These hash, they give the same to the site?

[kifirefox]

These hash, they give the same to the site?

 

I checked these hash, they confer and are equal to that of the site or may have been altered during the course? may have been changed or are equal to the original site? just want to know what hash prevention are equal and which have been modified.

 

I want to know if I'm downloading with the modified hash ...

 

following:

MD5

SHA1

SHA256

 

SumatraPDF-3.1.2-install

94271b0a946d46c277792b02c30a8501

57877262b77393b85437cb336092417fe67973d6

6c8a565b31b7bc6074dccad709077415373f6eb8720518e0bed4fe6f4f8ab0b6

Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

6878336e73439f66d4b6b4d6eacc21c3

fcfb702db940067fad07573ea250a4cac3726c00

be89a381e379617d39a50c87cc6de0f08bb92a378c15ad2128a4b155134de60c

 

outros:

adwcleaner_6.044.exe

814b4303957a7c23e603fcdd0b4c1e2e

27332bacd21c3cccc157ea69ea45133f762de430

e50f67848a98308931d24fd8f41a5f32287d24e51de9452fee60c7429e00377b

aimp_4.13.1887.exe

7b1f293c643ec31c1e15bd74e567058c

e13586f70f8c3c46e52ecda432a83f472d69d764

2cf7112d8ed7d50c9689726fcb92e976578d5a79d19b93964d2768de18568b49

ccsetup528.exe

311576bc9949a436f2adfeade344d229

404e1a274a0381359d617eee2411bdc93d5dd309

8505e1d0e75b0f7746d61d7ec42e4f03e03bc561fe6edc2ef46fc5968f472a91

DTLite1050-0221.exe

d8aaff67ee4197ec66a87f352c166fef

5a894a80031360f7a7015a15679ebc82ce3f0dfa

0584f200716ce5575cd61d8d3fa322faf45c726e1eb664c41af80f5b5ceb1704

HitmanPro.exe

8713220a7ad19b31f5d6f500194a2f31

16ac217484d2c09e27a59a0ba8416be7f9f72707

0540071781b3f9d2ef53f9225bb46e3baaee709ff57aa7f16e978a525b9041d5

jre-8u121-windows-i586_2576149195.exe

fa200ff79d0ef63a071daae6a83350de

aed8896549b3776ddde7a367c4c8212fd66a1d7f

ab9c8df0a084bca0aabb898fd988d626919adb6a5ee7f7e39981abd2e54eeb5b

K-Lite_Codec_Pack_1300_Full.exe

02b5e71a38adb785c856f87c4cf0c9bb

1fca77397313197733f283a03680856c02f5d296

d4c368354dd051b930920b12585193d5765ec65bf12962870725e74344de6eb5

mb3-setup-filehorse.32138-3.0.6.1469.exe

87103a6873cb44fd962ad78e3fa5ca2b

e6a28a5d9656f221a4fb98ffd2156831dcf3782a

bd23afbc6dc3916e2c1058b9375ccd5e5271dff1c5046c1858e18c8b9ecdaeef

nitro_pdf_reader.exe

1e40eb6a8db482777531d0efb8db1757

bba1e19782a824c1b02e5503b34b216d93cbfcde

f47ec7dc8d888041f743bd0386b35286337f17b953c52d7b7c96f756526af787

npp.7.3.3.Installer.exe

f2cdec03cd3ac546d174a13408db647d

b52d98ea111f3fe8e39fbd562b35929b7a571dfb

bc96288e6a11b862d31d57adaf4c2c00a637355d7a08c768cef988d40afd82cf

spsetup130.exe

1c2fb6fef7d6364def59e2ceee3812f9

6a8a9cc66d5dda483471a129b65b04ca7d00a7e9

03942f84bb9b9ebd3d3568f4d1d290e8fee4ff793207a7c6f1756ca0afd25beb

SUPERAntiSpyware

d3bc655bbebd8c74bb5a892b50d183b0

510621af81d1237dbd0d3a22d90a8fc065ca6fbe

2b8d372cc1509d710d5725def2a8473104c6fb657933ad54c59445d00f2496d2

vlc-2.2.4-win32_1102699125.exe

fa200ff79d0ef63a071daae6a83350de

aed8896549b3776ddde7a367c4c8212fd66a1d7f

ab9c8df0a084bca0aabb898fd988d626919adb6a5ee7f7e39981abd2e54eeb5b

winamp5666_full_all_redux.exe

b0f76f81b6c748a3831003a25014df03

d0c7e34afc139c5f5081575d6b654c2ae0245037

6763e66cdeca2d3484aaac99c12c096a076e0e9e0da2e4b810f9b250df8c798d

wrar540.exe

f3f9f88c2d3381f939dbb8f4b3c46f8a

5b1bca9929465d2d18e0550cb857708485375714

9729c6562d9f1cf79f3e81fea9880f9d36e20e841f1b4cae2e43c81da890dd47

Zemana.AntiMalware.Setup.exe

6cd6e5cd856c0b6365b2204009fdb084

bac9043ae11f7f293e1fad925ccce414a9d921c0

f5638264ce7690f610148bccf0266f291c8bc58a63818347ac42967c0c2d903d

Shockwave_Installer_Full.exe

153f0f02ebfe784b6bb1545ae0771e25

d5c9770f627ead01712e0d510e6ec6beffdc31e0

295d5fa542da399237b02ed4969786a7a3f5f036cc7a984f5b07ad8e30791005

SkypeSetup.msi

1a6053153420db091f79caa44623cb8f

b1dc452cb6a59124b19efc1be976c07c6f7c00d6

08cf7c5a2b7c8124921ded61ff706f19c3dfe7c697bd8be2c01be244abb4a420

ipscan24.exe

4420c642f33de2e7fc0276a8a1c36b9b

3c3fb9b09f5d3678b044894b725dc6afcfe0973e

9efcdb8a5192022a2ad6158746d0c1cf2186b9c412cf3956650deebe04dd1a18

 

 

[+BudMan MVC]

huh??  If you want to validate what you have downloaded from a 3rd party site - check the hash given by the original site..  Why does anyone download something not from the original site?

 

Confused at what your asking??

[goretsky Supervisor]

Hello,

 

In addition to what +BudMan suggested, check the digital signature on any file you have downloaded to make sure it is signed by the actual author.  Not everything that you download is going to be digitally-signed, of course, but it is a good practice to get into.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

[+BudMan MVC]

Also what exact download of firefox is that?  32 or 64 - What language?  Cuz their hash is going to be differernt

Here is English (US) 64bit

 

File: Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

CRC32: 0b4e6fa8
MD5: 54c09b8d242ce24e90e2db2d2f1d3901
SHA-1: e83a50f5230571492e643e49333670f3ef3e40a3
SHA-256: 2856ffff9fefb0bbbad79f0b9fcfa471ff473c61610e3a5a0566b43de3cd4bb1
SHA-512: 12401b9d67f78c0428891d6f00c21ec7d704b3edb0e38f79641b0e0b421f44f284841d0d025605c247691c219db80ac26d421e0669c3adf5d4e3e42175e17e08

 

So I see my hash in this file..

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/52.0.1/SHA256SUMS

2856ffff9fefb0bbbad79f0b9fcfa471ff473c61610e3a5a0566b43de3cd4bb1  win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

And in the 512

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/52.0.1/SHA512SUMS

12401b9d67f78c0428891d6f00c21ec7d704b3edb0e38f79641b0e0b421f44f284841d0d025605c247691c219db80ac26d421e0669c3adf5d4e3e42175e17e08  win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

 

But I don't see yours anywhere in there at all..

 

[kifirefox]

5 hours ago, BudMan said:

File: Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

CRC32: 0b4e6fa8
MD5: 54c09b8d242ce24e90e2db2d2f1d3901
SHA-1: e83a50f5230571492e643e49333670f3ef3e40a3
SHA-256: 2856ffff9fefb0bbbad79f0b9fcfa471ff473c61610e3a5a0566b43de3cd4bb1
SHA-512: 12401b9d67f78c0428891d6f00c21ec7d704b3edb0e38f79641b0e0b421f44f284841d0d025605c247691c219db80ac26d421e0669c3adf5d4e3e42175e17e08

 

 

Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe x86

9c586351a92f5950e5587d654b361b0a

64546ee9eece38f69e6d395c8ae10fb4f7863060

340a519bfb35fa6ec18228289b71d43c57670b2ae9b0ccf12b32f6d94596982f

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Browsers/Mozilla-Firefox-Final.shtml

And that hash? Confers
I gave the link and it's x86.

 

 

[+BudMan MVC]

So I downloaded via that link x86 version.. And its matches your hash.. and it matches the hash from mozilla

 

340a519bfb35fa6ec18228289b71d43c57670b2ae9b0ccf12b32f6d94596982f  win32/en-US/Firefox Setup 52.0.1.exe

 

But that is NOT the hash you first posted.. you posted this

 

be89a381e379617d39a50c87cc6de0f08bb92a378c15ad2128a4b155134de60c

 

what I just do not get is why and the F would you download from 3rd party like softepdea when you can just download direct from mozilla???

[+Warwagon MVC]

31 minutes ago, BudMan said:

what I just do not get is why and the F would you download from 3rd party like softepdea when you can just download direct from mozilla???

4

Maybe he has an adware fetish 

[kifirefox]

2 hours ago, warwagon said:

Maybe he has an adware fetish 

I really do not understand why someone would download something on each separate site, having a website that provides all the programs on one site.

I just down my programs and utilities in download sites because it is easier to find than to search for google.

Has a lot of good download site to do your downloads, and the softpedia is one of the best.

[DrunknMunky Veteran]

7 minutes ago, kifirefox said:

I really do not understand why someone would download something on each separate site, having a website that provides all the programs on one site.

I just down my programs and utilities in download sites because it is easier to find than to search for google.

Has a lot of good download site to do your downloads, and the softpedia is one of the best.

Because many of those sites use ad-wrappers? Is it really that hard to just go to the author's site and download a clean build?

[Mindovermaster Moderator]

It takes 5 seconds to write "mozilla" or "firefox" in google...

[kifirefox]

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

It takes 5 seconds to write "mozilla" or "firefox" in google...

Google is just a search engine, I prefer mega download sites.
I think you should not have a habit of doing lots of programs.

 

[T3X4S]

2 hours ago, kifirefox said:

I really do not understand why someone would download something on each separate site, having a website that provides all the programs on one site.

I just down my programs and utilities in download sites because it is easier to find than to search for google.

Has a lot of good download site to do your downloads, and the softpedia is one of the best.

OK - so use ninite

 

Softpedia is the best at .... nothing.

There are so many other, better, options out there - and personally, softpedia is a site I NEVER use.


You can use ninite (sign up for the pro - or use it as a trial - its great)
Before filehippo started adding adware to everything- it used to be handy.

But I think filehorse is still legit - not 100% sure.

There is also sourceforge, and countless others

NEVER use softpedia

If softpedia is so great - why are you worried & looking @ hashes ?
 

 

 

[T3X4S]

48 minutes ago, kifirefox said:

Google is just a search engine, I prefer mega download sites.
I think you should not have a habit of doing lots of programs.

 

I think you mean to say, one should not be in the habit of using multiple sites to download from ?
If that is the case, then the goto site you picked to get your wares, was a bad decision.

ninite is safe, free, and very handy.

But, just enter in some fake info, sign up for the Ninite Pro - and you can see how great that website service is.

*Also works with AD - and if you have domain admin rights, you can easily deploy to other computers.

[xendrome]

50 minutes ago, kifirefox said:

Google is just a search engine, I prefer mega download sites.
I think you should not have a habit of doing lots of programs.

 

Good luck with your malware infections then.

[T3X4S]

UPDATE:

filehorse is not safe either - they are wrapping adware in their downloads as well.

[T3X4S]

laziness + lack of education = bad decisions

[kifirefox]

26 minutes ago, xendrome said:

Good luck with your malware infections then.

I'm trying to test the hash, but nobody here does not understand, is there anyone to help do the test?

Post the program, the hash and the link and I'll check it out here too.

Get a program known as firefox, sumatra pdf, utorrent, cdburnerxp, recorders, pdf readers, codecs, etc.

 

And by the link to test in the same place, because in different sites it seems that the hash are different. Has to be the same link, same version, even everything.

 

[+BudMan MVC]

Again what you asking?  Sorry but I don't need your help on working with hashes... I am pretty sure I was doing hashes before you were out of diapers   And nobody else does either - if they did, they could just freaking google the info

 

And you still have not posted what you first posted was clearly not a firefox setup from legit sources - most likely something with an ad wrapper on it, etc.

 

 

[Mindovermaster Moderator]

3 hours ago, kifirefox said:

Google is just a search engine, I prefer mega download sites.
I think you should not have a habit of doing lots of programs.

 

I don't use mega download sites. As said above, most of them are bad.

 

I run Linux, hence my OS on the left. I do not download from abc.xyz site. I use repositories. (Debian, Arch, OpenSUSE) If I do ever download anything outside repositories, I make 100% sure it hasn't been infected. Like, Skype directly from MS.

[T3X4S]

OP - Your question, if I understand it correctly due to the language barrier - is you downloaded the same file from softpedia, multiple times - but rec'd a different hash each time.

If that is your question, there is an obvious answer - different ad wrapper.

If that isnt your question, I dont know what that question is.

But - the real kick here is you are fretting over hashes, because you choose to download from websites that add things to files, because you think it is convenient.

How convenient has this thread been ?  How much time have you spent dealing with this thread, and worrying about hashes before you even posted ?  How much time was lost because you chose to do something that wasn't very wise ?

Stop using softpedia, period.
Either get the software from the authors or from reputable sites which dont add things to the .exe each time causing different hashes.

 

A little education, and consideration before action can save a lot more than just time... and you wont get adware

 

[TAZMINATOR]

@kifirefox

 

If you are sharing the files, then you should post a link to the author's website so the visitors can download directly from author's website instead of your site because smart people like myself would go directly to author's website for details and downloads.

 

I noticed you posted about firefox, pdf, etc..   Those files are not yours.   You must link to author's websites, that way, people can download directly from the author's website ...

 

If they get malware or whatever that came from your site, they will report you and rank your site as bad site.

 

FYI, I never go softpedia. I don't trust them.  

 

Right:  I found a great browser which is called "Firefox"...  For more details, go here: http://mozilla.com/firefox ..

 

Wrong:  i found a great browser which is called, "Firefox"...  Fore more details, go to softpedia/path/to/file    

 

[T3X4S]

15 minutes ago, TAZMINATOR said:

@kifirefox

 

If you are sharing the files, then you should post a link to the author's website so the visitors can download directly from author's website instead of your site because smart people like myself would go directly to author's website for details and downloads.

 

I noticed you posted about firefox, pdf, etc..   Those files are not yours.   You must link to author's websites, that way, people can download directly from the author's website ...

 

If they get malware or whatever that came from your site, they will report you and rank your site as bad site.

 

FYI, I never go softpedia. I don't trust them.  

 

Right:  I found a great browser which is called "Firefox"...  For more details, go here: http://mozilla.com/firefox ..

 

Wrong:  i found a great browser which is called, "Firefox"...  Fore more details, go to softpedia/path/to/file    

 

How did you come to the conclusion he is hosting these files ?

[Dick Montage]

This guy again.  Sorry look, he is one of those people we get here from time to time who thinks they know more than they do, and refuses to accept otherwise even when acting like they want help.

 

Help has been given, move on and ignore.

[+BudMan MVC]

4 hours ago, kifirefox said:

because in different sites it seems that the hash are different. Has to be the same link, same version, even everything.

If the hash is different then its not the same file - period!!  Do you not understand these sites wrap their ads and malware installers around the files that users want that are too stupid to just go to the original place and get it.. It literally takes 2 freaking seconds to find the original maker of what your looking for.  if you download it from anywhere other than the maker - your just asking for ###### you most likely do not want..

[TAZMINATOR]

1 hour ago, T3X4S said:

How did you come to the conclusion he is hosting these files ?

What do you think?   What would he want to hash those files that aren't belong to him for?   If he hash them, most likely he would host them or upload to file sharing website such as softpedia  something like that so the visitors download the infected files... you NEVER know what he would be doing with those. Malware, virus, ad wrap, etc.

 

Some people are finding a way to get in your PC without your knowledge.