kryptonik Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 timdorr: In the end they are all the same. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redestium Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 Maybe a dual core G4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjmUK Posted December 6, 2003 Share Posted December 6, 2003 MacRumors is a great source, yes it is rumours...but, they are incredibly accurate. Last year I monitored their site and 9 times out of 10 - they have been accurate with release dates and hardware specs. 30" Cinema Display - possible, but unofficial IBM PowerPC 970FX 2.0GHz-2.6GHz - possible, but unofficial The CPU's are the most likely, the 30" is a rumour...but they're sources are 9/10 accurate. So as I said before, only time can tell. Hopefully we'll see the new iMac on the 24th too. Rumour / Speculation says it may be a G5 iMac with a silver finish instead of the current white one. And also running up to 2.0GHz, or at least the 1.6-1.8GHz...in any case, if this comes true then I'll be getting that instead of the PowerMac (price dependant of course) ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redestium Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Any chance they might put in the low end G5 in the iMac when they bump the PowerMacs up a few? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjmUK Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I do hope so, because the low end G5 will still out-smart the current 1.25GHz G4 CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isus Posted December 7, 2003 Author Share Posted December 7, 2003 the only competition for the g5 was the fastest dual g4's... which you can't even buy anymore : ninja : tricky apple. i think once apple can get the g5's through it's lineup, it'll look like this: no more g3. ever. g4: emac, ibook. g5: pmac (duh?), pbook, imac, xserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southern Patriot Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 two g4's have to run hotter than 1 g5, i don't really see why it wouldn't be that way. also, if you have ever looked at the insides of a 15" pbook, you will understand that there really is no space for another processor. While the 15" might not have enough room, I'd be willing to bet that the 17" could squeeze in a second processor. And a dual G4 (at say, 1.25Ghz) is still going to be faster on most tasks than a single 1.6Ghz G5. The large amounts of aluminum in the 17" would make for an excellent heat sink as well, if done right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isus Posted December 7, 2003 Author Share Posted December 7, 2003 but would you want a heatsink sitting on your lap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 i reckon the imacs are going to get the g5 first when it changes form factor... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusion Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 They are not going to put Dual G4's in laptops, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frod Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 They are not going to put Dual G4's in laptops, lol. i don't see why apple would even waste time they could be using to get the g5 into the powerbook on trying to get another processor into a powerbook. the 17"s don't have any extra space either really. all of the "extra space" is taken up by larger speakers and the ports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Dorr Veteran Posted December 7, 2003 Veteran Share Posted December 7, 2003 i don't see why apple would even waste time they could be using to get the g5 into the powerbook on trying to get another processor into a powerbook. Well, they don't actually have to wast any time at all. It's all a waiting game on IBM to get their processors to not dissipate so much heat (even the new G5 at 62 Watts is a real scrotum scorcher). So, their R&D team for the PB is basically twiddling their thumbs while IBM brings down the heat. Since they're looking at extreme cooling/power solutions for the G5 anyways, don't you think that applies to a dual G4 laptop as well? While I don't think it's likely we'll see a dual g4 laptop, I can't totally rule it out and wouldn't be surprised if Apple released one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusion Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 Well, they don't actually have to wast any time at all. It's all a waiting game on IBM to get their processors to not dissipate so much heat (even the new G5 at 62 Watts is a real scrotum scorcher). So, their R&D team for the PB is basically twiddling their thumbs while IBM brings down the heat. Since they're looking at extreme cooling/power solutions for the G5 anyways, don't you think that applies to a dual G4 laptop as well? While I don't think it's likely we'll see a dual g4 laptop, I can't totally rule it out and wouldn't be surprised if Apple released one... It just doesn't seem like a smart move because even if they worked out the heat issues for it, they would have to reengineer the whole inner workings of it to fit two processors. It seems like it would be smarter to just place faster g4's in there periodically for now until the g5 will work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macster Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I love it when Mr Secretive Steve Jobs makes everyone guess Rumors about the 750GX but nothing really concrete about it being reported G5 in a laptop when the "980" comes Dual G4 if the 750GX is cool enough. (Anyone works for IBM here?) I love heavy multitasking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isus Posted December 7, 2003 Author Share Posted December 7, 2003 while it is true that the current g5 runs at over 60 watts, lets not forget that this number is for a 130nm chip. the 90nm chip is reported to run at 12, compared to the current g4's 10. why waste power putting 2 10w g4 chips in a pbook, when we can get more performance (and better battery length) from a 12w 2ghz g5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts