Linux and Windows 8 Fast Startup


Recommended Posts

I thought this would be worth linking here, since it might be relevant to some Neowinians:

The new Fast Startup feature of Windows 8 puts the filesystem's integrity at risk if other operating systems are used to write to Windows partitions. Data loss is particularly likely with dual-boot configurations that involve Linux and Windows 8.

Full Article.

TL;DR If you're using the Windows 8 Fast Startup option and dual boot with another OS, consider the Windows 8 partition(s) to be read-only and/or disable fast startup. Writing to a Win8 partition from Linux can cause the files to go missing on Win8 and/or be corrupted due to the way that fast startup works. The NTFS-3G driver has not yet been updated to detect fast-boot, so will mount as read/write on many distros (including Debian and Ubuntu). Apparently a fix is in Debian testing, but this means that Stable users won't see it for a while yet.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1130568-linux-and-windows-8-fast-startup/
Share on other sites

I disabled fast boot when I was running 8 anyway, with an OS as young as 8 there is always going to be bugs that need a reboot to fix, fast boot means you have to reboot on top of normally powering on in the morning, where normally a shutdown and power on would have done the same job without fast boot

Of course, if you've disabled Hibernation, this need not apply. Still, a good article for the people that use this option.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't fast startup and hibernation different things? I mean they accomplish similar goals, but they're not the same thing. Disabling hibernation != disabling fast startup. NTFS-3G already detects hibernation and only mounts an NTFS partition as read-only if Windows is hibernating, but the issue is that it doesn't do the same thing for fast startup (yet), which means that there's a risk.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't fast startup and hibernation different things? I mean they accomplish similar goals, but they're not the same thing. Disabling hibernation != disabling fast startup. NTFS-3G already detects hibernation and only mounts an NTFS partition as read-only if Windows is hibernating, but the issue is that it doesn't do the same thing for fast startup (yet), which means that there's a risk.

The Fast Startup option uses Hibernation, or its own form of it. Disabling hibernation completely disables the fast startup option in Windows 8. I think the Fast Startup option is using the same hiberfile.sys that hibernation is using. Running the command "powercfg -h off" in the command prompt removes this option and deletes the hiberfile.sys. Fast Startup no longer becomes an option. You can achieve the same results this way of disabling Fast Startup (and saving space now that you no longer have a hiberfile.sys).

"The Fast Startup feature creates an issue because it doesn't shut Windows 8 down completely but switches it to a special hibernation state instead ? although it looks like it has been freshly booted when switched back on because all applications have been closed."

Also, found on Eightforums.com "Because if you disable Hibernate, Fast Startup also disabling automatically" http://www.eightforums.com/tutorials/6320-fast-startup-turn-off-windows-8-a.html (Option 3)

The Fast Startup option uses Hibernation, or its own form of it. Disabling hibernation completely disables the fast startup option in Windows 8. I think the Fast Startup option is using the same hiberfile.sys that hibernation is using. Running the command "powercfg -h off" in the command prompt removes this option and deletes the hiberfile.sys. Fast Startup no longer becomes an option. You can achieve the same results this way of disabling Fast Startup (and saving space now that you no longer have a hiberfile.sys).

"The Fast Startup feature creates an issue because it doesn't shut Windows 8 down completely but switches it to a special hibernation state instead ? although it looks like it has been freshly booted when switched back on because all applications have been closed."

Also, found on Eightforums.com "Because if you disable Hibernate, Fast Startup also disabling automatically" http://www.eightforu...indows-8-a.html (Option 3)

Ah okay, interesting. Thanks for the info :)

Is anyone able to verify this? If so, will pass the word along on the front page.

h-online.com is the English site of heise.de. Their magazines have a good reputation for actually researching what they're writing about.

That said independent confirmation could be good. Surely someone here has a Windows 8/Linux dual-boot config.

Is anyone able to verify this? If so, will pass the word along on the front page.

I'm not sure if files don't get lost or corrupted reliably, but I was not able to reproduce this with Windows 8 and Debian 7 dual-booting in VirtualBox. (I don't run Windows natively, but I don't see how a native installation would make any difference.) My log of commands I ran in Windows and Debian to try to reproduce this problem, as well as their output, is below.


PS C:\Users\xorangekiller> mkdir Desktop\rar


Directory: C:\Users\xorangekiller\Desktop


Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
d---- 1/14/2013 2:51 PM rar


PS C:\Users\xorangekiller> echo rar > Desktop\rar.txt
xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ sudo mkdir /mnt/rar
xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ sudo parted -l
Model: ATA VBOX HARDDISK (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 8590MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 8186MB 8185MB primary ext4 boot
2 8187MB 8589MB 402MB extended
5 8187MB 8589MB 402MB logical linux-swap(v1)


Model: ATA VBOX HARDDISK (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 32.2GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 368MB 367MB primary ntfs boot
2 368MB 32.2GB 31.8GB primary ntfs


xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb2 /mnt/rar
xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ mkdir /mnt/rar/rar
xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ echo rar > /mnt/rar/rar.txt
xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ ls -l /mnt/rar/ /mnt/rar/Users/xorangekiller/Desktop/
/mnt/rar/:
total 2359737
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 398156 Jul 25 23:44 bootmgr
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Jun 2 2012 BOOTNXT
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Jan 4 00:53 Config.Msi
lrwxrwxrwx 2 root root 60 Jul 26 03:22 Documents and Settings -> /mnt/rar/Users
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2147483648 Jan 14 14:30 pagefile.sys
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 26 03:33 PerfLogs
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Oct 27 11:45 ProgramData
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Nov 2 17:46 Program Files
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Dec 12 21:11 Program Files (x86)
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jan 14 14:38 rar
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jan 14 14:38 rar.txt
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 6 21:44 $Recycle.Bin
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 268435456 Jan 14 14:30 swapfile.sys
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Oct 27 11:38 System Volume Information
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Oct 15 00:37 Users
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24576 Jan 4 00:52 Windows

/mnt/rar/Users/xorangekiller/Desktop/:
total 1
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 282 Dec 12 21:55 desktop.ini
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jan 14 14:39 rar
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jan 14 14:39 rar.txt

xorangekiller@pigeonhole:~$ sudo umount /mnt/rar
PS C:\Users\xorangekiller> ls Desktop


Directory: C:\Users\xorangekiller\Desktop


Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
d---- 1/14/2013 2:51 PM rar
-a--- 1/14/2013 2:56 PM 12 rar.txt


PS C:\Users\xorangekiller> ls C:\


Directory: C:\


Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
d---- 7/26/2012 3:33 AM PerfLogs
d-r-- 11/2/2012 5:46 PM Program Files
d-r-- 12/12/2012 9:11 PM Program Files (x86)
da--- 1/14/2013 3:01 PM rar
d-r-- 10/15/2012 12:37 AM Users
d---- 1/4/2013 12:52 AM Windows
-a--- 1/14/2013 3:01 PM 4 rar.txt


[/CODE]

VirtualBox is OK for trying out new OS's w/o risk, but it's not quite like the real deal. Remember those anti-Windows 8 You Tube videos? Many were using VBox for those propaganda videos, making Windows 8 CP & RP look poorly, to turn users against 8. Looking at some of the videos closely revealed this.

I have dual boot, & I also have 4 working computers, so actually I can have Windows 8 & Zorin OS on at the same time, in real life speed. Plus on my main two computers, I have SSD's (a 180GB Intel 330 & 128GB M4), so all of that fast boot gimmick stuff isn't needed. I have Windows 8 Pro on two computers, one a "fast boot", on a WD RE4 & the other on the Intel 330, it's pointless to state which is the fastest.

However, I've yet to try dual boot Windows 8 & Zorin OS, now I have a reason to, to see which boots fastest on the same hardware. That in itself doesn't make either better than the other, though. Thing is, all one has to do is place their OS in hibernation, which is what is happening with 8, & see which is the fastest. It may or may not be Windows 8 that's truly the fastest starter.

Cat

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Chrome is Google's commercial web browser product; it consists of their proprietary features (Googlified everything including profile sync) plus their chromium project barebones web browser. Google developers control the chromium project. The chromium project is the "core" for the web browser product from other vendors including Microsoft Edge (their own proprietary features), Opera (their own features), Brave (their own features), etc... The "downstream" teams at Microsoft, Opera, Brave, etc., can either integrate their original MV2-supporting code into future builds, or they can integrate chromium wholesale and simply add-on their own features/functionalities -- their 'current' build pipeline, so to speak. THIS is why changes at the chromium project affect so many products besides only Google's commercial Chrome browser. -- Edit to add: The chromium project is open-source, and is the piece that's Google's code contribution to the W3C and world wide web at large; there are no licensing fees for others to use the code in their own products... which is what they do. Other browser engines do exist (Firefox's for example) but it's nearly impossible to have both engines bundled into the same 1 browser product.
    • You're comparing settler colonies to colonized war torn nations. It's easy to become the richest by coming in and stealing other people's land, culture and resources.
    • ABP has become "old news" when MV3 started rolling out. They've gone downhill and is now simply irrelevant..... in my experience.
    • About two years ago, I switched to Brave and haven't looked back.
    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      531
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!