• 0

Simple javascript pop-up


Question

Any idea how to make an javascript popup? I already added the code from below but whenever I click the links it opens the same page (demo.html):

<script type="text/javascript">

function popup(){

cuteLittleWindow = window.open("demo.html", "littleWindow", "location=no,width=614,height=222");

}</script>

<center>

<font face="Verdana"><font size="-1"><b><a href="http://www.mywebsite.com/"><font color="#000000">Home Page</font></a> | <a href="javascript:popup()">Demo</a> | <a href="javascript:popup()">Contact</a></b></font></font>

</center>

..and it looks like this:

DG6VE.png

What I'm doing wrong? Cause I know it's pretty simple but I'm not good a html. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1120482-simple-javascript-pop-up/
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Well, it works for me in Chrome, Firefox and IE 10. Normally I would say when you use the "javascript:xxx()" form in an href, to terminate it with a semi-colon ("javascript:xxxxx();")... but rules aren't very strict anymore and that seems to work in recent browsers. Is the window opening behind your browser? Do you have popups disabled or some other security setting enabled?

  • 0

Yes, there are no errors and there's not any other Javascript code apart from that. It's a pretty simple page, nothing complex.

The window opens as it should in the front. Maybe I didn't explained well the problem. The script is working but what doesn't work is this:

1. I have 3 menus: HOME | DEMO | CONTACT (so 3 pages) INDEX.html - DEMO.html and CONTACT.html

2. The javascript resides on the INDEX.html

3. If I click on DEMO it opens the DEMO.html as it should in the front of my browser.

4. But if I click on CONTACT it opens the same DEMO.html and not CONTACT.html

  • 0

I'm not really sure what you're asking, but if you want your links to open a new window, the "name" parameter needs to be: name="_blank". The value "littleWindow" will always point to the same window with every click. "_blank" will spawn a new window/tab with every click.

  • 0

Yes, there are no errors and there's not any other Javascript code apart from that. It's a pretty simple page, nothing complex.

The window opens as it should in the front. Maybe I didn't explained well the problem. The script is working but what doesn't work is this:

1. I have 3 menus: HOME | DEMO | CONTACT (so 3 pages) INDEX.html - DEMO.html and CONTACT.html

2. The javascript resides on the INDEX.html

3. If I click on DEMO it opens the DEMO.html as it should in the front of my browser.

4. But if I click on CONTACT it opens the same DEMO.html and not CONTACT.html

Ohhhhhhh! :) Yes, I very much misunderstood your question/problem. Use target="_blank", pass the page name as a parameter or use a separate javascript function, and also NAME the window dynamically in the open function.

  • 0

This was my little version to test yours...

<script type="text/javascript">

var aPage = new Array();

var aHandle = new Array();

aPage[0] = "somepage.html";

aPage[1] = "someotherpage.html";

aHandle[0] = null;

aHandle[1] = null;

function popupbyidx(idx) {

var prefix = "winname_";

aHandle[idx] = window.open(aPage[idx], prefix + idx, "location=no,width=614,height=222");

}

function closebyidx(idx) {

aHandle[idx].close();

}

function popup(page){

cuteLittleWindow = window.open("demo.html", "littleWindow", "location=no,width=614,height=222");

}</script>

<center>

<font face="Verdana"><font size="-1"><b><a href="http://www.mywebsite.com/"><font color="#000000">Home Page</font></a> | <a href="javascript:popupbyidx(0);">Demo</a> | <a href="javascript:popupbyidx(1);">Contact</a></b></font></font>

</center>

<center>

<font face="Verdana"><font size="-1"><b><a href="http://www.mywebsite.com/"><font color="#000000">Home Page</font></a> | <a href="javascript:closebyidx(0)">Close Demo</a> | <a href="javascript:closebyidx(0)">Close Contact</a></b></font></font>

</center>

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
    • Write to your MP 😄 Like believing in Santa. Total surveillance IS the goal. Wake up.
    • This whole dumb age verification thing needs to die and be replaced by giving parents tools to control devices. Why am I required to plaster my ID all over the internet to prove I'm old enough when parents should be the ones dictating what their kids are doing on their phones. Apple released great set of tools for iPhones coming to iOS 27 that do just that. Why are governments not mandating that kind of control to phone makers to built them into phones. This whole thing is so absolutely idiotic it's wild.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      220
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!