BREAKING: Hundreds of Child Porn Accounts Exposed on Twitter


Recommended Posts

Quote

A user that goes by the name of @0hour just exposed hundreds of twitter accounts with photos and videos of child porn on their public twitter profiles. These accounts have been active for weeks or longer. Why have these accounts not been banned by Twitter admins? EDIT: @0hour's account has been banned

Quote

Is this America's form of China's Tiananmen Square Mass Killing? Shutting down newspapers from distributing critical information to the masses?

I was there watching during the entire fiasco. The twitters they tagged contained ACTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!... The accounts were quickly removed and then 0hour was suspended shortly after. How is #PizzaGate not trending, being actively filtered, and yet twitter accounts hosting child pornography for months on Twitter still around and not suspended?!

THIS IS REAL LIFE FOLKS. WE ARE BEING MASS CENSORED. OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT IS INDIRECTLY BEING ACTIVELY BEING ATTACKED BY CENSORING AND CONTROLLING THE PLATFORMS THAT ALLOW FOR OUR DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION!

Links below do not contain any CP.

Evidence of ban:

http://imgur.com/a/IpWic

Other sources:

http://imgur.com/a/IpWic

http://imgur.com/a/hIvd3

http://imgur.com/a/xuPLQ

Active Twitter Tags for 0hour and #TwitterGate: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=%400HOUR&src=typd

EDIT: The point is... why would Twitter allow accounts that have been tweeting child pornography with hundreds of other followers doing the same on their platform for more than 6 months ban someone so fast for exposing them? This is especially worrisome because all of this is also related to #PizzaGate which is not being allowed to trend even though it has enough organic tweets to trend. What are Twitter's priorities?

EDIT2: MASSIVE 25,000 Twitter accounts associated and hosting child pornography dumped by gamer girl on a 3 hour whim scripting whim. https://twitter.com/Eclipse_OW

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EdeSTcwKsEhLJ-3NgRKolFg-hP17kNYNX3ffm0YWJbE/htmlview#gid=879848743

I am re-posting this. How did these accounts last for years? people who viewed these accounts can confirm pictures and videos of rapes. Please be careful if you consider viewing any of this.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pizzagate/comments/5e2wmg/breaking_hundreds_of_child_porn_accounts_exposed/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

WE ARE BEING MASS CENSORED. OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT IS INDIRECTLY BEING ACTIVELY BEING ATTACKED BY CENSORING AND CONTROLLING THE PLATFORMS THAT ALLOW FOR OUR DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION!

How many times do people have to be told, your first amendment does not apply. You are using a privately owned platform, which means they get to choose if they want to remove your post or not.

 

I have no idea what #PizzaGate is, and the fact that it has "Gate" in the name already means that I don't want to know.

 

As for how child pornography can go unnoticed for so long, I guess it depends on how you have your privacy settings in place? If you are a member of a ring you would get an invite to view the person's Twitter account, otherwise the information is hidden from the public. That doesn't explain how Twitter staff didn't notice this going on, but I'll wait to see if they provide any response.

 

EDIT: I also edited the title, the caps locks isn't necessary.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of the profiles are not private which surprises me more. I click a few because I couldnt believe it myself that no one caught on to this. I feel sick to my stomach .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

I don't fully understand the article as it seems it was written by a child, but people were sharing child porn photos on an open public forum such as Twitter????

Basically the google doc contains a list of twitter accounts containing CP. Some accounts lasting long as 2011. "I created a small google script to pull the data directly from the Twitter API into the sheet"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i recall there is someone here on neowin that strongly defends the viewing of child porn on the basis of "he is not harming any one". Sicko. Can't recall his name but he had 5000+ posts, I may have to go through my history to remember his name., he used to post here a lot until he made that statement. Wonder if he is in that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, timster said:

Reddit banned the Pizzagate subreddit at 7:00pm EDT.

Means they found something

 

EDIT: If anyone is interested in following Pizzagate, it is on Voat,

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate

 

EDIT 2:

Here is a good article from Washington Times,

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/22/james-alefantis-dc-power-player-blasts-insane-redd/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, J. X. Maxwell said:

Means they found something

No it doesn't. It means they shut down a crappy subreddit that was probably damaging a lot of peoples lives(workers who work at Cosmo Ping Pong.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rippleman said:

i recall there is someone here on neowin that strongly defends the viewing of child porn on the basis of "he is not harming any one". Sicko. Can't recall his name but he had 5000+ posts, I may have to go through my history to remember his name., he used to post here a lot until he made that statement. Wonder if he is in that list.

There's a difference between viewing and creating it. Arguably viewing child porn isn't harming anyone, it's the production of it that is. The issue is that demand creates supply - however, that's like linking drug users to the crimes committed by drug cartels.

 

I just wished we lived in a society where paedophiles could come forward and receive support for their condition in order to prevent them becoming child abusers rather than the situation we have today, where people will impose vigilante justice on anyone even suspected of being a paedophile and paedophiles are forced underground where they are much harder to monitor and pose a greater risk to society.

 

In Germany paedophiles are treated before they offend. That way they can be monitored to dramatically reduce the risk to society. I highly recommend watching The Paedophile Next Door - it's on Netflix at the moment and it explores paedophiles who do not act on their urges and want support.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

There's a difference between viewing and creating it. Arguably viewing child porn isn't harming anyone, it's the production of it that is.

Ummm no.  No.  Not at all buying that.  At all. 

 

By viewing that, you're saying it's fine to do and giving it your personal OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Open Minded said:

Ummm no.  No.  Not at all buying that.  At all. 

 

By viewing that, you're saying it's fine to do and giving it your personal OK.

Not at all. There's a Reddit channel called WatchPeopleDie that's full of clips of people dying - viewing such content doesn't mean you support the creation of it. However, if people are paying for child pornography then that is directly funding the creation of it and that should be a criminal offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

viewing child porn isn't harming anyone

Gross, It looks like it maybe you that was on the supporting side of it. in any case, you are disgusting and sick to assume that it causes no harm. MOST media is MADE for the CONSUMPTION from others. The very act of viewing creates the market for production. If NO ONE consumed it, most would NOT create it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rippleman said:

Gross, It looks like it maybe you that was on the supporting side of it. in any case, you are disgusting and sick to assume that it causes no harm. MOST media is MADE for the CONSUMPTION from others. The very act of viewing creates the market for production. If NO ONE consumed it, most would NOT create it.

Child pornography isn't a traditional capitalist business model. Instead you find it being produced by child abusers for their own sexual desires and then shared as a status symbol. If no-one consumed it it would still be made.

 

It goes without saying that I oppose child pornography but there is a distinction between producing it and consuming it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

Child pornography isn't a traditional capitalist business model. Instead you find it being produced by child abusers for their own sexual desires and then shared as a status symbol. If no-one consumed it it would still be made.

 

It goes without saying that I oppose child pornography but there is a distinction between producing it and consuming it.

your statement is 90% lie with 10% truth. I too know the distinction, but also know that your buddy sicko Mr.Bob produces it for consumption for 1) personal admiration from other active pedophoiles 2) personal profit from other active pedophiles. Without anyone to consume it, the power of both are taken away leaving only the personal sick desire which would be drastically less than if all factors combined.

 

Question for you: If you were in charge of laws that govern this topic, would you make the viewing of child pornagraphy legal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viewing such material supports the creation of new media/video/images, supports the abuse of children.

 

it's the same as these morons that post things just to get some attention, some views, some likes, if no one liked or gave them attention it would soon stop, by viewing it your giving them some reason to carry on doing what they are doing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, papercut2008uk said:

Viewing such material supports the creation of new media/video/images, supports the abuse of children.

And taking illegal drugs supports the atrocities of the drug cartels, yet you don't see that connection being made like it is for child pornography. People have double standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

people have double standards.

you may have skipped the question. Let's try again. 

 

Question for theyarecomingforyou:

 

If you were in charge of laws that govern this topic, would you make the viewing of child pornagraphy legal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Open Minded said:

Ummm no.  No.  Not at all buying that.  At all. 

 

By viewing that, you're saying it's fine to do and giving it your personal OK.

Exactly if no one watched it there wouldn't be a market for it. So by viewing it you are actually condoning child porn because you are the viewership. No viewership no child porn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rippleman said:

Question for theyarecomingforyou:

 

If you were in charge of laws that govern this topic, would you make the viewing of child pornagraphy legal?

No. The problem with child pornography is that if it increases the desire of a paedophile to act on their urges then that poses a danger to society. However, I would certainly consider whether simulated child pornography (i.e. computer generated) could be used as a form of treatment in supporting paedophiles who come forward to seek help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

No. The problem with child pornography is that if it increases the desire of a paedophile to act on their urges then that poses a danger to society. However, I would certainly consider whether simulated child pornography (i.e. computer generated) could be used as a form of treatment in supporting paedophiles who come forward to seek help.

You made the claim earlier and quote: "viewing child porn isn't harming anyone". So why, if harmless like you claim, why would you not legalize it unless you know why it is  that it should be illegal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.