What Killed the Linux Desktop (by GNOME founder Miguel de Icaza)


Recommended Posts

+Frank B.

What Killed the Linux Desktop

True story.

The hard disk that hosted my /home directory on my Linux machine failed so I had to replace it with a new one. Since this machine lives under my desk, I had to unplug all the cables, get it out, swap the hard drives and plug everything back again.

Pretty standard stuff. Plug AC, plug keyboard, plug mouse but when I got to the speakers cable, I just skipped it.

Why bother setting up the audio?

It will likely break again and will force me to go on a hunting expedition to find out more than I ever wanted to know about the new audio system and the drivers technology we are using.

A few days ago I spoke to Klint Finley from Wired who wrote the article titled OSX Killed Linux. The original line of questioning was about my opinion between Gnome 3's shell, vs Ubuntu's Unity vs Xfte as competing shells.

Personally, I am quite happy with Gnome Shell, I think the team that put it together did a great job, and I love how it enabled the Gnome designers -which historically only design, barely hack- to actually extend the shell, tune the UI and prototype things without having to beg a hacker to implement things for them. It certainly could use some fixes and tuning, but I am sure they will address those eventually.

What went wrong with Linux on the Desktop

In my opinion, the problem with Linux on the Desktop is rooted in the developer culture that was created around it.

Linus, despite being a low-level kernel guy, set the tone for our community years ago when he dismissed binary compatibility for device drivers. The kernel people might have some valid reasons for it, and might have forced the industry to play by their rules, but the Desktop people did not have the power that the kernel people did. But we did keep the attitude.

The attitude of our community was one of engineering excellence: we do not want deprecated code in our source trees, we do not want to keep broken designs around, we want pure and beautiful designs and we want to eliminate all traces of bad or poorly implemented ideas from our source code trees.

And we did.

We deprecated APIs, because there was a better way. We removed functionality because "that approach is broken", for degrees of broken from "it is a security hole" all the way to "it does not conform to the new style we are using".

We replaced core subsystems in the operating system, with poor transitions paths. We introduced compatibility layers that were not really compatible, nor were they maintained. When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong".

Source and full post: Miguel de Icaza's blog

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
ahhell

"When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong"."

That is the biggest problem with Linux.

  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites
ichi

How can you blog about the demise of the Linux desktop while praising Gnome3?

"When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong"."

Apple should sue, they likely have a patent on that.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Knife Party

Throughout the article he mentions things which make no sense what so ever, he generalises all over the place and this article feels like a hidden agenda. And Bingo, when I read the line "That day I stopped feeling guilty about my new found love for OSX." pretty much sums it all up. This is not a serious article, even the one liner of "When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong"" certainly isn't a linux community principle, and I hardly see how Gnome is solely tied to the 'linux desktop'. And lastly, he starts the article with "True Story", like there is already an array of BS being paraded as facts, hoping you won't notice and take his 'expert' advice because he's been part of one shell developing team.....yawn, get real please!

Link to post
Share on other sites
fenderMarky

When Vista was released, i installed Ubuntu on my desktop and notebook and i became an "ubuntu enthusiast user". But i had to quit and the reason was this:

When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong".

Then i tried Windows 7 beta and the story changed for me.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
simplezz

Miguel de Icaza is Microsoft's go to boy and has lost all credibility in the FOSS world. He spends his time trying to convince GNU/Linux and FOSS users of the benefits of his dotNET implementation, of which there are none - it's not fully compatible with Microsoft's, nor does it contain the things most C# developers use, namely Windows Forms. Ballmer called GNU/Linux a cancer, and I retort that dotNET, with its precarious licence and Microsoft controlled standard is a cancer which has thus far been thwarted by FOSS. Miguel can continue to push it as long as he likes, but no one's biting. We have many FOSS languages and development platforms, we don't want a proprietary Microsoft controlled one thanks.

Regarding the question: "What killed the Linux desktop" - I say nothing because it's not dead, it's alive and kicking and doing extremely well. The level of desktop environment choice available to GNU/Linux users is unheard of in OS X and Windows circles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
~Johnny
This is not a serious article, even the one liner of "When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong"" certainly isn't a linux community principle, and I hardly see how Gnome is solely tied to the 'linux desktop'

Yes, you are quite right. They are more likely to instead suggest that you download the source and fix whatever problems you have yourself by writing your own code if you don't like how overly complicated or broken something is. For that is the beauty of Linux! :p

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest LiquidCrystalMeth

How can you blog about the demise of the Linux desktop while praising Gnome3?

Apple should sue, they likely have a patent on that.

Correct, praising Gnome3 in the same context as bemoaning whats wrong with other facets of Linux is asinine. Gnome3 is awful.

Dont even get me started on Unity, or as i prefer to think of it, Metro for Linux. Its completely wrong, and the reason i avoid Ubuntu completely now.

I also dont think he has a well enough rounded grasp on the driver issue, as one who used to have to hack his own code for devices under SCO Unix in the dark ages, i think he undervalues the effort that has gone into device support. And without myriad developers (who according to him are doing everything wrong in Linux) where does he think we'd be exactly.

Waste of Neowin forum space......

p.s. careful using the word patent, rumour has it that Apple owns the concept of patent, completely avoiding prior art. I say this carefully, as i am looking at Neowin's CSS and noticing the rounded corners :)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
togermano

I think Haiku will have a chance to beat windows in the desktop market..... Everything that is wrong with linux haiku does perfectly....

ANother thing with linux is that a developer cant just list one binary file for someone to download they gotta do it for every disto.....

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest LiquidCrystalMeth

Yes, you are quite right. They are more likely to instead suggest that you download the source and fix whatever problems you have yourself by writing your own code if you don't like how overly complicated or broken something is. For that is the beauty of Linux! :p

Well said.

Perhaps, though, the author thinks a closed source, dictatorial approach is better.

Maybe i should shout him a copy of WIn8 :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
~Johnny

Well said.

Perhaps, though, the author thinks a closed source, dictatorial approach is better.

Maybe i should shout him a copy of WIn8 :)

I didn't actually mean that as a good thing. :p Rather, as an entirely ridiculous thing to ask an end user to do! Download the entire source code, and compilers, spend hours trying to find out where the actual problem is, spend hours actually building it, hoping it works? That's not the way to win anything meaningful - certainly not the appreciation of customers and end users.

Link to post
Share on other sites
simplezz

I think Haiku will have a chance to beat windows in the desktop market..... Everything that is wrong with linux haiku does perfectly....

Haiku is okay, but it's way behind GNU/Linux in terms of support.

ANother thing with linux is that a developer cant just list one binary file for someone to download they gotta do it for every disto.....

That's why we have 'make dist' (distribute source tarballs). ./configure && make && make install isn't so hard is it? Some people even provide scripts to do that :huh: . We don't distribute binaries because we use package managers in Linux. It's easy enough to make a deb, rpm, and source tarball.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest LiquidCrystalMeth

I didn't actually mean that as a good thing. :p Rather, as an entirely ridiculous thing to ask an end user to do! Download the entire source code, and compilers, spend hours trying to find out where the actual problem is, spend hours actually building it, hoping it works? That's not the way to win anything meaningful - certainly not the appreciation of customers and end users.

Why isnt it a good thing, how do you think developers get involved and in turn Linux progresses.

I remember trying to get a TV card working on Suse not too many years ago, i had to, to get it to work, shock horror, download the source for the driver and look for and actually adjust the code. What terrible harm did it do to me, i lost maybe an hour or two of time, but gained a bit more knowledge.

The problem with all these new smart devices and tablet OS's is that the populace is becoming the spoonfed generation and intellectually lazy.....

One of the first things any new Linux user should do, in my twisted world, is to compile their own kernel. What i think is wrong is the Ubuntu ecosystem where people treat it as a windows replacement, its easy to install and theres no incentive to ever peek beneath the hood. And Unity, in my opinion, is a further death knell for encouraging any peeking as it effectively dumbs down the interface to make it a faux tablet device.

And as for the "certainly not the appreciation of customers and end users" ....are we all just going to be end users, and stop encouraging involvement and increasing not only the community, and the skills it has

And thats it for me, its gone a bit off topic, but still better than the original topic :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
togermano

Haiku is okay, but it's way behind GNU/Linux in terms of support.

That's why we have 'make dist' (distribute source tarballs). ./configure && make && make install isn't so hard is it? Some people even provide scripts to do that :huh: . We don't distribute binaries because we use package managers in Linux. It's easy enough to make a deb, rpm, and source tarball.

Haiku is getting there though.. I didnt say it has a chance now.... It would also make a great phone platform

What if developer doesnt wanna give out source? Dont give me that stupid looking smiley i am much smarter then you are.

PS I bet your brain runs on the dos kernel x

Link to post
Share on other sites
Knife Party

Yes, you are quite right. They are more likely to instead suggest that you download the source and fix whatever problems you have yourself by writing your own code if you don't like how overly complicated or broken something is. For that is the beauty of Linux! :p

overly complicated? Nope. Logically laid out? Yes. All the time? No. But hey linux also requires the user the get an idea of what they are using, how it works and fits together to some extent. Alot of mainstream shells now, pretty much alot of them have good support, and hang around the right blogs areas will help you out with fixes and community instructions how to tweak things. You are just over portraying a common stereotype by computer users who are lazy and unable to get their way with linux, they expect other developers/programmers to fix all the problems, without even moving a muscle to really help out...afterall it is a community effort, no one works full time and sits on massive development budgets...

Link to post
Share on other sites
thomastmc

Why bother setting up the audio?

It will likely break again and will force me to go on a hunting expedition to find out more than I ever wanted to know about the new audio system and the drivers technology we are using.

We replaced core subsystems in the operating system, with poor transitions paths. We introduced compatibility layers that were not really compatible, nor were they maintained. When faced with "this does not work", the community response was usually "you are doing it wrong".

Amen...

I and almost every geek I know has tried Linux as a desktop, but only the masochists stuck with it.

http://www.netmarket...&qpcustom=Linux

Link to post
Share on other sites
ichi

ANother thing with linux is that a developer cant just list one binary file for someone to download

They can, and sometimes do. You are confusing binaries with packages.

While packages are more convenient for users since they integrate with the package manager, devs can just release a single .bin file for all distros.

Eg. Id and Epic have been doing that for every game they have released on Linux, and NVidia does that as well with their driver installer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
simplezz

I didn't actually mean that as a good thing. :p Rather, as an entirely ridiculous thing to ask an end user to do! Download the entire source code, and compilers, spend hours trying to find out where the actual problem is, spend hours actually building it, hoping it works? That's not the way to win anything meaningful - certainly not the appreciation of customers and end users.

People do spend hours writing and fixing code. If that didn't happen we wouldn't have software or operating systems. It's also optional, no one's forcing anyone to fix code. If there's a bug, the best way to get it fixed is by reporting it. Bitching and moaning achieves nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Knife Party

Amen...

I and almost every geek I know has tried Linux as a desktop, but only the masochists stuck with it.

http://www.netmarket...&qpcustom=Linux

? Clearly you do not have a conceptual understanding for the richness of functionality and potential Linux holds. Using linux isn't painful, if you know what works and what doesn't, you should just get on fine. If you using linux to run a bunch of stuff in wine and then want to complain "ahh linux sucks, its all backwards" then fine. Just don't come here bashing something which you associate success with market share. Linux isn't a business model, its community isn't centred on pleasing customers, rather its loyal users and contributors. Had a bad experience? Suck it up, find out what went wrong and try to find a community fix or article on it. get on with life. Don't moan and cry about it calling linux users "only the masochists stuck with it."

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
togermano

They can, and sometimes do. You are confusing binaries with packages.

While packages are more convenient for users since they integrate with the package manager, devs can just release a single .bin file for all distros.

Eg. Id and Epic have been doing that for every game they have released on Linux, and NVidia does that as well with their driver installer.

I've seen .sh installers but they dont always work very well for an example the .sh installer for crossover office failed on arch linux

Link to post
Share on other sites
simplezz

I've seen .sh installers but they dont always work very well for an example the .sh installer for crossover office failed on arch linux

Why would you download an installer when there's one in the AUR?

yaourt -Ss crossover
aur/crossover 11.2.0-1 (159)
	Run Windows Programs on Linux

Link to post
Share on other sites
I am Not PCyr

abandoned my linux desktop after doing a KDE upgrade in 2008'ish

it was such a long drawn out pain i was exhausted and had enough of the whole

messing around in terminals for hours on end routine. (My Distro Kubuntu)

it was gettin popular then so i tried it etc and liked it.

Windows draws me me back for faaar too many reasons one of them

is if your gonna crack or code FOR windows then you should be using windows to do it lol

Never liked Gnome.. have always avoided it

My goto Linux is usualy Backtrack (Slax ?)

usualy i install it to a spare HDD too

i can't even remember what that has for the GUI lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
ichi

I've seen .sh installers but they dont always work very well for an example the .sh installer for crossover office failed on arch linux

I don't know how that crossover installer works, it should just extract the files to some location anyway (usually /opt). If it was a widespread problem maybe it was a bug in that sh, else maybe it was a corrupted download.

You can also use InstallShield on Linux instead of rolling your own custom installer, it works exactly the same as it does on Windows.

Link to post
Share on other sites
togermano

Why would you download an installer when there's one in the AUR?

yaourt -Ss crossover
aur/crossover 11.2.0-1 (159)
	Run Windows Programs on Linux

Thanks love for pointing that out ill try again later I thought I tried looking at the package manager :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
simplezz

abandoned my linux desktop after doing a KDE upgrade in 2008'ish

To be fair, desktop Linux has come a long way since then in terms of usability. Mint and Ubuntu for instance are just as easy to use as Windows and in some cases easier.

Windows draws me me back for faaar too many reasons one of them

is if your gonna crack or code FOR windows then you should be using windows to do it lol

I write/port Windows applications on GNU/Linux using cross compliation or cygwin if I want to run without modification. Wine is great for debugging Windows applications written in Linux ;)

Never liked Gnome.. have always avoided it

I like MATE/Gnome 2 better than 3 if i'm honest. I'm currently running XFCE 4 and it's very nice.

My goto Linux is usualy Backtrack (Slax ?)

usualy i install it to a spare HDD too

i can't even remember what that has for the GUI lol

If you want to avoid the cli, you'd be better off with Ubuntu, Mint, or other easy to use distros.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Namerah S
      Metro Exodus announced for the PS5 and Xbox series X|S
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      Amidst celebrations of the tenth anniversary of its first-person shooter franchise, 4A Games has announced that Metro Exodus will be landing on the next-generation of consoles. In addition to the newly revealed console variants, the video game developer also stated that Linux and macOS versions of the game are also in the works.

      While no exact details were provided, the game's makers did confirm free next-gen upgrades as have become the industry norm. Faster frame rates, better resolution, quicker loading times, and other enhanced features such as ray tracing were also detailed for the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S variants of Metro Exodus.

      4A Games further revealed that the next game in the Metro series is already under development. The Ukrainian-Maltese video game developer commented:

      While the game dev did confirm its commitment to creating a 'story driven single player experience' for the next instalment in the franchise, it also mentioned the existence of a multiplayer mode. As the upcoming Metro title is still in the early phase of production, no concrete decisions about the two game modes have been made yet.

      For now, we'll have to sit tight and wait for further details to be shared by the creators of Metro Exodus on all fronts. No release date for the next-gen version of the third Metro game or its Linux and macOS variants has been disclosed yet.

    • By zikalify
      Fedora 31 will reach its end of life next Tuesday
      by Paul Hill



      The Fedora Project has announced that Fedora 31 will reach its end of life on 24 November 2020. The announcement comes just weeks after the launch of Fedora 33 which included GNOME 3.38 and BTRFS as the default file system.

      After next Tuesday, Fedora 31 will stop receiving vital security updates leaving your system open to exploitation as new vulnerabilities are discovered. To make sure that your system stays protected, you should upgrade to a later version; to do this, simply open Software and go to the Updates tab, there you should see a bigger banner offering you a Fedora upgrade.

      Once you begin the upgrade with this method, the required files will be downloaded and then your system will ask to reboot to install the files in a similar fashion to how normal updates work. When the upgrade is complete, the system will automatically reboot into the new release.

      In the Fedora documentation, it says:

      If you do not want to upgrade your system, you also have the option of downloading a fresh copy of Fedora 33 which was released last month. Whether you upgrade your system or do a clean install, ensure that you’ve backed up all of your important files.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      The new Intel Open FPGA Stack is geared towards easing development of custom platforms
      by Ather Fawaz



      Today at the Intel FPGA Technology Day, Intel showed off its newest offering in the eASIC lineup, the eASIC N5X. Alongside it, the tech giant also debuted its Open FPGA Stack (Intel OFS), a scalable, source-accessible hardware and software infrastructure meant to power customized, high-performance workloads.

      Distributed via git repositories, the Intel OFS will be geared towards easing the process of development and deployment on FPGAs by enabling greater code reusability and modularity. Vendors will be able to provide native support to third parties and proprietary Intel-OFS platforms, this would lead to greater portability across Intel FPGA platforms and enable native support across major OS vendor distributions. All of this would lead to a smaller barrier to entry, enabling increased adoption of FPGAs in the industry.

      "With the proven success from our early-access customers, we are excited to launch the Intel Open FPGA Stack, with its demonstrated ability to dramatically both reduce the development time and also increase code and hardware design reuse for customers and partners looking to accelerate their workloads,” said Dave Moore, Intel corporate vice president and general manager of the Programmable Solutions Group.

      If you are interested in trying out Intel OFS, it is currently in early access. For details on that, as a starting point, you should contact an Intel sales representative. The firm aims to provide assistance regarding the same over the next year. For more details, you may refer to this blog post.

    • By PNWDweller
      About 3 months ago I switched my  Operating system to Arch after being a distro hopper playing around with the Ubuntu Variants and never feeling quite satisfied.  Where I work, we use Ubuntu based systems and I have grown quite comfortable in the command line experience and I felt like it was time to switch to a different OS.  Until then, I had used and have experience in Centos, Ubuntu, Solus linux and Fedora Linux.  What drove me to switch and make the choice to switch over, I  was getting tired of reading about kernel updates being pushed out fixing security bugs and also adding different functions.  While I can honestly say that my day to day activities don't require the latest and greatest kernel and software, it made sense to me especially when I would read about new software being released and then days or weeks before Canonical would certify it and release it to the general community.  I understand why they do this and I chose to move on. 
       
      Arch itself tends to hold the notion that you have to compile all the software you want to use and it's a harder system to use.  I can honestly say that this is partially true, but what people fail to tell you is that the compiling is done automatically by the package manager (Pacman in this case).  If you are comfortable with the command line, and even if not, you can certainly install Arch or use an installer to do it for you.  I used Anarchy installer which basically formats your drive for you, and you select whatever software you want and then it installs it.  It does the heavy lifting.  When finished, you are booted into your Shiny new Arch system with the Desktop Environment you chose.  In my case, it is always KDE.
       
      When I moved to Arch, I quickly found that not only do I have access to the latest and greatest builds, but also a lot of the alpha/beta versions of software.  For instance, I am running the "Bleeding Edge" version of Thunderbird mail which is in the alpha channels for testing.  You can't always do this with other systems.  i also have been able to experiment with different kernel versions.  Usually when I get updates, I have the most recent stable kernel release. 
       
      For things I have done with Arch - aside from my Desktop, I have a PXE boot server installed on my NAS which is also using Arch and other server software on it.  My PXE server allows me to boot into clonezilla or fresh install Arch if I need to (really don't need to), without having any external installation media handy (Thumb drives usually).
       
      Anyway, I have found my final Operating System and couldn't be any happier!
    • By zikalify
      Debian Project selects “Homeworld” theme for Debian 11
      by Paul Hill



      Debian 11 “Bullseye” is due sometime in 2021 and in preparation it has selected a theme called Homeworld that will be prevalent throughout the operating system. The Homeworld theme was created by Juliette Taka and is inspired by the German Bauhaus art movement which has its beginnings in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

      Users will come into contact with the Homeworld theme in several places when they use Debian 11. One of the first times will be in the Debian installer where the banner carries the Homeworld artwork. Debian 11 also includes a Homeworld background and a Homeworld-theme login screen.

      Following a call for proposing themes, a total of eighteen choices were submitted. A desktop artwork poll was opened up to the public and it received 5,613 responses which ranked the different choices. The Homeworld theme came out on top and will be used in Debian 11.

      If you’ve ever run Debian 8 or Debian 9 on your system, you’ll have come across Juliette Taka’s artwork already, she was the author behind the Lines and softWaves themes which were used in those two releases.