Liquid Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 Who find the text verry small and unreadable on it, its terrible, the layout is nice, text, well, not so nice http://winamp.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggareis Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 How is winamp 5 anyway? I heard it was pretty buggy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquid Posted December 17, 2003 Author Share Posted December 17, 2003 How is winamp 5 anyway? I heard it was pretty buggy its great final ownz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggareis Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 Thats cool maybe ill try it :) Winamp 3 was way too buggy :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kombolcha Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 the text very small and unreadable!!?? you should check your settings.. it's fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoMasamune Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 Thats cool maybe ill try it :) Winamp 3 was way too buggy :( After using Winamp 5, you'll never go back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquid Posted December 17, 2003 Author Share Posted December 17, 2003 the text very small and unreadable!!?? you should check your settings.. it's fine oh, hehe, wierd, other sites were normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kainashi Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 oh, hehe, wierd, other sites were normal i was about to say that it was quite easy to read... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoMasamune Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 The text isn't that bad. It's readable and not as small as you make it out to be. The site could use a different layout though, IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryne Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 JMO, the layout is fine to me, but the choice of colours is not the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwiztedCam Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 I love the colors, nice layout, and Win5 is not buggy at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sully748 Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 the only thing i don't like is it takes a while to read all the id3 tags for my songs and when you have thousands it takes a while but i guess its worth it b/c i would rather have id3 tags than just the filenames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwiztedCam Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 I find editing filenames easier than editing id tags. I hate id tags, I take them off right away. I just wish there was an option in Winamp to turn off id reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nugg3t Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 very cool stuff, just installed the final version. (Y) , good stuff oh btw, i like the new site :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sully748 Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 i thought there was a way to turn off the id3 tags if you have v5 if you push atl+3 you should be able to unclick id3 tags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mxp Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 i find that it is better than the old one i like the color choice and the layout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwiztedCam Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 i thought there was a way to turn off the id3 tagsif you have v5 if you push atl+3 you should be able to unclick id3 tags Yeah, that's how I edit them all to take them off, but I meant for a way for Winamp to not read them at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMan Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 (edited) So, what's new about WA5? I really like version 2, is there any real reason to upgrade? Here's my WA2 skin, nice and simple and tucked away (Unlike the REALLY OVER BLOATED MediaPlayer9): Edited December 17, 2003 by AshMan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwiztedCam Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 So, what's news about WA5? I really like version 2, is there any real reason to upgrade?Here's my WA2 skin, nice and simple and tucked away (Unlike the OVER BLOATED MediaPlayer9): Other than support for WA3 skins, I see no real reason to upgrade. Although I did see that WA5 uses less memory, but if you have alot of memory then I guess it doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAD Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 the WA3 skins is the reason for the bloatness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesardrgn Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 I think it looks nice... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanctified Veteran Posted December 17, 2003 Veteran Share Posted December 17, 2003 the WA3 skins is the reason for the bloatness. then dont use the new skins, btw, overbloatness is 6 mb of use and almost no cpu used? :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redestium Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 ,Dec 17 2003, 01:31] then dont use the new skins, btw, overbloatness is 6 mb of use and almost no cpu used? :rolleyes: No kidding, I love how everyone loves to throw that word around so much that it loses all meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin-ergy Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 what's their obsession with llama's anyway? :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jymi Posted December 17, 2003 Share Posted December 17, 2003 the site;'s colours looks ugly in my eyes but the text is fine, nothing hard to read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts