9/11: Explosive Evidence - Psychologists Speak Out


Recommended Posts

Such as ?

well, such as why do they have no problem showing the planes hitting the trade center, but not showing the plane hitting the pentagon?

there's no reason not to show the video, they have enough of them to show, why not release it?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, such as why do they have no problem showing the planes hitting the trade center, but not showing the plane hitting the pentagon?

there's no reason not to show the video, they have enough of them to show, why not release it?

Because they have released two videos showing just that ? Second lets follow this through the reason for asking is the claim that a plane did not in fact hit the pentagon instead a missile did.

Now why the hell would the conspirators have no problem sending 4 planes into the towers but risk blowing their entire conspiracy by saving some money on a fifth jet and sending a missile instead ? Why not just send another plane ?

Thats without mentioning the people that were there at the time... A missile looks a lot different than a plane :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's your god damn explosive evidence

Oh please there is no way two fuel laden jet liners slamming into a steel structure could cause it to collapse after all jet fuel dosnt burn hot enough to melt steel... Yeah thats the way it works the steel is fine up until 2599.99999999999c and as soon as it hits 2600 it turns into liquid... Definitely no effect on its load bearing capacity before that though :rofl:

[/sarcasm]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh please there is no way two fuel laden jet liners slamming into a steel structure could cause it to collapse after all jet fuel dosnt burn hot enough to melt steel... Yeah thats the way it works the steel is fine up until 2599.99999999999c and as soon as it hits 2600 it turns into liquid... Definitely no effect on its load bearing capacity before that though :rofl:

[/sarcasm]

I used to be a truther.. until I realized how dumb that was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they have released two videos showing just that ? Second lets follow this through the reason for asking is the claim that a plane did not in fact hit the pentagon instead a missile did.

Now why the hell would the conspirators have no problem sending 4 planes into the towers but risk blowing their entire conspiracy by saving some money on a fifth jet and sending a missile instead ? Why not just send another plane ?

Thats without mentioning the people that were there at the time... A missile looks a lot different than a plane :rofl:

two videos? links please... someone just posted one, where it shows something hitting the building that doesn't look near the size of a passenger jet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

two videos? links please... someone just posted one, where it shows something hitting the building that doesn't look near the size of a passenger jet...

google Doubletree Hotel footage and as for your claim "that doesn't look near the size of a passenger jet..." this is exactly what i said would happen less than 8 posts ago

Cant prove a negative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.