Complete Switch to *NIX and Linux: May 17, 2015


Recommended Posts

HeartsOfWar

In all fairness Windows can be awfully intimidating and unforgiving to the uninitiated.  I'm my entire families tech support and have seen jaw dropping things as a result of a BSOD :laugh:

 

I'm simply pointing that out due to the level of polish I've seen getting back to Linux in recent weeks. Anyone using windows could just as easily use a mildy tweaked install of Ubuntu/Mint or even Opensuse. Enough so to get me to order another laptop that will be strictly Linux for home use.

 

I agree... I will admit that I haven't spent much time with Windows 8 / 8.1, but what I have seen / used... I think it has a lot of awful /horrible design decisions. Charms bar??? What?

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne

Aren't they the same?

No.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lazy8s

I agree... I will admit that I haven't spent much time with Windows 8 / 8.1, but what I have seen / used... I think it has a lot of awful /horrible design decisions. Charms bar??? What?

Once used to it it's not that bad....kind of...but enough to make MS backpedal on the start menu. The charms bar lol...I rarely use it. The UI isn't really all that much different from the all apps function in Opensuse, but Suse's layout and design are just...simpler, and more aesthetically pleasing imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Max Norris

The UI isn't really all that much different from the all apps function in Opensuse, but Suse's layout and design are just...simpler, and more aesthetically pleasing imo.

Assuming KDE?  (OpenSUSE supports multiple environments.)  Yea, it's pretty nice, OpenSUSE does put some decent polish on it, KDE in general probably having the nicest (in my opinion) balance of usability and modernization, just wish they'd fix some of those long time bugs.  Others like Cinnamon are nice but still feel pretty dated, that taskbar for example, ick, straight out of XP.  Get something like Gnome 3 though.  Yikes, some crazy design decisions in that, makes Windows 8.x look positively tame. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lazy8s

Assuming KDE?  (OpenSUSE supports multiple environments.)  Yea, it's pretty nice, OpenSUSE does put some decent polish on it, KDE in general probably having the nicest (in my opinion) balance of usability and modernization, just wish they'd fix some of those long time bugs.  Others like Cinnamon are nice but still feel pretty dated, that taskbar for example, ick, straight out of XP.  Get something like Gnome 3 though.  Yikes, some crazy design decisions in that, makes Windows 8.x look positively tame. 

Mentioning the DE would have helped eh? Lol - yes, KDE is what I'm running now,and haven't bumped into any bugs yet,although it's only been a week. You worded my impressions perfectly - I liked Mint/Cinnamon a lot, but dated feeling is the perfect description. KDE just feels more modern. Well done and very user friendly imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+InsaneNutter

Really? Then tell me, how many cell phones need their users to type terminal commands or edit files or whatever, in order to fix an issue? You can't compare the desktop with phones. It's like apples and oranges. It doesn't matter if the mobile OS is based on Linux, it's not the same thing as using Linux on your desktop.

 

"Linux is capable of providing a complete friendly experience" - well, by this logic Windows is also capable of providing a complete friendly mobile experience too, right?

 

I agree it's like comparing apples to oranges, however you can certainly call up the terminal with Android and do things you can't from the UI. Such as use iptables to make it so any device tethering via Wi-Fi is routed through the phones VPN connection.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
TDT

I agree it's like comparing apples to oranges, however you can certainly call up the terminal with Android and do things you can't from the UI. Such as use iptables to make it so any device tethering via Wi-Fi is routed through the phones VPN connection.

I know you can, that wasn't the point. I meant you don't have to do this if you have issues on Android, most of the time it comes down to a reboot or reflash of the rom and that issue is fixed. On the desktop, things can get messy very fast if you're a noob. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Depicus

On the desktop, things can get messy very fast if you're a noob. 

 

Indeed I've seen more than my fair share of Windows machines messed up by tinkering fingers. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

Nope. I wasn't comparing Android to the Linux desktop. What I was doing was stating that if developers recognize their audience correctly, even Linux can succeed in the wild against Windows. It's not impossible for Linux just because it's an unforgiving OS according to most. It just takes an exceptional design vision / goal.

 

In case you haven't figured it out: 99% of the market that is Linux / Unix is the cell-phone market... not the desktop as you think. You need to read / comprehend better.

The kernel doesn't affect the user experience that much. What does is the OS components, like Xserver, GNU stuff, etc.

Aren't they the same?

https://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html

 

----

 

Personally, I really feel like GNU/Linux with a modern window manager suits the needs of many computer users. You don't have to use the terminal anymore, except if you are doing things that are meant for advanced users anyway. Of course, GNU/Linux is not ready for the masses, just for people who are a little less than computer savvy. This situation is improving, as we see less focus on making a complete operating system and more a usable one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

Yeap. Linux breaks so easily just because it's not so easy to fix something. Sometimes trying to fix an issue leads to other issues and so on until the system becomes a complete mess. Yeah, you're protected against viruses, but who needs viruses to get their system screwed when you can do it too? :rolleyes:

 

Linux does exactly what you tell it to do because it assumes you are a technical user. If Linux broke, it's because you broke it due to your tweaking or you are running unstable repositories, and in that case you have what's coming to you.

 

Linux is stable if you leave it alone and let it do its job. The same theory applies to Windows, OS X, and pretty much every OS out there. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne

Linux does exactly what you tell it to do because it assumes you are a technical user. If Linux broke, it's because you broke it due to your tweaking or you are running unstable repositories or someone pushed a broken package to the stable repos, and in that case you have what's coming to you.

 

Linux is stable if you leave it alone and let it do its job. The same theory applies to Windows, OS X, and pretty much every OS out there. 

FTFY.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TDT

Linux does exactly what you tell it to do because it assumes you are a technical user. If Linux broke, it's because you broke it due to your tweaking or you are running unstable repositories, and in that case you have what's coming to you.

 

Linux is stable if you leave it alone and let it do its job. The same theory applies to Windows, OS X, and pretty much every OS out there. 

Spot on. So you can agree that Linux is NOT for any noob. There, 1,57% market share explained :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

Spot on. So you can agree that Linux is NOT for any noob. There, 1,57% market share explained :)

No, because non-technical users won't mess around. The technical users have already configured your operating system. Further tweaking it is up to you, for your needs, as the default config might generalize too much, but this again only matter to technical users.

 

The only reason it has that market share is because of marketing, and legacy. Free projects don't have that much of a marketing budget. Windows is the standard because it has been the most used operating system, and people will continue to use it. Why do people continue to use it? Because they used it in the past.

 

 

FTFY.

Many popular distributions have a strict testing policy and QA to ensure this never happens. Of course, as with any operating system, or any human made product, bugs come up with updates, just like that Windows update that bricked some systems.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TDT

No, because non-technical users won't mess around. The technical users have already configured your operating system. Further tweaking it is up to you, for your needs, as the default config might generalize too much, but this again only matter to technical users.

 

The only reason it has that market share is because of marketing, and legacy. Free projects don't have that much of a marketing budget. Windows is the standard because it has been the most used operating system, and people will continue to use it. Why do people continue to use it? Because they used it in the past.

 

Non-technical users WILL mess around simply because they don't know that they could break things. And if they break something and realize that a reboot doesn't fix it, bye bye Linux. Also, one other thing that really bugs me about Linux: when you have a problem, try to ask somewhere (like FB, or G+) in the official community of that distro and you get a "file a bug at Launchpad". Gladly, but I had bugs that after almost 1 year never got past the "undecided" status. I had to dig a lot to fix my issues. So this is another annoying thing...

And the last line, seriously? The force of habit? THAT's why people still use Windows? If you really believe that, then I'm sorry but I really don't want to give an answer...

Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

Non-technical users WILL mess around simply because they don't know that they could break things. And if they break something and realize that a reboot doesn't fix it, bye bye Linux. Also, one other thing that really bugs me about Linux: when you have a problem, try to ask somewhere (like FB, or G+) in the official community of that distro and you get a "file a bug at Launchpad". Gladly, but I had bugs that after almost 1 year never got past the "undecided" status. I had to dig a lot to fix my issues. So this is another annoying thing...

And the last line, seriously? The force of habit? THAT's why people still use Windows? If you really believe that, then I'm sorry but I really don't want to give an answer...

There isn't anything to do in the UI that could break your system. I don't think anyone is apt enough to use the terminal if they are clueless already. You can do tons of bad things using the Command Line and regedit on Windows. It is just that non technical users never mess around past a few settings. Most will never even touch their settings. It is a known fact that the majority of computer users keep their computer defaults. They just want to use their computer.

 

You also are acting as if Windows never has problems. There are tons of many successful businesses thriving on the fact that Windows will break and they can fix it.

 

I've never had that problem, nor have I seen it. I've seen that Linux has a more vibrant community than Microsoft in this field. With Microsoft, you get an MVP on their question forums answering your question with a generic answer that has nothing to do with the question, so they can get more points to get an upgraded forum status. On linux questions, and Linux Stack Exchange, you have experienced users that know exactly what they're doing and they can explain to you your problem, and how to fix it. If you're not technical, you can just say that and they will guide you through it that way.

 

 

Sorry, that last sentence had implied implications. When people use Windows previously, it means they are in an environment with Windows tools and apps, and it is easier for them to continue in this environment. Since they've been on Windows previously and are continuing to do so, Windows retains its market share, and these enhanced environments stay on Windows rather than moving to Linux. So, when someone considers change, they've already been locked in with apps so they can't switch. I'll admit that if you expect Linux to be exactly like Windows or compatible with it, or you want to make it that way, it requires technical skill for messing around with Wine, or even Crossover and PlayOnLinux, although the situation is rapidly improving. Of course, there are mostly free, Linux alternatives for pretty much every Windows app. Though again, people like to stay with what is comfortable and what they are used to, and changing operating systems is enough for even most semi technical users, much less changing their programs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TDT

There isn't anything to do in the UI that could break your system. I don't think anyone is apt enough to use the terminal if they are clueless already. You can do tons of bad things using the Command Line and regedit on Windows. It is just that non technical users never mess around past a few settings. Most will never even touch their settings. It is a known fact that the majority of computer users keep their computer defaults. They just want to use their computer.

Well let me give you an example: the UI freezes, for some reason (happened to me just yesterday, with the damn Openshot app). In Windows, before you hit the reset button, you at least try ctrl+alt+del to launch the task manager. Believe me, to this day I don't know if Linux has something like this and WHAT is the damn keyboard combination. And this is frustrating.

And while it's true that today they have "dumbed down" Linux (some distros) so people can't screw it up, it wasn't always like that. My first Linux installation was Slackware, and I broke that thing like 3 times/day.  :laugh: I was a total noob. 

 

You also are acting as if Windows never has problems. There are tons of many successful businesses thriving on the fact that Windows will break and they can fix it.

I never said such a thing. Of course Windows has problems, but it's quite normal, and I've been saying this to people complaining about it: think of how many different types of PC configurations are in this world, how can you expect Microsoft to test Windows on EACH one before they launch it? Also, higher market share means malware, viruses, etc., it's a target. This "our OS has no viruses and no malware" thing that you hear at Apple (and maybe Linux too) is just a marketing crap.

 

 

I've never had that problem, nor have I seen it. I've seen that Linux has a more vibrant community than Microsoft in this field. With Microsoft, you get an MVP on their question forums answering your question with a generic answer that has nothing to do with the question, so they can get more points to get an upgraded forum status. On linux questions, and Linux Stack Exchange, you have experienced users that know exactly what they're doing and they can explain to you your problem, and how to fix it. If you're not technical, you can just say that and they will guide you through it that way.

I'm sorry, but Microsoft's support line (not some forum, use the phone, is much faster), at least in my country, has always been excellent. I never had an issue that wasn't fixed fast, without the need to report bugs on Launchpad and never hear back (I get the need for feedback in the Linux community, but I also expect FAST answers). If we're talking about online communities, then maybe Linux has a much bigger one, but if I'm at work and I have a problem with Windows, do you really think I'll post on a forum rather than calling their support desk? :)

 

To end this with a conclusion, I would say that switching to Linux fully means you know what you're doing and you enjoy these occasional challenges, like making a Windows app run in Wine for example. This is what I do, I "play" with Linux every day and I love to experiment all kind of stuff, but that's because (most of the time) I know what I'm doing. I really don't care about the free part, because most of the apps that I NEED to use are shareware so I need a license even if I make them work in Wine. I don't use free apps, except browsers and VLC, and these are free in Windows too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

Well let me give you an example: the UI freezes, for some reason (happened to me just yesterday, with the damn Openshot app). In Windows, before you hit the reset button, you at least try ctrl+alt+del to launch the task manager. Believe me, to this day I don't know if Linux has something like this and WHAT is the damn keyboard combination. And this is frustrating.

And while it's true that today they have "dumbed down" Linux (some distros) so people can't screw it up, it wasn't always like that. My first Linux installation was Slackware, and I broke that thing like 3 times/day.  :laugh: I was a total noob. 

I never said such a thing. Of course Windows has problems, but it's quite normal, and I've been saying this to people complaining about it: think of how many different types of PC configurations are in this world, how can you expect Microsoft to test Windows on EACH one before they launch it? Also, higher market share means malware, viruses, etc., it's a target. This "our OS has no viruses and no malware" thing that you hear at Apple (and maybe Linux too) is just a marketing crap.

 

I'm sorry, but Microsoft's support line (not some forum, use the phone, is much faster), at least in my country, has always been excellent. I never had an issue that wasn't fixed fast, without the need to report bugs on Launchpad and never hear back (I get the need for feedback in the Linux community, but I also expect FAST answers). If we're talking about online communities, then maybe Linux has a much bigger one, but if I'm at work and I have a problem with Windows, do you really think I'll post on a forum rather than calling their support desk? :)

 

To end this with a conclusion, I would say that switching to Linux fully means you know what you're doing and you enjoy these occasional challenges, like making a Windows app run in Wine for example. This is what I do, I "play" with Linux every day and I love to experiment all kind of stuff, but that's because (most of the time) I know what I'm doing. I really don't care about the free part, because most of the apps that I NEED to use are shareware so I need a license even if I make them work in Wine. I don't use free apps, except browsers and VLC, and these are free in Windows too.

I didn't say that Linux was always user friendly. But now that Linux is generally stable and feature-rich, more focus is going into usability.

Linux doesn't have very good crash handling, I'll admit that, but it mattering depends on how stable your distro is. Some distros provide little QA to their packages, while distros like Fedora are rigorous in testing.

 

Yeah, both operating systems have their problems that don't outweight each other in that regard.

 

As for Linux malware, Linux is a very secure operating system, and unlike Mac OS, "Linux doesn't get viruses" is a mostly true statement. Even though Windows has more market share, Linux systems are generally more high value targets, as servers (with tons of client info) typically use Linux.

 

I don't know where you go for support, but suggesting to report a bug for a computing issue is wrong. In my experience, with the sites I've gone on, this has never happened. Microsoft's support has always been bad for me, no matter the system, phone, internet, live chat. As for waiting for an answer, a lot of issues have already been posted on forums and most of them have been answered on Linux forums. The same can be said about Microsoft forums, however the answers are never helpful. Of course, if you find the telephone support more convenient, I won't argue with you.

 

I guess it is always preference that decides. Though I think you may agree that Linux is on the road to becoming even more friendly and someday it will be a superior OS in all aspects. I don't expect Linux to always require technical aptitude for some issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TDT

I don't know where you go for support, but suggesting to report a bug for a computing issue is wrong. In my experience, with the sites I've gone on, this has never happened. Microsoft's support has always been bad for me, no matter the system, phone, internet, live chat. As for waiting for an answer, a lot of issues have already been posted on forums and most of them have been answered on Linux forums. The same can be said about Microsoft forums, however the answers are never helpful. Of course, if you find the telephone support more convenient, I won't argue with you.

 

I guess it is always preference that decides. Though I think you may agree that Linux is on the road to becoming even more friendly and someday it will be a superior OS in all aspects. I don't expect Linux to always require technical aptitude for some issues.

I agree. That's why I said is annoying. Right now, I have 6 bugs posted on elementary OS Launchpad page, and guess what? 5 of them are "undecided" and one is "incomplete". Of those 6, I managed to fix 4 of them by reading a lot of forum posts and opinions... This was time consuming and clearly not the way to go. But I guess if I got the OS for free, I can't argue, right? :) This, right here, makes the difference. I got a lot of "you got this for free and now you're bitching about some issues?" from Linux users, and while I clearly don't judge all of them because of a few, it's stuff like this that really makes you think that paid stuff comes with warranty and support whenever you need. Oh well, I guess each one has its own experiences with Linux.

And yes, I do agree that Linux has come a long way since my first encounter with Slack. But they always play catch-up and there always seems to be "the year of Linux", and it never is. And I disagree with the marketing thing and the legacy thing, those are not the primary reasons why Linux doesn't have a bigger impact in desktops. It's because of this fragmentation, there are a LOT of distros out there and this is not good for the user, even if "choice is good". He sees Ubuntu as the most used distro and might think to try that, but hey, here's a related article about Mint, that looks better than Ubuntu. Oh, but wait, here's elementary, wow, so clean and shiny. And so on. Like I said before, these developers should really come as one and do ONE Linux distro to "crush" all others and be the number 1 choice without any doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

FTFY.

 

Mistakes happen. Both Microsoft and Apple have shipped broken products only to pull them and issue fixes and a proper product. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
f0rk_b0mb

Spot on. So you can agree that Linux is NOT for any noob. There, 1,57% market share explained :)

 

Yes, I've never stated a noob should be using Linux. I'm also not screaming "YEAR ON THE LINUX DESKTOP!!! MICROSUCKZ IS DEAD!!!!! KILL BILL!!!!!!!!" from every mountaintop. I'm simply documenting my experience on an internet forum.

 

My computer works for me and i like it the way it is configured. I don't give a rat's if someone else's preference is different from mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
gohpep

I agree. That's why I said is annoying. Right now, I have 6 bugs posted on elementary OS Launchpad page, and guess what? 5 of them are "undecided" and one is "incomplete". Of those 6, I managed to fix 4 of them by reading a lot of forum posts and opinions... This was time consuming and clearly not the way to go. But I guess if I got the OS for free, I can't argue, right? :) This, right here, makes the difference. I got a lot of "you got this for free and now you're bitching about some issues?" from Linux users, and while I clearly don't judge all of them because of a few, it's stuff like this that really makes you think that paid stuff comes with warranty and support whenever you need. Oh well, I guess each one has its own experiences with Linux.

And yes, I do agree that Linux has come a long way since my first encounter with Slack. But they always play catch-up and there always seems to be "the year of Linux", and it never is. And I disagree with the marketing thing and the legacy thing, those are not the primary reasons why Linux doesn't have a bigger impact in desktops. It's because of this fragmentation, there are a LOT of distros out there and this is not good for the user, even if "choice is good". He sees Ubuntu as the most used distro and might think to try that, but hey, here's a related article about Mint, that looks better than Ubuntu. Oh, but wait, here's elementary, wow, so clean and shiny. And so on. Like I said before, these developers should really come as one and do ONE Linux distro to "crush" all others and be the number 1 choice without any doubt.

What sites do you try to get help from?

 

And really, the problem was making a stable operating system, but now they have a lot more support, especially because of Valve, so I am pretty excited for the future.

 

Although there a lot of distros out there, and it may feel overwhelming, I feel like the choice is comforting. I've switched distros many times, from Ubuntu when I was a noob, then Debian because I started to hate Ubuntu, and then Fedora because Debian wasn't very modern, and then Arch Linux because I became technical and wanted control, and then back to Fedora (on my laptop, for ease of use).

 

Now, I don't think tons of choice is making GNU/Linux lag behind. Look at Android, or even Windows itself. You have tons of choice on the OEM you go with, and they both have majority market share. They also both have a main sponsor/owner that has a lot of available cash for advertising. Not many people even know anything past 'I use an Apple and a computer', they don't even know they're running Windows.

 

Now about unifying distros, not only is it a bad idea, but it will never happen. Each distro was made because of different ideologies and missions, that's why they are separate. It is a bad idea because it will cause a lot more fragmentation. Think about Ubuntu. They haven't contributed a lot upstream and are making tons of their own products for Ubuntu, some of them even proprietary. Let's say Ubuntu had 49% OS market share world wide. They have their own custom made stuff for Ubuntu. People will make Ubuntu apps that work nice with say, ubuntu-systemd, but not other systems. This will cause fragmentation as it becomes more important to just support Ubuntu and not other systems, due to development costs.

 

The Linux community is already together, but separate. Most distributions contribute to upstream, and share ideas. This is the purpose of open source. Each distribution may have its own way of doing things, but they also work together in a way.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
f0rk_b0mb

I went ahead and switched to regular flavored ubuntu to see what's new. I really like it so far...it's actually faster and much less clunkey than Gnome 3. Ialso love the hud. Just tap Alt and type what you want in. Saves me from digging through menus.

 

Did I nail it?

 

post-447111-0-05960800-1436205229.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

If it works for you, run with it. :) I currently have to dual-boot, as I'm Developing and the software actually requires Windows (but it'll cross-compile for everything, so no worries. ;) ).

 

Looks good from where I sit, bud.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      The GNOME project launches Circle dev programme
      by Paul Hill



      The GNOME project has announced the launch of GNOME Circle, a new initiative that it hopes will widen its developer outreach. Developers that build on the GNOME platform and make their software open-source will be able to join GNOME Circle and have access to several benefits.

      By becoming a part of the GNOME Circle, developers will receive promotion and advertising for their programs so that they can reach a wider audience. Developers also qualify for GNOME Foundation membership which gives access to travel, marketing funds, and services including an @gnome.org email address, blog hosting, video conferencing, and a gnome.org Nextcloud account.

      To be a part of the GNOME project in the past projects needed to be hosted on GNOME infrastructure and follow GNOME’s development rules. These rules were a barrier for entry for developers that were focused on their own personal projects and by launching Circle, it should be easier for developers to become more involved with the GNOME platform.

      Under the new rules, the software must be open-source and use the GNOME platform. Developers of both programs and libraries can apply to join and don’t need to host their software on GNOME infrastructure nor do they have to follow the GNOME release cycle.

      Commenting on GNOME Circle, GNOME Foundation Executive Director Neil McGovern said:

      To learn more about GNOME Circle be sure to head over the project’s webpage. If you are a developer that’s interested in joining Circle, you’ll have to fill in a simple application form.

    • By Namerah S
      Metro Exodus announced for the PS5 and Xbox series X|S
      by Namerah Saud Fatmi

      Amidst celebrations of the tenth anniversary of its first-person shooter franchise, 4A Games has announced that Metro Exodus will be landing on the next-generation of consoles. In addition to the newly revealed console variants, the video game developer also stated that Linux and macOS versions of the game are also in the works.

      While no exact details were provided, the game's makers did confirm free next-gen upgrades as have become the industry norm. Faster frame rates, better resolution, quicker loading times, and other enhanced features such as ray tracing were also detailed for the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S variants of Metro Exodus.

      4A Games further revealed that the next game in the Metro series is already under development. The Ukrainian-Maltese video game developer commented:

      While the game dev did confirm its commitment to creating a 'story driven single player experience' for the next instalment in the franchise, it also mentioned the existence of a multiplayer mode. As the upcoming Metro title is still in the early phase of production, no concrete decisions about the two game modes have been made yet.

      For now, we'll have to sit tight and wait for further details to be shared by the creators of Metro Exodus on all fronts. No release date for the next-gen version of the third Metro game or its Linux and macOS variants has been disclosed yet.

    • By zikalify
      Fedora 31 will reach its end of life next Tuesday
      by Paul Hill



      The Fedora Project has announced that Fedora 31 will reach its end of life on 24 November 2020. The announcement comes just weeks after the launch of Fedora 33 which included GNOME 3.38 and BTRFS as the default file system.

      After next Tuesday, Fedora 31 will stop receiving vital security updates leaving your system open to exploitation as new vulnerabilities are discovered. To make sure that your system stays protected, you should upgrade to a later version; to do this, simply open Software and go to the Updates tab, there you should see a bigger banner offering you a Fedora upgrade.

      Once you begin the upgrade with this method, the required files will be downloaded and then your system will ask to reboot to install the files in a similar fashion to how normal updates work. When the upgrade is complete, the system will automatically reboot into the new release.

      In the Fedora documentation, it says:

      If you do not want to upgrade your system, you also have the option of downloading a fresh copy of Fedora 33 which was released last month. Whether you upgrade your system or do a clean install, ensure that you’ve backed up all of your important files.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      The new Intel Open FPGA Stack is geared towards easing development of custom platforms
      by Ather Fawaz



      Today at the Intel FPGA Technology Day, Intel showed off its newest offering in the eASIC lineup, the eASIC N5X. Alongside it, the tech giant also debuted its Open FPGA Stack (Intel OFS), a scalable, source-accessible hardware and software infrastructure meant to power customized, high-performance workloads.

      Distributed via git repositories, the Intel OFS will be geared towards easing the process of development and deployment on FPGAs by enabling greater code reusability and modularity. Vendors will be able to provide native support to third parties and proprietary Intel-OFS platforms, this would lead to greater portability across Intel FPGA platforms and enable native support across major OS vendor distributions. All of this would lead to a smaller barrier to entry, enabling increased adoption of FPGAs in the industry.

      "With the proven success from our early-access customers, we are excited to launch the Intel Open FPGA Stack, with its demonstrated ability to dramatically both reduce the development time and also increase code and hardware design reuse for customers and partners looking to accelerate their workloads,” said Dave Moore, Intel corporate vice president and general manager of the Programmable Solutions Group.

      If you are interested in trying out Intel OFS, it is currently in early access. For details on that, as a starting point, you should contact an Intel sales representative. The firm aims to provide assistance regarding the same over the next year. For more details, you may refer to this blog post.

    • By PNWDweller
      About 3 months ago I switched my  Operating system to Arch after being a distro hopper playing around with the Ubuntu Variants and never feeling quite satisfied.  Where I work, we use Ubuntu based systems and I have grown quite comfortable in the command line experience and I felt like it was time to switch to a different OS.  Until then, I had used and have experience in Centos, Ubuntu, Solus linux and Fedora Linux.  What drove me to switch and make the choice to switch over, I  was getting tired of reading about kernel updates being pushed out fixing security bugs and also adding different functions.  While I can honestly say that my day to day activities don't require the latest and greatest kernel and software, it made sense to me especially when I would read about new software being released and then days or weeks before Canonical would certify it and release it to the general community.  I understand why they do this and I chose to move on. 
       
      Arch itself tends to hold the notion that you have to compile all the software you want to use and it's a harder system to use.  I can honestly say that this is partially true, but what people fail to tell you is that the compiling is done automatically by the package manager (Pacman in this case).  If you are comfortable with the command line, and even if not, you can certainly install Arch or use an installer to do it for you.  I used Anarchy installer which basically formats your drive for you, and you select whatever software you want and then it installs it.  It does the heavy lifting.  When finished, you are booted into your Shiny new Arch system with the Desktop Environment you chose.  In my case, it is always KDE.
       
      When I moved to Arch, I quickly found that not only do I have access to the latest and greatest builds, but also a lot of the alpha/beta versions of software.  For instance, I am running the "Bleeding Edge" version of Thunderbird mail which is in the alpha channels for testing.  You can't always do this with other systems.  i also have been able to experiment with different kernel versions.  Usually when I get updates, I have the most recent stable kernel release. 
       
      For things I have done with Arch - aside from my Desktop, I have a PXE boot server installed on my NAS which is also using Arch and other server software on it.  My PXE server allows me to boot into clonezilla or fresh install Arch if I need to (really don't need to), without having any external installation media handy (Thumb drives usually).
       
      Anyway, I have found my final Operating System and couldn't be any happier!