• 0

Mysql error help


Question

G'day All,

First off, if this is in the wrong forum, could a mod move it to the correct one.

I was bored and thought I'd have a go at some php. I have no real idea what I'm doing but thought I'd start learning from a script I already had.

In this function, the line mysql_data_seek($sql,$row) throws up the following error.

Warning: mysql_data_seek(): Offset 2 is invalid for MySQL result index 8 (or the query data is unbuffered)


function traverse($root, $depth, $sql)
{
$row=0;
while ($acat = mysql_fetch_array($sql))
{
if ($acat['parentcat'] == $root)
{
echo "<option value='" . $acat['catID'] . "'>";
$j=0;
while ($j<$depth)
{
echo "  ";
$j++;
}
if($depth>0)
{
echo "-";
}
echo $acat['catname'] . "</option>";

mysql_data_seek($sql,0);
traverse($acat['catID'], $depth+1,$sql);
}
$row++;
mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);
}
}
[/CODE]

Any help on this would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1137886-mysql-error-help/
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've never used mysql_data_seek before (and neither should you because it's depreciated (as are all mysql_xxx functions) and will disappear in a future version of PHP, instead use mysqli or better yet PDO), but at a guess I'd say you're receiving this warning because you're trying to seek to a row that doesn't exist in the result.

You may not have seen that warning before if the code has been used in a production server because warnings are usually turned off so users don't see them.

You could use mysql_num_rows to get the number of rows in the result and only call mysql_data_seek if it's not outside the number of rows available.

function traverse($root, $depth, $sql)
{
  $num_rows = mysql_num_rows($sql);
  ...
  if ($row &lt; $num_rows)
	mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);

You could also call mysql_data_seek with at @ infront of it to suppress the error message.

$row++;
@mysql_data_seek($sql,$row);

  • 0

I've never used mysql_data_seek before (and neither should you because it's depreciated (as are all mysql_xxx functions) and will disappear in a future version of PHP, instead use mysqli or better yet PDO), but at a guess I'd say you're receiving this warning because you're trying to seek to a row that doesn't exist in the result.

You may not have seen that warning before if the code has been used in a production server because warnings are usually turned off so users don't see them.

You could use mysql_num_rows to get the number of rows in the result and only call mysql_data_seek if it's not outside the number of rows available.

You're right Virtorio, the script is from about 2006 I think. :D

As I said, I have no real idea of what I'm doing and after a few searches came to the conclusion that the error is generated for the reason you stated.

I did try and use mysql_num_rows, but couldn't work out how to put it in the correct place.

Where would be a good tutorial to rewrite the function in the correct manner?

Thank you for the quick reply as well. :)

  • 0

So, this is looping over a set of records that correspond to a hierarchical data structure stored using the Adjacency Model, printing them out in an indented fashion.

All records are gone through, looking for direct children of a given node, which for each one identified is printed and the function recalled to print its own direct children and so on. Each printing of a nodes children must loop through the entire result set from scratch looking for them, hence why the pointer is set back to 0 prior to calling the function to get its children. After getting its children printed, it needs to reset the pointer to the next record it is supposed to be moving on to. Here is where there's a flaw.

It's incrementing the variable that keeps track of where the pointer should be pointing to, so that it should be pointing to the next record, and then setting the pointer to it. However, upon having processed the last record in the set, the pointer is incremented to one greater than the index of the last item (itself) and therefore trying to set the pointer to it fails. A simple off by one bug.

All you should need to do is switch the order of the last two statements. Set the pointer to the current record, then increment $row. If mysql_fetch_array works how I think it works (I've never messed with setting the index pointer myself), the call to it will itself increment its pointer and fetch the next row, if there is one.

Furthermore, I'd set default values on the root and depth parameters if I were you, it'll make it simpler to use, by just calling traverse($sql);

function traverse($sql, $root = null, $depth = 0)
{
	$row = 0;
	while ($acat = mysql_fetch_array($sql))
	{
		if ($acat['parentcat'] == $root)
		{
			echo "&lt;option value='" . $acat['catID'] . "'&gt;";
			$j = 0;
			while ($j &lt; $depth) {
				echo "  ";
				$j++;
			}
			 if ($depth &gt; 0) {
				echo "-";
			}
			echo $acat['catname'] . "&lt;/option&gt;";

			mysql_data_seek($sql, 0);
			traverse($sql, $acat['catID'], $depth + 1);
		}
		mysql_data_seek($sql, $row);
		$row++;
	}
}

  • 0

Thank you to both Virtorio and +theblazingangel.

Tried what you suggested +theblazingangel, got rid of that error but threw up a different one. :)

Did what you suggested Virtorio and that worked a treat.

Thank you both very much.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Chrome is Google's commercial web browser product; it consists of their proprietary features (Googlified everything including profile sync) plus their chromium project barebones web browser. Google developers control the chromium project. The chromium project is the "core" for the web browser product from other vendors including Microsoft Edge (their own proprietary features), Opera (their own features), Brave (their own features), etc... The "downstream" teams at Microsoft, Opera, Brave, etc., can either integrate their original MV2-supporting code into future builds, or they can integrate chromium wholesale and simply add-on their own features/functionalities -- their 'current' build pipeline, so to speak. THIS is why changes at the chromium project affect so many products besides only Google's commercial Chrome browser. -- Edit to add: The chromium project is open-source, and is the piece that's Google's code contribution to the W3C and world wide web at large; there are no licensing fees for others to use the code in their own products... which is what they do. Other browser engines do exist (Firefox's for example) but it's nearly impossible to have both engines bundled into the same 1 browser product.
    • You're comparing settler colonies to colonized war torn nations. It's easy to become the richest by coming in and stealing other people's land, culture and resources.
    • ABP has become "old news" when MV3 started rolling out. They've gone downhill and is now simply irrelevant..... in my experience.
    • About two years ago, I switched to Brave and haven't looked back.
    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      531
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!