Windows 10 Privacy - Keylogger


Recommended Posts

It seems pretty simple to me.  How do you expect Cortana or learn or inking to get better if they don't record those things?  I understand your privacy concerns, but people want "better and easier".  It's that simple.  If you don't like it, don't use it.

I must have missed where they made it a law to use Windows 10...

  • Like 2

I agree with Logical Apex its a worthy discussion, and a bad sign that asking such questions is met with responses like 'stop complaining' or ''abcd' do it too so its all good'

I was unaware inking was also sent also thought this was only applicable to the insider program, very surprised it's in the final release.

Clearly a lot of people aren't concerned with these topics and that's fine but i'd definitely like more information from MS on what is collected, how it is secured and if its tied to personal id.  Even basic things like how does it differentiate between collecting data regularly and not collecting your bank information?  Is inprivate mode a contradiction, what privacy do you have if its collecting data when in this mode?

That must be it. Microsoft wants your banking information. They intentionally put out a product that steals your personal information because that wouldn't totally screw up their reputation or anything.

Seriously, this is not a keylogger. Do you realize how stupid that sounds as a business decision? Microsoft shipping an OS that steals your banking passwords would be like Toyota intentionally giving you a car with no brakes. They'd go bankrupt over night if they did something like that.

It seems pretty simple to me.  How do you expect Cortana or learn or inking to get better if they don't record those things?  I understand your privacy concerns, but people want "better and easier".  It's that simple.  If you don't like it, don't use it.

I must have missed where they made it a law to use Windows 10...

This is why I am confused about the need for this feature. If you turn on Cortana I would expect certain amounts of privacy reduction as that is the nature of the feature, but this is separate from Cortana. This is recording your text and speech even with Cortana turned off. As I'm requested to enable Cortana after installation. Cortana isn't enabled by default, but this is.

That must be it. Microsoft wants your banking information. They intentionally put out a product that steals your personal information because that wouldn't totally screw up their reputation or anything.

Seriously, this is not a keylogger. Do you realize how stupid that sounds as a business decision? Microsoft shipping an OS that steals your banking passwords would be like Toyota intentionally giving you a car with no brakes. They'd go bankrupt over night if they did something like that.

No one said Microsoft wants your banking details, but they do want details. Irrespective of what Microsoft wants a system wide recording of keystrokes and voice data should be concerning to people. Even if Microsoft has no intention of doing "bad" things with the data (which I am sure they don't intend to do "bad" things) you're left wondering about the risks in face of the recent high profile hacking cases. Even ignoring the hacking scenario... I think it is a very large step in the wrong direction for MS to, by default, record such a wide berth of user data. The majority of users don't change the defaults and without them making use of things like Cortana this seems like a strong sign of how Microsoft intends to make back the "free" Windows 10 upgrade costs (by trying to rival Google in the ad revenue department due to their attempt at a richer profile of the user... Google gets search and browsing... Microsoft gets every typed and spoken word).

Since everyone keeps saying this isn't a keylogger... Please, enlighten me to the definition of a Keylogger... A keylogger doesn't have to be malicious, it just needs to record key strokes.

  • Like 3

User:  Microsoft, build us a better OS.

Microsoft: No problem!  We would like you to opt-in with anonymous data collection so that we can see how people are using the OS and cater to that.

User: Wha? Send you info about how I use my OS, No way!  Invasion of privacy! Keylogger!

Microsoft: ...so you want us to improve the OS, but not have a method to see how people use the OS now?

 

That my friends, is how we end up with OS atrocities.

There is no keylogger. The system is not watching key presses, but user-initiated typing prediction fixes. 

Read this twitter thread for all replies from Gabe Aul:

https://twitter.com/gabeaul/status/564291796935528448

https://twitter.com/GabeAul/status/605484176352026624

User:  Microsoft, build us a better OS.

Microsoft: No problem!  We would like you to opt-in with anonymous data collection so that we can see how people are using the OS and cater to that.

User: Wha? Send you info about how I use my OS, No way!  Invasion of privacy! Keylogger!

Microsoft: ...so you want us to improve the OS, but not have a method to see how people use the OS now?

 

That my friends, is how we end up with OS atrocities.

Nice story, but Microsoft's Privacy Policy says that this isn't anonymous data collection. It is, in fact, tied to the user account directly...

But I guess the lawyers don't understand how it works?

There is no keylogger. Read this twitter thread for all replies from Gabe Aul:

https://twitter.com/gabeaul/status/564291796935528448

https://twitter.com/GabeAul/status/605484176352026624

As I stated above, the Privacy Policy states clearly that this is not anonymous data collection. That it is, in fact, tied to the user's account. MS claims to attempt to scrub it of certain data, but they aren't clear how they scrub it or any of those details...

But I guess MS' General Counsel doesn't have a clue?

Microsoft collects and uses data about your speech, inking (handwriting), and typing on Windows devices to help improve and personalize our ability to correctly recognize your input.

For example, to provide personalized speech recognition, we collect your voice input, as well your name and nickname, your recent calendar events and the names of the people in your appointments, and information about your contacts including names and nicknames. This additional data enables us to better recognize people and events when you dictate messages or documents.

Additionally, your typed and handwritten words are collected to provide you a personalized user dictionary, help you type and write on your device with better character recognition, and provide you with text suggestions as you type or write. Typing data includes a sample of characters and words you type, which we scrub to remove IDs, IP addresses, and other potential identifiers.  It also includes associated performance data, such as changes you manually make to text as well as words you've added to the dictionary.

Source: Windows Privacy Policy

I tend to trust the legal contracts more than random Twitter posts.

Can we move on to a discussion of the shift in Windows away from user privacy? And stop splitting hairs on the privacy reduction?

 

Nice story, but Microsoft's Privacy Policy says that this isn't anonymous data collection. It is, in fact, tied to the user account directly...

But I guess the lawyers don't understand how it works?

 

As I stated above, the Privacy Policy states clearly that this is not anonymous data collection. That it is, in fact, tied to the user's account. MS claims to attempt to scrub it of certain data, but they aren't clear how they scrub it or any of those details...

But I guess MS' General Counsel doesn't have a clue?

Source: Windows Privacy Policy

I tend to trust the legal contracts more than random Twitter posts.

Can we move on to a discussion of the shift in Windows away from user privacy? And stop splitting hairs on the privacy reduction?

Not anonymous?

So you are telling me they are classifying the data per user?

 

Riiiiight.

 

I must admit, what choices do we have as gamers and pc enthusiasts?

I play ESO, and some TF2, I'd drop Windows for Linux in a heartbeat, but i am no coder, while I get on with OSX I use that for work, and until I can find someone selling a psu for a EMC 2429 my iMac is out of action so I can't use that for gaming.

Long story short, we are stuck with Windows 10, I am on home though, that does concern me.

It's an important discussion. It is also one that will be impossible to have on Neowin. Pretty sad really.

Seriously... coming back to Neowin after a long time away and it just seems like the circle jerk reddit is....  IMO, if you don't have anything to contribute I don't know why people are bothering to post here...

 

OnTopic: This is concerning that it's enabled by default, but aslong as there is a clear method(easy to find in the UI, no tech experience needed) to disable these features that actually disables them(doesn't just appear to) then i'm okay with it.  I understand completely why Microsoft would want these features and I certainly see the value in it.  I think the responsibility lies on the end user here to know what they are running and turn the features off if they don't wan them on.

 

Would it be nice if I were informed and given the option at installation?  Sure... but I don't think its a "huge step in the wrong direction" just to have the default settings be the ones that benefit the most users and the company creating the software(and offering it for free) the most.  I certainly don't want my encryption keys in the cloud, but if im given the option to store them locally i'm good... I don't want my keystrokes or voice recorded, aslong as I can turn it off i'm good.

Overall, it'd be nice if they were a bit more transparent about it instead of throwing it into the ToS or w/e you agree to when installing the program that nobody will ever actually read(not that that's an excuse.. you're still agreeing to it); but at the end of the day if It can be turned off without jumping through hoops then I don't have any problems with it myself.

 

Nice story, but Microsoft's Privacy Policy says that this isn't anonymous data collection. It is, in fact, tied to the user account directly...

But I guess the lawyers don't understand how it works?

 

As I stated above, the Privacy Policy states clearly that this is not anonymous data collection. That it is, in fact, tied to the user's account. MS claims to attempt to scrub it of certain data, but they aren't clear how they scrub it or any of those details...

But I guess MS' General Counsel doesn't have a clue?

Source: Windows Privacy Policy

I tend to trust the legal contracts more than random Twitter posts.

Can we move on to a discussion of the shift in Windows away from user privacy? And stop splitting hairs on the privacy reduction?

My guess is that maybe they classify it as 'anonomous' because it's only tied to our user account which doesn't necessarily identify you?  One could easily have a fake user account(not tried to SSN).... it's almost like the whole 'open wifi' ordeal as far as legal permissibility of it goes.... but I do understand that that's a pretty weak way of putting it.  I'm also completely ignorant to the legal precedence here with regard to what constitutes anonymous on the internet... but i'd imagine MS's general counsel has a pretty good idea..

...... you're still agreeing to it); but at the end of the day if It can be turned off without jumping through hoops then I don't have any problems with it myself.

The problem is it can't be turned off without going through hoops. This is where people are having issue. If it was a simple setting to turn off sending telemetry, this topic would have ended on the first page itself. But Microsoft is being unethical and profiling it's users probably more than what Google does.

The problem is it can't be turned off without going through hoops. This is where people are having issue. If it was a simple setting to turn off sending telemetry, this topic would have ended on the first page itself. But Microsoft is being unethical and profiling it's users probably more than what Google does.

 

 

Thank you for the clarification, some of the comments I had read implied that it could be easily turned off.  I do agree that this IS a significant issue under these conditions... free or not I want my data to stay local unless I explicitly say otherwise.

 

How so? A Keylogger is a program that captures key-presses...

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystroke_logging

 

It is a keylogger... Obviously, I don't think Microsoft aims to log into you bank account using the data, but it is an important thing to discuss at any rate... From a privacy perspective it is worthy of a question.

 

I'd disagree... Discussing the loss of privacy and the implications of a keylogger in the OS is valid. Especially with the extent and frequency of recent data breaches. It is a valid discussion. How does Microsoft limit its data collection? Do they tie it to user accounts? What do they do to limit capturing of passwords and usernames and the like. Again, worthy of a discussion as this is a major shift for the computing industry...

But I do understand that discussions can often be hard to have. Judging by the lack of one here. I'll just conclude that privacy is a non-issue. At least among the crowd here...

true in definition, i'm just used keylogger being related to something malicious!

If you're religiously attached to the idea that there is literally a "keylogger" here instead of the collection of user-initiated typing/inking corrections made to keyboard autocomplete suggestions in order to update the local user suggestion dictionary and improve the default prediction system for other users over time (you would see this with periodic input windows updates since years ago) that has existed in Windows for over a decade, particularly for use with the CJK IMEs, and has simply been extended to the other language keyboards, despite all evidence to the contrary, then there's no discussion to be had, as we'd be unfortunately entering FUD territory, grasping for any evidence to support a predetermined conclusion/conspiracy. It's disappointing to see this kind of willful misinterpretation, although seeing this credulously reported as news clickbait on a tech site wouldn't be surprising.
 
Incidentally, the CJK IMEs have been extended further in win10 with online prediction, as well, but this requires an opt-in checkbox to be set in an obscure dialog box to enable: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-10/advanced-input-methods-for-east-asian-languages#v1h=tab02

User:  Microsoft, build us a better OS.

Microsoft: No problem!  We would like you to opt-in with anonymous data collection so that we can see how people are using the OS and cater to that.

User: Wha? Send you info about how I use my OS, No way!  Invasion of privacy! Keylogger!

Microsoft: ...so you want us to improve the OS, but not have a method to see how people use the OS now?

That my friends, is how we end up with OS atrocities.

yes because recording what users do on their computer is the ONLY way software can ever be improved....makes you wonder how we ever made software beforehand!!

Sarcasm aside, the one dimensional arguments of some of you guys are worrying. 

Even worse that if this is the ultimate way of getting user feedback and Windows 10 is the best result we can expect, we should all be collectively disappointed.

  • Like 2

So is this suggesting that the method on the first page (of this thread) doesn't properly disable the data collection? or is it suggesting that turning it off via the GPE only does nothing unless you are on an enterprise version?

yes because recording what users do on their computer is the ONLY way software can ever be improved....makes you wonder how we ever made software beforehand!!
Sarcasm aside, the one dimensional arguments of some of you guys are worrying. 

Even worse that if this is the ultimate way of getting user feedback and Windows 10 is the best result we can expect, we should all be collectively disappointed.

Anyone or any company who claims they can determine the needs and wants of a large user base without data collection is a liar.

  • Like 2

Anyone or any company who claims they can determine the needs and wants of a large user base without data collection is a liar.

I must have missed the conversation where someone, even myself suggested software improvements could be done without data collection. 

If I ask you did you "did you miss learning critical thinking at university?" and you responded 'yep' I've just collected data.  On the other hand I could collect all your posts and use that as a basis of determining if you have critical thinking abilities. 

Both are forms of data collection, and there are a lot more ways in between both of those extremes of the spectrum.  Crazy to imagine a world where there might be more than one tool and one way to do things isn't it....

I must have missed the conversation where someone, even myself suggested software improvements could be done without data collection. 

If I ask you did you "did you miss learning critical thinking at university?" and you responded 'yep' I've just collected data.  On the other hand I could collect all your posts and use that as a basis of determining if you have critical thinking abilities. 

Both are forms of data collection, and there are a lot more ways in between both of those extremes of the spectrum.  Crazy to imagine a world where there might be more than one tool and one way to do things isn't it....

 

 

  As for what you missed, you are the one who said it, despite your attempt to hide it with snark.

yes because recording what users do on their computer is the ONLY way software can ever be improved....makes you wonder how we ever made software beforehand!!
Sarcasm aside, the one dimensional arguments of some of you guys are worrying. 

Even worse that if this is the ultimate way of getting user feedback and Windows 10 is the best result we can expect, we should all be collectively disappointed.

So quick to forget.

Edited by adrynalyne

User:  Microsoft, build us a better OS.

Microsoft: No problem!  We would like you to opt-in with anonymous data collection so that we can see how people are using the OS and cater to that.

User: Wha? Send you info about how I use my OS, No way!  Invasion of privacy! Keylogger!

Microsoft: ...so you want us to improve the OS, but not have a method to see how people use the OS now?

 

That my friends, is how we end up with OS atrocities.

I'm pretty sure they don't need to know what's on my calender to make the OS better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 by Razvan Serea Glary Utilities offers numerous powerful and easy-to-use system tools and utilities to fix, speed up, maintain and protect your PC. Glary Utilities allow you to clean common system junk files, as well as invalid registry entries and Internet traces. You can manage and delete browser add-ons, analyze disk space usage and find duplicate files. You can also view and manage installed shell extensions, encrypt your files from unauthorized access and use, split large files into smaller manageable files and then rejoin them. Furthermore, Glary Utilities includes the options to find, fix, or remove broken Windows shortcuts, manage the programs that start at Windows startup and uninstall software. All Glary Utilities tools can be accessed through an eye-pleasing and totally simplistic interface. Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 changelog: Optimized Memory Defrager: Optimized the clipboard cleaning algorithm, increasing speed by 5%. Optimized Wipe Free Space: Optimized the free space wiping algorithm, increasing speed by 8%. Minor GUI improvements. Minor bug fixes. Download: Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 | 27.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Glary Utilities | 32.3 MB View: Glary Utilities Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      217
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!