DsnBehind Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 What the... :unsure: The image I linked to in my signature is 600x157, but it cuts-off at 550x157. :blink: I tried removing the entire signature, different skins, and re-uploading it: nothing. Why? WHY??? :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadishTM Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 It's by design now, deal with it .... Radish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DsnBehind Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 I thought the new signature guidelines were 600x170? What about all of the people who have those wide ass signatures? So many questions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadishTM Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 The guidelines for signatures have changed & will be updated in due course .... So that puts people with wide ass signatures **** out of luck .... Radish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thingsforjason Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 i thought max width was 600 too...but then again, i don't pay much attention to the new sig rules. i used to just click the link that voodoo had in his sig, but i think that's gone. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premgenius Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 so wot are the new sig sizes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 so wot are the new sig sizes? https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=7&t=25368&s= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahfunaki Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=...;t=25368&s= Well that says 170x600... And my sig is 94x583 and it is still being cutoff...whats the deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Yours is 88x523 on my screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 Yours is 88x523 on my screen. Same here... maybe he already changed it? On a side note, I don't know why peope need sigs that are over 550 px in length anyway. Maybe I just have no imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahfunaki Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Yea, I did change it... It was this before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 And here it is within the new Guidelines (doesn't seem like a drastic change to me): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 There may be something wrong with the starting point the code uses to measure 600px, it shouldn't have chopped the one that was under the 600px. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 There may be something wrong with the starting point the code uses to measure 600px, it shouldn't have chopped the one that was under the 600px. Really? Cause I heard Keldyn talking about the size of sigs changing, and Radish? has also made mention of it. I assumed the width had been reduced to 550 px. Hmmm... now that I look back, Keldyn did say it was reduced to 600... so I guess you're right about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahfunaki Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Yea, i think somthings wrong...hmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I think it was set at 550, but that Keldyn wrote 600. We'll have to wait and see which one it is in the end, I guess. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahfunaki Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Ah alright, well that makes sense then... I hope it's 600...yep yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thingsforjason Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 anyone know why my sig is cut off? it's missing the bottom black border...it's only a one pixel border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SYBOLD Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 not here, what browser, screen res. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thingsforjason Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 winxp, ie6, 1152x864. it happens on my laptop too, which is running 1024x768 it appears to just be missing the last pixel, but i haven't photoshopped it to actually check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 I see it too (1024x768): here is the sig (from Tim's site): Here is what I see: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 everyone should just use 1024x768 or higher, and we wouldn't have these problems :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thingsforjason Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 that's what i see too...on both computers. and i'm using at least 1024 :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted November 26, 2003 Veteran Share Posted November 26, 2003 everyone should just use 1024x768 or higher, and we wouldn't have these problems :D lol We are at 1024x768 and higher. :p You know, I didn't notice it until now, but the bottom border on my sig is gone too! See the sig here: Now compare it to the one below. Hmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts