Lurchybaby Posted October 20, 2003 Share Posted October 20, 2003 Hypothetically speaking, a T4 movie could be made without Ahnold..... T3 ended with the nuclear war beginning. Why not have T4 be about the war against the endoskeletons (as is seen during most of the dream/future sequences during the previous movies). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Dorr Veteran Posted October 20, 2003 Veteran Share Posted October 20, 2003 I though T4 was being planned for sure. There was a section for it on their official message boards when i looked one time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mackol Posted October 20, 2003 Author Share Posted October 20, 2003 ,Oct 20 2003, 06:52] hahahahahahaha, you dont have idea how that made me laugh! LMAO :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firen Posted October 20, 2003 Share Posted October 20, 2003 Seems like T3 was put together real fast...like the story was bad and in #2 they prevented Judgement day and now they are saying it is invietable (i think thats how you spell it) i meant WHAT THE HELL...the original director James Cameron never had plans for the third one i belive...well my point is i gave T3 a (N) (N) thumbs down.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boffa Jones Veteran Posted October 20, 2003 Veteran Share Posted October 20, 2003 I thought it was fine. It would be cool for them to make a movie about the war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt74441 Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 I don't know why they're even making a fourth one. They shouldn't have even made a third one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axis Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 Arnold will not do it while in office, he already said that, his term ends in 2007. If he runs again, then you know he wont do any other movies. As for another actor, please. No one but moronic wrastlin' fans want to see the Rock do it. Arnold started it, and if there is a 4th one, he will do it. I think the 3rd one was great, but do not want a 4th. But like always, they left the dor open for it. PS: I wish all bad things on Vin Diesel, he is a horrible actor. Anyone see Fast and the Furious or XXX or that stupid movie about him on the dark planet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrosive23 Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 Arnold will not do it while in office, he already said that, his term ends in 2007. If he runs again, then you know he wont do any other movies. As for another actor, please. No one but moronic wrastlin' fans want to see the Rock do it. Arnold started it, and if there is a 4th one, he will do it. I think the 3rd one was great, but do not want a 4th. But like always, they left the dor open for it.PS: I wish all bad things on Vin Diesel, he is a horrible actor. Anyone see Fast and the Furious or XXX or that stupid movie about him on the dark planet? watch boiler room if you think he is a horrible actor, or knock around guys, as an action guy he sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altezza Veteran Posted October 21, 2003 Veteran Share Posted October 21, 2003 I heard the rumour long ago that Mario Van Peebles in talk for next Terminator sequel but I'm not sure coz it's while back ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memNOC Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 actually, i was very pleasantly surprised with the 3rd one.. like everyone else, i had very low expectations of it, but in the end it really made one good action-packed movie (keyword: good).. in all honesty, i enjoyed it way more than Matrix Reloaded and it definitelly got me interested and thinking more, plus the actors are all top-notch.. great performances from all, especially from the John Connor kid.. he really brought to life my rendition of what an adult John Connor would be like.. to some extent even mis-cast Claire Danes was interesting to watch, but its not her fault the character is such a dumbass.. Arnold as good/bad as always, nothing surprising there.. as far as the Terminatrix goes, i really see no point to it, other than box office sales.. but it was definitelly a good movie, and, if done properly, im anxiously waiting for the 4th one.. my suggestion would be to ditch 'Terminator' as a whole.. just focus on the war between the machines, and an interesting scene would be to show the factory with thousands of Arnolds being built.. make it a classy (not corny) love story, and even bring Linda Hamilton back in some nostalgic role.. she would be fun to watch again.. scorched Earth, post-Judgment Day, fight between man and machine, and this time make it the final part of the story.. dont have anyone winning the war, simply present it like the end of the 3rd one.. "we will keep fighting, blah blah", have them both married, etc.. God, why arent i writer for these people?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neoxphuse Posted October 21, 2003 Share Posted October 21, 2003 I also thought the third was pleasently good. The fourth one is in talks right now, and I'm pretty sure they'll go through with it. I think if the Terminator was to play role, Arnold should be it, only him. Or they could use his double, that guy from Cupid. Anway, the story should focus when the Terminator comes back when John starts to rebel. It'll be great. Oh btw, Nick Stahl was the character who played John Conner in T3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts