Anticipating Windows 10 RTM - would It Be Build 10400 or Build 10800?


Recommended Posts

Judging by the time left until RTM sign off. I personally think that the final build will be 10400, but there's nothing to say that Microsoft won't do a build jump to 10800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since 10163 was the latest leaked build I've heard about I don't think they are going to get much higher for RTM. My money is on 10200.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RTM should hit user's trust so it will be around 10200 to touch everyone's beliefs (as it was with Windows 8.1-9600)

The RTM build number is supposed to be multiple of 16. 10200 isn't.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RTM build number is supposed to be multiple of 16. 10200 isn't.

Yep, also my guess(just my guess), MS now do away with the 100 multiple for RTM build no., so if a sign-off candidate fails, they compile the next candidate by jumping 16 nos instead of increasing the delta. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, also my guess(just my guess), MS now do away with the 100 multiple for RTM build no., so if a sign-off candidate fails, they compile the next candidate by jumping 16 nos instead of increasing the delta. :)

 

Microsoft's new bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there is a build 10500 out, which means 10400 is out of the question.

 

So that would lead me to believe 10.10800.0.XXXXXX.XXXX.  or 10.11200.0.XXXXXX.XXXX is going to be the final build number for RTM.

 

MS always increments on 1600 and divisible by 16, Windows 8.0 was 9200

 

6000 = Vista + 1600 = 7600 = Windows 7 + 1600 = 9200 = Windows 8.0

 

MS does not seem to count SP1/R2 releases on the major build RTM numbers. It's all a little murky, because 7601 was recompiled for Windows 7 when a show stopper bug was found. And Windows 8.1 was 9600, one of the only Service Pack / R2 releases with a /16 build number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wait and see. :)

 

I think better to post what I just said on MDL, here as well =) (sorry for the overquoting, but it's neccessary)

 

 

lol Martian :D Sounds plain English to me though. This event, that is going to be held next week, should shed light exactly on what I'm saying. If true, that would only apply to LTSB. As most of you are going to be on CB/CBB to get the latest features, yes, that's how its likely going to work. Insider-like distribution of any build, no numerology.

 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MS does not seem to count SP1/R2 releases on the major build RTM numbers. It's all a little murky, because 7601 was recompiled for Windows 7 when a show stopper bug was found. And Windows 8.1 was 9600, one of the only Service Pack / R2 releases with a /16 build number.

 

Interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like MS is working on RTM on the th1 (Threshold 1?) branch, with its multiples of 16: 10176, 10192, 10208, 10224.

 

th2 (Threshold 2?) seems to be a post-RTM branch with its 105xx numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like MS is working on RTM on the th1 (Threshold 1?) branch, with its multiples of 16: 10176, 10192, 10208, 10224.

 

th2 (Threshold 2?) seems to be a post-RTM branch with its 105xx numbers.

From what I heard(take with salt), the builds 10192 onwards are also post-RTM as they were GDR1 builds, though there is still a possibility that the th1 builds(with the 16384 delta) were RTM sign-off candidates. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dead links.

Also,what's zh-CN coming from?

 

It's a Chinese language... which it's leaked for that country.

 

It's easy to Google for it.  Google is your friend.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.