Liquid Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 IGN.com Max Payne 2 SS IMO they are ucky, maybe because im use to PC but eeewww Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+StevoFC MVC Posted November 16, 2003 MVC Share Posted November 16, 2003 only the first few look bad. the rest look the same as the pc shots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altermind Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 looks bad compared to the PC version..the textures are 1/4 the quality... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquid Posted November 16, 2003 Author Share Posted November 16, 2003 looks bad compared to the PC version..the textures are 1/4 the quality... more like 1/12th like the texture res looks as if its 8x8, when PC is 256x256 at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquid Posted November 16, 2003 Author Share Posted November 16, 2003 hmm, just a little different ;) PS2 PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearMeAll Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 ick..low textures..the ps2 does only have 8 megs texture memory and it shows.. the textures you see are 8-bit palletized textures... but maybe tv overscan can cover it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briandl79 Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briandl79 Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayepecks Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 I don't see what you're groaning about -- looks better than most other PS2 games. If you already have the PC version, why complain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KICK Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 Those looks extremely bad, the xbox version looks exact same except for the resu as it can do 1600x1200 which only makes it slightly less detail but I still reckon alot of people will buy this for PS2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krux Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 I seriously doubt that my 9700pro is only slightly more detailed then the geforce 3 in the xbox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WigglesTheFish Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 still looks better on ps2 than it did on my pc... man do i need a better graphics card than the tnt2, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TranceSphere Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 OMFG :x :x :x :x :x PS2 is showings its age :x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KICK Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 I seriously doubt that my 9700pro is only slightly more detailed then the geforce 3 in the xbox you forgetting the xbox is a dedicated games machine and it isnt a geforce 3 its a mix between the gf3 and 4 ti but yes it will almost produce same except for a lower res Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briandl79 Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 you forgetting the xbox is a dedicated games machine and it isnt a geforce 3 its a mix between the gf3 and 4 ti but yes it will almost produce same except for a lower res Don't worry about him, he's just trying to justify his 400.00 purchase. There is a reason why John Carmack said the Xbox version of Doom 3 would have the same fidelity as the PC version..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cocklea Posted November 16, 2003 Share Posted November 16, 2003 i think it looks quite good for PS2. Very good infact. U cant compare an all in one 32MB PS2, with Ultra Supa Dupa 3d card 128MB Barton or Athlon FX or whatever processor u have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts