• 0

Question

Hey gang,

I have a media application (Bedia, free available here: http://www.blissgig.com/display.aspx?id=13 ) that I have added speech recognition. The problem is that on some lower end systems the SR causes the audio playback to become "off" from the video playback, usually by only a fraction of a second. I am using WMP as the audio/video playback.

The question is, I am thinking of having a threaded class that does the monitoring for the speech recognition, but before I go down that path I thought I'd ask for any thoughts? Is there anything I should be aware of or......

I know the question is a bit vague, I am attempting to avoid mentioning specifics so that any and all issues for this process are brought up.

Thank for your time.

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If I understand well, you're currently handing the audio data to a speech recognition API before handing it to WMP, which can cause the audio to become out of sync? It's pretty strange that this is happening, but I'm not familiar with WMP.

In any case, doing this on separate thread would work as long as you're actually handing out the data to the processes (WMP and SR) in parallel and not having one waiting on the other, otherwise you're not gaining anything by using multiple threads.

  • 0

Thanks Dr.

The speech commands affect Play, Pause, other playback controls as well as menu commands. I really don't know why the audio becomes unsynced so the idea of moving the SR to another thread is a shot in the dark. I have completed the code in a test bed and will move it into the app in the next few days. I will drop a note here to let everyone know how it goes.

The nice part of the SR being on another thread is that some of the processing (is a command valid, etc) is within that thread and SHOULD not affect any playback. I just return a string that informs the base app what I need to do, just as if the user had pressed a mouse button.

Have a great day.

James

  • 0

Thanks Dr.

The speech commands affect Play, Pause, other playback controls as well as menu commands. I really don't know why the audio becomes unsynced so the idea of moving the SR to another thread is a shot in the dark. I have completed the code in a test bed and will move it into the app in the next few days. I will drop a note here to let everyone know how it goes.

The nice part of the SR being on another thread is that some of the processing (is a command valid, etc) is within that thread and SHOULD not affect any playback. I just return a string that informs the base app what I need to do, just as if the user had pressed a mouse button.

Have a great day.

James

Did you do it delegate style? Or are you constantly checking a string for a value?

  • 0

Did you do it delegate style? Or are you constantly checking a string for a value?

Yes I am using a Delegate, thanks for asking. Only when acceptable conditions have been met is a string sent back to the calling thread. This is why I thought about going this route, all the work to insure that this is an acceptable command before affecting the app. I really do appreciate you asking to make sure.

Peace,

James

  • 0

Yes I am using a Delegate, thanks for asking. Only when acceptable conditions have been met is a string sent back to the calling thread. This is why I thought about going this route, all the work to insure that this is an acceptable command before affecting the app. I really do appreciate you asking to make sure.

Peace,

James

I know some people will thread things but then sit there waiting for the thread to finish/do something instead of carrying on and doing what needs to be done away from the thread and acknowledging when the thread has something for it. That's the reason I asked.

But yea, logically if the thread is just sitting in a loop like:

wait for command

process command

if command is good raise the event

repeat

and the main program is sitting in a

play movie/sit in idle state

**Event raised**

check event

do event

repeat

And there is no reliance on one or the other to preform individual tasks and you aren't sitting there in a:

while (x != y) or while(myThread.ThreadState == ThreadState.Running)

Then I don't see why it wouldn't work, and it should work better than a non-threaded system.

  • 0

Thanks again Firey,

Your diagram statement is exactly what is going to happen (I haven't added my new class to my app yet. I almost always create a test bed application to insure that it is working on it's own before adding it to the real application)

I still find it strange that the audio becomes unsynced.... but when I shut down the SR option, which disposes of the SR components, the issue goes away. I state this in case anyone else ever has the issue that they know that someone else has seen it.

Have a fun day.

  • 0

Thanks again Firey,

Your diagram statement is exactly what is going to happen (I haven't added my new class to my app yet. I almost always create a test bed application to insure that it is working on it's own before adding it to the real application)

I still find it strange that the audio becomes unsynced.... but when I shut down the SR option, which disposes of the SR components, the issue goes away. I state this in case anyone else ever has the issue that they know that someone else has seen it.

Have a fun day.

One thing to check, would be CPU usage. I know that in some cases High CPU usage can cause things to become un-synced. If the playback has full video decoding frames can be ready and display but the CPU can't keep up with keeping things (like the Audio) synced properly.

  • 0

One thing to check, would be CPU usage. I know that in some cases High CPU usage can cause things to become un-synced. If the playback has full video decoding frames can be ready and display but the CPU can't keep up with keeping things (like the Audio) synced properly.

Interesting thought. The app has run for two+ years on this lightwight machine but with the addition of SR it could be hitting high. I will check this out, thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Chrome is Google's commercial web browser product; it consists of their proprietary features (Googlified everything including profile sync) plus their chromium project barebones web browser. Google developers control the chromium project. The chromium project is the "core" for the web browser product from other vendors including Microsoft Edge (their own proprietary features), Opera (their own features), Brave (their own features), etc... The "downstream" teams at Microsoft, Opera, Brave, etc., can either integrate their original MV2-supporting code into future builds, or they can integrate chromium wholesale and simply add-on their own features/functionalities -- their 'current' build pipeline, so to speak. THIS is why changes at the chromium project affect so many products besides only Google's commercial Chrome browser. -- Edit to add: The chromium project is open-source, and is the piece that's Google's code contribution to the W3C and world wide web at large; there are no licensing fees for others to use the code in their own products... which is what they do. Other browser engines do exist (Firefox's for example) but it's nearly impossible to have both engines bundled into the same 1 browser product.
    • You're comparing settler colonies to colonized war torn nations. It's easy to become the richest by coming in and stealing other people's land, culture and resources.
    • ABP has become "old news" when MV3 started rolling out. They've gone downhill and is now simply irrelevant..... in my experience.
    • About two years ago, I switched to Brave and haven't looked back.
    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      531
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!