• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

Community rules, warns and consequences updated

Recommended Posts

Steven P.    13,037
Quote

Consequences:

All actions have consequences and Neowin is no different, Neowin Moderators follow a standard policy when warning members.

If a member accrues a certain amount of points, they will not be allowed to post content in the following stages:

  • 4 points - 2 days
  • 6 points - 10 days
  • 8 points - 15 days
  • 10 points - 30 days
  • 12 points - Permanent Ban
All of the above is automated.

We can also give null warns that have no points addition or post restrictions, this precedes formal warning(s).

Repeat offenders can also be moved into the following groups before being eventually banned, this is always optional for staff to carry out:

  • Restricted (Gamers) - banned from Gamers' Hangout and sub forums
  • Restricted (Mac) - banned from Apple related sections of the forums
  • Restricted (News) - banned from commenting on the news posts
  • Restricted (no edit) - banned from editing any own post content
  • Restricted (PM) - banned from sending PM conversations
  • Restricted (Profile) - banned from editing profile
  • Restricted (Ratings) - banned from adding ratings to topics
  • Restricted (view) - banned from creating any content on Neowin

Added to the bottom of our Community Rules.

 

Since the new system is automated, this should stop everyone from assuming that different people get away with punishment, or are treated more harshly than anyone else.

 

Moderators are all volunteers, and we really do not need the crap we put up with all too often.

 

We, like other forums have house rules, and although they are probably different than other places, we all agree they are fair. We want a community where people aren't openly attacking each other,. and one that is friendly to the whole household old or young.

 

If you are a decent person that thinks before posting, you should never have a run in with us. If you do, there are consequences.

 

Thanks.

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Human.Online    8,168

Out of interest, the ability to restrict someone in various ways - I would assume relates to the cause of the warns?

 

Also, "preferential treatment" is always an argument brought up when someone causes their own trouble - lol.  It does make me laugh "Oh I'm so hard done by" (include myself in that previously too - lol).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geoffrey B.    1,415

Nice update, I hope this will clear things up for those that think that there is preferential treatment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yusuf M.    1,362

Out of interest, the ability to restrict someone in various ways - I would assume relates to the cause of the warns?

If you're referring to the restriction masks, then yes. Fortunately, I can't even remember the last time we used it (as far as I'm aware) which is a good thing.

 

Nice update, I hope this will clear things up for those that think that there is preferential treatment.

Indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

Out of interest, the ability to restrict someone in various ways - I would assume relates to the cause of the warns?

 

Also, "preferential treatment" is always an argument brought up when someone causes their own trouble - lol.  It does make me laugh "Oh I'm so hard done by" (include myself in that previously too - lol).

Yes, if someone keeps trolling in Gamers' hangout but not anywhere else we can ban that member from that section, but not others.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou    10,425

It sounds like a fair system and should make rulings more consistent.
 
The restriction that I found amusing was this one:
 

  • Restricted (Ratings) - banned from adding ratings to topics

Have you ever had to enforce that restriction? It strikes me that someone would have to seriously abuse the rating system for that to be considered necessary.

Anyway, it's good to see these have been added to the Community Rules as that's much more effective than a pinned topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Denis W.    731

Have you ever had to enforce that restriction? It strikes me that someone would have to seriously abuse the rating system for that to be considered necessary.

Anyway, it's good to see these have been added to the Community Rules as that's much more effective than a pinned topic.

 

Sometime in the past, I think certain members were abusing the topic ratings especially in areas such as the console subforums. Members belonging to one section would always downvote another member's threads that they don't like.

 

Can't think of any uses of that recently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

Many were setup over a decade ago :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken    1,585

I already have 4 points from the past, will I be banned for 2 days :s ?? I have significantly turned around the way i post compared to the past. Neowin is such a great place for getting and sharing technology info!  I do like the new system compared to the old, and you can see your warning points which is nice to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rickkins    283

These 'points', do they expire..??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

I already have 4 points from the past, will I be banned for 2 days :s ?? I have significantly turned around the way i post compared to the past. Neowin is such a great place for getting and sharing technology info!  I do like the new system compared to the old, and you can see your warning points which is nice to know.

4 points = 80% out of a 100% on the old system. So you're getting a bit of a break here.

 

Behave and you have nothing to worry about. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou    10,425

Sometime in the past, I think certain members were abusing the topic ratings especially in areas such as the console subforums. Members belonging to one section would always downvote another member's threads that they don't like.

lol, I can actually picture that happening.  :laugh:

 

PS - Have any of the other moderators ever tried giving points to Neobond?  :shifty: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

These 'points', do they expire..??

Yes, after 90 days (per warning) old system was every 6 months = reduced by 20%. The old system will be wiped at some point, probably after 3 months because those points won't be auto reduced on the new system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dashel    542

If this is 'automated', what triggers points?  Are violations weighted?

 

So two in 90 days results in a 2 day.  Wouldn't a week make more sense for the 6pt violation?

 

So per the expiration - all points have a decay of 90 days or is it 20% reduction per 90?  Will mods stop badgering members over expired points?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

If this is 'automated', what triggers points?

 

 

All actions have consequences and Neowin is no different, Neowin Moderators follow a standard policy when warning members.

 

If a member accrues a certain amount of points, they will not be allowed to post content in the following stages:

The punishments are automated, maybe I should have been more clear. Moderators still issue warnings, but the points = standard punishments..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    6,757

Yes, after 90 days (per warning) old system was every 6 months = reduced by 20%. The old system will be wiped at some point, probably after 3 months because those points won't be auto reduced on the new system.

 

Oh, so now you reduce the warning period.  I had to wait a full year for all my warnings to drop off.  :P    haha

 

Good deal, hope this cracks down on the trolls here.  They can take a good post and ruin it real quick.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

If this is 'automated', what triggers points?  Are violations weighted?

 

So two in 90 days results in a 2 day.  Wouldn't a week make more sense for the 6pt violation?

Additional points = harsher punishments, and eventual ban.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obi-Wan Kenobi    1,116

Thanks, Neobond. This site is simply amazing, and you keep making it better and better every day. Keep up the great work, buddy! (Y)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken    1,585

Neowin should have a system that autmatically that detects bad words and simple personal attack sentences and refuses to posts them. It would take some weight off of moderator shoulders.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dashel    542

The punishments are automated, maybe I should have been more clear. Moderators still issue warnings, but the points = standard punishments..

 

So how does that "stop everyone from assuming that different people get away with punishment, or are treated more harshly than anyone else." if mods are the ones still deciding who gets them and how many?  Just confused on how that different from the 'automation' of the old system from a member's POV.

 

Are infractions per the CR given a uniform point penalty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    6,757

Neowin should have a system that autmatically that detects bad words and simple personal attack sentences and refuses to posts them. It would take some weight off of moderator shoulders.

 

There is already a swear filter and personal attacks would be hard to filter/detect.  Some try and circumvent the swear filter but leaving letters out of a swear word.  But again, hard to filter that out automatically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Denis W.    731

So how does that "stop everyone from assuming that different people get away with punishment, or are treated more harshly than anyone else." if mods are the ones still deciding who gets them and how many?  Just confused on how that different from the 'automation' of the old system from a member's POV.

 

Are infractions per the CR given a uniform point penalty?

 

Prior to this, sometimes some staffers forget or intentionally don't apply posting restrictions when members hit a certain warning level, say 10 days for reaching 60%. Now the forum software automatically places an appropriate posting restriction when it detects a warning level is about to hit a 'milestone.'

 

That also means that a few members would tend to stay at 100% multiple times, just with posting restrictions piled on and them getting warnings faster than they're shedding them. With this new system, a full 12 points and you're out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    13,037

So how does that "stop everyone from assuming that different people get away with punishment, or are treated more harshly than anyone else." if mods are the ones still deciding who gets them and how many?  Just confused on how that different from the 'automation' of the old system from a member's POV.

 

Are infractions per the CR given a uniform point penalty?

When you reach x points x punishment is handed out, as stated in the community rules consequences section. What's so hard to understand about that? :p

 

I find it sad that people can't post without resorting to (personal) insults and all the trolling that goes on. I for one am glad there's now a system that automates the points tallies against punishments. Before, staff had endless conversations on "what to do with <insert membername here>, we've given <insertmember name here> x chances already.

 

Edit: Denis beat me to it :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Denis W.    731

Neowin should have a system that autmatically that detects bad words and simple personal attack sentences and refuses to posts them. It would take some weight off of moderator shoulders.

 

That's unnecessarily strict and it also defeats the purpose of the warnings, which is to get members to change their behaviour.

 

If I were to quote a story posted on say Kotaku in Gamers Hangout and the article has the word ###### in it, why should that post be denied?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
techbeck    6,757

I find it sad that people can't post without resorting to (personal) insults and all the trolling that goes on.

Agreed, I used to be bad at some of that a few years ago, but hey...people can change. It is ok to voice your opinion and no one knows everything. It is just how you voice it that is the problem.

I have to say tho that sites like TheVerge are terrible with user comments. WHy I do not read their comments and just pay attention to the news posts. Neowin is much more controlled. Night and day.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.