Share

Recommended Posts

Crisp

NASA Ames Director: We?re Closer To Answering, ?Are We Alone??

 

1105_earth-like-624x350.jpg

An artist?s illustration of Kepler-62f, a planet in the ?habitable zone? of a star that is slightly smaller and cooler than ours. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle)

 

India successfully launched its first space mission to Mars today. The orbiter, named Mangalyaan, is expected to land on Mars on Sept. 24, 2014. It would make India the fourth country to successfully land a spacecraft on Mars.

Meanwhile, scientists have estimated that in the Milky Way, there are 8.8 billion stars with Earth-sized planets at temperatures that would allow water in liquid form.

 

?Its a really neat result, it?s one that nobody expected 20 years ago that we could even do,? Pete Worden, director of NASA?s Ames Research Center, told Here & Now?s Jeremy Hobson.

NASA?s Kepler satellite took a census of about 4,000 of the planets in the galaxy, and from there, Warden says, scientists have been able to extrapolate what their solar systems looked like.

The next step is to determine whether the plants are habitable. Near the end of the decade, there will be a mission aimed at determining whether some of the nearest Earth-like neighbors have oxygen and water in their atmospheres.

?In the next five or ten years, I think we?re going have a really good indication of, ?Are we alone,?? Worden said.

 

Source and more

Link to post
Share on other sites

astropheed

And then what? Go and visit them? Kind of far. I almost rather not know. It's far easier to deal with, "Is there life out there?", than it is to deal with, "There is life out there, and we're not smart enough to get to it...".

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

The article starts off badly with -

India successfully launched its first space mission to Mars today. The orbiter, named Mangalyaan, is expected to land on Mars on Sept. 24, 2014. It would make India the fourth country to successfully land a spacecraft on Mars.

Mangalyaan is a Mars orbiter ONLY, not a lander.

As to knowing/not knowing, knowledge is better. It tells you many things about the conditions that can support exobiology and that can give you hints about what happened here.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

IsItPluggedIn

If they found a planet that had life. Imagine how much money would be pored into space exploration. Within 50 years we would have means to get there.

 

We would have a new common goal. Maybe even a global one to work towards. This would bring people together.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Boo Berry

It's already been answered.  :alien:

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

That depends on the relative stage of development between us and an alien civilization. On Earth the less developed civilization usually doesn't fare too well, so it could he a period of passive observation, signals and probes approaching from a different direction would be prudent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dead.cell

That depends on the relative stage of development between us and an alien civilization. On Earth the less developed civilization usually doesn't fare too well, so it could he a period of passive observation, signals and probes approaching from a different direction, would be prudent.

And just like that, we become the aliens. :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

Yup, and with the recent rapid advances in bionics and bio-augmentation we'll be the prototype for the BORG too.

Did you ever stop to think that social media is the first baby step towards their hive mind? Implant the comm devices (cell becomes node) and make a direct hardware/wetware connection (already in the works as the brain-machine interface - BMI) and you're half way there.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IsItPluggedIn

If we found a primitive race do you think we would try to help them, leave them alone,  try to rule them or put them in Zoo's and wipe out the rest?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

If smart we'd leave them alone and just observe until they turn outwards and reach the SETI stage. We usually aren't that smart.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

thomastmc

Knowing is always better than not knowing. Without knowledge reality becomes a bleak, bland, and boring existence of ignorance. I'm glad that I know that there are stars and galaxies and planets out there, even if I may never be able to visit them. The knowledge itself is very entertaining and thought provoking.
 
Theoretical physicists and Astrophysicists can tell you several ways in which it may be possible for humans to travel to other stars and even other galaxies quickly. We are incapable of testing any of them yet, but they do have the math to back it up. We also don't even know most of what is possible or impossible yet.
 
Even in the 1950's, it was very prudent for someone who was educated and well informed to declare that sending a man to the moon was impossible. It turned out to be extremely possible.
 
Humans will eventually visit these planets, the only question is when. Finding them is the first step.
 
We probably will treat animals on these planets in the same way we treat animals on this planet. Some will become food, others will become zoo attractions. How we treat other intelligent species will be the question. Robots are our new slaves and will even replace all low wage workers eventually. And, with billions of planets to choose from, territory and resources won't be a factor either. We will study more primitive intelligent species, and either cooperate or simply coexist with others.
 

Clarke's Three Laws are three "laws" of prediction formulated by the British writer Arthur C. Clarke. They are:

 

1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

Clarke was 100% correct with his three laws of prediction. Also;

No statement should be believed because it is made by an authority.

--Robert A. Heinlein

Today's most public example is how SpaceX is turning rocketry on its ear with their work on reusable, vertically landable launchers. 2 years ago the "experts" laughed, but no more.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hum

pffft .... It is already very clear, We are NOT Alone.

 

We never were.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Crisp

We would have a new common goal. Maybe even a global one to work towards. This would bring people together.

 

and a new wave of terrorism, because the religious fanatics wouldn't be able to accept they're wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

FYI the church has accepted the idea of off-world life for quite some time - just another zip code in creation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dot Matrix

FYI the church has accepted the idea of off-world life for quite some time - just another zip code in creation.

There's still sects out there that don't believe that. Earth is Eden and there is no other. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustGeorge

If smart we'd leave them alone and just observe until they turn outwards and reach the SETI stage. We usually aren't that smart.

Laugh it off, but the Prime Directive from Star Trek would make alot of sense in this situation. Hell, take a bunch of info from TNG and make it into a space exploration directives guide book.

 

We're close to having fusion, "warp drive" may not be impossible and I've read some stories awhile back about energy shielding. Combine all of this with other tech advances and we're probably less than a 75~100 years away from a real Star Trek universe. Shame most of us will not live to see it :(

 

I think once we've mastered fusion power, everything else will fall into place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Praetor

well, considering that people believed (before cars existed) that a man could not survive if traveled more than 60Km/h, i really can't even conceive the technological wonders we will have in 75 to 100 years from now.

 

Also don't know why some religious sectors can't live with the fact that we most likely aren't alone; heck, it doesn't change nothing!

 

And i think knowledge is one of the most fundamental things we, as humans, can achieve and possess; without it we are simply regarded to our most basic instincts and fears. having said that if we ever find a intelligent alien civilization we should leave them alone, hoping that they won't hunt us for sport or turning into a xenomorph and have us for lunch :woot:

Link to post
Share on other sites

JustGeorge

well, considering that people believed (before cars existed) that a man could not survive if traveled more than 60Km/h, i really can't even conceive the technological wonders we will have in 75 to 100 years from now.

 

Also don't know why some religious sectors can't live with the fact that we most likely aren't alone; heck, it doesn't change nothing!

 

And i think knowledge is one of the most fundamental things we, as humans, can achieve and possess; without it we are simply regarded to our most basic instincts and fears. having said that if we ever find a intelligent alien civilization we should leave them alone, hoping that they won't hunt us for sport or turning into a xenomorph and have us for lunch :woot:

I'm not in favor of establishing contact with any species we can't "own" if need be. It will not go well for us if we run into beings more advanced than us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Praetor

I'm not in favor of establishing contact with any species we can't "own" if need be. It will not go well for us if we run into beings more advanced than us.

 

well, according to Star Trek (:D) that's not necessary true. Yes they might be a warrior society or a mixed one like humans or they can be so advanced that consider us a non-threat and even try to help us to evolve. Still, as Stephen Hawkings said about humans making contact with intelligent and advanced aliens: "might be a bit like the original inhabitants of America meeting Columbus. I don't think they were better off for it."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dot Matrix

An Enterprise would be nice, but I'll take the battlestar Galactica anyday.  :D

 

I honestly think BSG is closer to the type of FTL engines we'll have someday. I don't see man (or anything, really) actually travelling faster than light. Maybe we can push probes up to relativistic speeds, but certainly not faster than light.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

DocM

NASA is moving forward research into quantum field thrusters & drives (Q-thrusters.) No propellant - the drive pushes against the quantum foam of spacetime itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crisp

And then what? Go and visit them? Kind of far. I almost rather not know. It's far easier to deal with, "Is there life out there?", than it is to deal with, "There is life out there, and we're not smart enough to get to it...".

 

If we could develop a ship that could travel at 99% the speed of light, it would only take 80 years to reach the edge of the galaxy.

 

1 day on board a ship traveling at 99% the speed of light, would be the same as 1 year on Earth. - Nearing the cosmic speed limit slows time down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fusi0n

pffft .... It is already very clear, We are NOT Alone.

 

We never were.

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

astropheed

If we could develop a ship that could travel at 99% the speed of light, it would only take 80 years to reach the edge of the galaxy.

 

1 day on board a ship traveling at 99% the speed of light, would be the same as 1 year on Earth. - Nearing the cosmic speed limit slows time down.

 

The edge of what galaxy? The closest edge to us in our Galaxy is about 10,000 - 15,000 light years away. Milky way is over 100,000 Light years in Diameter and we're about 2/3 out on one of the spiraling arms. At 100% light speed it'd take at least 10,000 years to reach the closest edge.

 

Where you got your number from I have no clue. It's a big place.

 

Also did some research on the effects of Time Dilation. 1 day on board a ship travelling at 99% the speed of light would be equivalent to approx. 20 days of Earth-time relative to the Astronaut. Not even close to one year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      TWIRL 24: United Launch Alliance to send CST-100 Starliner to the ISS
      by Paul Hill



      Following several weeks of billionaires launching themselves into space, we have a quieter week with just two confirmed launches. The first launch comes from the United Launch Alliance which will send its CST-100 Starliner on an uncrewed mission to the International Space Station (ISS) and the launch of a communications satellite called Zhongxing 2E from China.

      Tuesday, August 3
      The first launch of the week comes from the United Launch Alliance (ULA) where an Atlas V rocket will launch the second CST-100 Starliner on a second uncrewed Orbital Flight Test (OFT-2) to the ISS as part of NASA’s commercial crew program. While the craft won’t be delivering humans to the ISS, it will be carrying 345kg of cargo for the astronauts already aboard. The CST-100 Starliner is expected to stay in space for five to 10 days before making its way back to Earth where it’s due to land in the Western United States. ULA did attempt this launch last Friday but it seems to have been delayed, the live stream link for the event remains the same as last week. The launch is expected at 5:20 p.m. UTC.

      Friday, August 6
      One of China’s Long March CZ-3B/E is set to launch the Zhongxing 2E communications satellite into orbit on Friday from the Xichang Satellite Launch Center. The technical details of this satellite are not known but its relation to other satellites suggests that it will be able to deliver secure voice and data communications to ground terminals. It could also feature advanced multiple steerable spot beam antenna technology so that ground users can communicate while they’re on the go. A stream for this launch isn’t likely. Its launch is slated for 3:00 p.m. UTC.

      Recap
      We were treated to several launches last week, the first was a Long March 2D carrying the Tianhui 1D satellite for the Hangtian Dongfanghond Weixing Corporation and the Chinese Academy of Space Technology for performing remote image sensing.

      The second launch was a Rocket Lab Electron rocket carrying the Monolith satellite for the United States Space Force (USSF) Space Test Program (STP). The mission was called ‘It’s a Little Chile Up Here’.

      The final launch was an Ariane 5 ECA+ carrying the Star One D2 and Eutelsat Quantum communications into orbit. The Star One D2 satellite is owned by Embratel Star One, a Brazilian telecoms firm. The satellite will deliver telecommunications, direct-to-home television services, and fast broadband across parts of the Americas.



    • By Chandrakant
      Jeff Bezos gives NASA an offer it can't refuse to win the moon mission contract
      by Chandrakant Isi



      In Godfather-like fashion, billionaire Jeff Bezos has made NASA an offer it can't refuse. In a bid to secure a manned lunar lander mission for Blue Origin, its Founder who also happens to be the wealthiest man on the planet has offered to waive $2 billion of payments.

      For those not in the know, this is a reaction to NASA's decision to award a $2.9 billion lunar lander contract to Elon Musk's SpaceX. Blue Origin has already managed to put this program on hold by filing a complaint with the Government Accountability Office (GOA) claiming favorable treatment to SpaceX.

      In a letter to NASA's Administrator, Bill Nelson, Bezos emphasizes how "meaningful competition" is crucial to take the Americans back to the moon, perhaps making you wonder how he feels about Amazon's monopoly in e-commerce. Bezos highlights that in April, only SpaceX was given a chance to revise their pricing, which led to their selection. The billionaire called it a "mistake" but stated it is "not too late to remedy".



      As a solution, Bezos has offered to waive payments of up to $2 billion. Mind you, it is not like Amazon Buy Now, Pay Later scheme. As mentioned in the letter, it is an outright and permanent waiver of those payments. Blue Origin is willing to accept a fixed-price contract and will take care of any cost overruns.

      Bezos believes that his offer takes care of "NASA's near term budgetary issues". As a result, the space agency can now afford to go ahead with the "dual-source" strategy for the Artemis program.

      NASA and Bezos' rival billionaire Elon Musk, have not yet commented on this offer. It will be interesting to see if $2 billion are enough to influence a decision at the most prolific space agency in the world.

    • By Chandrakant
      SpaceX to fly NASA's reconnaissance mission to Jovian moon Europa
      by Chandrakant Isi



      Elon Musk's SpaceX has bagged another contract from NASA. The private space exploration company has been awarded approximately $178 million to fly the upcoming Europa Clipper mission on its Falcon Heavy rocket. That's significantly cost effective compared to NASA's in-house Space Launch System (SLS) that burns around $2 billion per launch. The Europa Clipper mission is expected to take off in 2024 from Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

      Europa is one of the most fascinating heavenly bodies in our solar system. The Jovian moon has been on the radar of astronomers due to the vast ocean underneath its icy shell. It is one of the most likely places in our solar system to harbor life as we know it. Hence, NASA has been planning the Europa Clipper mission to closely study this Jovian moon and scout for possible landing sites for future lander missions.

      The Europa Clipper spacecraft will be equipped with several instruments to study if this icy moon harbors conditions suitable for life. The reconnaissance mission will focus on capturing high-resolution images of Europa's surface and detect signs of geological activity. The onboard spectrography sensors will try to determine the moon's composition. NASA also hopes to measure the thickness of Europa's icy shell and the depth and salinity of the sub-surface ocean.



      Based on current data, Europa's ice shell probably has a depth of 10 to 15 miles. Below that lies an ocean with depths of whopping 40 to 100 miles. To put things in perspective, although Europa's diameter is only one-fourth to that of Earth, it may hold twice as much water compared to our home planet.

      In addition to this latest contract, SpaceX recently won a $2.9 billion contract from NASA to build a lunar lander. However, it has been put on hold after Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin filed a complaint with the Government Accountability Office (GOA) over NASA's favorable treatment to SpaceX among other things.

    • By zikalify
      TWIRL 23: FAA denies Branson and Bezos astronaut title
      by Paul Hill



      Over the last few editions of This Week in Rocket Launches, we’ve covered Richard Branson’s and Jeff Bezos’ trips to space aboard their own spacecraft. Following their successful launches, the U.S.’ Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has come up with new rules which deprive the billionaires and their passengers of the title astronaut. Under the new definition, those looking to get the title must be part of the flight crew and make contributions to space flight safety.

      Despite the FAA’s rejection of the billionaire’s claim to be astronauts, BBC reports that the FAA will offer honorary awards based on merit but that these are offered at the discretion of the FAA’s associate administrator. It’s unclear yet whether the FAA will recognise those on the two launches or not at this time.

      Now, let's take a look at next week's launches.

      Tuesday, July 27
      The first launch of the week comes from China where a Long March CZ-2D will carry the Tianhui 1D satellite into orbit. The satellite was built by the Hangtian Dongfanghong Weixing Corporation and the Chinese Academy of Space Technology, it includes a three-dimensional imaging system. The constellation this satellite is part of has been merged with part of the Ziyuan Earth Observation program that’s made up of civilian and military remote sensing satellites.

      Friday, July 30
      There are two launches on Friday, the first is a United Launch Alliance Atlas V N22 rocket carrying the second CST-100 Starliner. The CST-100 Starliner will be doing its second uncrewed Orbital Flight Test (OFT-2) to the International Space Station as part of NASA’s commercial crew program. The craft will dock at the ISS for 5 to 10 days and will arrive with 345kg of cargo for those aboard. The cargo will consist of food and crew preference items. You will be able to see the launch on YouTube.

      The second launch on Friday will be from Arianespace which will launch the Ariane 5 ECA+ rocket carrying the Star One D2 and Eutelsat Quantum communications satellites into orbit. The Star One D2 satellite is owned by Embratel Star One and will deliver telecommunications, direct-to-home television services, and fast broadband to people in South America, Mexico, Central America, and parts of the Atlantic Ocean.

      Recap
      The first launch we got last week was the Long March 2C carrying the Yaogan 30 Group 10 and Tianqi 15 satellites. The Yaogan satellites will perform electromagnetic detection.

      The second launch was the popularized New Shepard 16 carrying Jeff Bezos and co. to the edge of space.

      Finally, Roscosmos launched the much delayed Nauka module into space aboard a Proton M rocket. It will add about 14-meters to the ISS and is carrying the European Robotic Arm for the European Space Agency.