Militant Neo-Nazi Group Claims Credit for Hanging Hitler Portrait, Swastikas on Campus Building

[SenatorRobb]

3 hours ago, Mirumir said:

Our laws are no longer based on Judeo-Christian morality, but on Kinsey’s immoral ‘morality’: an adulterous, fornicating, aborting, pornography-addicted, masturbating, impotent, sadistic, masochistic, bisexual, homosexual, exhibitionist, voyeuristic, and child-sexual-abusive world.

First, I copy and pasted your quote, so really that should be a quote in a quote, I did that so everyone doesn't have to continually scroll back. Though is it just me, or is there a lack of question/statement here? However I'm not saying they should be religion based, as that would be, imo, a bad route to take in a country where we value religious freedom. But I'm not understanding what your trying to say.

Certainly you're not saying either of those attributes, by and of themselves, is immoral? I'm just completely lost.

[+Mirumir Subscriber¹]

8 hours ago, SenatorRobb said:

 I'm just completely lost.

It's very simple.

 

I responded to a quote about morality with another quote.

[SenatorRobb]

8 hours ago, Mirumir said:

It's very simple.

 

I responded to a quote about morality with another quote.

I noticed, I should've been clearer, what was your point? Or was there none or that morality is subjective? In which case it is subjective, kind of. Majority, I'm certain, would call murder immoral, they would also say hate propaganda is immoral too. Close, if not majority, would also say hitler was an immoral, sociopathic, crazy SOB.

[troysavary]

18 hours ago, oldtimefighter said:

So BLM

We are criticizing them because they are not sound Nazis? LOL Yes, I sure they are just punk kids or jobless adults but the result is the same... Certain groups of people are being threatened on their own campuses. Media campaign?

 

 

 

Psst... YOU are the slow one. I sure most of these acts are not being done by official Nazis with business cards and everything. LOL Most of the racist acts like this are also NOT being done by "operatives of the left" so please stop making stuff up and make your way back to the Breitbart website.

 

 

 

I do... People even while excising legitimate free speech or civil disobedience do get arrested if they break the law and often even when they are not. This is NOT protected speech so drop it and I would suggest a Constitution 101 class.

 

Thanks for playing guys.

So free speech is only legitimate when it fits one worldview but not another? How is BLM any more legitimate than a neo-Nazi group? They are both racist. Both are detestable, but being dedicated to free speech means I must defend speech that I don't agree with.

[oldtimefighter]

3 hours ago, troysavary said:

So free speech is only legitimate when it fits one worldview but not another? How is BLM any more legitimate than a neo-Nazi group? They are both racist. Both are detestable, but being dedicated to free speech means I must defend speech that I don't agree with.

No one said that dude... No one is talking about BLM. Are you even following the discussion or prefer to just remain ignorant? THIS POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FREE SPEECH!

[troysavary]

2 hours ago, oldtimefighter said:

No one said that dude... No one is talking about BLM. Are you even following the discussion or prefer to just remain ignorant? THIS POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FREE SPEECH!

Actually, you did say that. When I asked if you would be against BLM or a similar group doing the same, you said "even while exercising legitimate free speech", implying that BLM's speech is legitimate and this group's isn't. And this has everything to do with free speech. No one is upset they put up a poster, they are upset that Hitler was on the poster. So it has nothing to do with putting a poster on private property, but with putting up a poster with a message people didn't like.

[oldtimefighter]

18 minutes ago, troysavary said:

Actually, you did say that. When I asked if you would be against BLM or a similar group doing the same, you said "even while exercising legitimate free speech", implying that BLM's speech is legitimate and this group's isn't. And this has everything to do with free speech. No one is upset they put up a poster, they are upset that Hitler was on the poster. So it has nothing to do with putting a poster on private property, but with putting up a poster with a message people didn't like.

You can't be this stupid... You can't post racist speech on a college campus period. End of story.

 

Bye.

[troysavary]

14 minutes ago, oldtimefighter said:

You can't be this stupid... You can't post racist speech on a college campus period. End of story.

 

Bye.

Won't answer the question, will you? Are, or are not, groups like BLM just as racist as neo-Nazis? Does free speech only apply when you happen to like the speech? Judging from the way you are avoiding the answer, I am betting yes.

[Emn1ty]

3 hours ago, oldtimefighter said:

You can't be this stupid... You can't post racist speech on a college campus period. End of story.

 

Bye.

Actually, that's debateable. Considering people are posting flyers about white privilege on college campuses should show that you can. Though I guess you can't be racist against white people.