Linus Reviews HTC One M8 for Windows

By theyarecomingforyou,
in Windows Phone/Mobile

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

theyarecomingforyou
Posted

 

All in all this phone baffles me a bit. It's a phone for no-one. I understand that some people have a thing for supporting the market underdog and are willing to work around numerous inconveniences to do it or have specific complaints about Google and Apple that would cause them to want to avoid using the services of both those companies, and for you there's high-end Windows phones, like the One M8 for Windows. For everyone else there's stuff out there that's just plain more functional and easier to use and in the case of the One M8 also exactly the same price, so the conclusion pretty much writes itself here.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
+E.Worm Jimmy
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

holy crap.  this review highlight all that is wrong with WP

 

i love windows.... but they just did not create an appealing OS for phone.  

was it their fault, or the fact they were too late, and too sucky, so no developer support...

 

does not matter.  actually, i am kidding... MS messed up big. unfortunately..  

i was thinking of buying WP for the longest time.  but it was just never appealing overall.

 

 

i WOULD LOVE TO LOVE WP.   but overall, it still does not provide what i expect of it (not just apps... OS functionality)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Draconian Guppy
Posted

There's no youtube app on windows phone?

Link to post
Share on other sites
+E.Worm Jimmy
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

this guy is so un-objective that  is quite humorous.

un-objective....

   

 

 

can you name points why it is?

 

 

everything i have heard from actual users points to me that WP is way behind, not only in developer support, but in basic usability.  

as a long time MS fan, i am disappointed, but i am not going to dismiss the points as humorous. i find them mostly upsetting.. as i expected much better of them!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Praetor
Posted

it's still a big problem the lack of high profile apps in the store and some of the ones that exist aren't official.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou
  • Author
Posted

this guy is so un-objective that  is quite humorous.

If you have a specific issue with the review then please share it but broad, unsubstantiated statements like yours contribute nothing to the discussion.

 

I like Linus, as he calls it how he sees it. This review pretty much sums up the problems with Windows Phone right now, which is that Android and iOS devices just do everything better. I didn't realise that Windows Phone doesn't support third-party keyboards, which is annoying as I love Swype - I've tried other keyboards but their swiping and predictions just aren't as good.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Dot Matrix
Posted

There's no youtube app on windows phone?

Yes, there are. But since Google is being a bully, the official app might as well not even exist.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou
  • Author
Posted

Yes, there are. But since Google is being a bully, the official app might as well not even exist.

I haven't been keeping up with all the details. What exactly has Google done to make YouTube bad on Windows Phone or to act as a 'bully'? I see the app has terrible user reviews on the Windows Store.

Link to post
Share on other sites
siah1214
Posted

Apparently I'm no one.

I would fall into the enthusiast category, however, I love my Lumia 928.  I've used Android on tablets, iOS on tablets and iPod touches, and webOS, and of those, Windows phone will always be my favorite. It's always been the least frustrating, most enjoyable, "Just works" experience. My iPod usually "just worked" (other than some build quality issues that are neither here nor there for this discussion), however, I hate the way the homescreen works, it's just way too limiting.  My 928's homescreen is full of folders of tiles of stuff I care about, the app drawer is vastly superior to Android's (seriously, an icon grid is the WORST layout imaginable, the list is infinitely more functional and easy to use), the UI is beautiful (and yes, most mobile OSs are beautiful these days but Windows Phone's has been the most coherent for me), and it works great with MS services that I'm invested in. 

 

 

Who's it for? It's for someone that wants a "just works" experience that also wants more flexibility than iOS and doesn't care about stuff like loading ROMs onto Android phones. It's for people that want a fast, beautiful OS that runs on the lowest and highest end hardware.  Most of the apps people care about are actually there, either first party or third party alternative (which are usually fantastic and sometimes even better than the official apps on other platforms), the average person probably doesn't care about pebble or niche apps like that. 

I love the tiles, and if you hate them, you can turn them into icons with a few taps, and you can have the nice hideous grid you've always dreamed for. 

 

Btw as far as google integration goes, if you're completely married to Gmail, Gdocs, gcalendar, etc. then maybe it's not the phone for you. I used to be but switched over after I got my first Windows Phone (an HTC trophy back when Nodo was cool)

And I don't miss anything from it.

 

Anyway, this is all opinion, which is all that Linus has to offer as well. Everyone's needs are different, one size does not fit all, and neither Android nor iOS fit me. WP8.1 is the best alternative. 


I haven't been keeping up with all the details. What exactly has Google done to make YouTube bad on Windows Phone or to act as a 'bully'? I see the app has terrible user reviews on the Windows Store.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/24/microsoft_pulls_youtube_winphone_app/

 

TL:DR Microsoft made a gorgeous youtube app for WP8.  Google issued a takedown notice, Microsoft made changes that they asked for and republished, Google proceeds to make up ###### and issue another takedown notice, Microsoft caves and reverts to the terrible previous app.  Google are ######.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

Serious question, due my ignorance. Why MS relies on companies to make apps like youtube? As far as I know HTML5 is mature and responsive enough to act like an app inside a wrapper. Surely any modern mobile OS can take advantage of that, right? I think that's what Firefox OS is trying to do. In that way, the web is your appstore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

If you have a specific issue with the review then please share it but broad, unsubstantiated statements like yours contribute nothing to the discussion.

 

I like Linus, as he calls it how he sees it. This review pretty much sums up the problems with Windows Phone right now, which is that Android and iOS devices just do everything better. I didn't realise that Windows Phone doesn't support third-party keyboards, which is annoying as I love Swype - I've tried other keyboards but their swiping and predictions just aren't as good.

Therein lies the problem.  He calls it as HE sees it, not everyone else.

 

I rather see an unbiased review, not some twit telling everyone who a phone is for(or in this case not for).

Serious question, due my ignorance. Why MS relies on companies to make apps like youtube? As far as I know HTML5 is mature and responsive enough to act like an app inside a wrapper. Surely any modern mobile OS can take advantage of that, right? I think that's what Firefox OS is trying to do. In that way, the web is your appstore.

Google is being an ass and has killed off Microsoft's attempts with takedown requests.  I think there were at least two attempts by MS, if memory serves.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

Google is being an ass and has killed off Microsoft's attempts with takedown requests.

 

How so? HTML5 is public. An html5 version of youtube in an app is no different from opening youtube.com inside Mobile Internet Explorer? That sounds quite unreasonable from Google's part.

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

How so? HTML5 is public. An html5 version of youtube in an app is no different from opening youtube.com inside Mobile Internet Explorer? That sounds quite unreasonable from Google's part.

HTML5 is, the API is not, at least not in the way HTML5 is.

 

Google has also shut down webview versions too, I think.

 

Which, webview versions blow anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

HTML5 is, the API is not, at least not in the way HTML5 is.

 

I see. That's crazy. Unbelievable how the three big companies sometimes seem more interested in tripping each other than to offer us better solutions.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
eddman
Posted

"It's a phone for NO ONE"

 

Yes, well done. Very objective. /s

 

How is the lack of some apps an OS' fault? Sure, WP would be a no go for those who want a specific app that is missing, but not all people are the same.

Google apps? Ask google why they are missing.

 

He dislikes the keyboard yet there are reviews where they actually like it. Subjective.

IINM, text prediction learns over time and gets much faster.

He says he mistyped letters. Well, no surprise there. He's not used to it.

Auto correct, auto fill, etc. take space? How else can they be shown then?

Says the keyboard takes too much space, but it's about half the page, pretty much the same as android. Then he says there's the new swype style keyboard but he dismisses it because... he doesn't use it and doesn't care. Subjective much?

 

He picks on the UI. Again, very subjective. Some like how it looks, some don't.

 

Not being able to back out of an email, initiated from the notification center, into the inbox; this is a good criticism. A design oversight, I suppose.

Lack of T9 dialing; this is also a good point, but he acts like it's the be-all when it comes to dialing and that its absence somehow breaks the whole thing. There are other ways, like pinning contacts to the home page and there is a speed dial page too. Stock android didn't have it either, until kitkat 4.4.

 

He was corrected on saying it lacked folder support; just shows he doesn't even properly investigate what he's reviewing.

 

The most popular, and perhaps, the best third party youtube app, metrotube, is free. Yes, it says $0.99, but actually in the description it says *Unlimited & unrestricted free trial!*. He didn't care to read that either.

 

He says battery life is good and even lasted two days, but then says it probably lasted that much because he DIDN'T ACTUALLY USE IT THAT MUCH. Was he even using this thing during the review period?

 

As for draft emails not showing; Could it be a sync protocol limitation? For example, outlook.com drafts don't show because EAS protocol lacks draft syncing. The same thing happens in office 2013 too. Very stupid limitation. Don't know about gmail though.

 

It seems that he just does not like WP and actively looks for flaws to nitpick upon.

 

I'm surprised he didn't mention the settings page, which is a bit unorganized, or that it's not possible to dismiss notification individually. You can either clear all or clear a group of them.

 

The video should be titled "Why I still dislike WP".

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Dot Matrix
Posted

Unbelievable how the three big companies sometimes seem more interested in tripping each other than to offer us better solutions.

Indeed.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
siah1214
Posted

Oh yes, on the topic of dialing: Either set up speed dial, pin the contacts to your start screen, or just tell Cortana to call that person. Seriously, learn the phone you're reviewing.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
sanctified
  • Veteran
Posted

I understand the learning curve. But that something the reviewers should help us with, not surrender to it like the rest of us. I admit I don't like Windows Phone much, but it's an amazing OS. The phone my mother learned to use the quickest is her trusty Lumia 520.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne
Posted

I see. That's crazy. Unbelievable how the three big companies sometimes seem more interested in tripping each other than to offer us better solutions.

Yeah, its a bunch of petty crap.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Stoffel
Posted

I see. That's crazy. Unbelievable how the three big companies sometimes seem more interested in tripping each other than to offer us better solutions.

 

For once we can't blame MS for this one, they have all their main apps available on all 3 platforms.

Often the rivaling platforms get new features before the Windows platform

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
tsupersonic
Posted

I think his review is pretty spot on, and it is nice to see good hardware on WP. I'd love to see MS overcome challenges and be a true competitor to iOS & Android. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draconian Guppy
Posted

Yes, there are. But since Google is being a bully, the official app might as well not even exist.

So no "official" app then?

Link to post
Share on other sites
DrainTheSw4mp
Posted

Just so you know, you can play Youtube videos flawlessly using Internet Explorer, don't see the need for an app. Also, WP8.1 brought an excellent built in swype-like keyboard.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
notchinese
Posted

There's no youtube app on windows phone?

 

 

There are multiple free youtube apps that are amazing. I use myTube, which IMO is the best 2nd Youtube app available on any platform (Hyper for Youtube on Windows 8 is the best IMO)

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • New Surface Pro 7 ad puts it up against Apple's ARM-powered MacBook Pro
      By Rich Woods
      New Surface Pro 7 ad puts it up against Apple's ARM-powered MacBook Pro
      by Rich Woods

      Over the weekend, Microsoft posted a new Surface Pro 7 with one of its most common themes (behind clicking hinges): comparing it to Apple's products. Obviously, the comparison itself is no surprise since the alternative is comparing it to Microsoft's own partners' products, but this is the first one to compare Surface to Apple's new ARM-powered MacBook Pro.

      The first thing that the host of the video says after announcing the two devices is, "The Surface comes with a pen", something that is absolutely untrue. Naturally though, the form factor is something that Microsoft loves to boast over MacBooks, with the touchscreen, pen support (even though the Surface Pen is sold separately), and even the detachable keyboard. The presenter expressed disappointment in being stuck with "what you got" in Apple's MacBook Pro.

      Then, the advertisement turned to a segment about power, and how the Surface Pro 7 can run your games. Of course, the Surface Pro 7+ is way better suited for playing games with its Iris Xe graphics, but for some reason, that one is limited to businesses. This segment was also geared toward app compatibility, the biggest issue that's facing Apple's M1 processor, or any new architecture for that matter. The bottom line is that Windows PCs with Intel processors just run the apps that you want.

      And the final thing Microsoft pointed out was the price. While it wasn't true that the Surface Pro 7 comes with a pen, the company did show prices that include the tablet, a keyboard, and the pen.

      You'll notice that the advertisement doesn't mention Microsoft's own ARM-powered PC, the Surface Pro X. The main reason would be that Microsoft simply wouldn't have as much to brag about. App compatibility is even more of an issue with Windows on ARM than it is with Apple's M1 processor, and on top of that, the Surface Pro X is more expensive than the Surface Pro 7.

    • Microsoft previews new Azure Resource Manager-based deployment model
      By Hamza Jawad
      Microsoft previews new Azure Resource Manager-based deployment model
      by Hamza Jawad



      Last year at its virtual Build conference, Microsoft introduced new templates for its Azure Resource Manager (ARM) service. Today, the tech giant has released the recently unveiled Cloud Services (extended support) model in the form of a public preview. With this move, the older Azure Service Manager (ASM)-based model will now be referred to as Cloud Services (classic).

      The key changes that are brought to users through the newer variant are primarily deployment scripts-based, with no changes being required in the runtime code. For starters, Azure Key Vault will be used for certificate management in Cloud Services (extended support). A virtual network will also be necessary for any resource deployed through the ARM-based model. And finally, the Service Configuration and Service definition file will need to be fully consistent with whatever ARM template is being used to define the configuration for a project.

      In terms of benefits that are being introduced, the ARM-based Cloud Services provides region resiliency, alongside all the other features offered through the ASM-based Cloud Services. Some ARM capabilities such as role-based access and control (RBAC), tags, policy, and support for deployment templates are provided as well. Two migration paths from ASM to ARM are to be provided: re-deploy, and in-place migration.

      Microsoft has recommended additional Azure services including Virtual Machine Scale Sets, App Service, Azure Kubernetes Service, and Azure Service Fabric for those customers who are considering migrating to the extended support variant from the classic one. The newer one is suggested for application workloads that are not expected to evolve continuously.

      Interested customers can learn more about Cloud Services (extended support) through its documentation. A preview of the re-deploy path is available starting today, while a preview for the in-place migration path is expected to be announced soon.

    • Microsoft updates its rollout plans for Windows 10 Team 2020
      By Rich Woods
      Microsoft updates its rollout plans for Windows 10 Team 2020
      by Rich Woods

      Back in October, Microsoft announced the Windows 10 Team 2020 Update, promising that it would begin rolling out the following week. In fact, it had an actual timeline of when it would roll out by region. In December, it partially paused the rollout due to some post-installation issues that some customers had, and today, the firm posted an update.

      According to the update back in December, the first two phases had started rolling out, and that includes Surface Hub 2S devices in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, Belgium, Mexico, UK, Japan, Switzerland, and Italy. Out of the devices in those two phases, 70% had already completed the update. Phase three was the United States and Germany, and phase four was the rest of the world. Due to the issues that some customers had, it was phases three and four that were held back indefinitely.

      Here's the deal if you've got a Surface Hub 2S. The Windows 10 Team 2020 Update is available via Windows Update for Business, and the Bare Metal Recovery image is available now. As for when it will be available through Windows Update, that will be February 2021. For the first-gen Surface Hub, the timeline is similar, although it's getting the update in Windows Update and Windows Update for Business in February 2021. Those users can, however, get it now by using the Surface Hub Recovery Tool.

      There are several new features included in the feature update, such as Microsoft's new Chromium-based Edge browser, which is making its way to more and more platforms. There's also support for inking with two pens at the same time, and there's a new Coordinated Meetings feature in Teams that lets you easily switch between Surface Hub and Teams Rooms devices on the fly.

      Microsoft also noted that Windows 10 Team version 1703, the previous update for Surface Hub, will no longer be supported after March 16. So basically, the 2020 Update will arrive in late February and you'll have just a few weeks to upgrade before being out of support.

    • Kurt DelBene becomes third Microsoft executive to leave the company this year
      By indospot
      Kurt DelBene becomes third Microsoft executive to leave the company this year
      by João Carrasqueira

      Image credit: Brian Smale/Microsoft Microsoft is losing yet another key member of its leadership with Kurt DelBene set to leave the company at the end of the fiscal year. The news was announced to employees in a letter from CEO Satya Nadella, which was first reported on by ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley.

      Kurt DelBene is currently serving as Executive Vice President and head of the Corporate Strategy and Core Services Engineering division at the company, where he's been since 2015. DelBene had already worked at Microsoft from 1992 through 2013, working on the Office division and eventually leading it. He left the company to help U.S. President Barack Obama with the Healthcare.gov website, then had a short tenure at Madrona Venture Group before returning to Microsoft. DelBene has been working on Microsoft's COVID-19 response, which he will continue to do through the end of his stay at Microsoft, in June. He's also a member of Microsoft's Senior Leadership Team.

      DelBene's role isn't being replaced in a traditional sense. His role will be divided between other divisions, with some parts falling under the Cloud and AI division led by Scott Guthrie. Others will be part of the Business Development organization, and finally, Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood will be responsible for the last part of the role.

      This is the third major departure from Microsoft to be announced in 2021, although it's the first by a member of the Senior Leadership Team. Brad Anderson, Corporate Vice President (CVP) for Commercial Management Experiences announced a couple of weeks ago that he'd be leaving to join Qualtrics. Just a few days later, Julia White also announced her departure from her role as CVP of Product marketing for Azure, Development Tools, and Servers, transitioning to a new role at SAP.

    • PWAs installed with Microsoft Edge will now let you switch profiles
      By Rich Woods
      PWAs installed with Microsoft Edge will now let you switch profiles
      by Rich Woods



      Microsoft has announced that you can switch profiles in progressive web apps (PWAs) that were installed using its Edge browser. Easy profile switching is something that's been available in the browser for some time, but now it's available for installed apps, and moreover, it's independent from your selection in the browser.

      In order to do it, you'll see the profile icon in the title bar of the app. You can click it, and then select the profile you want. A second app will launch with the new profile. The default profile will be the one that you last used, and of course, the available profiles will mirror the ones available in Edge.

      Microsoft didn't say which versions of Edge this is available in, but you can bet it's only Dev and Canary, since this is still considered to be an experiment. The company is also asking for feedback on how this works, specifically for three questions:

      In order to get started, the feature should just start showing up in your installed PWAs.