Linux vs Windows


Recommended Posts

Growled

I'm probably going to regret this but recently I got to do a fresh install of both Windows 7 and Linux Mint 15. I decided to do them side by side to compare them. I did the fresh install of Windows on a Toshiba Satellite laptop for a friend and I installed Linux Mint on my older HP desktop. The only things I was going to add to Windows was Office 2010 and Adobe CS5. 

 

Install times were very similar. The rub came when I started doing updates. In 30 minutes I had not only updated mint but added PPAs to update Libreoffice, Gimp, and VLC to the newest versions. It took me nearly 4 hours to install the updates in Windows. 

 

While Windows was chugging away, I spend another hour in Mint getting some more PPAs added, for themes and for Handbrake and FormatJunkie and the Sunflower File Manager. That took another hour, mainly because I was just taking my time and trying out new themes.

 

So to summarize, Windows took me me nearly 5 hours to install and update and Linux Mint 15 took me 2 hours. 

 

On the Windows box, I then installed Office and the Creative Suit. To install them and then do the updates took me over 2 hours. I charged my friend for 8 hours of work. I had done been finished with Linux and had posted on many sites and had even ripped a movie and converted it with Handbrake. 

 

So on round 1 (installation) Linux wins easily.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster

Well, yeah, because Windows has to do upgrade 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, wherein Linux, can skip from nothing to 5. There is less to update, too. As Linux doesn't have all these security holes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ZakO

...Linux Mint 15 has been out for 3 days, Windows 7 has been out for 3 years (nearly 4 years), it's obviously going to have significantly more updates to install. It's also going to depend on your connection and computer speed, a fresh Windows 7 install + updates hasn't ever taken anywhere near 4 hours for me (90 minutes max).

 

Windows 8 would be a slightly fairer comparison, around 20 minutes to install + 10 minutes to install a few updates. 

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites
BobbyJobs

The thing is in a few days linux will screw up and something will become corrupt and take you ages to sort. Windows however will keep on chugging away :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken

I had Ubuntu on a laptop once upon a time, its a good OS with lots of features but lacked many things that I loved in Windows!  I grew up using Windows and is why I use and love it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified

The thing is in a few days linux will screw up and something will become corrupt and take you ages to sort. Windows however will keep on chugging away :)

 

Yeah, because that is the experience of us all linux users, right?

 

Honestly this question should not be asked. They are two different systems with exclusive strengths. Windows is the standard for many applications and excels at gaming options, it's very stable and fast too. Linux is stable and fast if the user is stable too, algo it's software library it's not too shaby and the customization is amazing, gaming is its weakness, however since version 1.5 Wine does wonders and we all know about this thing called Steam.

 

I consider GNU/Linux as a working/experimenting/Scientific research environment while Windows 7 is perfect for day-to-day normal users.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
astropheed

This thread will definitely be filled with intelligent rebuttals and scholarly gentlemen communicating in a rational and just way. I can see no reason this thread would turn into a flaming ball of flaming flames.

  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites
Neu B

Blah...neither one is better than the other. Each one offers different user experience.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Noir Angel

I've always found Linux updates to take ages to install, especially when you have to update and resolve dependencies at the same time. However the beauty of Windows 7 is that you can inject updates into the image, and it's really easy. I keep fully updated images mastered with wintoolkit and it takes me about an hour to fully stage a good PC (with Office) and about 2 hours to stage an older PC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

Four hours for updating Windows?  Old machine?  I just installed Win7 onto one of my test systems a couple days ago, nothing fancy, 2GHz C2D, 2GB RAM and a couple of SATA drives, install and updates took maybe an hour, maybe as I wasn't sitting there watching it the whole time, and that's including a couple versions of dotNET.  That doesn't include adding third party software of course though.

 

There is less to update, too. As Linux doesn't have all these security holes.

The CVE lists say otherwise.  It's had a crapton of security holes.  (And I'm not implying Windows doesn't.  No such thing as a 100% secure OS.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified

In a very possible futile attempt to rail the train again: Both systems have security holes, there is no such thing as a 100% armored desktop system (maybe fedora 64bits come close), so it's pointless to debate this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

I had Ubuntu on a laptop once upon a time, its a good OS with lots of features but lacked many things that I loved in Windows!  I grew up using Windows and is why I use and love it.

Can you list some of the things that Ubuntu lacks?

The thing is in a few days linux will screw up and something will become corrupt and take you ages to sort. Windows however will keep on chugging away :)

I've been running Linux for months on my server and it has never screwed up.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
srbeen

I had Ubuntu on a laptop once upon a time, its a good OS with lots of features but lacked many things that I loved in Windows!  I grew up using Windows and is why I use and love it.

 

 

Ubuntu is closer to a windows xp experience now IMO. Its a very well developed OS for completely free. Windows only leads due to the commercial application development really. WINE works well for free apps like winrar, imgburn and the like.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster
The CVE lists say otherwise.  It's had a crapton of security holes.  (And I'm not implying Windows doesn't.  No such thing as a 100% secure OS.)

 

Let's say at best, Linux has way less than Windows.

Link to post
Share on other sites
medhunter

I 'd say we stick to the topic which is the installation time of the OS and main software in order to be productive

Any more wondering should have another topic.

My opinion. I love this aspect of linux distros with almost every thing ready out of the box (apart fro some codecs,....).

Even install time from recovery DVDs for my HP laptop is way too much for an OS

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

Let's say at best, Linux has way less than Windows.

Actually, not even close.  Statistically speaking, the Linux kernel itself has had more reported vulnerabilities than the entire Windows operating system, and that's not including holes in the various Linux applications, servers, etc.  You can easily find this online, here's one to save a bit of time, the "top vulnerabilitiy" list.

 

All time -- Linux kernel #1, Windows XP #5 with almost half the number, Windows 7 #23 with about a quarter.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php

2012 -- Linux kernel #5, Windows 7 #44.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php?year=2012

2013 (so far) -- Linux kernel #1, Windows 7 #11, Windows 8 #31.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php?year=2013

 

Since this thread was talking about Mint, which is (last I checked anyway, I'm using Arch) based on Ubuntu, here's some more vulnerabilities to look at.

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/

 

If you're messing with servers, that gap gets much bigger when you throw Apache, PHP, etc into the mix. That #1 is just the kernel itself, doesn't take into account all that other stuff that goes along with it, including the other services, desktop environment, applications, etc. Of course Windows having a bajillion people using it does make the holes that much more prominent, doesn't mean it doesn't exist for Linux. Even malware.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified

Actually, not even close.  Statistically speaking, the Linux kernel itself has had more reported vulnerabilities than the entire Windows operating system, and that's not including holes in the various Linux applications, servers, etc.  You can easily find this online, here's one to save a bit of time, the "top vulnerabilitiy" list.

 

All time -- Linux kernel #1, Windows XP #5 with almost half the number, Windows 7 #23 with about a quarter.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php

2012 -- Linux kernel #5, Windows 7 #44.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php?year=2012

2013 (so far) -- Linux kernel #1, Windows 7 #11, Windows 8 #31.

http://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-products.php?year=2013

 

Since this thread was talking about Mint, which is (last I checked anyway, I'm using Arch) based on Ubuntu, here's some more vulnerabilities to look at.

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/

 

If you're messing with servers, that gap gets much bigger when you throw Apache, PHP, etc into the mix. That #1 is just the kernel itself, doesn't take into account all that other stuff that goes along with it, including the other services, desktop environment, applications, etc. Of course Windows having a bajillion people using it does make the holes that much more prominent, doesn't mean it doesn't exist for Linux. Even malware.

 

Are you aware that these are historical reports? Also, please, be aware that the Kernel versioning it's quite different, with edge, backported and stable variations. All these bugs get staked on the same entry. It's totally unfair and illogical to compare.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

Are you aware that these are historical reports? Also, please, be aware that the Kernel versioning it's quite different, with edge, backported and stable variations. All these bugs get staked on the same entry. It's totally unfair and illogical to compare.

Well yes it's historical, it's showing vulnerabilities over the years, not sure what you're trying to say with that. As far as versioning goes, you can break that down on that list, and you can filter by version. But since there's a ton of distros all running different versions of the thing, it's hardly fair to cherry-pick one version of the kernel out of one distro and compare that to another operating system. Also, you're comparing a more "fluid" operating system with something that stays static for years. You can't just kick up a build number and pretend all the previous vulnerabilities never happened.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken

Ubuntu/Linux is not a bad OS by any means, but I grew up using Windows and a lot of programs that went with. I have used Ubuntu on several pcs, and it does have good driver support and its also very flexible (installing on any PC). Ubuntu is a solid OS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
cork1958

Blah...neither one is better than the other. Each one offers different user experience.

 

Exactly right!

 

Linux and it's updates have always installed faster than Windows, for me also, but as stated already, usually when I'm doing an install of Linux, it's a brand new version with next to no updates. When ever I'm installing Windows, it's usually a restore of some one's broke d**k stuff and needs years worth of updates!

Link to post
Share on other sites
ToneKnee

Can you list some of the things that Ubuntu lacks?

I've been running Linux for months on my server and it has never screwed up.

 

 

Linux, great as a server, but falls way short as a Desktop based system.  I've ran into so many issues with different distros (a lot have been driver related sure, but still).  Linux has never felt as smooth as Windows, at least for me that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

Linux and it's updates have always installed faster than Windows, for me also, but as stated already, usually when I'm doing an install of Linux, it's a brand new version with next to no updates.

That's a good point too depending on the distro; a couple of my machines run Debian stable as a server (installed before Wheezy), a decent number of updates but not a rediculious number, but my primary Linux play machine runs Arch.. everything's downloaded fresh during the install, zero updates to begin with. Something like the 'Buntu's get a new release every 6 months so the updates are pretty minor. Conversely, pick an older version of Windows that's been around for a while and it adds up.. I'd guess if I were in a retro/masochistic mood XP probably has at least 150-200 spanning a few restarts after all is said and done, and that's not including spending a pantload of time to customize it into something more usable.

 

Linux has never felt as smooth as Windows, at least for me that is.

For me it's about productivity. I've been working with *Nix even before Linux was born, I still have yet to get the environment that does everything I need without compromise, for the desktop end that is.. absolutely love it as a server, and I don't have a particular bias, it just has to work. I don't care to fuss around just getting things going or dealing with the little things that pop up with Linux desktops, compatibility issues, the occasional breakage, missing the small details. I'm a big fan of click-click-done.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
vcfan

I absolutely love mint. it is my favorite hands down.....chocolate flavor

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified

Well yes it's historical, it's showing vulnerabilities over the years, not sure what you're trying to say with that. As far as versioning goes, you can break that down on that list, and you can filter by version. But since there's a ton of distros all running different versions of the thing, it's hardly fair to cherry-pick one version of the kernel out of one distro and compare that to another operating system. Also, you're comparing a more "fluid" operating system with something that stays static for years. You can't just kick up a build number and pretend all the previous vulnerabilities never happened.

 

Linux is generally the same, no matter the GNU/Linux distro, so no cherry picking is necessary. What I meant by historical is that bug reports for Kernel 1.x, 2.x and 3.x are grouped together. This make it look like the Kernel is very buggy, but it's actually not different to the NT kernel, bug wise, however the NT Kernel is never grouped together because, in that list, is separated by Windows versions: XP, Vista, 7, 8.

 

A more accurate way to compare them is to separate the kernel versions by milestones: 2.2, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0, etc. just like Windows does: NT 4.x, NT 5.0, 5.1, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Andre S.

As ZakO said, it's not surprising Linux Mint 15 doesn't have many updates considering it was released 3 days ago - if anything, it's surprising it has any updates at all! There's no general conclusion to draw about "Linux vs Windows" based on that triviality. As such I don't think this thread is likely to go anywhere, there's simply nothing much to say about such a poor comparison.

 

Since this is a silly thread let's post some silliness.

 

From the data we have, 3 days of availability of Linux Mint led to a 2 hour install; 3 years of availability of Windows 7 led to a 5 hour install. We can therefore establish with mathematical certainty that at this rate, in one year it will take 243 hours to install Linux Mint 15, or a bit more than 10 days. At this time, Windows 7 will install in 6 hours and 40 minutes.

 

We could also draw completely unrelated conclusions from this comparison, such as saying one system is certainly more secure or faster than the other, or - why not - that Hitler was in fact a tapeworm.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By News Staff
      Practical Linux Security Cookbook - Second Edition ($35.99 Value) Free Download
      by Steven Parker

      Claim your complimentary eBook (worth $35.99) for free, before the offer expires on 03/03.



      Over the last few years, system security has gained a lot of momentum and software professionals are focusing heavily on it.



      Linux is often treated as a highly secure operating system. However, the reality is that Linux has its share of security aws, and these security aws allow attackers to get into your system and modify or even destroy your important data. But there’s no need to panic, since there are various mechanisms by which these aws can be removed, and this book will help you learn about different types of Linux security to create a more secure Linux system.

      With a step-by-step recipe approach, the book starts by introducing you to various threats to Linux systems. Then, this book will walk you through customizing the Linux kernel and securing local files. Next, you will move on to managing user authentication both locally and remotely and mitigating network attacks. Later, you will learn about application security and kernel vulnerabilities. You will also learn about patching Bash vulnerability, packet filtering, handling incidents, and monitoring system logs. Finally, you will learn about auditing using system services and performing vulnerability scanning on Linux.

      By the end of this book, you will be able to secure your Linux systems and create a robust environment.

      This free offer expires on March 3.

      How to get it
      Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these free offers, you will not need to re-register. While supplies last!

      >> Practical Linux Security Cookbook - Second Edition ($35.99 Value) - free download <<
      Offered by Packt Publishing, view their other free resources. Expires 03/03/21.

      Not for you?
      That's OK, there are other deals on offer you can check out here.



      Home Gym Giveaway | Ultimate Gaming Giveaway (feat. PlayStation 5 & Xbox Series X) Ivacy VPN - 5 year subscription for just $1 per month NordVPN - 2 year subscription at up to 68% off Private Internet Access VPN - subscriptions at up to 71% off Unlocator VPN or SmartDNS - unblock Geoblock with 7-day free trial Neowin Store for our preferred partners. Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for Ad-Free experience Disable Sponsored posts · Neowin Deals · Free eBooks · Neowin Store

      Disclosure: This is a StackCommerce deal or giveaway in partnership with Neowin; an account at StackCommerce is required to participate in any deals or giveaways. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site, and it all goes toward the running costs.

    • By zikalify
      Debian 10.8 launches with new software patches and updates
      by Paul Hill

      Image via Alex Makas The Debian Project has announced the availability of Debian 10.8, the eighth update to its stable distribution Debian 10. Each time a point release is made available, a new ISO is spun with all the latest security fixes and software updates so that they do not need to be installed when Debian is installed on a new system.

      Some packages that have received updates with Debian 10.8 include Firefox ESR, Chromium, Flatpak, VLC, the Linux kernel, OpenSSL, X.Org, APT and Thunderbird. The NVIDIA graphics drivers have also been updated to a newer upstream version that fixes a denial of service issue.

      Appealing to users to think about the environment, the Debian Project said:

      Debian 10 was first launched on July 6, 2019, and it’s set to receive long-term support until 2024. Each new version of Debian arrives every two years but launch dates are not set in stone. If there aren’t any delays, Debian 11 should come out this year and Debian 10 will be demoted to the status of Old Stable alongside Debian 9 which is maintained by the main Debian security team until July 18, 2020.

    • By zikalify
      Canonical releases second point release of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
      by Paul Hill



      Canonical has announced the availability of Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS – the second point release for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. As with other point releases, Canonical has spun a new ISO that includes all the security and software updates and it comes with the latest hardware enablement stacks so that newer hardware works properly.

      Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS is available for the Desktop, Server, and Cloud products as well as other flavours of Ubuntu such as Kubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie, Ubuntu MATE, Lubuntu, Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu Studio, and Xubuntu. If you want to download any of the Ubuntu products or the spins, head over to the Ubuntu downloads page and find what you want.

      According to the Ubuntu 20.04 release notes page, Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS ships with the Linux 5.8 kernel instead of Linux 5.4 which was the original kernel shipped last April when Focal Fossa came out. Those installing Ubuntu Server will have to opt-in to using the new kernel through the installer bootloader as it’s not the default choice.

      As with all Ubuntu LTS releases, you should expect security and software updates for five years until the first half of 2025. The derivative flavours are an exception, however, receiving support for just three years.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Total War: Warhammer III announced by Creative Assembly, coming this year
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      The Total War: Warhammer trilogy that Creative Assembly began back in 2016 is concluding this year with the newly revealed third entry. After several teasers from the past few days, publisher Sega announced the latest turn-based and real-time strategy title today with a brand new cinematic trailer, catch it above.

      Total War: Warhammer III will have the conflict expanding to further territories like the Realms of Chaos and Lands of the East. New fantasy races are incoming too, with Kislev and Cathay, as well as Chaos factions Khorne, Nurgle, Slaanesh and Tzeentch. The studio promises to deliver the most diverse array of "legendary heroes, gargantuan monsters, flying creatures and magical powers that the series has ever seen."

      "Our vision, from the start, was to create a series that felt like an incredible journey through this world we all loved," said game director Ian Roxburgh. "The enormous support of our players in ensuring the success of the first two installments has pushed our ambition to new heights, and we can’t wait for everyone to experience it."

      Like in the first two games, Creative Assembly will allow players to combine the maps of the complete trilogy to have one massive campaign. However, this will arrive as a post-launch free update, as the studio's full focus is currently on Total War: Warhammer 3.

      Total War: Warhammer 3 is coming to Windows later this year, with Linux and macOS versions coming soon after. Both Steam and Epic Games Store versions are currently available for pre-order, and Creative Assembly will be bringing the previous two games and all their DLC to the latter store before the latest game's launch.

    • By zikalify
      Canonical launches Ubuntu Core 20 for IoT devices
      by Paul Hill



      Canonical has announced the general availability of Ubuntu Core 20, a stripped back version of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS designed for IoT devices and embedded systems. According to the company, this update improves device security with the inclusion of secure boot, full disk encryption and secure device recovery.

      Ubuntu Core is available for many popular x86 and ARM single board computers making it pretty accessible. IoT devices are not always easy to update so Canonical has configured Ubuntu Core to provide automated and reliable updates out of the box so end users don’t need to worry about updating their devices. While an LTS is usually supported for five years, it provides business-critical devices with 10 years of support.

      Commenting on today’s launch CEO Mark Shuttleworth said:

      Probably the most familiar device that can run Ubuntu Core, is the Raspberry Pi Compute Module. If you have a Raspberry Pi Compute Module or other compatible device lying around you can get it to work with Ubuntu Core 20 by heading over to the IoT section of the Ubuntu website and scrolling down to Ubuntu Core.