Recommended Posts

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

Do you want to explain why WSA is so bad? Maybe is better SpyBot? Or maybe Emsisoft? Or even better MSE? lol.

@sanctified.

Try Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus. This is WSA installed on 4 gb of ram:

Ztd9K.png

Mar-Apr/2012 AV-Test results:

http://www.av-test.o...testreports_pi1[report_no]=121361

Not overkill at all, personally I don't need all the stuff from the 'Complete' version. PM me - I can send you a link with 50% off - only $39.95 for WSA Complete instead of $79.95.

Awesome. PM sent.

Now it is a link from Softpedia, not sure if that's a terrible thing.

http://download1us.s...hrome-win32.zip

I would like a more trusted site.

Softpedia sometimes carry questionable apps. I would like a developer page that keep pushing builds and give direct support.

I'm not familiar with nor do I have any experience with Webroot, but, I've been using Eset Nod32 for years and it has never failed me. It is also one of the few AV's that is light on resources.

  • Like 2

Just downloaded the latest mini installer. Will try it for the rest of the week. It imported my srw iron profile on the fly. So good so far.

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

No task manager noob here, WSA Antivirus has only 2 processes:

579OF.png

Gotta say. You dont even notice Webroot is running in the background. Very light on resources and the computer scan was amazingly fast (Also, detected extra malware hiding in the appdata folder).

Now a summary:

Replaced MSE with Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete

Followed all the advises found in J_R_G's amazing guide here: http://bulletproof-w...ws.blogspot.mx/

Installed precompiled Chromium that I will test for a week.

This along all the points I described in the first point (Forgot to say that Im using Windows 7 64bits)

Can I say now that my system is above average secure?

First off if you care about security, you would look at SRWare Iron. Second, the amount of memory used by your protection package is only part of the picture. As a security person the only thing that i trust on my personal machines is VIPRE. I have been using it for years, and in CEH class, we eacg tried our own software to scan a directory (read only) with thousands of samples of known and some zero day virus and a few we created. VIPRE out did ever one tested. Even the instructor changed his person use between classes.

VIPRE is was one of the first to be the lowest in resource usage and also the leader in multi-core technology.

This CEH v7 only uses VIPRE personally and recommends it to everyone.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

First of all, thanks for the suggestion.

It's not that all we care is performance. However some of us use heavy software and every cycle or ram amount we can save counts.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

Let's get GData Antivirus - it offeres 10/10 protection in every single test I've seen. My question for you: have you ever tried to install GData ? If not do it on a system with 2 gb of ram and please post here the results. I care more of my security but I can't have installed Malware Defender, Kaspersky AV, Emsisoft Mamutu, No Script andf MalwareBytes running in background all the time like I see everyday in some security boards just to watch stupid YouTube videos or to buy a pair of discounted shoes from time to time. That's insane and I'm not NASA or FBI. And let's get real, if someone want to penetrate your (or mine) ''great'' $39.99 security softwares it can do it anytime, even if your PC is full with security suites, hips protection, antikeyloggers and so on....It happened to NASA, Amazon, FBI, Symantec, Microsoft and others. Spending hundreds of dollars on security software and dreaming to the perfect ''security combo'' is just stupid.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

I hate to tell you this but I doubt if anything will help you permanently if you have to do that. Other than swab in Linux.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

Wouldn't it be better to have a separate laptop for looking at strange USBs?

Wouldn't it be a good idea to change your card number too ?

I've been told (Never said I believed mind you) that creating a folder called "autorun.inf" and placing it on your thumb drive will stop any attempt by an autorun virus to infect your flash drive. Supposedly, they can't overwrite the folder with a real autorun.inf. My personal belief is that its B.S.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
    • Write to your MP 😄 Like believing in Santa. Total surveillance IS the goal. Wake up.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      219
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!