DocM Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 Nothing like publishing too soon.... http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/big-bang-backlash-bicep2-discovery-of-gravity-waves-questioned-by-cosmologists/2014/05/16/e575b2fc-db07-11e3-bda1-9b46b2066796_story.html?tid=HP_more Big Bang backlash: BICEP2 discovery of gravity waves questioned by cosmologists It was the science story of the year: Astrophysicists held a news conference at Harvard on March 17 announcing that theirSouth Pole telescope had found evidence of gravity waves from the dawn of time. Cosmology doesn?t get any bigger than this. The discovery was hailed as confirmation of a mind-boggling addendum to the big-bang theory, something called ?cosmic inflation? that describes the universe beginning not in a stately expansion but with a brief, exponentially rapid, inflationary spasm. Science is a demanding and unforgiving business, and great discoveries are greeted not with parades and champagne but rather with questions, doubts and demands for more data. So it is that, in recent days, scientists in the astrophysics community have been vocalizing their concern that the South Pole experiment, known as BICEP2, may have detected only the signature of dust in our own galaxy. These doubters say, in effect, that rather than seeing the aftershock of the birth of the universe the scientists may have seen only some schmutz in the foreground, as if they needed to clean their eyeglasses. This is a delicate issue. Careers and prizes are potentially at stake. So too is the credibility of a field that dares to probe the deepest secrets of the universe no matter where that search may lead. No one is alleging an outright scientific error. It?s more of a debate about how scientists should communicate their uncertainties when presenting blockbuster findings. This is a case of ?extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence,? to use the formulation made famous by astronomer Carl Sagan. The South Pole telescope saw something in the sky ? of that there is little doubt, because the team took great care to eliminate systematic errors that could have come from the instruments. But what the telescope saw ? polarization of ancient radiation from the early universe ? could have been produced by either primordial gravity waves or by foreground dust, or by some combination of both. ?They have very nice measurements of something. We don?t know what that something is,? said Uros Seljak, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of California at Berkeley. ?We can?t tell if BICEP2 has measured dust or has measured gravity waves.? > > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts