Recommended Posts

Hum

A team of researchers led by Melba Ketchum, a Texas veterinarian, claims to have not only conclusively proven the existence of Bigfoot through genetic testing, but also that the mysterious monster is a half-human hybrid, the result of mating with modern human females about 15,000 years ago.

Ketchum?s work ? which had been delayed for years because no peer-reviewed scientific journal would accept her study ? was finally published yesterday in something called the ?DeNovo Scientific Journal.?

There?s been much discussion about the dubious validity of the study; the fact that it was rejected by mainstream science journals and instead self-published in a ?science journal? and web site created specifically for that purpose raised many eyebrows.

Ketchum sees her research as an important first step in obtaining legal status for Bigfoot, which she believes are an undiscovered Native American population. Ketchum issued a statement demanding that the U.S. ?Government at all levels must recognize them as an indigenous people and immediately protect their human and Constitutional rights against those who would see in their physical and cultural differences a ?license? to hunt, trap, or kill them.?

Ketchum believes that ?The Sasquatch people are more like us than they are different. The Sasquatch people have their own language, traditions, and rituals. They live in family units, they order their lives according to the laws of their people, and they bury their dead. Yet the Sasquatch people are captivating because of their physical, genetic, and cultural differences. Sadly, these special traits also make them uniquely vulnerable to those who would see in their unusual lifestyle or appearance a justification to harass, trap, or even kill them. Your compassion and understanding will be vital to protect the Sasquatch people.?

Ketchum?s complaint ? echoed by many on the Bigfoot and paranormal fields ? that closed-minded scientists refuse to look at her evidence because they are afraid of its implications is absurd. If and when hard evidence is offered for Bigfoot, scientists will be scrambling to investigate and research this amazing scientific breakthrough.

more

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled
Ketchum?s work ? which had been delayed for years because no peer-reviewed scientific journal would accept her study ? was finally published yesterday in something called the ?DeNovo Scientific Journal.?

Gee, I wonder why?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Pupik

Gee, I wonder why?

Because of this: "Ketchum sees her research as an important first step in obtaining legal status for Bigfoot, which she believes are an undiscovered Native American population.".

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hum

Not very 'scientific' to not look at the evidence.

A lot of people will have egg on their faces should this unknown primate be captured. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou

Without peer-review scientific research is meaningless. And if I recall correctly in order to get this paper published they had to actually buy a scientific journal and rename it, so this one doesn't pass the sniff-test.

Not very 'scientific' to not look at the evidence.

Scientists are willing to look at the evidence but it has to meet certain criteria, which this research clearly didn't.

PS - This should be in the conspiracy section.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hum

^ Why ? No one is conspiring unless you say the science community is.

Cryptozoology is a legitimate study, and it would not be the first time an unknown creature was found to be quite real.

If DNA isn't worth examining, I don't know what is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

How do we know this DNA evidence is real?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hum

^ How about the experts look at it ?

The scientific thing to do is track this down and prove or disprove it one way or another.

Assuming that something can't possibly exist is the worst kind of 'science'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ambroos

I honestly find it hard to believe there could ever be an undiscovered animal of this size living in the US, even less in a population of "family units". How can things of probably near-human size just live in a place undiscovered, without ever travelling to inhabited areas.

Seriously, the people who believe in stuff like this should be classified with people who don't believe in evolution. I think we should call those people "ignorant fools" or something similar :p

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hum

^ Only fools ignore possible evidence. ;)

So-called bigfoots have been seen in inhabited areas.

They tend to live as far apart from humans as they can -- which seems very sensible.

And because something doesn't neatly fit into the theory of 'evolution' is no reason to not take a look at it.

Nearly 2,500 years ago an expedition from the Phoenician merchant city of Carthage to western coasts of Africa accidentally discovered a group of wild gorillas. Upon first encountering gorillas, African locals shared their name for the great ape with him ? the rough translation of which meant "hairy person".

Many ancient explorers and African tribes have described gorillas as primitive hairy people. They have also been referred to as anthropoid or "man-like" apes.

During the sixteenth century an English sailor by the name of Andrew Battel was captured by the Portuguese in West Africa. He spoke of two man-like apes (today easily recognized as chimpanzees & gorillas) that would visit the campfire when it was unattended.

During the 1600s very little was known about apes and scientific literature often confused the greater apes with pygmy tribesmen.

In 1860 an explorer named Du Chaillu described the gorilla as a bloodthirsty forest monster that is willing to attack any human beings. Author Alfred Brehm discounted Du Chaillu?s claim in the 1876 book, Thierleben (Animal Life).

The mountain gorilla was first discovered by a German officer, named Captain Robert von Beringe in 1902. Prior to this time, only lowland gorillas were known to exist. The mountain gorilla subspecies name is derived from Captain Robert von Beringe?s last name (Gorilla beringei beringei).

Link to post
Share on other sites
mudslag

Another reason this thread is full of Bigfoot Dung

Ketchum?s work ? which had been delayed for years because no peer-reviewed scientific journal would accept her study ? was finally published yesterday in something called the ?DeNovo Scientific Journal.?

Scientific journal?

Ketchum's study had been rejected by other scientific journals. So what about the journal that finally published the study, "DeNovo Scientific Journal"? The journal has no other studies, articles, papers or reviews. Ketchum's is the only paper the journal has "published." No libraries or universities subscribe to it, and the journal and its website apparently did not exist three weeks ago. There's no indication that the study was peer-reviewed by other knowledgeable scientists to assure quality. It is not an existing, known or respected journal in any sense of the word.

^ Only fools ignore possible evidence. ;)

So-called bigfoots have been seen in inhabited areas.

They tend to live as far apart from humans as they can -- which seems very sensible.

And because something doesn't neatly fit into the theory of 'evolution' is no reason to not take a look at it.

And yet NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE exists for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
cropcircles


http://www.ghosttheory.com/2013/02/15/bigfoot-dna-results-does-anyone-care
[/CODE]

[size=3][color=#505050][font=Arial][b]Problem 1[/b] ?We finally see the other authors, at least. Note that none are academics, but forensic specialists.[/font][/color]

[color=#505050][font=Arial][b]Problem 2[/b] "This is brand new journal. Was it launched JUST for this paper? Well, this is an interesting and HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS twist. We do not know what the standards are for review. There are no rules for starting up your own journal and calling it ?peer reviewed?. And, indeed, that's what was done (from Sasquatch Genome Project) (Note: Site now gives 403 error):[/font][/color]

[color=#505050][font=Arial]After this journal agreed to publish the manuscript, their legal counsel advised them not to publish a manuscript on such a controversial subject as it would destroy the editors? reputations (as it has already done to mine). I have documentation on all of this drama. So, rather than spend another five years just trying to find a journal to publish and hoping that decent, open minded reviewers would be chosen, we acquired the rights to this journal and renamed it so we would not lose the passing peer reviews that are expected by the public and the scientific community. [b][i]Denovo[/i][/b], the new journal is aimed at offering not only more choices and better service to scientists wanting to submit a manuscript, but also reviewers and editors that will be fair, unlike the treatment we have received.[/font][/color]

[color=#505050][font=Arial][b]Problem 3[/b] : The paper costs $30 to download. No academic institution is going to have access to a new journal site so they will have to pay to review it. Some Bigfoot bloggers have received embargoed copies. Bigfoot bloggers. With NO scientific qualifications. I have yet to see any genetic specialists comment on the paper but it?s very early and I expect some will. I have requested access to the paper. ? Doubtful News "[/font][/color][/size]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheatyface

This topic. It's about Science in the same way that Honey Boo Boo is about Learning.

Link to post
Share on other sites
compl3x

^ Only fools ignore possible evidence. ;)

So-called bigfoots have been seen in inhabited areas.

They tend to live as far apart from humans as they can -- which seems very sensible.

And because something doesn't neatly fit into the theory of 'evolution' is no reason to not take a look at it.

So much silly, it's hard to know where to start.

Considering how maybe cryptozoologists are out there and the very high quality of photo and video equipment, doesn't it strike you as slightly curious no one has quality footage?

How do we know they live "far apart from humans" what do you base that on?

If bigfoot existed it would still have had to evolve like every other creature on the planet. It wouldn't have just magically appeared completely separate from all other species.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mudslag

So much silly, it's hard to know where to start.

Considering how maybe cryptozoologists are out there and the very high quality of photo and video equipment, doesn't it strike you as slightly curious no one has quality footage?

How do we know they live "far apart from humans" what do you base that on?

If bigfoot existed it would still have had to evolve like every other creature on the planet. It wouldn't have just magically appeared completely separate from all other species.

Imagination is what it's based on.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      Elon Musk asks Twitter if it wants to see a gigafactory built in Texas
      by Paul Hill



      Elon Musk has issued a poll on Twitter asking followers if they want to see a new gigafactory built in Texas. While he didn’t expand much in the post, it has gained over 139,000 votes in the first four hours with almost a full day left to go. At the time of writing, “Hell yeah” responses are beating “Nope” responses 79.3% to 20.7%.

      Now that the Chinese-based Gigafactory 3 has been built and Gigafactory 4 construction is underway in Germany, Musk is trying to find the next location for a new gigafactory. The firm also has Gigafactory 1 and Gigafactory 2 based in Storey County, Nevada, U.S., and Buffalo, New York, U.S. respectively.

      At an earnings call last week, Elon Musk outlined the vital need to ramp up battery capacity to produce high-capacity models such as the Cybertruck. Commenting on the matter he said:

      Throughout Monday and Tuesday, Tesla had been enjoying a rise in share price with prices going from $650 to $960 before tapering off slightly towards the end of trading on Tuesday. It’s unclear what effect Musk’s tweet will have the price going into Wednesday but in pre-market trading, the price was down 1.7% on yesterday’s close price.

      Via: Reuters

    • By zikalify
      Apple announces new green campus in Austin, Texas
      by Paul Hill

      Apple has announced that it’s expanding operations in Austin, Texas, with the start of construction on a new campus. The new facility will cost $1 billion and cover 3-million-square-feet. The new campus will initially house 5,000 employees from 2022, with the capacity being upgraded to accommodate 15,000 employees later on. When the work is complete, the 15,000 employees will join the already existing 7,000 employees bringing the total to 22,000.

      Apple also mentioned the fact that the new Mac Pro, which is due in December, is currently being manufactured in Austin, just a short distance away from the planned campus. The Mac Pro facility currently employs over 500 people who work in a range of including electrical engineering and electronic assembly.

      Commenting on the Mac Pro assembly and the planned campus, Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, said:

      In a bid to improve its green credentials, Apple announced that the new campus would be home to native trees. The company is partnering with Austin-based Bartlett Tree Experts to help preserve and increase the native tree stocks. The firm said the trees that have been planned represent a “significant” increase over the number that was on the site before construction started.

      According to the latest plans, 60 percent of the campus will be a green space. Included in the 60 percent figure is a 50-acre nature and wildlife preserve which will be open to the public. Lastly, Apple mentioned that the Austin campus will run on 100% renewable energy, some of which will be sourced from on-site solar panels.

    • By Rich Woods
      Apple will once again manufacture its new Mac Pro in Texas
      by Rich Woods

      Announced at WWDC this year, Apple's new Mac Pro will begin production soon, and today, the Cupertino company confirmed that the new PC will be manufactured at the same Austin, Texas plant where the previous model was manufactured since 2013. The firm said that it's receiving a federal product exclusion, so it's likely that manufacturing these PCs in the U.S. is getting it a deal on taxes on products coming in from China.

      "The Mac Pro is Apple’s most powerful computer ever and we’re proud to be building it in Austin. We thank the administration for their support enabling this opportunity," said Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO. "We believe deeply in the power of American innovation. That’s why every Apple product is designed and engineered in the US, and made up of parts from 36 states, supporting 450,000 jobs with US suppliers, and we’re going to continue growing here."

      According to the announcement, the parts in the new Mac Pro are sourced from over a dozen American companies, which are from Arizona, Maine, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Vermont. Apple also said that there are two and a half times as many American-made parts in the new Mac Pro compared to the old one, in terms of value.

      Apple's plan is to invest $350 billion into the United States economy through 2023, and it says that it's on track to reach that goal. The firm says it supports 2.4 million jobs across the country, and that includes 90,000 of its own employees.

    • By Hamza Jawad
      Microsoft partners with Nextlink Internet in the latest Airband Initiative milestone
      by Hamza Jawad



      In 2017, Microsoft unveiled the Airband Initiative to bring broadband internet to two million people living in unserved rural areas in the U.S., a goal which was later increased to three million. This year, as part of the initiative, the tech giant has partnered up with the U.S. state of Vermont, the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, and more recently, with Watch Communications. Last month, Microsoft also termed the rural broadband gap an "urgent national crisis".

      Now, the Redmond firm is teaming up with Nextlink Internet to further advance this initiative. Both companies will be aiming to serve high-speed internet access to more than nine million people in the Central U.S., with around one million of them living in rural areas.

      Shelley McKinley, Vice President of Technology and Corporate Responsibility at Microsoft, commented on this partnership in the following way:



      States in the U.S. that will benefit from this collaboration include Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas. Over 29 million people in these places are noted to be living without access to internet at broadband speeds. A number of broadband connectivity technologies will be deployed to significantly decrease the aforementioned figure. While work regarding this is already underway in Texas and Oklahoma, deployment efforts in the other four states will also commence immediately, with rollouts planned through 2024.

      Nextlink's CEO, Bill Baker, detailed the advantages offered by this partnership, noting:

      These states also contribute around $120 billion in annual agricultural value for the U.S., or 29% of the agricultural output of the country. Microsoft believes broadband internet will provide farmers in these areas with better access to information regarding their crops, and thus, increase the economic output. In fact, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has estimated that connected tech in widespread use could increase the annual gross benefit in the U.S. by $47 billion.

      Microsoft and Nextlink will be ensuring that once increased connectivity is provided, people living in these states are also given the necessary digital skills training to benefit them further.

    • By Chris Schroeder
      Hurricane Harvey relief being expedited by drone use
      by Chris Schroeder

      A view of a hurricane from space At the time of writing, Hurricane Harvey has claimed 50 lives and caused more than $23 billion in property damage. The Category 3 super-storm wreaked havoc on the state of Texas, hitting parts of Louisiana hard as well. The cleanup and relief efforts in the wake of the storm are underway and, for at least parts of the collective endeavors, drones are playing a part in speeding up the process.

      As the flood waters slowly recede, numerous institutions are utilizing drones to help provide assistance to those affected by the storm. Insurance companies, like Farmers and Allstate, are using iPad-controlled drones provided by the tech company Kespry to survey homes that have been damaged or wiped away by Hurricane Harvey, allowing inspectors to assess up to three homes per hour instead of the typical three homes per day. The expediency these drones provide in assessing damages will help those that are insured to receive payouts faster to help rebuild their homes once the flood waters recede.

      High flood waters convert city streets into small lakes In addition to private insurance companies, emergency crews and public utility groups are assessing damages and identifying civilians in need of assistance using drone surveillance. With people still trapped in their homes, drones allow emergency crews to quickly identify and respond to lives that are in danger. Without them, emergency crews would be forced to use small boats to cross flooded streets - a much slower process.

      Kespry drone kits being used in areas affected by Hurricane Harvey The use of drones for relief efforts was approved by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) for both commercial and government entities. From what we know, 43 commercial operators were given the go-ahead to operate drones both in and around the Houston area to try and expedite the relief efforts following the storm. To prevent potential interference, personal drones are not allowed to be used at this time within 100 miles of Houston, TX.

      Air Force Maj. Gen. James Witham, Director of Domestic Operations for the U.S. National Guard said "the potential for drone impact is a big deal". With companies like DJI, which continue to push drone technology to the masses, it's likely that they'll become critical to carrying out relief efforts across the world following major disasters.

      Source: 3D Insider Images: NASA, International Business Times