Linux vs Windows


Recommended Posts

ViperAFK

Yes, there is commercial software on Linux. There is commercial software and open source software on every OS. No doubt about that. However, the entire idea being pushed to the masses is that Linux and other FOSS software are some how better because you have the code in hand and this is not true at all. None of this is a stereo type, it's been pushed by the Linux and FOSS community for years.

Let me guess, you have just used Linux recently over the past few years. Nothing I wrote was a stereo type, it's really not. You are not living in reality.

I started using computers back in 1982 and I know what FOSS is and I know the licenses and I know what has been pushed by the FOSS community and also Richard.

I have been using Unix since 1994 from Washington University. I am not a newbie dude.

It does not matter when you started using computers, it does not make what you are saying any less absurd. Everything you wrote is a stereotype and/or a gross generalization.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yogurtmaster

It does not matter when you started using computers, it does not make what you are saying any less absurd. Everything you wrote is a stereotype and/or a gross generalization.

For years many people would point out the reason why Linux was better than anything else was because the code was available and you can take that code and add what you want to it.

So, now things have changed?

I guess if what you have said is true than the FOSS advocates and zealots have moved somewhere else?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

It is mostly true. I am sure I can think of more, but it can also be hard to find open source equivalents to some commercial programs.

Photoshop vs Gimp

Microsoft Office vs Open Office

MacOS X vs Linux

Windows 7 vs Linux

any commercial program vs Audacity

quickbooks vs everything

I agree with you if you are talking about a narrow amount of professionals who use these products to make their living. However, for most average users, better is subjective. Photoshop might be better, but it's not $700 better just to tweak a home photo now and then. I use Excel at work for advanced spreadsheets and it's worth the price to me, but to the secretary down the hall it's nearly worthless. And it's not worth the price for my home use, since I use a spreadsheet to keep track of my home inventory and my bill paying. 

 

If something is better depends on it's usage. I use mostly free at home ( as a hobbyist) and make it just fine. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
neohelp

I agree with you if you are talking about a narrow amount of professionals who use these products to make their living. However, for most average users, better is subjective. Photoshop might be better, but it's not $700 better just to tweak a home photo now and then. I use Excel at work for advanced spreadsheets and it's worth the price to me, but to the secretary down the hall it's nearly worthless. And it's not worth the price for my home use, since I use a spreadsheet to keep track of my home inventory and my bill paying. 

 

If something is better depends on it's usage. I use mostly free at home ( as a hobbyist) and make it just fine.

Im not doing this to provoke you or anything but I really want to know your defense against those two points:

1: Why compare the install and update time between a 3 year old operating system vs a 2 month old one?

2: Where is a source that has realiable and undisputed proof of there being a backdoor in Windows?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified

It is mostly true. I am sure I can think of more, but it can also be hard to find open source equivalents to some commercial programs.

Photoshop vs Gimp

Microsoft Office vs Open Office

MacOS X vs Linux

Windows 7 vs Linux

any commercial program vs Audacity

quickbooks vs everything

I am sure you can give me very small amounts of cases where the other is true. I am not talking about other things like JavaScript apps. I am talking about comparing commercial programs to their open source counterparts.

I am not a Richard Stallman fan. Sure, I admire that he went to Harvard and then later on to MIT, but the man is totally wacked out. I believe he is too unrealistic in his approach to FOSS.

 

I can't take you seriously if you think Windows or OS X are intrinsically better than a random GNU/Linux distro. I think we have clearly established that these cannot be compared.

 

You strike me as generalizing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
kaylathenongeek

To be honest, whilst I believe Linux has its place, it's not ready to be a primary desktop OS as yet. No distro is ready - that's why I only use Linux in a VM. And many of the 'free' software that comes with Linux is crappy, to be honest, and having all of that downloaded and installed by default is something I hate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

To be honest, whilst I believe Linux has its place, it's not ready to be a primary desktop OS as yet. No distro is ready - that's why I only use Linux in a VM. And many of the 'free' software that comes with Linux is crappy, to be honest, and having all of that downloaded and installed by default is something I hate.

Well I'm not touching most of that, for me it's not ready but I know plenty of people who are quite happy with it as their desktop OS and I'm sure you're going to be hearing about it in this thread soon, but there are distros that you build up from a core OS instead of tearing down an everything-plus-three-forks-of-kitchen-sink install, or they provide detailed options during the installation so you can weed out stuff you don't want. I'm the same way with Windows.. I avoid pre-built systems like the plague but if I do get one the first thing that happens is it gets erased. You can keep your crapware/trials/etc thanks.
Link to post
Share on other sites
PGHammer

Well I'm not touching most of that, for me it's not ready but I know plenty of people who are quite happy with it as their desktop OS and I'm sure you're going to be hearing about it in this thread soon, but there are distros that you build up from a core OS instead of tearing down an everything-plus-three-forks-of-kitchen-sink install, or they provide detailed options during the installation so you can weed out stuff you don't want. I'm the same way with Windows.. I avoid pre-built systems like the plague but if I do get one the first thing that happens is it gets erased. You can keep your crapware/trials/etc thanks.

There are many folks that are quite happy with Linux distributions, and as a desktop OS.  However, when put on the spot, the reasons given are typically as un-objective (subjective, in other words) as any commercial OS - including commercial Linux distributions, such as RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).  When it gets down to brass tacks, all OS choice for individual use is subjective - not objective; it's why non-enterprise OS usage is as splintered as it is, and especially among Linux distributions.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

To be honest, whilst I believe Linux has its place, it's not ready to be a primary desktop OS as yet. No distro is ready - that's why I only use Linux in a VM. And many of the 'free' software that comes with Linux is crappy, to be honest, and having all of that downloaded and installed by default is something I hate.

It's more than ready for me. The programs that I use in Windows are the same programs that I use in Linux. I don't need Office or Adobe CS at home. I can get by rather nicely with native tools. I even rip DVDs in Linux. To each their own, though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
ZakO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOP500

 

Linux - 476
Windows - 3

All Top 10 places are Linux based.

 

A supercomputer is usually headless worker machine and requires specialized changes to the operating system... obviously they're going to be running an OS/kernel that can be recompiled with certain optimizations. What's your point? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

What's your point? 

This is a Linux vs Windows thread. :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

This is a Linux vs Windows thread. :D

By your own first post, it's a Linux vs Windows on a consumer desktop thread... being on a phone or supercomputer really doesn't have anything to do with it, it's an entirely different application of the software running on different hardware and an entirely different set of needs being served. Just because a supercomputer might be running Windows HPC doesn't mean it'd make a great desktop OS either.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

f you consider NetApplications' data set, then Linux owns only about 1 percent of the desktop OS market and Windows has almost 92 percent. But if you consider all computing platforms, including mobile, than Windows has only 20 percent and Linux has 42 percent - and that would be in the form of Google's Android alone.

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/linux-windows-microsoft-android-ios,20220.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris
Again, different hardware and different application of the software, never mind it's the Linux kernel, you're not running KDE on your phone and I can't automagically run Android software on my Linux desktop, a virtual machine of some sort is still required. You got the unofficial x86 port of Android of course, but you're still locked into the Android desktop, you can't bring over Linux software and go on your merry way. It's not the same thing.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Growled

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013431/10-reasons-to-choose-ubuntu-12-10-over-windows-8.html

 


Both Microsoft and Canonical have received considerable flak for the default user interfaces in their respective OSs. In Microsoft's case, of course, it's the Modern UI, formerly known as Metro; in Canonical's case, it's Unity. Both are designed with touchscreens in mind, and borrow heavily from the mobile world.

 

By removing the Start button and overhauling the way users interact with the operating system, Windows 8's Modern interface poses a considerable challenge for users, who face a significant learning curve.

 

Unity, on the other hand, became a default part of Ubuntu back in April 2011 with Ubuntu 11.04 ?Natty Narwhal.? It has definitely undergone growing pains, but more than a year has passed, and Canonical has revised the interface accordingly. Although it still has numerous critics, most people concede that it has matured and improved. Some observers, in fact, have even suggested that it may feel more familiar to many longtime Windows users than does Windows 8.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

I'm probably in the minority but I (mostly) like where Unity's going, second favorite behind KDE. Like it much better over that train wreck that is Gnome 3, makes Win 8 look good. (And yea, that's opinion.) Big question mark about the display server though.

But that said, meh, it's a non-issue for both. Both are different than what people were used to but both are also stupidly easy to pick up, I'd give it to Windows 8 there though as once you spend 10 seconds to see that little intro, you still got same software, same desktop, etc as you had before, just a different set of menus.. 10 seconds to customize it and you'd have a desktop with zero learning curve while the clueless new Unity user is still trying in vain to move the taskbar to the bottom or navigate (or even customize) the Unity menu.. the dash and hidden menus alone can be confusing.. "where's the f'ing file menu?!?" Both can also have their look and feel radically changed rather easily. Also some of these authors tend to forget that Windows has been able to change shells to something completely difference since, well, forever.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
medhunter

Me, too.I like unity.I find it productive especially, the hood.I used to like KDE before.

I think because I like to be keyboard dependent with no mouse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Growled

I've honestly only tried Ubuntu on my crappy (legacy graphics card with no 3D) desktop but I didn't care much for it. I prefer lite weight on it anyway since I do a lot of video and graphics work. I might have a different opinion if I tried Ubuntu on my laptop. But Unity really annoys me from my time spent with it. The HUD seems fine but I'm really more of a mouse guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Major_Plonquer

Well, yeah, because Windows has to do upgrade 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, wherein Linux, can skip from nothing to 5. There is less to update, too. As Linux doesn't have all these security holes.

Yes it does.  Linux is by FAR the easiest system to hack.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ichi

Yes it does.  Linux is by FAR the easiest system to hack.

 

I guess that might depend on the situation (eg. software running on it). As a broad statement though, pwn2own seems to disagree with that (at least up to the last year it was part of the contest), and so does the pwnium contest.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster

Yes it does.  Linux is by FAR the easiest system to hack.

 

With backtrack, you can do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Noir Angel

The main reason most supercomputers use Linux is simple: Licensing for Windows is prohibitively expensive for machines with a lot of physical CPUs, and access to the code makes it easier to manipulate it to those needs. Supercomputers are very specialised, they don't represent normal usage.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By News Staff
      Practical Linux Security Cookbook - Second Edition ($35.99 Value) Free Download
      by Steven Parker

      Claim your complimentary eBook (worth $35.99) for free, before the offer expires on 03/03.



      Over the last few years, system security has gained a lot of momentum and software professionals are focusing heavily on it.



      Linux is often treated as a highly secure operating system. However, the reality is that Linux has its share of security aws, and these security aws allow attackers to get into your system and modify or even destroy your important data. But there’s no need to panic, since there are various mechanisms by which these aws can be removed, and this book will help you learn about different types of Linux security to create a more secure Linux system.

      With a step-by-step recipe approach, the book starts by introducing you to various threats to Linux systems. Then, this book will walk you through customizing the Linux kernel and securing local files. Next, you will move on to managing user authentication both locally and remotely and mitigating network attacks. Later, you will learn about application security and kernel vulnerabilities. You will also learn about patching Bash vulnerability, packet filtering, handling incidents, and monitoring system logs. Finally, you will learn about auditing using system services and performing vulnerability scanning on Linux.

      By the end of this book, you will be able to secure your Linux systems and create a robust environment.

      This free offer expires on March 3.

      How to get it
      Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these free offers, you will not need to re-register. While supplies last!

      >> Practical Linux Security Cookbook - Second Edition ($35.99 Value) - free download <<
      Offered by Packt Publishing, view their other free resources. Expires 03/03/21.

      Not for you?
      That's OK, there are other deals on offer you can check out here.



      Home Gym Giveaway | Ultimate Gaming Giveaway (feat. PlayStation 5 & Xbox Series X) Ivacy VPN - 5 year subscription for just $1 per month NordVPN - 2 year subscription at up to 68% off Private Internet Access VPN - subscriptions at up to 71% off Unlocator VPN or SmartDNS - unblock Geoblock with 7-day free trial Neowin Store for our preferred partners. Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for Ad-Free experience Disable Sponsored posts · Neowin Deals · Free eBooks · Neowin Store

      Disclosure: This is a StackCommerce deal or giveaway in partnership with Neowin; an account at StackCommerce is required to participate in any deals or giveaways. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site, and it all goes toward the running costs.

    • By zikalify
      Debian 10.8 launches with new software patches and updates
      by Paul Hill

      Image via Alex Makas The Debian Project has announced the availability of Debian 10.8, the eighth update to its stable distribution Debian 10. Each time a point release is made available, a new ISO is spun with all the latest security fixes and software updates so that they do not need to be installed when Debian is installed on a new system.

      Some packages that have received updates with Debian 10.8 include Firefox ESR, Chromium, Flatpak, VLC, the Linux kernel, OpenSSL, X.Org, APT and Thunderbird. The NVIDIA graphics drivers have also been updated to a newer upstream version that fixes a denial of service issue.

      Appealing to users to think about the environment, the Debian Project said:

      Debian 10 was first launched on July 6, 2019, and it’s set to receive long-term support until 2024. Each new version of Debian arrives every two years but launch dates are not set in stone. If there aren’t any delays, Debian 11 should come out this year and Debian 10 will be demoted to the status of Old Stable alongside Debian 9 which is maintained by the main Debian security team until July 18, 2020.

    • By zikalify
      Canonical releases second point release of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
      by Paul Hill



      Canonical has announced the availability of Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS – the second point release for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. As with other point releases, Canonical has spun a new ISO that includes all the security and software updates and it comes with the latest hardware enablement stacks so that newer hardware works properly.

      Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS is available for the Desktop, Server, and Cloud products as well as other flavours of Ubuntu such as Kubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie, Ubuntu MATE, Lubuntu, Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu Studio, and Xubuntu. If you want to download any of the Ubuntu products or the spins, head over to the Ubuntu downloads page and find what you want.

      According to the Ubuntu 20.04 release notes page, Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS ships with the Linux 5.8 kernel instead of Linux 5.4 which was the original kernel shipped last April when Focal Fossa came out. Those installing Ubuntu Server will have to opt-in to using the new kernel through the installer bootloader as it’s not the default choice.

      As with all Ubuntu LTS releases, you should expect security and software updates for five years until the first half of 2025. The derivative flavours are an exception, however, receiving support for just three years.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Total War: Warhammer III announced by Creative Assembly, coming this year
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      The Total War: Warhammer trilogy that Creative Assembly began back in 2016 is concluding this year with the newly revealed third entry. After several teasers from the past few days, publisher Sega announced the latest turn-based and real-time strategy title today with a brand new cinematic trailer, catch it above.

      Total War: Warhammer III will have the conflict expanding to further territories like the Realms of Chaos and Lands of the East. New fantasy races are incoming too, with Kislev and Cathay, as well as Chaos factions Khorne, Nurgle, Slaanesh and Tzeentch. The studio promises to deliver the most diverse array of "legendary heroes, gargantuan monsters, flying creatures and magical powers that the series has ever seen."

      "Our vision, from the start, was to create a series that felt like an incredible journey through this world we all loved," said game director Ian Roxburgh. "The enormous support of our players in ensuring the success of the first two installments has pushed our ambition to new heights, and we can’t wait for everyone to experience it."

      Like in the first two games, Creative Assembly will allow players to combine the maps of the complete trilogy to have one massive campaign. However, this will arrive as a post-launch free update, as the studio's full focus is currently on Total War: Warhammer 3.

      Total War: Warhammer 3 is coming to Windows later this year, with Linux and macOS versions coming soon after. Both Steam and Epic Games Store versions are currently available for pre-order, and Creative Assembly will be bringing the previous two games and all their DLC to the latter store before the latest game's launch.

    • By zikalify
      Canonical launches Ubuntu Core 20 for IoT devices
      by Paul Hill



      Canonical has announced the general availability of Ubuntu Core 20, a stripped back version of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS designed for IoT devices and embedded systems. According to the company, this update improves device security with the inclusion of secure boot, full disk encryption and secure device recovery.

      Ubuntu Core is available for many popular x86 and ARM single board computers making it pretty accessible. IoT devices are not always easy to update so Canonical has configured Ubuntu Core to provide automated and reliable updates out of the box so end users don’t need to worry about updating their devices. While an LTS is usually supported for five years, it provides business-critical devices with 10 years of support.

      Commenting on today’s launch CEO Mark Shuttleworth said:

      Probably the most familiar device that can run Ubuntu Core, is the Raspberry Pi Compute Module. If you have a Raspberry Pi Compute Module or other compatible device lying around you can get it to work with Ubuntu Core 20 by heading over to the IoT section of the Ubuntu website and scrolling down to Ubuntu Core.