Help me choose between this headphones


Recommended Posts

perochan

Hi,

 

I am researching for a headphone that is under $200. I have narrowed down to 3 headphones.

 

Onkyo ES-FC300®

http://www.amazon.com/Onkyo-ES-FC300-On-Ear-Headphones-Red/dp/B008FQKKB0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1407543009&sr=8-1&keywords=onkyo+headphone

 

Philip Fideli M1

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008OQLLT6/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A1GAD27JKMQM26

 

Bowers & Wilkins P3

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0082471N0/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_3?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER

 

I am looking for stylish design, portable and nice sound of course. My girlfriend wants the same headphone as me but different color so design is important. All 3 headphones above look pretty nice and reviews are nice too.

 

Has anyone bought any of the 3 headphones before and how is the experience?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Jay Bonggolto
      LiteXim Aerobuds review: Completely wireless earphones for on the go users
      by Jay Bonggolto

      When it comes to top-of-the-line wireless earphones available in the market, the Apple AirPods and Bose SoundSport are easily the more popular options. Outside the U.S. however, a company called LiteXim is making a name for itself by offering wireless earbuds that provide good sound without breaking the bank.

      The Chinese firm isn't actually new to the listening device segment. It has been in existence since 2006, and its range of products includes active noise-canceling and Bluetooth earphones. A few weeks ago, LiteXim sent me its latest product called the Aerobuds, a pair of completely wireless earphones that cost $60 on Amazon right now (down from $90). After a few weeks of using the earbuds, here are the high and low points of the product.

      Inside the box
      The product was shipped to me in a rectangular white box containing the earbuds, charging dock, user manual, quick guide, micro USB cable (USB Type A to Micro-USB B), and three pairs each of the ear and wing tips. The ear tips and wing tips come in various sizes to take into account those with different ear sizes.



      Additionally, there is a printed QR code which can be used to download the complete user manual onto your mobile device. Unfortunately, the package does not include a USB charger adapter, which must be purchased separately.

      Specs
      Bluetooth version v4.2 Bluetooth name Aerobuds Standby time Approximately 60 hours Talk time Approximately 3.5 hours Non-stop audio play 4 hours Total play time 16 hours Battery capacity 2 x 50mAh Battery dock capacity 500mAh Battery temperature 0°C-45°C Design
      Unlike the pricier earphones out there with a flashy design, the Aerobuds have a simple yet thoughtfully crafted look. There are no fancy contours, which would otherwise make the pair stand out from the crowd. The earphones are also sweat proof, which will definitely be a good catch for athletes or gym goers.

      Made entirely of plastic, the earbuds are light to hold and include a multi-function button (MFB) that's positioned on the back of the earpieces. The button performs various tasks including switching on the earbuds, pausing a track, skipping songs, and answering/ending calls.



      The three pairs of ear and wing tips are made of silicone rubber and are designed such that they fit comfortably and securely in the ear canal without falling out easily. Like the earbuds themselves, the tips come only in black, though it would have been nice if a different color accent had been thrown into the mix.

      The charging case that comes with it looks a bit larger than other models on the market, but can still be put inside a pocket without bulging out. It can also be easily opened with a button latch on the front. In addition, closing the lid produces a clicking sound. The earbuds are charged by snapping them into their designated slots in the case.



      Power is supplied to the earbuds through the metal connectors built into each earpiece and designed to magnetically hold them in place. When the earbuds are charging, the LEDs on the back of the case will keep on blinking red until fully juiced up, at which time the lights turn white.



      Keep in mind that there are three indicator lights: one for each of the left and right earpieces, and a separate one for the power status of the case itself. When the indicator light for the case's power is blinking red, that means the charging case itself needs to be recharged using the USB cable provided. The earbuds inside the case are also charged in the process.

      Features and performance
      As mentioned above, the main operations of the earbuds are performed through the multi-function button. To get started, I turned both earpieces on by pressing and holding down each of their MFBs for approximately four seconds until a voice prompt indicates they are powered on and connected with each other. The indicator light on the right earpiece will then blink alternately in red and white while the left earpiece flashes only a white light. Once the earbuds are connected to a phone via Bluetooth (also announced by the voice prompt), both indicator lights will blink only in white.



      The MFB provides a quick way to control music playback. A single press works to play/pause a song, while a double tap skips a song. An incoming call can also be accepted with a single press and rejected with a double tap, while an outgoing call can be ended with a single press.

      However, I've encountered issues with these MFB capabilities multiple times. In one instance, after several minutes of playing a song, I would try to pause it to no avail. The same intermittent glitch also happens with the double-tap function, as it sometimes won't skip to the next song. It is worth pointing out, though, that the button works properly more often than not. Thankfully, I have had no trouble using the MFB for calling, save for the fact that many people I've called told me the mic sounded a bit muffled. That's understandable, since the built-in microphone is far away from my mouth.



      While it's nice to be able to perform multiple tasks using the earbuds' MFB without having to reach for my phone, the button doesn't allow me to rewind a song or control the volume. That means I have to open my device and tap the repeat button on the media player if I wish to listen to the same song again. Likewise, I also need to squeeze the volume rockers for adjustments if the sound is too loud or low. These capabilities would be welcome additions to a future iteration of the Aerobuds.

      When it comes to connectivity, the earbuds' Bluetooth function almost instantly connects to my phone once turned on. But here's the rub: the wireless connection is frequently plagued by dropouts when playing an audio file, though not so when watching a movie or when you're in a call. This occurs even without an obstruction, and the problem is accentuated when your handset is inside a pocket or placed in another room.

      It should be pointed out that the random dropout occurs only when playing some music; phone calls via Bluetooth run smoothly without hiccups. What's odd though is that for some reason or another, phone calls are relayed only through the right earpiece.

      It's also a pity that the Bluetooth connection range did not live up to LiteXim's claimed distance. The Aerobuds are supposed to maintain a Bluetooth connection within 24 meters (27 yards), but in my experience, it drops out just beyond seven meters or so, and doesn't reconnect unless I go back standing within the tolerable range.



      In terms of longevity, the earbuds' batteries don't live up to expectations either, except when you make certain compromises. LiteXim claims the batteries can last up four hours for non-stop audio play; however, they barely reached three hours when I used the earphones multiple times to listen to music continuously. On average, the earbuds' batteries last 2.5 hours for uninterrupted playback at 80% volume and up. Reducing the volume to between 50% and 60% results in the buds lasting closer to the claimed four hours, though not quite reaching said number.

      The charging case can also juice up the earbuds four times, 1.5 hours per charging session. That means the earbuds can only be used for about 10 hours of full-volume audio playback.

      Sound quality
      The moment I popped the earbuds into my ears, I was immediately captivated by the balance and richness of sound produced. While admittedly the mids and highs are not super impressive, the bass packs a punch. For what they cost, the Aerobuds nevertheless deliver a decent sound quality on the lower end of the price spectrum.

      To test out audio quality with various music genres, I listened to Sheppard's Geronimo and it sounded just as it should be — rich and solid in the bass. Then I switched to James Bay's Let It Go and came away impressed by the rich and vibrant sound, though without the crispness I'm looking for in a premium listening device. However, sound distortion began to rear its ugly head when I tried to increase the volume from 85% to 100%, which is definitely a turn-off for real audiophiles.



      On the passive noise-cancellation side of things, the Aerobuds definitely don't disappoint, aided in no small way by how the pair tightly, yet conveniently fits in the ears. It's like listening to a 3D surround sound system. I should also add that when I put on the earbuds without playing a song, all I could hear was my own breathing. It's certainly adept at isolating you from the outside noise.

      The Aerobuds earphones are rated with IPX4, which means the earbuds can endure ordinary water splashing and sweat produced by a strenuous workout. A common pain point with most earbuds today is the strain they cause to the ear after long hours of wearing them, but LiteXim's earphones still feel comfortable even after at least two hours of non-stop use.

      Final words
      The Aerobuds don't sound great by any strict audiophile standards. While they're not the perfect choice for the aforementioned, pickier audio listeners, when it comes to sound quality the pair can still compete with its more costly counterparts. I've been using the earbuds for a couple of weeks now, and I must say the experience has been satisfactory, save for a few occasions when the Bluetooth connection suddenly comes to a momentary halt.

      It may be true that these are not the best truly wireless earbuds you can purchase on a budget, but for $60, they're worth checking out. Although Jabra or Apple AirPods lovers may not come away impressed with LiteXim's offering, the Aerobuds still offer a good value for money.

    • By duoi
      Video is released reportedly showing off Apple's 'lightning' EarPods
      by Steven Johns



      Apple has been in the news for quite some time now for allegedly removing the 3.5mm headphone jack in the upcoming iPhone 7 and replacing it with a proprietary Lightning connector instead. These rumors for the iPhone 7 have been going around since late last year and have even spurred a petition to keep the 3.5mm headphone jack that has received hundreds of thousands of signatures.

      Adding more fuel to the rumor is a video that has just been filmed showing what is described as Apple EarPods with a Lightning connector rather than a 3.5mm plug. The person describes them as "iPhone 7 EarPods" and describes them as looking exactly the same, barring the Lightning connector change. The user plugs them in and loads up a YouTube video and presses various buttons on the EarPods to show that the functionality, at least for the buttons, is working as expected.

      There is little to confirm that the Apple EarPods in the video are real, though. This isn't the first time that someone has made Apple EarPods use a Lightning connector and the whole demeanor of the video leaves a lot of questions unanswered. Apple has also usually held more control over its leaks - especially with something as big as this.

      You can view the video below:

      While it is difficult to confirm the legitimacy of the video as of yet, a change to Lightning based audio solutions should not come as a complete surprise as Apple quietly updated its "Made for iPhone" program last year to include Lightning headphones prior to Philips and JBL releasing such products.

    • By Usama Jawad96
      200,000 people are petitioning against dropping the headphone jack in unannounced iPhone 7
      by Usama Jawad

      There have been several unconfirmed reports from various media outlets that Apple is considering dropping the headphone jack in favor of an all-in-one Lightning connector in its upcoming iPhone 7. While this rumor - obviously - has not yet been corroborated by Apple, hundreds of thousands of people are already petitioning against dropping the 3.5mm headphone jack in the unannounced iPhone 7.



      A petition has started gaining steam on activist site, SumOfUs.org, with over 200,000 people signing "Apple is ditching the standard headphone jack to screw consumers and the planet" petition in less than four days. The petition accuses Apple of ripping off "every one of its customers. Again.", and goes on to list a few statistics to form an argument that dropping the headphone jack in the iPhone 7 will create "mountains of electronic waste -- that likely won't be recycled." The heated petition further goes on to state that:

      With that being said, it is quite interesting to note that concrete details regarding the upcoming iPhone 7 have not been revealed as of yet, and rumors of Apple ditching the headphone jack for the Lightning adapter are currently unfounded. Regardless, at the time of writing, more than 204,000 signatories have already voiced their support for the petition with no signs of slowing down.

      Source: SomeOfUs via Forbes

    • By Chris Schroeder
      Another source claims iPhone 7 will be without headphone jack
      by Chris Schroeder



      The next iPhone has a lot of buzz surrounding it. If the reports are true, the next iteration of Apple's popular smartphone will include a bigger battery and additional storage capacity. Those improvements might be key for keeping positive news circulating over the next iPhone after the iPhone 6S and 6S Plus have seen production cuts as a result of weak sales. But perhaps the biggest news surrounding the next iPhone isn't over what it could have, but what it could not have.

      It's becoming more likely that the iPhone 7 is not going to include the mainstream 3.5mm jack - the same jack that you use for your headphones, inline mics, speakers, etc. The possibility of this major omission first broke back in November and has been now been reinforced through another unnamed source. The headphone jack would be erased and all connected devices requiring the 3.5mm jack would have to have a Lightning adapter to plug in.

      With the next iPhone likely another eight months away from being announced, we are forced to take these reports with some skepticism. Apple won't talk about any of its plans this far ahead, but it's clear to see that killing off the 3.5mm jack would allow for the iPhone to be slimmer, possibly waterproof and offer more space for other components to grow (like a battery). This new source is sworn to be rock-solid and is adamant that the next iPhone is doing away with headphone jack. If so, how are iPhone owners going to feel about being forced to purchase an adapter to connect things like headphones, speakers and car stereos?

      Source: Fast Company

    • By Gerowen
      Pretty nifty I thought.