Linux vs Windows

By Growled,
in Linux/Unix

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

Don't get me wrong, I am not Anti-FOSS. I just don't think it is magically better than paid software with resources

 

Proprietary software is also not magically better just because it has resources. I removed your bit about proper development tools and testing because, honestly, you cant compare both dynamics. There are amazing open dev tools and the community testing is unparalleled.

 

I concede that nothing tops Office, the same with some tools like Photoshop. Does not mean every FOSS alternative is crap. In fact some are heavily used and favored in professional environments, like Hollywood (Lightworks is massively used). In other fields, like science, GNU/Linux is almost the exclusive platform, specifically LaTex. Many print houses are favoring Scribus and Inkscape over InDesign and Illustrator, mainly because of the former's programmaticable options and their adherence to standards.

 

You cant dismiss FOSS as an alternative. You have the choice to ignore it, and I respect that, but don't say it's useless. In all honesty, it's the only ethical centered software movement today. Ethics matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yogurtmaster
Posted

Proprietary software is also not magically better just because it has resources. I removed your bit about proper development tools and testing because, honestly, you cant compare both dynamics. There are amazing open dev tools and the community testing is unparalleled.

 

I concede that nothing tops Office, the same with some tools like Photoshop. Does not mean every FOSS alternative is crap. In fact some are heavily used and favored in professional environments, like Hollywood (Lightworks is massively used). In other fields, like science, GNU/Linux is almost the exclusive platform, specifically LaTex. Many print houses are favoring Scribus and Inkscape over InDesign and Illustrator, mainly because of the former's programmaticable options and their adherence to standards.

 

You cant dismiss FOSS as an alternative. You have the choice to ignore it, and I respect that, but don't say it's useless. In all honesty, it's the only ethical centered software movement today. Ethics matter.

Most of the software that I have tried in Linux is rather poor. I am just going to be honest here. You have some bright spots like Asterisk/FreePBX and also PHP/Apache/MySQL and I love VirtualBox and MAME/DosBox. That stuff is great and GIMP/Inkscape is good too, but most of it is not great.

Most of it is either already on Windows already or it is very low quality compared to non FOSS alternatives. I am being honest. A lot of people on the Internet think FOSS is some magic bullet and that freedom of compiling source code is so great, but a lot if not most Linux guys have no idea how to code and add quality stuff to existing code.

Just because you have the freedom to modify code, doesn't mean that you have skills to improve that code.

Too many people think that FOSS is magic and it makes things more secure and better and that is just not true. That is a myth and a fantasy.

The reason why Linux is secure is because it has it's roots in a Unix Clone which by itself is more secure and also secure by obscurity.

FOSS to me is like saying isn't it great that you can build a car with car parts and give you the basic ability to create the most basic car by using the car parts, but it requires skill to put them together and make something meaningful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK
Posted

Most of the software that I have tried in Linux is rather poor. I am just going to be honest here. You have some bright spots like Asterisk/FreePBX and also PHP/Apache/MySQL and I love VirtualBox and MAME/DosBox. That stuff is great and GIMP/Inkscape is good too, but most of it is not great.

Most of it is either already on Windows already or it is very low quality compared to non FOSS alternatives. I am being honest. A lot of people on the Internet think FOSS is some magic bullet and that freedom of compiling source code is so great, but a lot if not most Linux guys have no idea how to code and add quality stuff to existing code.

Just because you have the freedom to modify code, doesn't mean that you have skills to improve that code.

Too many people think that FOSS is magic and it makes things more secure and better and that is just not true. That is a myth and a fantasy.

The reason why Linux is secure is because it has it's roots in a Unix Clone which by itself is more secure and also secure by obscurity.

FOSS to me is like saying isn't it great that you can build a car with car parts and give you the basic ability to create the most basic car by using the car parts, but it requires skill to put them together and make something meaningful.

There are plenty of high quality FOSS programs and tons of very skilled FOSS developers., this idea that FOSS software is "generally low quality" and FOSS developers "Don't know how to code" is pure FUD.

 

You are correct that open source is not some "magic bullet", but the rest of the FUD you keep trying to peddle about open-source is just ridiculous stereotyping.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK
Posted

 

 

If I could run Lightroom without any issues on Linux I'd make the switch. It's the only piece of software that isn't available (or has alternatives) for Linux and it's something I really, really need.

 

 

Have you tried darktable as an alternative to lightroom? http://www.darktable.org/

 

I've heard good things about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yogurtmaster
Posted

There are plenty of high quality FOSS programs and tons of very skilled FOSS developers., this idea that FOSS software is "generally low quality" and FOSS developers "Don't know how to code" is pure FUD.

 

You are correct that open source is not some "magic bullet", but the rest of the FUD you keep trying to peddle about open-source is just ridiculous stereotyping.

You act like I have never run any software on Linux. It's my opinion and I am telling things from my view point. I just don't see a lot of high quality software on Linux and most of it that is quality has a Windows version.

I like Linux because I can set up a server and experiment with things, but it's not a replacement for other OSes such as Mac or Windows for software.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

Have you tried darktable as an alternative to lightroom? http://www.darktable.org/

 

I've heard good things about it.

 

The problem is that right now no RAW solution support new cameras that get rid of low pass filters and new RGB sensors.

 

Right now there's no linux raw manager that supports my Fujifilm x100s

Link to post
Share on other sites
fobban
Posted

Yes, but AFAIK, you can only run Linux Steam on Ubuntu or Debian. Good luck trying to get that on Arch.

Steam works great on Arch. It's in the official repositories and the games I've tried works great (World of Goo, Killing Floor, Dota 2, CS:S and L4D2). L4D2 has some annoying bugs though. I'm having most problems with AMD's catalyst drivers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ambroos
Posted

Have you tried darktable as an alternative to lightroom? http://www.darktable.org/

 

I've heard good things about it.

Yeah, I tried it. My camera is perfectly supported in RAW and the rendering looks fine, but the interface just feels very limited and without things like the adjustment brush (to make localized edits) it's just not worth it for me. Lightroom is incredibly well-made and functional, I think it'll be very hard for FOSS software to come close to it. It's pretty much a Photoshop + Camera RAW front-end.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Som
Posted

Wrong.

 

IBM brought computers to the main stream. Apple and Commodore made them easy to use. Unix made them robust.

 

Billy stole DOS and and ran away with it.

 

not what I meant, what I meant was that windows brought computers to the average person.  We wouldn't even be having this conversation if it wasn't for it.  Most people will start with windows and move on from there...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster
Posted

not what I meant, what I meant was that windows brought computers to the average person.  We wouldn't even be having this conversation if it wasn't for it.  Most people will start with windows and move on from there...

 

Not true. I know some people who never used a computer, and are using Ubuntu right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Red King
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Not true. I know some people who never used a computer, and are using Ubuntu right now.

They really need a tablet though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

not what I meant, what I meant was that windows brought computers to the average person.  We wouldn't even be having this conversation if it wasn't for it.  Most people will start with windows and move on from there...

 

So, you're saying that before Windows the average person did not have a computer? This is what you're saying?

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

So, you're saying that before Windows the average person did not have a computer? This is what you're saying?

Do you deny that?

 

Remember, "average" user.

Not true. I know some people who never used a computer, and are using Ubuntu right now.

The average person isn't using Ubuntu.

 

The average user is using Windows,  by sheer market share numbers alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK
Posted

Do you deny that?

 

Remember, "average" user.

The average person isn't using Ubuntu.

 

The average user is using Windows,  by sheer market share numbers alone.

Yes, but that is because the average user just uses what their computer comes with, it does not mean that ubuntu is not user-friendly enough for an average user to use. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

Yes, but that is because the average user just uses what their computer comes with, it does not mean that ubuntu is not user-friendly enough for an average user to use. 

I am just saying by sheer numbers alone, the statement the poster made was true.

 

As to whether it was the cause for it, of course not.  Falling prices and greater availability is what brought the PC to the average user.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster
Posted

I've even known some elderly people that hates Windows, asks their kids/grankids to put Ubuntu on. So, it is possible that average users like Ubuntu.

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

I've even known some elderly people that hates Windows, asks their kids/grankids to put Ubuntu on. So, it is possible that average users like Ubuntu.

 

 If the average user used Ubuntu, then Windows wouldn't be on most desktop computers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
COKid
Posted

. Linux needs something that only they have that they can offer that's a compelling reason to switch besides ideological or FUD reasons.

 

Ideology means a great deal to some of us, but if you'd rather continue filling the coffers of the wealthy elite, suit yourself. In the words of Robert Frost, I have gone down the path less traveled, and it has made all the difference. I would much rather donate money, which I do, to an individual or small group of people working on an open-source project than to multi-billion dollar corporations whose main priority is their shareholders.

 

Honestly, before Windows 8, I had rarely considered switching to Linux. But now that I have made the leap, oh my god, I feel great! I'm running Debian Wheezy with the Xfce desktop. And sure, everyone has different needs when it comes to programs, but I have had no problem finding what I need that allows me to get things done.

 

I didn't make the move to Linux because of the cost. As I said, I donate freely to developers. No, for me, it just felt "right". The right time, the right way, and for the right reasons. I wish I would have opened my mind and tried Linux years earlier, instead of being simply a dollar sign to Microsoft, Adobe, etc.

 

Computing is fun again. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK
Posted

 If the average user used Ubuntu, then Windows wouldn't be on most desktop computers.

You keep posting this same logical fallacy over and over again.

 

Yes, most users run windows, therefore the "average user" is a windows user. No one is debating this.

 

However we are talking about someone with an "average" amount of computer literacy, equal to that of your average windows user, and saying that ubuntu/linux can certainly be user friendly enough for an "average" user to use, and that there are indeed "average users" out there that do in fact use linux.

 

Trying to say that "windows is on most computers, therefore if another OS was as user friendly as windows then it would be the one on most computers" is just silly. Windows is on most computers because microsoft had a monopoly in this area for many years, and it just became the "de-facto" standard. It is very hard to dethrone a platform that is so encumbered as the "de-facto" standard. I've got nothing against windows and I do think it is a user-friendly OS, and do still use it on one of my computers.

 

Mac OSX also has far less users than windows, and I don't think anyone would argue that an average user cannot use or that they don't use OSX.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster
Posted

Thanks, Viper. What he said.

Link to post
Share on other sites
soldier1st
Posted

The thing is in a few days linux will screw up and something will become corrupt and take you ages to sort. Windows however will keep on chugging away :)

Do you have any proof of that? i've installed Linux Mint 13 on 2 ibm thinkpad T43's in april of this year and they are still runnin fine, i know some1 who has been running Ubuntu 10.04 forever and it still runs great from what i've seen.

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

You keep posting this same logical fallacy over and over again.

 

Yes, most users run windows, therefore the "average user" is a windows user. No one is debating this.

 

However we are talking about someone with an "average" amount of computer literacy, equal to that of your average windows user, and saying that ubuntu/linux can certainly be user friendly enough for an "average" user to use, and that there are indeed "average users" out there that do in fact use linux.

 

Trying to say that "windows is on most computers, therefore if another OS was as user friendly as windows then it would be the one on most computers" is just silly. Windows is on most computers because microsoft had a monopoly in this area for many years, and it just became the "de-facto" standard. It is very hard to dethrone a platform that is so encumbered as the "de-facto" standard. I've got nothing against windows and I do think it is a user-friendly OS, and do still use it on one of my computers.

 

Mac OSX also has far less users than windows, and I don't think anyone would argue that an average user cannot use or that they don't use OSX.

Apparently you misunderstood me.

 

I never stated anything about the ease of use or user friendliness of Ubuntu.

 

What I did say is that if the average user was using Ubuntu, then Windows wouldn't be as popular today.  Instead, Ubuntu would be.

 

User friendliness was not part of my discussion.

 

It can accurately be said that:

The average user does not use GNU/Linux.

The average user does not use OS X.

The average user does not build their own PC.

 

 

In this particular conversation, average can be replaced with the word typical.  Typical is going to be what the norm is.  The norm is windows-based PCs.  That is because of a near monopoly, true.  However, I was never discussing the cause of it.  I certainly never mentioned user friendliness anywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris
Posted

Ideology means a great deal to some of us, but if you'd rather continue filling the coffers of the wealthy elite, suit yourself.

For me it has absolutely nothing to do with "filling coffers" or as I mentioned (and you plainly demonstrated) ideologies. I go with what works for what I need it to do. If it's free. Great. If I find a closed source solution that's even better, whatever, so much the better. If the company that makes it has to sacrifice kittens in a demonic ritual to build it and the end result is better than the FOSS alternatives, sucks to be a kitten then. Snarky aside, in the real world people like to get paid for their work. I have absolutely no problems paying for a quality product, and I get the same in return for my work. A smug sense of self satisfaction doesn't pay the bills, and frankly I have better things to do than perpetually tinker around to get a desktop going, I'll take "it just works" 100% of the time.

Hey, if that's your motivation, by all means knock yourself out. Just don't expect everybody to fall in line with you... I tell the door to door bible thumpers the same thing. Do whatever, just don't shove it down peoples throats.

And besides, I thought I mentioned it a few pages back, but you don't need to throw the sales pitch at me. I've been using Unix long before Linus got some neat ideas from Minix and Stallman started "the movement", and have been using Linux on a daily basis for well over a decade... but thanks. Feel free to travel your roads, some of us have to work in the real world.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ViperAFK
Posted

Apparently you misunderstood me.

 

I never stated anything about the ease of use or user friendliness of Ubuntu.

 

What I did say is that if the average user was using Ubuntu, then Windows wouldn't be as popular today.  Instead, Ubuntu would be.

 

User friendliness was not part of my discussion.

 

It can accurately be said that:

The average user does not use GNU/Linux.

The average user does not use OS X.

The average user does not build their own PC.

 

 

In this particular conversation, average can be replaced with the word typical.  Typical is going to be what the norm is.  The norm is windows-based PCs.  That is because of a near monopoly, true.  However, I was never discussing the cause of it.  I certainly never mentioned user friendliness anywhere.

No one in this thread thinks that the majority of users use ubuntu or linux. When someone says that an "average" user can (and some do) use ubuntu, what they are obviously referring to is user-friendliness, not that most users use ubuntu...

 

You were stating the obvious and being pedantic, which is why people misunderstood you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

Do you deny that?

 

Remember, "average" user.

 

Yes, I deny that.

 

MILLIONS of very average users were already using Commodore 64 -to this date the best selling computer of all time-.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • Linux Mint 20.1 ISOs have been approved for release [Update]
      By zikalify
      Linux Mint 20.1 ISOs have been approved for release [Update]
      by Paul Hill



      Following the beta release of Linux Mint 20.1 in mid-December, the stable release has been finalised and approved for release according to the Linux Mint website. While approved, the Linux Mint project has not yet published a blog post about the release or the ISOs but they are expected imminently.

      For those already running Linux Mint 20, the upgrade will be made available via the Update Manager but upgrading won’t be necessary if you’re happy with your existing setup. Like Linux Mint 20, Linux Mint 20.1 will receive security updates until 2025 as they’re both based on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, however, it will come with desktop improvements and new apps developed by the Linux Mint project.

      Some of the new apps that will be available include Web Apps which lets your turn your favourite sites into web apps accessible from the app menu and an IPTV program called Hypnotix that’ll come pre-loaded with several freely available channels. For Chromium fans, the Mint team has decided to begin compiling the browser itself without a dependence on Ubuntu’s Snap packaging software.

      In a blog post from the end of December, Linux Mint’s head Clem Lefebvre said that there were still some issues that they wanted to work out before the release and couldn’t give an exact release date. Linux Mint is not known for giving exact release dates so there’s nothing out of the ordinary this time around. In the post, Lefebvre also stated that the team was considering an extra ISO image with the Linux 5.8 kernel to address some AMD Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 issues but this extra ISO has not yet shown up on the Mint website.

      Update: Linux Mint 20.1 has now been released and can be downloaded from linuxmint.com.

    • Save 95% off this Complete Computer Networking eBook & Video Course Bundle
      By News Staff
      Save 95% off this Complete Computer Networking eBook & Video Course Bundle
      by Steven Parker

      Today's highlighted deal comes via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store where you can save 95% off this Complete Computer Networking eBook & Video Course Bundle. Attain systems efficiency & security with 14+ hours of video content and 5 comprehensive e books on DevOps, Programming, AWS, CCNA, and more.



      This bundle consists of the following courses:

      The Ultimate Kubernetes Bootcamp by School of Devops [Video]
      Prepare for the CKA Exam — Master Container Orchestration with Kubernetes One Step at a Time AWS Certified Advanced Networking: Specialty Exam Guide [eBook]
      Build Your Knowledge & Technical Expertise as an AWS-Certified Networking Specialist Hands-On Network Programming with C [eBook]
      Learn Socket Programming in C & Write Secure and Optimized Network Codes Analyzing Network Traffic with Wireshark 2.6 [Video]
      Delve Into Network Traffic & Analyze Individual Protocol Data Units Active Directory Administration Cookbook [eBook]
      Actionable, Proven Solutions to Identity Management & Authentication on Servers and in the Cloud Hands-On PowerShell for Active Directory [Video]
      Use PowerShell for Active Directory to Eliminate Manual Labor with Quick Automation Tasks & Functions Effective Jenkins: Getting Started with Continuous Integration [Video]
      Learn Continuous Integration, Automate Your Jenkins Projects & Get Continuous Feedback for Your Upstream/Downstream Projects Hands-On Kubernetes Networking [Video]
      Unravel the Mystery of Networking in Your Kubernetes Cluster in a Pragmatic Manner CCNA Cyber Ops SECOPS: Certification Guide 210-255 [eBook]
      Develop Your Cybersecurity Knowledge to Obtain CyberOps Certification Hands-On Linux for Architects [eBook]
      Design & Implement Linux-Based IT Solutions Good to know
      Updates included Length of time users can access after purchase: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase For a full description, specs, and author info please click here.

      Here's the deal:
      This Complete Computer Networking eBook & Video Course Bundle normally costs* $746 but it can be yours for just $29.99 for a limited time, that's a saving of $716.01 (95%) off the price.

      >> Get this deal, or learn more about it here <<
      See all Online Courses on offer. This is a time limited deal.
      Get $1 credit for every $25 spent · Give $10, Get $10 · 10% off for first-time buyers.

      Not for you?
      If this offer doesn't interest you, why not check out the following offers:



      The Win Your Dream 2020 Tesla Model 3 Giveaway Ivacy VPN - 5 year subscription for just $0.99 per month NordVPN - 2 year subscription at up to 68% off +3 months for free! Private Internet Access VPN - subscriptions at up to 71% off Unlocator VPN or SmartDNS - unblock Geoblock with 7-day free trial Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for Ad-Free experience Disable Sponsored posts · Neowin Deals · Free eBooks · Neowin Store

      Disclosure: This is a StackCommerce deal or giveaway in partnership with Neowin; an account at StackCommerce is required to participate in any deals or giveaways. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site, and it all goes toward the running costs.

    • Pay What You Want for this Complete Linux eBook Bundle
      By News Staff
      Pay What You Want for this Complete Linux eBook Bundle
      by Steven Parker

      Today's highlighted offer comes via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, where for a limited time you can Pay What You Want for the Complete Linux eBook Bundle. The 4-book guide to programming more powerfully and efficiently with Linux.



      How does it work?
      With the Pay What You Want bundles, you can get something incredible for as little as you want to pay. And if you beat the average price, you’ll receive the fully upgraded bundle! Included in this Pay What You Want deal, are the following courses:

      Pay What You Want (as little as $1) for the unlocked eBook:

      Mastering Embedded Linux Programming, Second Edition
      Master the Techniques Needed to Build Great, Efficient Embedded Devices On Linux

      ... and unlock the following eBooks with a bid over the average price:

      Mastering Linux Security & Hardening
      A Comprehensive Guide to Preventing Your Linux System From Getting Compromised

      Linux Shell Scripting Cookbook, Third Edition
      Do Amazing Things with the Linux Shell

      Mastering Linux Shell Scripting, Second Edition
      Master the Complexities of Bash Shell Scripting

      Here's the deal:
      The bundle represents an overall retail value of $160. Pay What You Want for the unlocked courses (as little as $1). Bid the average price or over and you'll take home the entire bundle. Qualify for the giveaway!
      Beat the Leader's price and get entered into the epic giveaway, plus get featured on the leaderboard!

      >> Pay What You Want for this Complete Linux eBook Bundle <<
      See other Pay What You Want deals. This is a time-limited deal.
      Get $1 credit for every $25 spent · Give $10, Get $10 · 10% off for first-time buyers.

      Not for you?
      If this offer doesn't interest you, why not check out the following offers:



      The Win Your Dream 2020 Tesla Model 3 Giveaway Ivacy VPN - 5 year subscription for just $0.99 per month NordVPN - 2 year subscription at up to 68% off +3 months for free! Private Internet Access VPN - subscriptions at up to 71% off Unlocator VPN or SmartDNS - unblock Geoblock with 7-day free trial Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for Ad-Free experience Disable Sponsored posts · Neowin Deals · Free eBooks · Neowin Store

      Disclosure: This is a StackCommerce deal or giveaway in partnership with Neowin; an account at StackCommerce is required to participate in any deals or giveaways. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site, and it all goes toward the running costs.

    • Linux Mint 20.1 'Ulyssa' beta launches with new programs
      By zikalify
      Linux Mint 20.1 'Ulyssa' beta launches with new programs
      by Paul Hill



      The Linux Mint project has just released the beta for Linux Mint 20.1. The new beta is available in the Cinnamon, MATE, and Xfce flavours of Linux Mint and aside from desktop improvements, share the same set of new features.

      Neowin has covered some of Linux Mint’s development updates in recent months and the work that went in then has landed in a more mature form in this beta. Highlights include a new Web Apps tool that lets you turn your favourite sites into web apps accessible from the app menu and IPTV program called Hypnotix has been created and items can be marked as favourites in the file manager on Cinnamon.

      Another change in Linux Mint 20.1, which has been known for quite a while now, is the inclusion of Chromium in the repositories. Chromium had previously been removed from the Linux Mint repositories because the maintainers didn’t like that it had Snap dependencies. The Chromium that is now included is compiled directly by the Mint team and updates will be released in a timely manner.

      As with the other releases in this series, Linux Mint 20.1 will continue to get updates until 2025. Those running Linux Mint 20 will be able to upgrade in a pain-free manner when Linux Mint 20.1 is stable because the base packages will remain the same. Those who choose to download the beta today won’t have to reinstall when the stable version comes out in a few weeks, instead, you just need to make sure you install available updates.

      You can find the three Linux Mint 20.1 beta flavours over on the Evowise mirror which should provide decent download speeds no matter where you are in the world.

    • Firefox 84 launches with support for Apple Silicon CPUs
      By zikalify
      Firefox 84 launches with support for Apple Silicon CPUs
      by Paul Hill



      Mozilla has released Firefox 84 with native support for Apple Silicon CPUs. Firefox 83, by contrast, was released just after Apple’s CPU announcement and had to run using Apple’s Rosetta 2 emulation software on newer Macs.

      Aside from support for Apple Silicon CPUs, it’s worth mentioning again that Firefox 84 is set to be the last version of Firefox that will include support for Adobe Flash. The plug-in, which has largely been supplanted by HTML5 and Unity, was first released in 1996 and sometimes acted as a security weak point.

      Firefox 84 is a big update in terms of Mozilla’s rollout of WebRender, its Servo rendering architecture. The rollout has been extended to devices running macOS Big Sur, Windows devices with Intel Gen 6 GPUs, and Intel laptops running Windows 7 and 8. Linux users with the GNOME desktop with X11 will also get WebRender switched on in this update but it’s unclear when users of other desktop environments and of Wayland will get the feature switched on.

      The final point worth mentioning also pertains to Linux; Mozilla says it is now using “more modern techniques” for allocating shared memory on Linux which improves overall performance and increases compatibility with Docker.

      Head over to the Firefox website now to grab a fresh copy of the browser or wait for your existing installation to upgrade itself. You can also force the upgrade by going to the Menu button > Help > About Firefox where you should see the update download and eventually offer to restart the browser.