oldtimefighter Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 17 minutes ago, Hum said: It is always bad to assume. Well what order do you think he violated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hum Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I don't know -- but I would expect anyone doing crimes to try covering up. Look at the Clintons ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtimefighter Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 2 minutes ago, Hum said: I don't know -- but I would expect anyone doing crimes to try covering up. Look at the Clintons ... The Clintons are not the subject but I didn't think you could stay focused and on point for more than 30 seconds. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrynalyne Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Hum said: I don't know -- but I would expect anyone doing crimes to try covering up. Look at the Clintons ... Please try and be mature enough not to drag politics into a non-political thread. Danielx64 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyMike Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 11 hours ago, Gary7 said: It does not state in The OP how many times it was wiped. http://www.piriform.com/docs/recuva/recuva-settings/options-general https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutmann_method All I know is that Hillary's Server was wiped but her data was retrieved, Because her aide copied her emails onto a Gmail account as a backup. Besides I believe there were several other sources where her emails ended up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skiver Veteran Posted September 27, 2016 Veteran Share Posted September 27, 2016 What the hell are you guys talking about!?! He IS a convicted Paedophile and as part of that conviction, it is a requirement that he does not use anything to cover his tracks of where he has been online. Where the hell does it talk about the use of deleting cookies or using CCleaner as being illegal? You really seem to be taking 1 + 1 and making 3000 here. Danielx64 and Nick H. 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick H. Supervisor Posted September 27, 2016 Supervisor Share Posted September 27, 2016 5 minutes ago, Skiver said: He IS a convicted Paedophile and as part of that conviction, it is a requirement that he does not use anything to cover his tracks of where he has been online. Where the hell does it talk about the use of deleting cookies or using CCleaner as being illegal? You really seem to be taking 1 + 1 and making 3000 here. Damn, you beat me to it. I was sat here thinking, "this all makes perfect sense." Skiver 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skiver Veteran Posted September 27, 2016 Veteran Share Posted September 27, 2016 Just now, Nick H. said: Damn, you beat me to it. I was sat here thinking, "this all makes perfect sense." I actually had to go back to the article and re-read because of a number of comments I thought I had missed something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Anarkii Subscriber² Posted September 27, 2016 Subscriber² Share Posted September 27, 2016 He wasn't using a VPN or Tor, so his internet logs would be on his ISP anyway, regardless where he went or what he downloaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skiver Veteran Posted September 27, 2016 Veteran Share Posted September 27, 2016 5 minutes ago, Anarkii said: He wasn't using a VPN or Tor, so his internet logs would be on his ISP anyway, regardless where he went or what he downloaded. Which again is irrelevant and not the point. He breached his order by doing it. The police had to spend more time and effort to prove he had not done anything else illegal which is what he is now leading to him being charged for that effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts