Recommended Posts

^ yup would be a an issue.. Kind of hard to get 120 if your wan is only 100.. Would of hoped you would of looked at that before buying that router.. Can you return it?

This is perfect example at the problem with marketing nonsense.. States on their website

"802.11ac dual-band wireless at up to 733 Mbps for high-performance wireless"  So that would be 300 on 2.4 and 433 on 5ghz.  Which kind of hard to get anywhere close to that then you connect the device via 100mbps wire..  So even if on 300 for the 2.4 and make that down to realistic /2 or 150 vs the 300PHY I still can not get anywhere close to that because the wire is limited to 100 or about mid 90's since you can never actually see full wire speed in real world performance because of overhead of protocols, etc..

And if your doing wireless to wireless that is automatic /2 of the bandwidth.. So where exactly is anyone getting anywhere close to those numbers.. Just kind of nonsense to make a device with 433 for 5ghz and then not even put in a gig interface.  So you could get the actual real world performance of 433 of about 200..

Edited by BudMan
  • Like 1

Well what is your budget?  And do you have any AC devices?  Or just N?  And your devices do 5ghz?  What is the layout of the place - 5ghz does have a lot of coverage area.  To be honest not really a big fan of any wifi routers for good wifi coverage.  To really cover a place in good wifi coverage you need multiple AP around the place.  Even here in the US where walls are very wifi friendly ;)  You should really look to something like unifi to get some cost effective AP what are POE and allow you to proper place them in the ceiling for good coverage.  The new AC line are very price friendly at range from 89 to 149 here in the US.

Now that you are getting to over 100mbps internet speed, kind of pointless if that all in one soho router gives you crap speeds where you most need wifi coverage in the house, etc.  And doesn't leverage that speed everyone in the house.  I just put a new uap-ac-lr in the kitchen to give me full coverage even out on the patio.  Max out my internet even on the patio now - my new 1st world problem is my older ipad wifi is not fast enough ;) hehehe

I have the 1043ND and I can say that it doesn't handle a lot of open connections very well but it would probably do what you need in terms of bandwidth.  Just expect to put limiters on torrent like programs.  You can also put DDWRT on it but it makes the wireless a bit slower. 

 

How's the compatibility and stability on that UAP-AC-LR?

I have the 1043ND and I can say that it doesn't handle a lot of open connections very well but it would probably do what you need in terms of bandwidth.  Just expect to put limiters on torrent like programs.  You can also put DDWRT on it but it makes the wireless a bit slower. 

 

How's the compatibility and stability on that UAP-AC-LR?

How many connections do you then have on torrents? Does DDWRT fix that? Before my connection upgrade I had a small TP-Link router which also dropped WiFi a lot of times, but I googled a bit and found a solution, had no problem after that, but it doesn't support that high speeds- 

If your running torrents over wifi - your doing it wrong!!  That protocol is so freaking chatty it would be horrific over wifi for anything else trying to use that wifi.. 

I have 2 iphones 5s and 5c, 3 laptops all with different wifi cards and my son's nexus all using it without any issues.  Along with harmony hub and nest thermostat that connect without any issues.

No this is all wired.  Only mobile, laptops and printers are on WiFi.  DDWRT helped with open connections but cuts your wireless in half I think.  As long as you don't push it with torrents it was a decent router.  I would leave the stock firmware because of the wireless performance.

If your running torrents over wifi - your doing it wrong!!  That protocol is so freaking chatty it would be horrific over wifi for anything else trying to use that wifi.. 

I have 2 iphones 5s and 5c, 3 laptops all with different wifi cards and my son's nexus all using it without any issues.  Along with harmony hub and nest thermostat that connect without any issues.

No I'm not doing that. I just had 4 phones and a laptop on WiFi. I'm actually seriously considering buying Asus RT-N66U now. It's a bit pricey but I hope it's worth the money!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 by Razvan Serea Glary Utilities offers numerous powerful and easy-to-use system tools and utilities to fix, speed up, maintain and protect your PC. Glary Utilities allow you to clean common system junk files, as well as invalid registry entries and Internet traces. You can manage and delete browser add-ons, analyze disk space usage and find duplicate files. You can also view and manage installed shell extensions, encrypt your files from unauthorized access and use, split large files into smaller manageable files and then rejoin them. Furthermore, Glary Utilities includes the options to find, fix, or remove broken Windows shortcuts, manage the programs that start at Windows startup and uninstall software. All Glary Utilities tools can be accessed through an eye-pleasing and totally simplistic interface. Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 changelog: Optimized Memory Defrager: Optimized the clipboard cleaning algorithm, increasing speed by 5%. Optimized Wipe Free Space: Optimized the free space wiping algorithm, increasing speed by 8%. Minor GUI improvements. Minor bug fixes. Download: Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 | 27.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Glary Utilities | 32.3 MB View: Glary Utilities Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      217
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!