6 percent."

Link to post
Share on other sites

xeleraph

Firefox isn't as good as it used to be and is losing Market Share. Chromes share is very high and in some metrics beats IE. For example the latest Chrome beats the latest IE in usage. But when you add all the IE versions together they beat Chrome. The reason for this is simple. Many consumers use whatever comes with their PC. Most PC's run Windows and Windows comes with IE.

And I would disagree with you that Market Share has little to do with Quality otherwise Windows Mobile 6.5 and Rims Blackberry would hold 90% of the market. Instead Android and iOS (much better operating systems) are dominating.

You're being inconsistent. Frankly speaking, your argument that the reason a product isn't leading the market is because it sucks is complete nonsense, and when the flaw in your reasoning pointed out to you all you do is try to find excuses to hand-wave away your logical inconsistencies. Just because a product isn't leading the market is hardly evidence that it sucks, the web browser market proves that to anyone who isn't busy being blinded by their pro-Android fanboyism.

People buy new phones all the time and they want to buy the best phone at that time. That is why they aren't buying Windows Phones, they aren't the best.

Wrong. Teens who buy iPhones and the vast majority of average people who buy dirt-cheap Android phones have never made any research or objective comparison of which phone is the "best". The overwhelming majority of users simply can't tell which phone is the "best" even if their lives depended on it, what they do is buy whatever their friends are using, or whatever's cheap and what the salesperson is telling them to like how my dad did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      HMD unveils its “life-proof” Nokia XR20, starting at €449
      by Paul Hill



      HMD Global has announced a selection of new phones today including the Nokia 6310, Nokia C30, and most notably the Nokia XR20 which the firm describes as “life-proof” because of the work it has put in to make this phone resistant to spills and falls. To demonstrate the toughness of the Nokia XR20, HMD worked with former Brazil football star Roberto Carlos to put the device through its paces.

      The Nokia XR20 is one of HMD Global’s more expensive phones but the firm ensures you get your money’s worth. It has promised to support the device with four years of monthly security updates, and three years worth of Android upgrades – it will launch with Android 11 so the final upgrade you’ll get on the Nokia XR20 will be Android 14. In terms of hardware, it’s packing a Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G CPU, 128 GB of internal storage, and 6 GB of RAM.

      According to HMD, the Nokia XR20 can withstand extreme temperatures, drops of up to 1.8 metres and an hour or so underwater. It also comes with the Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, which HMD describes as one of the “toughest of glass out there” so you should be able to avoid scratching your display.

      The Nokia XR20 also features a 48MP+13MP dual camera with ZEISS Optics, OZO spatial audio and “innovative imaging solutions” such as SpeedWarp mode which lets you create a montage. HMD says the Nokia XR20 pushes the boundaries of mid-range devices with its 5G speeds, 15W wireless charging, and its durability.

      The Nokia XR20 is available today in select global markets in Ultra Blue and Granite colours. There are two variants a 4/64 GB option and a 6/128 GB option but which ones you can pick will depend on your market. To check whether you can buy it, head to your local Nokia.com website.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia to help bring 10 Gbps broadband to UK by 2025
      by Paul Hill



      Nokia has announced a partnership with Lightspeed Broadband to help bring 10 Gbps “symmetric fibre broadband” to 1 million homes and businesses in the east of England by the end of 2025. The initial rollout will begin as soon as the end of 2022 in several places.

      Under the agreement, Nokia will provide Lightspeed with its XGS-PON equipment which will be used at customers' homes as well as at the operator’s points of presence. It will also provide aggregation switching, IP edge solutions, Nokia’s whole-home Wi-Fi 6 Beacons, and its Altiplano management platform.

      Commenting on the deal, Steve Haines, CEO of Lightspeed Broadband, said:

      According to the announcement, the first 100,000 customers will be connected by the end of 2022. They will be located in 10 market towns around South Lincolnshire and West Norfolk including Spalding, Stamford, Boston, and King’s Lynn. In the succeeding years, connectivity will be expanded to Norfolk, Suffolk, and Essex.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia and KDDI trial liquid cooling to help reduce CO2 emissions
      by Paul Hill



      Nokia has announced that it’s involved in a trial with the Japanese mobile operator KDDI to trial the Finnish firm’s Liquid Cooling AirScale Baseband solution. The two companies are attempting to show how the new solution can cut energy consumption by 70% compared to gas coolant-based air-cooling solutions.

      According to Nokia, this is the first time that liquid cooling is being used in Japan by a mobile operator, it said that this shows KDDI’s commitment to sustainability and fighting climate change. If KDDI opts for a heat reuse option, it could lead to a reduction of up to 80% in CO2 emissions.

      Commenting on the trial, John Lancaster-Lennox, Head of Market Unit Japan at Nokia, said:

      Aside from the climate change aspects, Nokia’s Liquid Cooling AirScale Baseband solution needs little maintenance and is almost silent, allowing for its use in buildings with tenants. Traditional air-cooling solutions, on the other hand, can be noisy and require regular maintenance.

      In addition to liquid cooling, KDDI is also trialling Nokia’s Nokia AVA for Energy Efficiency which utilises artificial intelligence to help reduce overall energy bills by as much as 20% by allowing energy to be used more sustainably.

    • By zikalify
      UK begins vehicle-to-everything road safety system trials
      by Paul Hill



      Vodafone has announced that the UK has begun trials of its vehicle-to-everything road safety system that connects vehicles, cyclists, pedestrians, and infrastructure to create a more cohesive digital transport system that provides live, localised, and targeted updates about lane closures, speed restrictions, and traffic incidents.

      The new system has been developed by Vodafone, Nokia, and Chordant with support from the government’s Centre for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CCAV) and the Midlands Future Mobility (MFM) consortium. For its part, Vodafone is providing the 4G and 5G networks and advanced multi-access edge computing (MEC) technology to allow real-time road information to be sent from Highways England to users’ smartphones.

      Commenting on the system which is being trialled in the West Midlands, Mike Waters, Director of Police, Strategy and Innovation at TfWM, said:

      According to Vodafone, 4,000 people are killed every day around the world in road traffic crashes with over 50% of those killed being pedestrians, motorcyclists, and cyclists. Additionally, it said road transport contributes to 20% of the global carbon emissions. With vehicle-to-everything technology, it hopes to reduce both carbon emissions and fatalities.

    • By zikalify
      EE to use Self-Organizing Networks software to boost reliability
      by Paul Hill



      Nokia has announced that its Self-Organizing Networks (SON) software will be adopted by BT’s mobile network, EE. With the new SON software, EE’s network reliability and service will be improved in its 4G and 5G networks.

      With the deployment of SON software, EE should be able to manage its network in a more cost-effective manner. It uses intelligent automation to prevent issues from arising which leads to better customer experiences. As EE’s operational costs fall, it could pass on the savings to customers making its services more competitive.

      Commenting on the deal between the two firms, Steve Holmes, RAN Design Director of BT, said:

      According to Nokia, EE will be able to use a Software Development Kit (SDK) to create their own SON solutions that are unique to their needs. One use case of the software will be to help smoothly transition customers from one radio cell to another without the customers experiencing dropped calls or interruptions.