Recommended Posts

Polonium

It's not 5 hours long. Give that a rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites
123456789A

5 hours long? Were they doing a speed run?

Link to post
Share on other sites
soniqstylz

It's not 5 hours long. Give that a rest.

 

It is if you just run through.  See the above walkthrough.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

We shall see when it launches won't we.

The hate for this game is staggering.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

Many games can be completed in shorter amounts of time if you just "run through them", the essence of a speedrun. If that's how you play your games though I really doubt atmospheric based story games are really what you're after. You'd be better buying something based solely around gameplay/repetition of gameplay. Members of GAF who have copies cite 10-15 hours for completion.

 

While I have my doubts about this game pre-release it really is getting an awfully strange amount of hype surrounding it being a disaster - People almost wishing for it to suck which strikes me as strange in a world where new IP is desperately needed. If it sucks we'll find out shortly through reviews, if it's good same applies, but it's bewildering to see people almost hoping a TPS based around a serious story will flop (serious as in nothing inherently offensive like crude humour or distasteful subjects - unless you're part of a #thinkofthelycangate movement.).

 

Lastly, as for the MP argument, sure it's not there, but this is a big stepup from PSP games for the studio. I seriously doubt they'd be able to cram in a decent MP offering this time without taking away from the SP, or avoiding having a MP no one will play in large numbers. ND are well established and even they didn't get MP into their first Uncharted. Pretty sure Uncharted took me around the 10~12 hour mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

We shall see when it launches won't we.

The hate for this game is staggering.

You can already see the whole game in the link and he also said that even with collectables\etc it tops out at 7 or so hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

You can already see the whole game in the link.

Speed run doesn't really count.

Many people are saying it's around the 10 hour mark so the odd Twitter post saying it's less doesn't mean jack.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Speed run doesn't really count.

Many people are saying it's around the 10 hour mark so the odd Twitter post saying it's less doesn't mean jack.

How is it a speed run? It was his first play through, with all the cutscenes..

 

Okay, you didn't even bother to read or click the link I posted...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

I've seen it already and others that claim the same thing yet far more I've seen state the complete opposite.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LaP

How is it a speed run? It was his first play through, with all the cutscenes..

 

Okay, you didn't even bother to read or click the link I posted...

 

It might not be a speed run but still many games can be complete in less than 10 hours if you run thru them on the easiest difficulty settings. At which difficulty setting the guy is playing?

 

It looks like a good game to be honest from the video. But it looks definitely too easy. Is it because people play it on the easiest or normal difficulty settings? Who knows but people doing videos often play on easy or normal to not die too much. But if the game has a hard difficulty setting (dunno f it has) that is lot harder that what we saw in the videos then it will take more time to complete the game.

 

There's many game i can complete in 6-7 hours on easy or normal but then it takes me over 20 hours on hard or some other crazy settings cause i die and need to take my time to avoid dying more.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I've seen it already and others that claim the same thing yet far more I've seen state the complete opposite.

What? that does not make sense. You can't deny its around 5-6 hour game. Now people are using the excuse of speed run, when it's in fact his first play through of the whole game.

 

If you watch his playthrough, its obvious he wasn't trying to speed through the game and just by watching the chapters there's alot of qte and cutscenes.

 

Untitled_1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

It might not be a speed run but still many games can be complete in less than 10 hours if you run thru them on the easiest difficulty settings. At which difficulty setting the guy is playing?

 

It looks like a good game to be honest from the video. But it looks definitely too easy. Is it because people play it on the easiest or normal difficulty settings? Who knows but people doing videos often play on easy or normal to not die too much. But if the game has a hard difficulty setting (dunno f it has) that is lot harder that what we saw in the videos then it will take more time to complete the game.

 

There's many game i can complete in 6-7 hours on easy or normal but then it takes me over 20 hours on hard or some other crazy settings cause i die and need to take my time to avoid dying more.

He doesn't say what difficutly settings his playing at(if there is even one). The problem with that 5-6 hour is the non skippable cutscenes and QTE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

I can't deny? Why? You can't prove it is either.

Until the general public have it in their hands nobody can say anything. The media and gaming press can not be trusted.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I can't deny? Why? You can't prove it is either.

Until the general public have it in their hands nobody can say anything. The media and gaming press can not be trusted.

WOW..... I can't prove it? YOU CAN WATCH THE WHOLE GAME IN THE LINK I PROVIDED. The guy had the final game in his hand.

 

first the speed run excuse and now I can't prove it? ....SMH

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

What? that does not make sense. You can't deny its around 5-6 hour game. Now people are using the excuse of speed run, when it's in fact his first play through of the whole game.

 

If you watch his playthrough, its obvious he wasn't trying to speed through the game and just by watch the chapters there's alot of qte and cutscenes.

 

Because one person completes it this quickly that somehow sets the standard that everyone's experience will be the same?

 

I will admit I won't watch the videos as you'd have to really not care to do so - It's a story based game, so, um, spoilers. That is still my point to you though, one person on YT completes it this quickly and you're happy to say that's a final admission of how long it will take a mass audience?

 

Variations in play time always exist, whether it's down to skill level, difficulty level and in the case of a story based game how much exploring and time you take to take notice of the environment. 

 

You are trying a little bit too hard to take one persons experience and tell everyone that is how long their playthrough will be - We already have a small, but variable range from all who have gotten their hands on the game early. As I said there are a few people on GAF who have said 10-15 hours. Why not take their experience as gospel vs the person on YT? Because you can't, we need a larger pool of statistics to draw any real conclusions.

 

edit: That image also contains chapter name spoilers, you might want to remove it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Because one person completes it this quickly that somehow sets the standard that everyone's experience will be the same?

 

I will admit I won't watch the videos as you'd have to really not care to do so - It's a story based game, so, um, spoilers. That is still my point to you though, one person on YT completes it this quickly and you're happy to say that's a final admission of how long it will take a mass audience?

 

Variations in play time always exist, whether it's down to skill level, difficulty level and in the case of a story based game how much exploring and time you take to take notice of the environment. 

 

You are trying a little bit too hard to take one persons experience and tell everyone that is how long their playthrough will be - We already have a small, but variable range from all who have gotten their hands on the game early. As I said there are a few people on GAF who have said 10-15 hours. Why not take their experience as gospel vs the person on YT? Because you can't, we need a larger pool of statistics to draw any real conclusions.

 

edit: That image also contains chapter name spoilers, you might want to remove it.

He even states that even if you take your time it's 7 hours tops with collectables. Those GAF poster's are hearsay, unless they prove it otherwise.The guy playing the game seems like an average player and didn't speed through the game at all.

 

After skimming through all the videos. The game is full with walking to point a to point b, quick time action, cutscenes, than a few shooting action in between.

 

I'm not saying the game is going to suck or the story sucks(that's why i skimmed through the video to advoid the story). We will see when reviews and critics get's their hands on the game. Just don't expect alot of replay value from this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

Listen, as AB said above, just because this guy did it in 5 hours and then states its 7 hours tops does not mean it will take that amount of time for everybody.

 

We all know that Gears of War could have been done in around 5/6 hours yet that game scored highly and was considered to be one of the best in class. Now suddenly a Sony exclusive does something similar (maybe) with the time to complete, and it's bad.

 

It reminds me of the Driveclub reviews - slating it for not being open world like Horizon 2. Not sure what the press have against the Playstation brand but it's becoming dull, and fast.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

He even states that even if you take your time it's 7 hours tops with collectables. Those GAF poster's are hearsay, unless they prove it otherwise.The guy playing the game seems like an average player and didn't speed through the game at all.

 

After skimming through all the videos. The game is full with walking to point a to point b, quick time action, cutscenes, than a few shooting action in between.

 

You're still taking the views of one person as ultimate of everyone's experience. Just because others haven't uploaded their whole playthrough on YT doesn't make them any less valid - Especially when they are posting things only someone who has played the game would know. Bit of a strange point you're making, it would mean you wouldn't even listen to someone on Neowin posting text based impressions of their own.

 

Maybe this YTer is your new bestie or something?  :laugh:

 

TLoU, the pinnacle of any TPS based story game contains a lot of walking, and maybe 1~2 hours of cutscenes? That doesn't mean anything. On a related note I seriously doubt this game will come anywhere near close to TLoU, but as a new IP from whom I've already said used to be a PSP only dev, will have it's due critical reception very shortly. And from many different people, not just one on YT. I think that is only the point we're trying to make - It's hardly reasonable to take one persons experience as indicative of everyone's. Now if the masses start obtaining an average playthrough of 5-6 hours then we can talk about this one YTers experience being representative of the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

Listen, as AB said above, just because this guy did it in 5 hours and then states its 7 hours tops does not mean it will take that amount of time for everybody.

 

We all know that Gears of War could have been done in around 5/6 hours yet that game scored highly and was considered to be one of the best in class. Now suddenly a Sony exclusive does something similar (maybe) with the time to complete, and it's bad.

 

It reminds me of the Driveclub reviews - slating it for not being open world like Horizon 2. Not sure what the press have against the Playstation brand but it's becoming dull, and fast.

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

 

I forgot you've played the order and can say it has no replay value. Thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nosense

I forgot you've played the order and can say it has no replay value. Thanks for your input.

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes just for trophies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Polonium

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes.

 

I don't know, how many times? You see, yet again, you are failing to understand that everybody is different. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Audioboxer

The difference with gear is that, It had 4 player co-op\mp\horde mode\beast mode\etc. Something called replay value.

 

Where one experience is aimed to shine, it may falter elsewhere. I seriously doubt you're going to get many say Gears was an amazing story up there with the giants of gaming storytelling (mass opinion).

 

Money and effort have been funneled into making this game shine like TLoU did with story. As I said above while I doubt it will come anywhere near as close, I would expect it to surpass the writing and atmosphere of Gears of War. It's gameplay probably won't be as good, but Gears had to be setup with gameplay high on the agenda as any game with MP/co-op really has to.

 

And to reiterate what I've already said twice, small studio previously based with PSP only making a leap to this level. Their budget and experience aren't on the same scale as ND or Epic. Doesn't mean we can't critically examine all titles in the same way, we should, in fact especially when a game defines itself as featuring exclusively on one area (narrative). If it fails at that then the whole title goes down (no MP to redeem crap story, like say BF or COD).

 

Sure it's harder to spend RRP when there isn't MP tacked on, but to build a real SP franchise you have to start somewhere (like Uncharted 1 with no MP).

 

 

It only has campaign. How many times are you  going to replay a game where you can't even skip the cutscenes just for trophies.

 

 

They should be skippable for a 2nd playthrough, and that should be easy to patch in. Minor nuisance though that doesn't degrade from a title setting out to have a great story, if it does indeed have one.

 

I bought TLoU remastered to replay a great story (and improved graphics), not to replay for collectibles. Some people will replay a games story down the line if it was memorable. Not all of us have time to replay games just for trophies.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
elenarie

Moving from point a to point b, quick time action, cutscences, and shooting... you mean like 99% of all shooting games then?

 

 

Maybe on consoles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Usama Jawad96
      Gran Turismo 7 has been delayed due to COVID-19
      by Usama Jawad

      Sony made multiple announcements today including the next iteration of PlayStation VR as well as plans for its exclusive titles making their way to PC, starting with Days Gone. While these are positive pieces of news, some not-so-good news is that Gran Turismo 7 has been delayed to 2022.

      In a statement to GQ, Sony stated that the delay is due to COVID-19 and that Gran Turismo 7's release will be pushed to 2022 as a result:

      The announcement will likely come as a blow for fans of the series. When Sony announced the latest entry in June 2020, it showed off in-game footage captured on the PlayStation 5 to highlight just how pretty the graphics can end up being on the new hardware.

      Gran Turismo 7 also features a brand-new campaign mode which lets players customize cars in their own garage and unlock new vehicles - like the Mazda RX-VISION GT3 concept - by winning various races. Little else is currently known about the Polyphony Digital title except that it will be a PlayStation 5 exclusive, and will purportedly support ray-tracing and 4K60 gameplay. It is also expected to utilize features offered by the DualSense controller. While there is no firm release date for Gran Turismo 7 as of yet, fans of the series will have to sit out the rest of this year at the very least.

      Source: GQ

    • By LoneWolfSL
      More PlayStation exclusives head to PC, starting with Days Gone this spring
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      Sony will soon bring back its PlayStation to PC porting initiative according to Sony Interactive Entertainment president Jim Ryan, who revealed the detail in an interview with GQ.

      Days Gone is slated to be the next game to leave the PlayStation exclusives list, with it releasing this spring on PC, following in the footsteps of Horizon Zero Dawn from last year. The Bend Studio-developed title is an open-world action survival game set in a post-apocalyptic scenario involving zombie-like creatures. It originally released in 2019 for the PlayStation 4.

      However, the porting journey won't stop there, as Ryan had said even more exclusives will come pouring through to PC afterward. An Amazon leak from last year - which Sony called inaccurate - showed PC listings of Days Gone, Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection, Persona 5 Royal, and Gran Turismo Sport, among other games. In the end, these could be the games that are incoming to PC.

      When asked what changed within the company to allow PC ports of its exclusives after a long time of closed doors, Ryan answered saying:

      Ryan added that Horizon Zero Dawn's launch on PC was a success. This was thanks to the PC community going on to liking and purchasing the game and the PlayStation community not having a "massive adverse reaction" to the porting decision. Sony also announced its next-generation virtual reality plans today, though the headset and controllers won't be landing this year.

      Source: GQ

    • By LoneWolfSL
      Sony announces its next-generation PlayStation VR system, not launching in 2021
      by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe

      The original PlayStation VR system Today Sony announced that it is building a next-generation virtual reality system specifically for its new PlayStation 5 console. However, it will be a while before PlayStation VR (PS VR) fans get their hands on it.

      "We’re continuing to innovate with our new VR system so that our fans can continue to enjoy the unique experiences that are synonymous with PlayStation," said Sony Interactive Entertainment senior vice president Hideaki Nishino in today's announcement. "We’re taking what we’ve learned since launching PS VR on PS4 to develop a next-gen VR system that enhances everything from resolution and field of view to tracking and input."

      The new PS VR headset will connect to the PlayStation 5 with a single cable to "simplify setup and improve ease-of-use" according to the company, shedding the wireless rumors. Moreover, Sony is building a new VR controller, and it will take on features from its PlayStation 5 DualSense controller. This should mean that the latter's advanced haptic features will also make an appearance on the VR controller side.

      The bad news is that the project is still in development, and not even images of what the VR headset or controllers look like were shared today. While a launch window reveal wasn't a part of the announcement, Nishino said that the next-gen virtual reality system is not coming in 2021. The original PlayStation VR headset from 2016 can be used with the PlayStation 5, however, the compatible games may only run the original version, not a next-gen enhanced version.

    • By Copernic
      Universal Media Server 10.1.0
      by Razvan Serea



      Universal Media Server is a DLNA-compliant UPnP Media Server. UMS was started by SubJunk, an official developer of PMS, in order to ensure greater stability and file-compatibility. The program streams or transcodes many different media formats with little or no configuration. It is powered by MEncoder, FFmpeg, tsMuxeR, AviSynth, MediaInfo and more, which combine to offer support for a wide range of media formats. Because it is written in Java, Universal Media Server supports all major operating systems, with versions for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

      To see a comparison of popular media servers, click here.

      Universal Media Server 10.1.0 changelog:

      General

      Added lastPlaybackPosition, lastPlaybackDate, and playbackCount to UPnP responses Added bitsPerSample to UPnP responses (thanks, sf666!) Fixed VLC transcoding bugs Fixed SkipExtensions setting not supporting spaces (thanks, ik666!) Fixed tsMuxeR on 64-bit Linux and macOS systems Fixed MPlayer/MEncoder on macOS 10.15+ Translation updates via Crowdin

      Arabic (100%) (thanks,خليل مراطلة (meratkha)!) Catalan (93%) (thanks, nikodeimos!) Dutch (100%) (thanks, DJ_eMPe!) Korean (99%) (thanks, VenusGirl!) Serbian (Cyrillic) (100%) (thanks, Slobodan Simić (Слободан Симић) (slsimic)!) Dependency updates

      Bump junit5.version from 5.7.0 to 5.7.1 Bump maven-checkstyle-plugin from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 Bump MPlayer/MEncoder for macOS to SB67 Download: Universal Media Server 10.0.1 | 160.0 MB (Open Source)
      Download: Other operating systems
      View: Universal Media Server Website

      Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware

    • By Namerah S
      PS Plus vs. PS Now: Which one should you get?
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      We currently live in the age of the consumer, there is no limit to what you can buy. The recent years have seen the advent of various monthly subscription services in the world of gaming. Big names like Microsoft, Sony, Apple, Google and Amazon have all jumped on board and released similar products.

      Such gaming services can be quite convenient as they provide users with value for money and can usually be cancelled at any time. Today we will consider two subscriptions provided by Sony, PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now, which cater to PlayStation and PC users. While the former has been around since 2010, the latter came around about four years later.

      A very common question that so many PlayStation owners are plagued with - myself included - is "Which subscription should I choose?". To help our readers solve this conundrum, we will analyze both options and tell you which one is the right choice for you.

      What each subscription offers
      PS Plus is a subscription which offers members two free games for the PS4 and recently, one extra for the PS5, exclusive PS Store discounts, exclusive added content, 100GB of cloud storage and access to a collection of 20 classic games only on the PS5. It also enables online gaming and is a requirement for almost all multiplayer games except for free-to-play titles like Apex Legends or Fortnite. Once the PS Plus subscription expires, members lose access to their PS Plus library until they activate their subscription again.

      PS Now is a cloud gaming subscription which allows users to stream or download select titles from the PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3 and the PlayStation 4 on the compatible platforms. Like PS Plus, once the monthly pass expires, players no can no longer access any of the games that they may have downloaded or streamed before. PC users need a DualShock 4 or any other compatible controller to play, and can only stream games from the service, not download them.

      Price and platforms
      The PS Plus subscription costs $9.99 per month, $24.99 for three months, or $59.99 for 12 months. Initially, the PS Now service used to cost more but the prices changed in October 2019. Following the change, PlayStation Now costs exactly the same, $9.99 for one, $24.99 for three or $59.99 for 12 months as the PS Plus.

      While the PS Plus membership is limited to the PS4 and PS5, PS Now is available on both the Sony consoles as well as PC.

      Collection of games
      PlayStation Plus offers three free titles each month. Apart from that, it also has a library of 20 games that players can download. This library is called the PS Plus Collection and it's only available on the PS5. All games can only be kept as long as they are active members.

      The PS Plus Collection has the following list of games:

      Bloodborne Days Gone Detroit: Become Human God of War Infamous Second Son Ratchet and Clank The Last Guardian The Last of Us Remastered Until Dawn Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End Batman: Arkham Knight Battlefield 1 Call of Duty: Black Ops III – Zombies Chronicles Edition Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy Fallout 4 Final Fantasy XV Royal Edition Monster Hunter: World Mortal Kombat X Persona 5 Resident Evil 7 Biohazard The PlayStation Now Library, on the other hand, has over 800 games in its arsenal. However, these games don't always stay in the collection permanently. From time to time, new games are added and old ones are given the boot. All of them are playable on the PS4, PS5 and PC.

      Some of the current titles on the PS Now Library are:

      Call of Duty Black Ops III Detroit: Become Human Ratchet and Clank Uncharted 2: Among Thieves Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception Uncharted: Drake's Fortune Darksiders Genesis WWE 2K Battlegrounds The Crew 2 Frostpunk Surviving Mars Little Nightmares Horizon Zero Dawn Darksiders III The Surge 2 Wreckfest Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain Mafia III A comprehensive list of all PS Now titles in the collection at the moment can be found here.

      Requirements
      It goes without saying that an internet connection is required to access both PlayStation services. When it comes to PS Plus, users can download their games and play them offline unless they are playing online multiplayer titles. So once the games are downloaded, users don't really need a connection.

      Unfortunately, for most of the PS Now titles, subscribers need to stream the game. Therefore, at least a minimum speed of 5Mbps is required at all times. Only a few games from this collection can be downloaded while most of the games, including some popular titles like God of War and the Uncharted franchise, are only available to stream.

      Availability
      The Playstation Plus service is available in 73 countries around the globe. Different regions have different content depending on the rules and demands of the area. The full list of regions where people can purchase PS Plus can be found here.

      Meanwhile, PS Now is available in far lesser territories than PS Plus. As of March 12, 2019, the PlayStation Now service is only available in 19 countries. These are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK and the U.S.

      Conclusion
      So, after considering all the above factors, which one should you choose? Well, the answer actually varies from person to person. Obviously, if you are situated in a region where either or both gaming subscriptions aren't available, you can't get them. However, if you have both options available, you'll need to consider your gaming needs to select the right one.

      Our recommendation is that if you don't play online multiplayer, like to play on the PC as well as console and have a really good internet connection, go with PlayStation Now. It has a huge selection of games that you can play as long as they're in the library. You may not be able to download them all, but that's a small price to pay for access to such a large collection. The service provides true-blue bang for your buck.

      On the other hand, if you play online multiplayer, frequently purchase games or lack a stable internet connection, opt for the PS Plus service. Although it doesn't offer many games, it does give you three games per month, access to 20 classic titles on the PS5, 100GB of cloud storage, a ton of discounts, and exclusive content.

      If you have a nice fat disposable income and both offerings have something essential to you, we would suggest you choose both of them! An active PS Plus subscription is mandatory for almost all multiplayer on PlayStation consoles so it's a very logical choice. In fact, both monthly memberships complement each other as the cloud storage of the PS Plus helps you store your PS Now games. If you can afford it, why not?

      Which subscription service - PlayStation or otherwise - do you prefer? Do you think we missed out on any important factors? Let us know in the comments below!



      As an Amazon Associate, Neowin may earn commission from qualifying purchases.