European carriers: Lumia phones are 'not good enough' to compete


Recommended Posts

Vice

You're being inconsistent. Frankly speaking, your argument that the reason a product isn't leading the market is because it sucks is complete nonsense, and when the flaw in your reasoning pointed out to you all you do is try to find excuses to hand-wave away your logical inconsistencies. Just because a product isn't leading the market is hardly evidence that it sucks, the web browser market proves that to anyone who isn't busy being blinded by their pro-Android fanboyism.

Wrong. The overwhelming majority of users simply can't tell which phone is the "best" even if their lives depended on it, what they do is buy whatever's cheap and what the salesperson is telling them to, like how my dad did.

You've not refuted any of my points because you are unable to do so. If Windows Phone is so good why does it continually lose market share each quarter? Why are european OEM's saying they can't sell it?

People just are not interested in this OS from Microsoft. Even the European carriers are saying the Lumia range would sell better with Android, can't you see the facts?

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

You've not refuted any of my points because you are unable to do so. If Windows Phone is so good why does it continually lose market share each quarter? Why are european OEM's saying they can't sell it?

People just are not interested in this OS from Microsoft.

I've not refuted your points because you haven't made any. All you did was resort to the flawed logic that if a product isn't leading the market, then it means it sucks, and I've already debunked that to outer orbit. Why don't you actually give us some good reasons why Windows Phone sucks instead of using flawed arguments, then I might have something to refute?

Link to post
Share on other sites
UndergroundWire

I've not refuted your points because you haven't made any. All you did was resort to the flawed logic that if a product isn't leading the market, then it means it sucks, and I've already debunked that to outer orbit. Why don't you actually give us some good reasons why Windows Phone sucks instead of using flawed arguments, then I might have something to refute?

How about this as a point: It sucks because it doesn't have the market share. If it had the market share, it would have the app developers in its market.

You see to say that Firefox or Chrome are behind in market share is not a valid argument. They are not missing any features because of the lack of developers.

Do you agree with that point?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

I've not refuted your points because you haven't made any. All you did was resort to the flawed logic that if a product isn't leading the market, then it means it sucks, and I've already debunked that to outer orbit. Why don't you actually give us some good reasons why Windows Phone sucks instead of using flawed arguments, then I might have something to refute?

The fact only a few OEM's are even willing to make Windows Phones and we've not seen many new models from other companies than Nokia. The fact that Samsung can sell a single Android phone in a higher volume than all the Windows Phones put together etc - This shows consumers are not interested in Windows Phone. And again you can't refute this because you'll never admit that Windows Phone is inferior to other products in the market.

Microsoft paid Nokia 1 Billion dollars just to pick it over Android. What more evidence do you need?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Melfster
Spec wise they are "behind" because of WP's stringent requirements and not because they couldn't put a multi-core processors in there.

I don't believe Nokia makes ARM chips like Samsung does they would always be behind with both screen tech and CPU.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

How about this as a point: It sucks because it doesn't have the market share. If it had the market share, it would have the app developers in its market.

You see to say that Firefox or Chrome are behind in market share is not a valid argument. They are not missing any features because of the lack of developers.

Do you agree with that point?

So Windows Phone doesn't have app developers in its market? I suppose those 80k apps in the Marketplace must have all been developed by Microsoft and Nokia, then. They seem to be doing a great job of it too, since between just the two of them they're writing enough apps to grow the Marketplace at a faster rate than all the third-party developers for Android managed to when Android was 1.5 years old.

I think you can definitely make a much better argument. Please try again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

The fact only a few OEM's are even willing to make Windows Phones and we've not seen many new models from other companies than Nokia. The fact that Samsung can sell a single Android phone in a higher volume than all the Windows Phones put together etc - This shows consumers are not interested in Windows Phone. And again you can't refute this because you'll never admit that Windows Phone is inferior to other products in the market.

Microsoft paid Nokia 1 Billion dollars just to pick it over Android. What more evidence do you need?

Consumers not being interested in Windows Phone is completely different from consumers not even knowing anything about Windows phone, which is in turn completely different from Windows Phone sucking.

I can't refute arguments that you've never made. All you've proven is that Windows Phone doesn't have market share, which is different from the quality of the actual product itself. You're desperate to argue that Windows Phone sucks, but all you have are logical flaws and not a single solid argument that makes sense. Frankly speaking, you're being irrational; I don't believe Windows Phone is going to threaten Android in the near future either, so you can just relax and let go of your insecurities now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

Consumers not being interested in Windows Phone is completely different from consumers not even knowing anything about Windows phone, which is in turn completely different from Windows Phone sucking.

I can't refute arguments that you've never made. All you've proven is that Windows Phone doesn't have market share, which is different from the quality of the actual product itself. You're desperate to argue that Windows Phone sucks, but all you have are logical flaws and not a single solid argument that makes sense. Frankly speaking, you're being irrational; I don't believe Windows Phone is going to threaten Android in the near future either, so you can just relax and let go of your insecurities now.

I don't even own an Android phone mate. I have an iPhone 4S. If anything Android threatens iPhone so as an iPhone user it would be illogical for me to stick up for Android. I'm just using such good logic you can't refute it so all you can say is I don't make sense. Like a robot unable to understand a command. Windows Phone can't be bad or your tiny head will explode.

Only thing Windows Phone is going to threaten is Nokias survival.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

I don't even own an Android phone mate. I have an iPhone 4S. If anything Android threatens iPhone so as an iPhone user it would be illogical for me to stick up for Android. I'm just using such good logic you can't refute it so all you can say is I don't make sense. Like a robot unable to understand a command. Windows Phone can't be bad or your tiny head will explode.

Insisting that your logic is good doesn't make it so. Accusing me of being a robot doesn't work either when you're apparently incapable of understand how basic logic works (maybe that's why you believe your argument is a good one). Your logic has been proven to be, well, crap. Example, the browser market. Was IE6 better than Firefox when the latter had only 5% market share?

Go ahead, make your excuses, and show everyone that your logic of "it doesn't have market share therefore it sucks" is, in fact, dead wrong. You've also shown us what "logic" means to you, apparently it means emotional arguments based on what you like instead of what is actually true, such as not defending Android simply because you use an iPhone. The quality of your so-called logic (or rather, the lack of it) is painfully obvious.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

Insisting that your logic is good doesn't make it so. Accusing me of being a robot doesn't work either when you're apparently incapable of understand how basic logic works (maybe that's why you believe your argument is a good one). Your logic has been proven to be, well, crap. Example, the browser market. Was IE6 better than Firefox when the latter had only 5% market share?

Go ahead, make your excuses, and show everyone that your logic of "it doesn't have market share therefore it sucks" is, in fact, dead wrong.

I don't need to say anything you cant convince me that Windows Phone is good. You've not even tried as you know it is impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

Neither Dell nor Sony are the market leading OEM's - Their competitors make up more than the market than they do. And even if they do come with Chrome bundled they still also come with Internet Explorer. People see the word Internet and know what they are doing. Chrome doesn't give an idea of what it is by just the name and I'd doubt many consumers who buy those computers with it bundled even use it, I mean for starters they are buying a Dell or a Sony notebook so they are obviously not all there mentally.

And no I disagree with you about IE beating Chrome. The latest Chrome does beat the latest IE in market share. http://www.tomshardw...sers,15053.html

Quote the article: "The most popular browser version was Chrome 17 with 29.51 percent. IE9 was a distant second with just 15.6 percent."

Neither Dell nor Sony are the market leading OEM's - Their competitors make up more than the market than they do. And even if they do come with Chrome bundled they still also come with Internet Explorer. People see the word Internet and know what they are doing. Chrome doesn't give an idea of what it is by just the name and I'd doubt many consumers who buy those computers with it bundled even use it, I mean for starters they are buying a Dell or a Sony notebook so they are obviously not all there mentally.

And no I disagree with you about IE beating Chrome. The latest Chrome does beat the latest IE in market share. http://www.tomshardw...sers,15053.html

Quote the article: "The most popular browser version was Chrome 17 with 29.51 percent. IE9 was a distant second with just 15.6 percent."

Right. as I said, statcounter got it wrong, neowin had a story a couple of days ago. As far as I know Dell is still #2 PC maker worldwide and GOOG might be paying HP to make Chrome default? I haven't seen a new HP in recent times to know for sure.

Which brings us to the point (even with just Dell and Sony) is GOOG buying marketshare for Chrome? :p

I also don't understand comparing Chrome 17 on all Windows versions with IE9 which is just Windows 7. Why not compare just Windows 7 share then? ( I know it is Microsoft's "fault" but still)

If Windows Phone is so good why does it continually lose market share each quarter?

Source? Most such usage share stats combine WP with WinMo and hence doesn't count. Find me one which shows only WP and losing marketshare.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

The fact only a few OEM's are even willing to make Windows Phones and we've not seen many new models from other companies than Nokia.

Did you completely miss HTC Titan II? :huh: not to mention WP is kind of on an yearly cycle.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

I don't need to say anything you cant convince me that Windows Phone is good. You've not even tried as you know it is impossible.

It's impossible to use logic to convince someone who rejects logic. As you've already repeatedly demonstrated, your understanding of "logic" is a completely bizarre one, like how you think it's "illogical" to defend Android as an iPhone user since your so-called logic is based on your personal preferences instead of facts. A logical iPhone user would have no problems with defending Android if the facts call for it, but you obviously don't belong in that category, by your own admission. So, really, why should I try reasoning with someone who rejects logic?

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

Even the European carriers are saying the Lumia range would sell better with Android, can't you see the facts?

People also said (still say) that OS X would sell better if Apple sold it to OEMs, can't you see the facts? OS X must suck then by your "logic".

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

People also said (still say) that OS X would sell better if Apple sold it to OEMs, can't you see the facts? OS X must suck then by your "logic".

What you just said makes no sense at all.

OS X would sell way better if Apple sold it to OEM's - How would that make OS X ****? If anything it would indicate that Apples Macs are overpriced.

In the Windows case. The phone is good (Lumia handsets) it is the OS that people don't want. If they put Android on it, it would sell great.

It's impossible to use logic to convince someone who rejects logic. As you've already repeatedly demonstrated, your understanding of "logic" is a completely bizarre one, like how you think it's "illogical" to defend Android as an iPhone user since your so-called logic is based on your personal preferences instead of facts. A logical iPhone user would have no problems with defending Android if the facts call for it, but you obviously don't belong in that category, by your own admission. So, really, why should I try reasoning with someone who rejects logic?

5M9j6m.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

What you just said makes no sense at all.

OS X would sell way better if Apple sold it to OEM's - How would that make OS X ****? If anything it would indicate that Apples Macs are overpriced.

In the Windows case. The phone is good (Lumia handsets) it is the OS that people don't want. If they put Android on it, it would sell great.

It doesn't make sense right? because that's exactly what you said about WP and that doesn't make sense either. Lumias are not selling because people don't want WP? How is that even a logical conclusion?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

It doesn't make sense right? because that's exactly what you said about WP and that doesn't make sense either. Lumias are not selling because people don't want WP? How is that even a logical conclusion?

Because that is exactly what the Carriers are saying. You know the people who actually do this for a living and sell millions of handsets a year. People who know more than you on this subject I'm sure. I merely quoted them.

From Neowins home page on this story:

Another telco representative, from a network that has sold both the Lumia 800 and 710 in its stores, states, "No one comes into the store and asks for a Windows phone", adding that "if the Lumia with the same hardware came with Android in it and not Windows, it would be much easier to sell."
Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

Because that is exactly what the Carriers are saying. You know the people who actually do this for a living and sell millions of handsets a year. People who know more than you on this subject I'm sure. I merely quoted them.

/facepalm.

Carriers are saying and that's why it makes true? Some carriers also said Apple doesn't stand a chance with iPhone.

Dell sells millions of PCs each year and they said Apple should close shop.

btw When you say WP sucks or you will never recommend WP, then you are not just quoting it. It's your prejudice (for whatever reason) in action.

Link to post
Share on other sites
UndergroundWire

So Windows Phone doesn't have app developers in its market? I suppose those 80k apps in the Marketplace must have all been developed by Microsoft and Nokia, then. They seem to be doing a great job of it too, since between just the two of them they're writing enough apps to grow the Marketplace at a faster rate than all the third-party developers for Android managed to when Android was 1.5 years old.

I think you can definitely make a much better argument. Please try again.

I think you know what I mean. You just don't want to admit you are wrong. Do you have Angry Birds Space? Do you have Draw Something? Do you have Words With Friends?

Surely you don't want to play the numbers game. How many apps does iOS and Android have?

Link to post
Share on other sites
TheLegendOfMart

unibody, design and name, and of course there's NO 4,3 screen WP in Europe - Titan is more, Omnia 7 is less and 1st gen - and that's not Lumia 900 but Lumia specific but the Nokia Drive/Maps/Transport apps are a large appeal

HTC HD7 says hi.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vice

/facepalm.

Carriers are saying and that's why it makes true? Some carriers also said Apple doesn't stand a chance with iPhone.

Dell sells millions of PCs each year and they said Apple should close shop.

btw When you say WP sucks or you will never recommend WP, then you are not just quoting it. It's your prejudice (for whatever reason) in action.

I'd not recommend people drink bleach either. Obviously I'm prejudice against people killing themselves. I'd not recommend Windows Phone because it offers a poorer experience compared to both iOS and Android which are much better. Android allows more customisation and iOS has an App for everything. Windows has neither of those features which are important to consumers.

But it is hard to discuss this stuff on here because the Windows Phone people are just blind. They see big 2D blocks on an interface and they gush like school girls. Same with Metro defenders on Windows 8. I own an iPhone but I have no trouble saying Android offers a better experience than Windows Phone. iOS and Windows Phone are quite similar where one company dictates everything but atleast iOS has Applications and a Tablet operating system in the market already which integrates with the iPhone and its app ecosystem perfectly. Windows Phone? Not so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xeleraph

I think you know what I mean. You just don't want to admit you are wrong. Do you have Angry Birds Space? Do you have Draw Something? Do you have Words With Friends?

Surely you don't want to play the numbers game. How many apps does iOS and Android have?

I'm not the one playing the numbers game; you're the one who said that Windows Phone doesn't have developers due to its Marketplace. Does this mean that the 80k apps in the WP Marketplace were all developed by Microsoft and Nokia, since WP doesn't have developers? Do you want to backpedal now and change your argument, or stick with your original one?

And you're bringing up games now? Not just games, but social games? From someone who said that only juveniles use social networks on their phones and you use yours for much more mature, important stuff? It's not a matter of me refusing to admit that I'm wrong. It's a matter of your hypocrisy and your flip-flopping between positions depending on which flavor of the day is better to bash Windows Phone with. Can you please clarify whether you think social networks and social games are important or not, as opposed to just flip-flopping between two opposing positions as convenient to suit your agenda?

Link to post
Share on other sites
epk

Um, yesterday I walked into both Vodafone and Nova stores in Reykjavik and they both had the Lumia 800 right there for you to play with it (I loved it, by the way, it was the first time I actually had it in my hands). Sure, I didn't talk to any reps, but it was like the first thing you saw when you walked in with a sign saying "Try me!". Hard to miss.

Link to post
Share on other sites
kaffra

after poor experience with the n series and their handling of the ovi sites, i hope to try a cheap windows phone someday, but not nokia

Link to post
Share on other sites
BajiRav

I own an iPhone but I have no trouble saying Android offers a better experience than Windows Phone.

I have no problem with your post as such but that statement does not make any sense? If you think Android is better than iPhone then why are you using iPhone yourself? If iPhone is better than Android then why don't you recommend iPhone instead because it clearly has better ecosystem (and argubly better hardware?)

Personally I like and use Windows Phone but when I recommend someone for phones, I ask what they need and if I think their needs are not covered by Windows Phone then I recommend iPhone first and if cost is a factor I ask them to look at Android.

You clearly have prejudice against metro (based on your comment in that post) but you failed to understand that a person who asks you for recommendation might actually like WP's design and their needs might be satisfied by what it offers.

I am still trying to understand why you think+recommend Android is better than WP because it offers more customization? WTF with customization have to do with average phone user?

When you say WP offers poorer experience compared to iOS, do you mean only the app count? or those "2D blocks" that are regarded as a unique and beautiful design that you metro haters are just blind to?

When you say WP offers pooer experieience compared to Android, do you mean lack of customization but not app count?

Just trying to understand where are you coming from on this point and why WP sucks as you mentioned initially.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      Nokia research says 5G is 90% more energy-efficient than 4G
      by Paul Hill



      A new study conducted by Nokia and Telefonica has found that 5G networks are up to 90% more efficient than 4G networks. The findings were the result of a three-month study which looked at the power consumption of the Radio Access Network (RAN) in Telefonica’s network.

      The two firms were keen to highlight that although 5G networks will dramatically increase network traffic, it will not lead to a rise in energy consumption at the same rate, which they say shows their commitment to climate change.

      Despite the positive results, Nokia admits that 5G networks still require further action to make them more energy-efficient and to reduce their CO2 emissions. It said existing energy-saving features at the radio base station and network levels like 5G power-saving features, small cell deployments, and new 5G architecture and protocols can “significantly improve” energy efficiency of wireless networks when they’re combined.

      The study used solutions from Nokia’s AirScale portfolio including AirScale Base Stations and AirScale Massive MIMO Active Antenna solutions. Commenting on the hardware and study President of Mobile Networks at Nokia Tommi Uitto said:

      Both of the firms say they’re committed to limiting global warming to 1.5C. Nokia, in particular, said that it will be decreasing its emissions from its operations by 41% by 2030 and that it has helped customers who modernised their base stations to use 46% less energy. Last year, the firm said that it delivered zero-emission products to over 150 customers worldwide; this should help cut a lot of CO2 emissions that would have otherwise been produced.

    • By indospot
      HMD Global introduces the Nokia 6300 and 8000 with 4G and Google Assistant
      by João Carrasqueira

      HMD Global has announced the latest members of its family of feature phones, or "dumb" phones, as they're sometimes called. The new phones are the Nokia 6300 4G and Nokia 8000 4G, and they share some similarities in terms of specs and features, including the same Snapdragon 210 chipset, 512MB of RAM, and 4GB of internal storage, which you can expand via microSD cards.

      The Nokia 6300 4G naturally draws some inspiration from the original Nokia 6300 from 2007 in terms of design, but it's been modernized to be more suitable for the modern day. KaiOS can run some basic apps - including popular apps like WhatsApp - and it also supports the Google Assistant, so there are still some smarts. What's notable about it is that it's Nokia cheapest phone yet to offer that feature set, coming in at an average retail price of €49.



      In addition to 4G, the phone supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, A-GPS, and it has an FM radio, which is enabled by connecting a headset with the 3.5mm jack. The display is a 2.4-inch QVGA panel, which isn't meant to wow anyone, and the camera is also the bare minimum, being a VGA sensor, but it does have a flash, which can be used with the camera or just as a flashlight. There's a 1,500mAh battery, which promises up to 27.9 days of standby time and 8.2 hours of talk time.

      As mentioned above, the Nokia 8000 4G is very similar in terms of specs, and the biggest differences are in the design. It has a front panel that curves at the edges, including the number keys, and the back uses a "glass-like" material to make the phone feel more premium. It also comes in different colors that make better use of that design.



      Specs-wise, the only differences are the display, which is 2.8 inches diagonally, and the rear camera, which is a 2MP sensor instead of a VGA one. Everything else is pretty much the same.

      Both phones are available in select markets from today. The Nokia 6300 4G comes in Cyan Green, Light Charcoal, and Powder White colors and costs €49 on average. The Nokia 8000 4G comes in Onyx, Opal, Citrine, and Topaz color options, and costs €79.

    • By Abhay V
      HMD Global brings the Nokia 8.3 5G as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW via Verizon to the U.S.
      by Abhay Venkatesh

      HMD Global today announced that it is launching the Nokia 8.3 5G in the U.S. as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW via Verizon. The 8.3 5G originally debuted in March and was reported to be coming to the U.S. sometime this fall.

      The latest 5G offering from Verizon Wireless bears the nomenclature seen on all its other devices, with the UW suffix signifying support for the faster mmWave 5G speeds. The device also supports Verizon 5G Nationwide, the carrier’s recently announced sub-6Ghz low band 5G network. Juho Sarvikas, Chief Product Officer at HMD Global, said that the device is the company’s “first affordable flagship carrier device on Android in the U.S.”.

      As for the specs, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is powered by a Snapdragon 765G with 6GB or 8GB RAM and 64GB or 128GB storage options. The device also supports expandable storage via microSD cards. At the front sits a 6.81-inch FullHD+ PureDisplay screen with support for HDR. At the rear, the device sports a quad-camera setup with ZEISS optics. The main camera duties are carried out by a 64MP sensor accompanied by an ultra-wide-angle sensor with Night video mode for improved low light performance, a macro lens, and a depth camera unit. The phone features a power button-mounted fingerprint sensor and houses a 4500mAh battery.

      The Nokia 8 V 5G UW will be available starting November 12 from $699.99 on Verizon’s website and the My Verizon app.

    • By zikalify
      Nokia report warns of rising cyberattacks on IoT devices
      by Paul Hill



      Nokia’s latest Threat Intelligence Report has warned that cyberattacks on internet-connected devices are continuing to rise at an “alarming rate” due to poor security protections. The report found that IoT devices now make up 33% of infected devices, up from 16% in 2019.

      According to the report, the most affected IoT devices are those that are routinely assigned public-facing internet IP addresses. It highlighted that networks that use carrier-grade Network Address Translation see the infection rate of IoT devices reduced considerably because the vulnerable devices are not visible to network scans.

      Commenting on the findings in the report, Bhaskar Gorti, Nokia Software President and Chief Digital Officer, said:

      Pivoting away from IoT devices, the report also looks at how cybercriminals have used the COVID-19 pandemic to launch cyberattacks. It said that criminals are using people’s fears to spread malware, for example, it said that a coronavirus map application mimicked the Johns Hopkins University app and deployed malware on the devices it was installed on. To protect against these types of attacks, Nokia’s report suggests that people should only install applications from trusted sources such as Google and Apple.

    • By Jay Bonggolto
      HMD Global announces the Nokia 2 V Tella for $168
      by Jay Bonggolto

      HMD Global announced today its latest entry-level smartphone that costs less than $200. The Nokia 2 V Tella is available to purchase now in Walmart stores and through Walmart.com from $89, with availability on select Verizon stores scheduled later this month for $168.

      The device sports a 5.45-inch HD+ display and is powered by a quad-core MediaTek Helio A22 SoC, paired with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage. At the back of the phone, there's a dual camera comprising an 8MP auto focus sensor that uses artificial intelligence to provide "greater depth and brighter image results even in challenging lighting situations". It is complemented by a 2MP depth sensor.

      While most of its key specs are nothing to write home about, its battery life offers a better experience for its price range. Its 3000mAh battery features an AI-powered Adaptive Battery system to prioritize resources for your most frequently used apps, keeping your phone up for as long as two days.

      The Nokia 2 V Tella has a dedicated Google Assistant button and AI Face Unlock. Other features include support for dark theme, Focus Mode, Family Link, and many more. The phone runs Android 10 and comes in blue color.