Vote


Of these two, which one do you think is the better multiplayer game (or which style do you prefer)?  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Of these two, which one do you think is the better multiplayer game (or which style do you prefer)?

    • Unreal Tournament (the original)
      17
    • Counter-Strike (1.5/1.6/whichever you prefer playing)
      15
    • Both as good
      6
    • I can't decide
      4


Recommended Posts

Well i was having this argument with a few people, about which is better (yeah I know a bit immature but as Maddox hates so much "we all are kids at heart" :p )

vote people and of course put down your reasons

for me counter-strike is way better, mainly cos of the 1 death - you're out concept, also the weapons, basically everything, tactics, it's more interesting generally. Just my opinion (another sentence Maddox hates - sorry i've just read his latest article).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say UT are you limiting that to a single gametype? If so, which one? There are a shed load of mods too, including CS style and then more realistic ones like Infiltration and TTR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well didn't play the original, but I'm sure it was better than CS anyway. I love UT2003, its graphics are good, weapons are kewl, and its hilarious to hear them swear, especially when ppl are walkin down the hall in the dorm and hear "Die Duschbag" I love it. I've seen CS, graphix are horrible, and its the same thing all the time, its so annoying, played it once...that was more than enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UT and UT2003 are VERY different games. I was quite dissapointed with UT2003, never played it after buying it that much till Red Orchestra was released. Thank god for mods, wasnt a wasted 30 quid after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UT2k3> i tried the demo, it convinced me that it wasn't worth buying the game.

I'm talking about original UT, not BulletTime mods etc just plain old deathmatch (with modded weapons if you really want...) which was amazing. Both UT and CS are classics for me.

CS is NOT always the same thing, it just takes time to get into and like, i went in my first match thinkin "there's no way i'll get a frag" and considered myself lucky to get one, that's the kind of approach you want with CS cos otherwise if you expect a UT type 50 frags per match score - you'll be disappointed. Just my opinion. Oh and i much prefer the classic, realistic (in their own way) weapons of CS to the more "mad" approach of UT too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.