Recommended Posts

Ah - I didn't realise you were using SQL Express :(

You could still do this with a combination of Windows scheduled tasks and Jobs within SQL Server but it'd be pretty cludgy.. :( What you'd want to do would be doing transaction log backups rather than full database backups which would mean the file you needed to copy over was smaller and would take less time to restore.. that's what (unsurprisingly) log shipping does :)

Sorry - I forgot to say.. In terms of what you use, it depends on how you want to use the 'backup' database - is it to be used as a standby system, or are you just going to be doing reporting off the database or subsets of the data?

OK - logshipping would do exactly what you want. The only thing you need to bear in mind is that, AFAIK, logshipping will only be backing up the contents of the database. Any other things you change (such as adding new users, etc) will not come across in the logshipping - so any such changes that you make to one server, you'll need to do to the other.

Have you tried on the client PC that is connecting to the VPN...

Open Network Connections, Right click the VPN Network Adapter -> Properties -> Networking -> Double click Internet Protocol Version 4 - > Click Advanced -> Untick Use default gateway on remote network.

Have you tried on the client PC that is connecting to the VPN...

Open Network Connections, Right click the VPN Network Adapter -> Properties -> Networking -> Double click Internet Protocol Version 4 - > Click Advanced -> Untick Use default gateway on remote network.

That was it :) found it after a quick help from google lol

.Problem im having now is

Cannot open backup device '\\server2\backups\test.bak'. Operating system error 5(error not found).

RESTORE FILELIST is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 3201)

Both backup folders have full write/read access to folders and i can manually copy those folders across.

Ed

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Chrome is Google's commercial web browser product; it consists of their proprietary features (Googlified everything including profile sync) plus their chromium project barebones web browser. Google developers control the chromium project. The chromium project is the "core" for the web browser product from other vendors including Microsoft Edge (their own proprietary features), Opera (their own features), Brave (their own features), etc... The "downstream" teams at Microsoft, Opera, Brave, etc., can either integrate their original MV2-supporting code into future builds, or they can integrate chromium wholesale and simply add-on their own features/functionalities -- their 'current' build pipeline, so to speak. THIS is why changes at the chromium project affect so many products besides only Google's commercial Chrome browser. -- Edit to add: The chromium project is open-source, and is the piece that's Google's code contribution to the W3C and world wide web at large; there are no licensing fees for others to use the code in their own products... which is what they do. Other browser engines do exist (Firefox's for example) but it's nearly impossible to have both engines bundled into the same 1 browser product.
    • You're comparing settler colonies to colonized war torn nations. It's easy to become the richest by coming in and stealing other people's land, culture and resources.
    • ABP has become "old news" when MV3 started rolling out. They've gone downhill and is now simply irrelevant..... in my experience.
    • About two years ago, I switched to Brave and haven't looked back.
    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      531
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!