Recommended Posts

I remember a couple of years ago seeing a World of Warcraft screenshot comparing the different resolutions, and noticing that there was indeed more content in higher resolutions vs fewer. I mean, the screen was displaying more content. (720p vs 1440p)

 

Then, I have tried doing this with other games, like Assassin's Creed , (1920*1080p vs 1400*900) the screen's content is the same. 

 

So, is this true for all games, or just for some like World of Warcraft... Furthemore, am I smoking or the thing that I saw was an illusion (can't remember well how did I find it)

It wouldn't make any sense, would it?

"Guys, let's create a game with content, but only if you've paid <X> amount do you..."

Wait...

Honestly, I don't know. But sarcasm aside, I stand by my first sentence.

EDIT: For context and to avoid a fight over semantics, <X> would be the price of a higher resolution screen. But that ruins the joke. ;)

I believe he means how much you see onscreen. It depends on the game honestly. As long as the aspect ratio between two resolutions is the same, as well as the field of view, then they should display the same thing.

 

If you increase FoV, you will see more as everything is "zoomed out" a bit.

 

Some games have a forced aspect ratio, so if it is forced 16:10 and you run a 16:9 monitor, the game will actually show more width-wise on your monitor than it would on a 16:10 (because it has to shrink the vertical size to fit 16:9, but can fit more along the horizontal size then).

<Picture 2>

Using that example, are there games where someone with a screen resolution of 1920x1080 will see more in their field of vision within the game - using an FPS like FarCry 3, for example - than someone looking at the same view but with a screen of 1680x1050? Or will it be the same view range regardless of game and screen size?

Using that example, are there games where someone with a screen resolution of 1920x1080 will see more in their field of vision within the game - using an FPS like FarCry 3, for example - than someone looking at the same view but with a screen of 1680x1050? Or will it be the same view range regardless of game and screen size?

The bigger the screen with small resolution, this happens:

 

pixel.jpg

compare.jpg

 

 

 

 

I believe this image below answers your question better.4k_comparison.jpg

 

This is true, unless the game engine/graphic card does some sort of scaling, which the majority do.

  • Like 3

As far as gaming goes, how much of the world you see in a game depends on the FOV (field of view).

 

Different aspect ratios (4:3 vs 16:9) will display slightly different amounts of "content".

Wide screen monitors usually allow you to see more to the left and right.

 

If the monitors are the same aspect ratio, increasing the resolution in a game will not allow more "content" to be seen. It will simply be clearer and more detailed.

 

Here is an example of different FOVs in Halo CE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se95M2ySzDI#t=19

 

Outside of games. Higher resolution means smaller text, and smaller icons. Meaning you can fit more on the screen, but smaller is harder to read.

Windows automatically bumps up the DPI (dots per inch) on certain large resolution monitors which makes text and icons larger, for example 125% their original size

 

For maximum working space the best thing is a large monitor with a large resolution.

Usually no, it would just mean it's easier for you to see the details, but FOV is generally the same. Depends on the game though.

Definitely though, if the UI doesn't scale with the resolution, it gets alot smaller at high resolutions, meaning you can see more of the game behind the interface or in a MMORPG etc. you can have alot more hotbars etc. on the screen at once without it getting full up. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Those persons has complete control over the internet right now. They do see everything what we do regardless.
    • Everyone and every country who doesn't support Israel's aggression, terrorism and hypocrisy is their immediate enemy. You can definitely see how many innocent people they are killing almost everyday. In fact they're the actual Neo-Nazi who holds Hitler's ideology.
    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      221
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!