Defendants' intent the central question in Oregon standoff trial

[TPreston]

 

Ammon Bundy, his brother and co-defendants transformed the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge into a ramshackle camp this winter, manned the perimeter with military-style armed patrols and warned of violence against anyone who attempted to remove them while declaring the refuge a "base place for patriots from all over the country,'' prosecutors will argue this week.

What a jury must decide is whether their actions and intent amounted to a crime.

 

The trial pits the federal government against a group of self-described patriots who fervently believe public lands are in the wrong hands. The case will help to further establish when political protest protected by the First Amendment crosses the line into words and deeds that will send you to prison, and what the legal limitations are to constitutional guarantees of free speech, assembly and the right to bear arms.

Seven defendants have pleaded not guilty to the federal charge of conspiring to impede U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officers from conducting their work at the refuge through intimidation, threats or force. Five of the seven are also charged with possession of firearms in a federal facility. Two face an additional count of government property theft.

 

Margaret L. "Margie" Paris, a law professor and former University of Oregon School of Law dean, said much is at stake.

"The prosecutors must put to bed the crazy constitutional notions that the defendants have,'' Paris said. "They have to be able to get a conviction here and meaningful sentences because there are people waiting to repeat this activity. It'll be an important deterrent.''

 

The highly anticipated trial in Portland's downtown federal courthouse is expected to last more than two months and will revisit in detail the politically and emotionally charged 41-day refuge occupation that drew national and international attention to Oregon.

 

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/09/defendants_intent_the_central.html#incart_river_index_topics

[DocM]

Acquitted in trial #1

 

Clearly, many westerners don't like the Feds any more than they did at the Ruby Ridge trial.

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/27/ammon-bundy-oregon-refuge-standoff-leaders-acquitt/

 

Quote

 

All defendants in Oregon standoff acquitted; attorney taken into custody

 

All seven defendants in the Oregon standoff, including brothers Ammon and Ryan Bundy, were found not guilty Thursday by a jury in Portland in a stunning conclusion to a charged episode in the federal-lands debate.

 

There was more drama after the verdict was announced: Ammon Bundy’s attorney Marcus Mumford was tackled to the ground by U.S. marshals after he began shouting that his client should go free, even though the Bundy brothers still face federal charges in Nevada.

 

Mr. Mumford was taken into custody by marshals. (WTF??!!??)

 

The seven defendants were indicted on conspiracy and firearms charges stemming from their 41-day armed takeover of a Fish and Wildlife Service building in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, which began in January as a protest against federal land-management policy.

 

Supporters of the occupiers hugged and waved small American flags outside the federal courthouse after the verdict, while Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said in a statement she was “disappointed.”
>

 

[TPreston]

If they were BLM protesters they would have been riddled with bullets yet these clowns were allowed to point firearms at federal agents.

[DocM]

2 words: jury nullification.

 

If the feds rub the locals the wrong way this is what happens. The feds have been rubbing Westerners the wrong way for several decades, taking large portions of their states and off the local & state tax rolls etc.

 

The Bureau of Land Management is the face of such DC overreach, so it catches the hell. That said, BLM has done several things on its own to deserve their scorn.