Linux vs Windows


Recommended Posts

Aergan

Something we can all agree on: ###### printers.

 

I don't care if it's a Linux disto, Microsoft Windows, *NIX, *BSD, OS/2, OSX, iOS - printers are always a pain in the ass.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

More popular? Where? I still see Macs and PCs with Windows sold at stores and online. I still only see Windows and Mac apps sold at stores and online. I still only see third party companies support OSX and Windows. 

 

So OEM's aren't selling computers with Linux on them? Canonical didn't raise 6 million dollars in 3 days for their Ubuntu phone? Steam didn't come to linux and Origin isn't in the works? Oh and I bet you think the Crytek developers are porting over the Cryengine just for kicks and giggles. Linux is getting bigger and more popular every year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dot Matrix

So OEM's aren't selling computers with Linux on them? Canonical didn't raise 6 million dollars in 3 days for their Ubuntu phone? Steam didn't come to linux and Origin isn't in the works? Oh and I bet you think the Crytek developers are porting over the Cryengine just for kicks and giggles. Linux is getting bigger and more popular every year.

 

And who exactly uses it? No one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
guitmz

And who exactly uses it? No one.

 

I use it. Your argument is invalid! LOL

 

Seriously now, people don't use because they seem "affraid". Just now we hired a PHP developer who never touched linux in his ######ing life and he's using elementary os for 2 days and already can do several things in terminal for example and he's loving it. You just need to dive into the idea.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
yowanvista

One major annoyance with Linux distros is that a simple kernel upgrade might screw your entire system, not to mention the fragmented APIs and the lack of binary compatibility among distros. You might want to check this. Linux is simply a huge pile of software maintained by people who don't have a clue how together towards a common goal, it simply contains too much rubbish obsolete parts with improper software implementations resulting in poor functionality (e.g no audio mixer). X11 for instance needs to go, of course Wayland will be adopted but some lazy developers think that their own custom display server (Mir) is way better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

And who exactly uses it? No one.

 

I use it too. The government uses it. Did you check the weather today? That data is crunched by Linux supercomputers. NASA uses it. The American and the London stock exchange use it.

 

Now who uses Windows 8? The people who got it for cheap and fanboys like you. Is it used on any mission critical systems? Nope.

One major annoyance with Linux distros is that a simple kernel upgrade might screw your entire system, not to mention the fragmented APIs and the lack of binary compatibility among distros. You might want to check this. Linux is simply a huge pile of software maintained by people who don't have a clue how together towards a common goal, it simply contains too much rubbish obsolete parts with improper software implementations resulting in poor functionality (e.g no audio mixer). X11 for instance needs to go, of course Wayland will be adopted but some lazy developers think that their own custom display server (Mir) is way better.

 

What do you mean? We have audio mixers if I'm understanding correctly?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Evolution

I'd 

 

I use it too. The government uses it. Did you check the weather today? That data is crunched by Linux supercomputers. NASA uses it. The American and the London stock exchange use it.

 

Now who uses Windows 8? The people who got it for cheap and fanboys like you. Is it used on any mission critical systems? Nope.


 

What do you mean? We have audio mixers if I'm understanding correctly?

Aren't most mission critical systems using Unix instead of Linux?

Link to post
Share on other sites
notchinese

Interesting thread. I've been a Windows user for about 20 years, but am in the process of switching over to Linux. Why? Sure, I have had some issues with Windows 7 and 8. Of course, no operating system is flawless. Even Linux-based ones. I create full disk images daily, so not that big of a deal. For me, it was more of a philosophical thing.

 

Windows & Macs = Profit is king.

Linux = Community-based. Donations are certainly welcomed, but that's not the overriding concern. Canonical is a possible exception, I am discovering.

 

Anyway, after playing around with Ubuntu and Mint, which like so many distros are based on Debian, http://futurist.se/gldt/, I just decided to simply go with Debian itself. Slackware & Red Hat and their offshoots are beyond my skill level and appear more geared for businesses. Anyway, my needs aren't that great, and I've had no problem finding programs that allow me to get things done. I'm like,  "Do I really need Word or Photoshop?" Honestly, no.

 

Sorry for rambling on here. It's just feels cool to be a part of something, as opposed to being a dollar sign. Use whatever works for your needs. For me, though, Linux just 'feels' right and the transition has been quite liberating. :)

 

PS. I will say this: For what it's worth, I never even considered leaving Windows until Windows 8.

 

So instead of installing 1 free program to remove all traces of Metro you completely switch operating systems? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
nfiniti9

Can you list some of the things that Ubuntu lacks?

I've been running Linux for months on my server and it has never screwed up.

 

DX10, Quite a few all-in-one dont work (esp business models with accounting), and easy way to configure 3+ button mice.  The list could go on.  I do like linux and use it in quite a few VM's but thats just not a good argument.  Linux is not a direct replacement for windows.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ShadowMajestic

I'd 

 

Aren't most mission critical systems using Unix instead of Linux?

Only if you have the money. Much runs on a stripped down 'custom' Linux. A lot of internet critical hardware runs IBM's OS. Often Linux or NT have to much overhead and aren't nearly as stable as these optimized OS's.

 

This is why Linux web hosting is also faster than Windows. There are less updates and less components to install while security is updated automatically which gives Linux also the advantage of being more secure. A comparison can be found at www.weloveourhost.com/linux-windows.html

Contact major webhosters that run Linux. Usually when a system is setup, it is not touched again unless absolutely necessary. 

But in Linux's defense, many sysadmins for Windows follow this practice too.

Personally the amount of not updated Linux far outweighs unupdated Windows and lately this is mostly Ubuntu... still wonder why anyone would run a Linux Unstable distro as a server :s)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

This is why Linux web hosting is also faster than Windows. There are less updates and less components to install while security is updated automatically which gives Linux also the advantage of being more secure. A comparison can be found at www.weloveourhost.com/linux-windows.html

Anecdotal. Both operating systems require updates to stay secure, and both have automatic update capabilities.. if the OS doesn't update then both are that much more prone to security problems. Linux being more secure is entirely a myth, especially when it comes to web servers, just look at any tech news site, the things get hacked rather frequently.

As far as performance goes... that depends on what the server is doing. You'll find benchmarks favoring both sides of the argument depending on what's being done and what server platform is being used. I can throw Rails on a Windows box, see the performance isn't quite as good as the Linux version and claim "ZOMG Windows sucks." Then I can do the exact same thing in reverse with ASP on Linux, "ZOMG Linux sucks." Pick the right tool for the job. You can pretty much run anything on both operating systems, but obviously one platform will do better than the other depending on the software involved.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster

But Linux requires way less restarts than Windows does, therefore it is better for uptime.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

But Linux requires way less restarts than Windows does, therefore it is better for uptime.

If the kernel gets updated, it requires a restart, with very few exceptions and if you're willing to pay for it. Windows Servers obviously need restarts too when something in the core OS gets updated, but it's nowhere near as frequent as with the desktop versions. Regardless of the OS, if the servers in question get updated, they'll need a restart too. Both will have brief downtime if the sysadmins stay up to date with updates, it's unavoidable, and any differences in restart time is going to be negligible. Of course you can go the "never going to update" route and claim zero downtime on both OS's too, assuming you want to roll the dice with a hacker.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster

Yea, kernel updates, that is the only time when it restarts Linux. Windows, on the otherhand, has much more software that requires a restart.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

Yea, kernel updates, that is the only time when it restarts Linux. Windows, on the otherhand, has much more software that requires a restart.

Yes, again that's on the desktop version, it's a lot less frequent on the Server editions which doesn't have a lot of the components that the desktop versions have, updating the core of the OS will require a full restart on both operating systems. And again, if Apache, Nginx, IIS, SQL services, etc or whatever gets updated, you got to restart those services as well. Just like Windows. Regardless of if you're rebooting Windows or Linux, restarting IIS or Apache, The downtime difference is going to be insignificant.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster

I remember reading this article: http://starhoster.com/notices/announcements/linux-vs-windows-servers-who-has-the-best-web-hosting-technology/

 

 

Reliability and Stability

Windows servers have less reliability than their Linux equivalent.  With an average of 9 hours of downtime per year, Windows servers are more likely to go offline than Linux servers.  Windows blamed their long downtime on server software updates and maintenance of the system.  Changes on Windows server configuration require a reboot of the system, causing inevitable increase in downtime.

On the other hand, Linux systems are the hands down winner in reliability.  In fact, users graded Linux with a 90+ percent reliability rating.  Unlike Windows, Linux Systems generally do not require a reboot with every configuration change.  Linux also handles multi-tier processes with much better stability than Windows.  This has reduced Linux downtime to just 30 minutes per year (up to 36% less than Windows).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris
Wow, some serious misinformation in that article. Server configuration changes require a restart? Windows doesn't have a proper permissions system? (Seriously? Windows has if anything a more robust permission system, never mind group policy, etc.. any Windows sysadmin with half a clue knows how to properly lock it down.) Pretty much insinuates Linux can't suffer from malware? Really wouldn't mind seeing some sources on that downtime statistics as well.

Note that I'm not advocating Windows is the better server, as personally a few exceptions aside (ASP.NET mainly) I prefer Unix or Linux by far myself, but I seriously detest misinformation just to prove a point.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Andre S.

Linux desktop market share is insignificant - it's hovered around 1% for the past decade and continues on this merry trend. I'm well aware that Linux is highly successful and relevant in many areas, but it's getting pretty ridiculous to argue that it's somehow going to make a breakthrough on the desktop. That argument has been made every year since the inception of desktop of Linux and has always turned out to be false. Every time Microsoft releases an unpopular version of Windows it's always the same; it's going to be the year of Linux! Most market share loss goes to Mac anyway - and comes back to Windows once Microsoft releases a better version. This happened with Vista/7; same will go with 8/whatever polished successor of 8 gets the public's favor.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK

Linux desktop market share is insignificant - it's hovered around 1% for the past decade and continues on this merry trend. I'm well aware that Linux is highly successful and relevant in many areas, but it's getting pretty ridiculous to argue that it's somehow going to make a breakthrough on the desktop. That argument has been made every year since the inception of desktop of Linux and has always turned out to be false. Every time Microsoft releases an unpopular version of Windows it's always the same; it's going to be the year of Linux! Most market share loss goes to Mac anyway - and comes back to Windows once Microsoft releases a better version. This happened with Vista/7; same will go with 8/whatever polished successor of 8 gets the public's favor.

Its naive to think there will ever be a magical "year of the linux desktop", but its just as naive to think linux will never achieve any kind of breakthrough on the desktop just because of its current market share. Linux is currently getting better 3rd party support than its ever had and things are only getting better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dot Matrix

I use it too. The government uses it. Did you check the weather today? That data is crunched by Linux supercomputers. NASA uses it. The American and the London stock exchange use it.

 

Now who uses Windows 8? The people who got it for cheap and fanboys like you. Is it used on any mission critical systems? Nope.

 

What do you mean? We have audio mixers if I'm understanding correctly?

 

 

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking consumers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking consumers.

 

You're really comparing apples to oranges here. Linux is geared towards tech savvy people, and always will be. I don't care what Mint and Ubuntu are doing, they will always serve as the "gateway drug" to Linux for tech savvy people. Windows and OS X have always been marketed to the masses. Love it or hate it, Microsoft and Apple aren't going anywhere over night and users will buy what they want. For the tech savvy crowd, IMO, Linux is becoming a better platform everyday compared to what Microsoft and Apple are currently doing. IMO, Linux companies (Novell, Canonical, Blue Systems, etc.) are the ones that are truly innovating and making what they have better and easier.    

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gerowen

I haven't bothered reading most of the replies yet because having been on the internet for a day or two, I know all it consists of is infighting e-penis comparison.  In response to the OP though, that's one of the reasons I switched to Linux exclusively years ago, on top of the ethical reasons and the ease of customization that comes with an open source system.  It was a moment of anger one time when I was trying to show something to a friend of mine, rebooted and had to say, "Well sorry, let's go watch a movie or something." so I got ****ed and nuked Windows from the hard drive on all my computers.  I got tired of doing a restart after installing a game or something, not realizing or remembering that updates were in the process of downloading, and having to stare at "Windows is Configuring Updates, Stage 1 of 3, Please Wait..." for sometimes over an hour.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LaP

Can you list some of the things that Ubuntu lacks?

I've been running Linux for months on my server and it has never screwed up.

 

Don't waste your time. It's neowin.

 

As long as you don't play games or don't need a particular pro software Linux is a fine os. It got a big library of open source apps. Some of then are actually really good.

 

It's not hard to install for anyone who know the basis of computers.

 

And yes Windows Updates can be a pain in the ***.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne

I could have installed Mint 13 which is based on Ubuntu LTS 12.04 and I would have seen many more updates, but it wouldn't have have taken nearly as long as Windows to install them. Windows has/had a big problem with updates in Windows 7 taking so long to install, at least on the machines I've installed Windows 7 on. Still, this was just my experience installing the two systems side by side. Anyone that doesn't like it or doesn't agree with me is free to do their own experiment and post their results. :)

Again, Windows 7 has been out since 2009, and 12.04 was released in 2012....

 

Maybe compare 10.04.

I use it too. The government uses it. Did you check the weather today? That data is crunched by Linux supercomputers. NASA uses it. The American and the London stock exchange use it.

 

Now who uses Windows 8? The people who got it for cheap and fanboys like you. Is it used on any mission critical systems? Nope.

 

What do you mean? We have audio mixers if I'm understanding correctly?

 

While there may be a lot of businesses and organizations using GNU/Linux, I urge you to find how many are using the latest version of the distro chosen.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the numbers are similar to how many organizations use Windows 8.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Namerah S
      Metro Exodus announced for the PS5 and Xbox series X|S
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      Amidst celebrations of the tenth anniversary of its first-person shooter franchise, 4A Games has announced that Metro Exodus will be landing on the next-generation of consoles. In addition to the newly revealed console variants, the video game developer also stated that Linux and macOS versions of the game are also in the works.

      While no exact details were provided, the game's makers did confirm free next-gen upgrades as have become the industry norm. Faster frame rates, better resolution, quicker loading times, and other enhanced features such as ray tracing were also detailed for the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S variants of Metro Exodus.

      4A Games further revealed that the next game in the Metro series is already under development. The Ukrainian-Maltese video game developer commented:

      While the game dev did confirm its commitment to creating a 'story driven single player experience' for the next instalment in the franchise, it also mentioned the existence of a multiplayer mode. As the upcoming Metro title is still in the early phase of production, no concrete decisions about the two game modes have been made yet.

      For now, we'll have to sit tight and wait for further details to be shared by the creators of Metro Exodus on all fronts. No release date for the next-gen version of the third Metro game or its Linux and macOS variants has been disclosed yet.

    • By zikalify
      Fedora 31 will reach its end of life next Tuesday
      by Paul Hill



      The Fedora Project has announced that Fedora 31 will reach its end of life on 24 November 2020. The announcement comes just weeks after the launch of Fedora 33 which included GNOME 3.38 and BTRFS as the default file system.

      After next Tuesday, Fedora 31 will stop receiving vital security updates leaving your system open to exploitation as new vulnerabilities are discovered. To make sure that your system stays protected, you should upgrade to a later version; to do this, simply open Software and go to the Updates tab, there you should see a bigger banner offering you a Fedora upgrade.

      Once you begin the upgrade with this method, the required files will be downloaded and then your system will ask to reboot to install the files in a similar fashion to how normal updates work. When the upgrade is complete, the system will automatically reboot into the new release.

      In the Fedora documentation, it says:

      If you do not want to upgrade your system, you also have the option of downloading a fresh copy of Fedora 33 which was released last month. Whether you upgrade your system or do a clean install, ensure that you’ve backed up all of your important files.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      The new Intel Open FPGA Stack is geared towards easing development of custom platforms
      by Ather Fawaz



      Today at the Intel FPGA Technology Day, Intel showed off its newest offering in the eASIC lineup, the eASIC N5X. Alongside it, the tech giant also debuted its Open FPGA Stack (Intel OFS), a scalable, source-accessible hardware and software infrastructure meant to power customized, high-performance workloads.

      Distributed via git repositories, the Intel OFS will be geared towards easing the process of development and deployment on FPGAs by enabling greater code reusability and modularity. Vendors will be able to provide native support to third parties and proprietary Intel-OFS platforms, this would lead to greater portability across Intel FPGA platforms and enable native support across major OS vendor distributions. All of this would lead to a smaller barrier to entry, enabling increased adoption of FPGAs in the industry.

      "With the proven success from our early-access customers, we are excited to launch the Intel Open FPGA Stack, with its demonstrated ability to dramatically both reduce the development time and also increase code and hardware design reuse for customers and partners looking to accelerate their workloads,” said Dave Moore, Intel corporate vice president and general manager of the Programmable Solutions Group.

      If you are interested in trying out Intel OFS, it is currently in early access. For details on that, as a starting point, you should contact an Intel sales representative. The firm aims to provide assistance regarding the same over the next year. For more details, you may refer to this blog post.

    • By PNWDweller
      About 3 months ago I switched my  Operating system to Arch after being a distro hopper playing around with the Ubuntu Variants and never feeling quite satisfied.  Where I work, we use Ubuntu based systems and I have grown quite comfortable in the command line experience and I felt like it was time to switch to a different OS.  Until then, I had used and have experience in Centos, Ubuntu, Solus linux and Fedora Linux.  What drove me to switch and make the choice to switch over, I  was getting tired of reading about kernel updates being pushed out fixing security bugs and also adding different functions.  While I can honestly say that my day to day activities don't require the latest and greatest kernel and software, it made sense to me especially when I would read about new software being released and then days or weeks before Canonical would certify it and release it to the general community.  I understand why they do this and I chose to move on. 
       
      Arch itself tends to hold the notion that you have to compile all the software you want to use and it's a harder system to use.  I can honestly say that this is partially true, but what people fail to tell you is that the compiling is done automatically by the package manager (Pacman in this case).  If you are comfortable with the command line, and even if not, you can certainly install Arch or use an installer to do it for you.  I used Anarchy installer which basically formats your drive for you, and you select whatever software you want and then it installs it.  It does the heavy lifting.  When finished, you are booted into your Shiny new Arch system with the Desktop Environment you chose.  In my case, it is always KDE.
       
      When I moved to Arch, I quickly found that not only do I have access to the latest and greatest builds, but also a lot of the alpha/beta versions of software.  For instance, I am running the "Bleeding Edge" version of Thunderbird mail which is in the alpha channels for testing.  You can't always do this with other systems.  i also have been able to experiment with different kernel versions.  Usually when I get updates, I have the most recent stable kernel release. 
       
      For things I have done with Arch - aside from my Desktop, I have a PXE boot server installed on my NAS which is also using Arch and other server software on it.  My PXE server allows me to boot into clonezilla or fresh install Arch if I need to (really don't need to), without having any external installation media handy (Thumb drives usually).
       
      Anyway, I have found my final Operating System and couldn't be any happier!
    • By zikalify
      Debian Project selects “Homeworld” theme for Debian 11
      by Paul Hill



      Debian 11 “Bullseye” is due sometime in 2021 and in preparation it has selected a theme called Homeworld that will be prevalent throughout the operating system. The Homeworld theme was created by Juliette Taka and is inspired by the German Bauhaus art movement which has its beginnings in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

      Users will come into contact with the Homeworld theme in several places when they use Debian 11. One of the first times will be in the Debian installer where the banner carries the Homeworld artwork. Debian 11 also includes a Homeworld background and a Homeworld-theme login screen.

      Following a call for proposing themes, a total of eighteen choices were submitted. A desktop artwork poll was opened up to the public and it received 5,613 responses which ranked the different choices. The Homeworld theme came out on top and will be used in Debian 11.

      If you’ve ever run Debian 8 or Debian 9 on your system, you’ll have come across Juliette Taka’s artwork already, she was the author behind the Lines and softWaves themes which were used in those two releases.