Recommended Posts

Polonium

It's not 5 hours long. Give that a rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites
123456789A

5 hours long? Were they doing a speed run?

Link to post
Share on other sites
soniqstylz

It's not 5 hours long. Give that a rest.

 

It is if you just run through.  See the above walkthrough.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

We shall see when it launches won't we.

The hate for this game is staggering.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

Many games can be completed in shorter amounts of time if you just "run through them", the essence of a speedrun. If that's how you play your games though I really doubt atmospheric based story games are really what you're after. You'd be better buying something based solely around gameplay/repetition of gameplay. Members of GAF who have copies cite 10-15 hours for completion.

 

While I have my doubts about this game pre-release it really is getting an awfully strange amount of hype surrounding it being a disaster - People almost wishing for it to suck which strikes me as strange in a world where new IP is desperately needed. If it sucks we'll find out shortly through reviews, if it's good same applies, but it's bewildering to see people almost hoping a TPS based around a serious story will flop (serious as in nothing inherently offensive like crude humour or distasteful subjects - unless you're part of a #thinkofthelycangate movement.).

 

Lastly, as for the MP argument, sure it's not there, but this is a big stepup from PSP games for the studio. I seriously doubt they'd be able to cram in a decent MP offering this time without taking away from the SP, or avoiding having a MP no one will play in large numbers. ND are well established and even they didn't get MP into their first Uncharted. Pretty sure Uncharted took me around the 10~12 hour mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

We shall see when it launches won't we.

The hate for this game is staggering.

You can already see the whole game in the link and he also said that even with collectables\etc it tops out at 7 or so hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

You can already see the whole game in the link.

Speed run doesn't really count.

Many people are saying it's around the 10 hour mark so the odd Twitter post saying it's less doesn't mean jack.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Speed run doesn't really count.

Many people are saying it's around the 10 hour mark so the odd Twitter post saying it's less doesn't mean jack.

How is it a speed run? It was his first play through, with all the cutscenes..

 

Okay, you didn't even bother to read or click the link I posted...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

I've seen it already and others that claim the same thing yet far more I've seen state the complete opposite.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LaP

How is it a speed run? It was his first play through, with all the cutscenes..

 

Okay, you didn't even bother to read or click the link I posted...

 

It might not be a speed run but still many games can be complete in less than 10 hours if you run thru them on the easiest difficulty settings. At which difficulty setting the guy is playing?

 

It looks like a good game to be honest from the video. But it looks definitely too easy. Is it because people play it on the easiest or normal difficulty settings? Who knows but people doing videos often play on easy or normal to not die too much. But if the game has a hard difficulty setting (dunno f it has) that is lot harder that what we saw in the videos then it will take more time to complete the game.

 

There's many game i can complete in 6-7 hours on easy or normal but then it takes me over 20 hours on hard or some other crazy settings cause i die and need to take my time to avoid dying more.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I've seen it already and others that claim the same thing yet far more I've seen state the complete opposite.

What? that does not make sense. You can't deny its around 5-6 hour game. Now people are using the excuse of speed run, when it's in fact his first play through of the whole game.

 

If you watch his playthrough, its obvious he wasn't trying to speed through the game and just by watching the chapters there's alot of qte and cutscenes.

 

Untitled_1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

It might not be a speed run but still many games can be complete in less than 10 hours if you run thru them on the easiest difficulty settings. At which difficulty setting the guy is playing?

 

It looks like a good game to be honest from the video. But it looks definitely too easy. Is it because people play it on the easiest or normal difficulty settings? Who knows but people doing videos often play on easy or normal to not die too much. But if the game has a hard difficulty setting (dunno f it has) that is lot harder that what we saw in the videos then it will take more time to complete the game.

 

There's many game i can complete in 6-7 hours on easy or normal but then it takes me over 20 hours on hard or some other crazy settings cause i die and need to take my time to avoid dying more.

He doesn't say what difficutly settings his playing at(if there is even one). The problem with that 5-6 hour is the non skippable cutscenes and QTE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

I can't deny? Why? You can't prove it is either.

Until the general public have it in their hands nobody can say anything. The media and gaming press can not be trusted.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I can't deny? Why? You can't prove it is either.

Until the general public have it in their hands nobody can say anything. The media and gaming press can not be trusted.

WOW..... I can't prove it? YOU CAN WATCH THE WHOLE GAME IN THE LINK I PROVIDED. The guy had the final game in his hand.

 

first the speed run excuse and now I can't prove it? ....SMH

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

What? that does not make sense. You can't deny its around 5-6 hour game. Now people are using the excuse of speed run, when it's in fact his first play through of the whole game.

 

If you watch his playthrough, its obvious he wasn't trying to speed through the game and just by watch the chapters there's alot of qte and cutscenes.

 

Because one person completes it this quickly that somehow sets the standard that everyone's experience will be the same?

 

I will admit I won't watch the videos as you'd have to really not care to do so - It's a story based game, so, um, spoilers. That is still my point to you though, one person on YT completes it this quickly and you're happy to say that's a final admission of how long it will take a mass audience?

 

Variations in play time always exist, whether it's down to skill level, difficulty level and in the case of a story based game how much exploring and time you take to take notice of the environment. 

 

You are trying a little bit too hard to take one persons experience and tell everyone that is how long their playthrough will be - We already have a small, but variable range from all who have gotten their hands on the game early. As I said there are a few people on GAF who have said 10-15 hours. Why not take their experience as gospel vs the person on YT? Because you can't, we need a larger pool of statistics to draw any real conclusions.

 

edit: That image also contains chapter name spoilers, you might want to remove it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Because one person completes it this quickly that somehow sets the standard that everyone's experience will be the same?

 

I will admit I won't watch the videos as you'd have to really not care to do so - It's a story based game, so, um, spoilers. That is still my point to you though, one person on YT completes it this quickly and you're happy to say that's a final admission of how long it will take a mass audience?

 

Variations in play time always exist, whether it's down to skill level, difficulty level and in the case of a story based game how much exploring and time you take to take notice of the environment. 

 

You are trying a little bit too hard to take one persons experience and tell everyone that is how long their playthrough will be - We already have a small, but variable range from all who have gotten their hands on the game early. As I said there are a few people on GAF who have said 10-15 hours. Why not take their experience as gospel vs the person on YT? Because you can't, we need a larger pool of statistics to draw any real conclusions.

 

edit: That image also contains chapter name spoilers, you might want to remove it.

He even states that even if you take your time it's 7 hours tops with collectables. Those GAF poster's are hearsay, unless they prove it otherwise.The guy playing the game seems like an average player and didn't speed through the game at all.

 

After skimming through all the videos. The game is full with walking to point a to point b, quick time action, cutscenes, than a few shooting action in between.

 

I'm not saying the game is going to suck or the story sucks(that's why i skimmed through the video to advoid the story). We will see when reviews and critics get's their hands on the game. Just don't expect alot of replay value from this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

Listen, as AB said above, just because this guy did it in 5 hours and then states its 7 hours tops does not mean it will take that amount of time for everybody.

 

We all know that Gears of War could have been done in around 5/6 hours yet that game scored highly and was considered to be one of the best in class. Now suddenly a Sony exclusive does something similar (maybe) with the time to complete, and it's bad.

 

It reminds me of the Driveclub reviews - slating it for not being open world like Horizon 2. Not sure what the press have against the Playstation brand but it's becoming dull, and fast.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

He even states that even if you take your time it's 7 hours tops with collectables. Those GAF poster's are hearsay, unless they prove it otherwise.The guy playing the game seems like an average player and didn't speed through the game at all.

 

After skimming through all the videos. The game is full with walking to point a to point b, quick time action, cutscenes, than a few shooting action in between.

 

You're still taking the views of one person as ultimate of everyone's experience. Just because others haven't uploaded their whole playthrough on YT doesn't make them any less valid - Especially when they are posting things only someone who has played the game would know. Bit of a strange point you're making, it would mean you wouldn't even listen to someone on Neowin posting text based impressions of their own.

 

Maybe this YTer is your new bestie or something?  :laugh:

 

TLoU, the pinnacle of any TPS based story game contains a lot of walking, and maybe 1~2 hours of cutscenes? That doesn't mean anything. On a related note I seriously doubt this game will come anywhere near close to TLoU, but as a new IP from whom I've already said used to be a PSP only dev, will have it's due critical reception very shortly. And from many different people, not just one on YT. I think that is only the point we're trying to make - It's hardly reasonable to take one persons experience as indicative of everyone's. Now if the masses start obtaining an average playthrough of 5-6 hours then we can talk about this one YTers experience being representative of the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

Listen, as AB said above, just because this guy did it in 5 hours and then states its 7 hours tops does not mean it will take that amount of time for everybody.

 

We all know that Gears of War could have been done in around 5/6 hours yet that game scored highly and was considered to be one of the best in class. Now suddenly a Sony exclusive does something similar (maybe) with the time to complete, and it's bad.

 

It reminds me of the Driveclub reviews - slating it for not being open world like Horizon 2. Not sure what the press have against the Playstation brand but it's becoming dull, and fast.

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

 

I forgot you've played the order and can say it has no replay value. Thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I forgot you've played the order and can say it has no replay value. Thanks for your input.

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes just for trophies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes.

 

I don't know, how many times? You see, yet again, you are failing to understand that everybody is different. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

 

Where one experience is aimed to shine, it may falter elsewhere. I seriously doubt you're going to get many say Gears was an amazing story up there with the giants of gaming storytelling (mass opinion).

 

Money and effort have been funneled into making this game shine like TLoU did with story. As I said above while I doubt it will come anywhere near as close, I would expect it to surpass the writing and atmosphere of Gears of War. It's gameplay probably won't be as good, but Gears had to be setup with gameplay high on the agenda as any game with MP/co-op really has to.

 

And to reiterate what I've already said twice, small studio previously based with PSP only making a leap to this level. Their budget and experience aren't on the same scale as ND or Epic. Doesn't mean we can't critically examine all titles in the same way, we should, in fact especially when a game defines itself as featuring exclusively on one area (narrative). If it fails at that then the whole title goes down (no MP to redeem crap story, like say BF or COD).

 

Sure it's harder to spend RRP when there isn't MP tacked on, but to build a real SP franchise you have to start somewhere (like Uncharted 1 with no MP).

 

 

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes just for trophies.

 

 

They should be skippable for a 2nd playthrough, and that should be easy to patch in. Minor nuisance though that doesn't degrade from a title setting out to have a great story, if it does indeed have one.

 

I bought TLoU remastered to replay a great story (and improved graphics), not to replay for collectibles. Some people will replay a games story down the line if it was memorable. Not all of us have time to replay games just for trophies.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
elenarie

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

 

Maybe on consoles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Usama Jawad96
      Sony still in talks with Microsoft, but cloud strategy to be 'only on PlayStation'
      by Usama Jawad

      The cloud is the next frontier which tech giants such as Microsoft, Sony, Google, and Amazon seem to be interested in conquering. Microsoft and Sony even signed a strategic partnership back in 2019, which included the use of Azure, AI solutions, and more for content streaming. The deal caught many by surprise given the firms' rivalry in gaming but nothing tangible has emerged so far.

      Now, PlayStation boss Jim Ryan has confirmed that Sony is still collaborating with Microsoft, but its cloud strategy will be solely about the PlayStation.



      In an interview with Nikkei (paywall, Japanese, translated by VGC), Jim Ryan went on to say that:

      The statement is vague enough to be open to anyone's interpretation. To us, it seems like Sony will use Microsoft's Azure-based infrastructure for technical tooling, but at the end of the day, the solution will solely be for the benefit of PlayStation gamers rather than a cross-platform audience. Of course, plans like these can change anytime.

      When asked about the future of cloud gaming and its potential to disrupt console release cycles, Ryan emphasized that "history shows that sales peak in the third or fourth year. At the end of the cycle, the cloud may play some role." When it came to the question about whether the PlayStation 5 will be the last console from Sony, Ryan understandably did not give a straightforward answer and stated that the company is currently evaluating how gamers are enjoying the console, and only after its own investigation is complete will it be able to "think about the future of PlayStation".

      Importantly, Sony did boost its PlayStation Now infrastructure recently with support for 1080p gaming, so the firm is definitely interested in the potential of the cloud. That said, only time will tell whether it is ready to go all-in on its cloud strategy, whatever that may end up being.

    • By Usama Jawad96
      PlayStation Now is finally getting support for 1080p streaming
      by Usama Jawad

      There are two core services which make up the online PlayStation experience: namely PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now. You can find out more details about each of them in our dedicated article here, but in a nutshell, the former allows you to play multiplayer games online and also throws in a selection of games each month that you can play for free. Meanwhile, the latter allows you to stream a vast library of games to your PS4, PS5, or PC.

      Up until now, streaming on PlayStation Now has been limited to 720p resolution, which doesn't impact old PlayStation games as much, but significantly pulls back the visual fidelity in newer titles. This is set to change soon as Sony has announced that it will start supporting 1080p streaming for capable games this week:

      It is interesting to note that Sony first promised to roll out support for 1080p streaming back in 2019, and it took two years for the plan to come to fruition.

      All in all, this is good news for gamers because it offers them titles in higher resolution, bringing them in line with the visual fidelity offered by games being played in the traditional method. On the other side of the fence, cloud gaming via Xbox Game Pass is currently limited to 720p too, but we do know that Microsoft is testing out support for 1080p streaming internally as well.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Sony reverses PlayStation 3 and Vita store closure decision
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe



      In April, Sony revealed that its PlayStation 3, Portable, and Vita digital stores will soon become inaccessible, as the PlayStation Store will shut down across these platforms later this summer. However, after much criticism from the community, the decision has now been rolled back, though not entirely.

      In a new announcement, Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO and president Jim Ryan plainly said the company had originally "made the wrong decision". The PlayStation Store will continue to be available across the PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita devices, however, the PlayStation Portable's digital store will close as previously planned on July 2.

      Regarding how the company came to the original decision, Ryan said the following:

      Sony's quick turnaround after vigorous community feedback is a similar move to what Microsoft pulled in January, where the company had to backpedal heavily on the Xbox Live Gold price doubling measures after facing a tremendous community backlash of its own.

      "We see now that many of you are incredibly passionate about being able to continue purchasing classic games on PS3 and PS Vita for the foreseeable future, so I’m glad we were able to find a solution to continue operations," Ryan added regarding what had changed Sony's mind.

    • By Namerah S
      Sony Xperia 1 III and Xperia 5 III price revealed on Sony Russia website
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      In a launch event that was live-streamed on YouTube yesterday, Sony announced its latest trio of smartphones under the Xperia branding. The Japanese conglomerate unveiled the Xperia 1 III, Xperia 5 III, and Xperia 10 III.

      Almost all the key specifications of the three smartphones were unveiled yesterday. However, Sony chose not to share the exact launch dates and prices of the Xperia devices. Thanks to two new listings on Sony Russia's online store, spotted by Android Authority, the Russian prices are now known. These are likely to be similar in other parts of the world such as the U.S., giving people approximate figures for the phones once they launch in those places as well.

      As seen on Sony.ru, the Xperia 1 III boasting a 6.5-inch 4K HDR OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, 21:9 aspect ratio and Gorilla Glass Victus is priced at 99,990 RUB ($1,313.31). The device also features the Snapdragon 888 5G chipset, a 4500mAh with 30W fast-charging, and a quad-camera setup that includes a variable telephoto lens paired with a dual PD sensor.

      Meanwhile, the Xperia 5 III is selling for RUB 84,990 ($1,116.29) on the Russian site. The second Xperia device features a 6.1-inch 21:9 HDR 120Hz OLED display with a 21:9 aspect ratio and Gorilla Glass 6. It uses the same SoC as the Xperia 1 III, the SD 888 5G chip, and also has a 4500mAh with 30W fast-charging. Both smartphones have IPX5 and IP X8 waterproof certifications paired with IP6X dustproof ratings.

      Pre-orders for the two smartphones are currently open on Sony Russia's online store. As for the launch date, Sony Russia has teased launch promotion on its official Instagram handle, revealing Russian release dates and pre-order bonuses for the region.

      As seen in the promo banners shared by Sony Russia on the social media platform, the Xperia 1 III is set to arrive on July 20 while the Xperia 5 III is scheduled to launch on August 3. Both Xperia products will ship with a pair of Sony WF-XB700 true wireless earbuds as a pre-purchase bonus.

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Days Gone launches May 18 on PC, platform specific enhancements detailed
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      Sony and Bend Studio announced in February that Days Gone will soon leave its PlayStation exclusivity behind, with the action survival horror game getting a PC release this year. Now, that release has a launch date attached to it. Days Gone is launching across Steam and the Epic Games Store on May 18.

      As with most other console ports nowadays, the PC version is landing with additional enhancements over the original 2019 PlayStation 4 version. Bend Studio says the new version has "increased level of detail, foliage draw distances, and graphical customization" options for much better visuals.

      Support for unlocked frame rates, ultra-wide monitors, keyboard and mouse, as well as first- and third-party controllers were confirmed as well. Moreover, there will be a Super Resolution Photo Mode included here, an upgraded version of what is available in the original.

      Days Gone PC pre-orders are now available across Steam and Epic Games Store for $49.99. Following this launch, and with Horizon Zero Dawn now behind it, Sony is planning to bring even more PlayStation exclusives to PC, though no specific games have been announced just yet.