Recommended Posts

http://spacenews.com/darpa-aims-to-disrupt-national-security-space-business/

 

DARPA aims to ‘disrupt’ national security space business



DARPA's Fred Kennedy: "Our savior is going to be the commercial sector."

WASHINGTON — The military space business is stuck in its old ways and missing a "golden opportunity" to capture the energy of a rejuvenated commercial industry, said a former White House space and aviation technology adviser who is now a top official at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
"In the national security space sector, we're in dire need of new thinking and innovation,"  said Fred Kennedy, director of DARPA’s Tactical Technology Office. He assumed that post in September after serving as deputy director since January.

Speaking at a breakfast meeting of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation Nov. 15, Kennedy criticized the Pentagon’s methods for acquiring satellites and called for a “shakeup” in national security space programs.

In the Defense Department, Kennedy said, "We've gotten very good at building small numbers of extremely exquisite things, very expensive things on very long time schedules." That culture that emphasizes high performance and low risk is now working against the military because its satellites have become huge targets for adversaries.

"Our savior is going to be the commercial sector,” said Kennedy. Some pockets within the military are moving in that direction but not soon enough. “We’re starting to see an influx of commercial technology, but we need more of it, and quick."

Kennedy worries that the commercial space boom could turn out to be a fad that fades in a few years, so the Pentagon should be harnessing that energy now. "My biggest fear is that in a couple of years people will forget Matt Damon and 'The Martian' and be back where we were before."

'Other transactions' contracting

DARPA’s weapon for capturing privately funded technology is an authority known as "other transactions," or OTA, to sign contracts with vendors that bypasses some of the federal procurement red tape.

"We do that. It's very effective and useful," said Kennedy. "I can’t say it's always quicker than the normal contracting process. But it is actually an effective way of teaming."

The way it works with DARPA: The agency selects a commercial partner and the company is expected to help fund the venture. "Then we can go out and work on problems jointly," Kennedy said.
>
>

A fad, huh. So the Colonization of Mars is seen as a "fad"? A passing ADHD interest that'll lose its' luster in a few years? Nah. That dream of the 50's and 60's, and even the early 70's, when we dared to think that Space was the next great frontier, was killed because of people who worked for DARPA and OldSpace because they were too busy trying to figure out ways to kill other people most efficiently during the Cold War.

 

That's all over with, and they can't get out of that lame-assed midset (being the students of those old idiots) so they have no idea how to deal with the new ideas and new ambitions. Good for them for trying, though.

  • 1 month later...

AKA braking shields

 

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/uw-team-wins-nasas-nod-small-satellites-magnetic-braking-systems/

 

Quote

UW team wins NASA’s nod for small satellites with magnetic braking systems

 

NASA says itll provide resources for a University of Washington research team thats working on a concept to put small satellites in orbit around other worlds using magnetic interactions.

The concept, known as magnetoshell aerocapture, is one of nine university-led technology development projects winning NASAs backing under the Smallsat Technology Partnerships initiative. The nationwide program is managed by NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley.

Magnetoshell aerocapture uses magnetic fields and magnetized plasma to help slow down spacecraft and get them into stable orbits. The technology is particularly suited for interplanetary missions involving small spacecraft, where size and weight constraints may rule out using thrusters, physical aeroshells or other weighty deceleration systems.

UW researchers have been working on the technology for years. Last year, an associated team from Redmond, Wash.-based MSNW received a $500,000 NASA grant for ground-based development work on magnetoshell aerocapture.

The technology can turn less than an ounce of plasma into a magnetized deceleration barrier that’s as wide as a football field.
>
The nine newly selected teams will have the opportunity to establish a two-year cooperative agreement with NASA, through which each university will receive up to $200,000 per year. As part of the agreement, NASA researchers will collaborate on the projects. UWs team, for instance, has been paired up with Langley Research Center in Virginia.
>

 

 

 

160513-mag3.jpg

 

  • Like 1

Sounds like Russia lost Angosat-1, a GEO commsat for Angola launched yesterday on Zenit.  Sounds like the Fregat tug got it to GEO, separated then things went south. 

 

http://tass.ru/kosmos/4846548

 

Quote

MOSCOW, December 27. / TASS /. With the Angolan satellite "Angosat", which was launched on December 26 from Baikonur, it was not possible to establish a connection. This was reported by a TASS source in the rocket and space industry.

 

"So far, there are no links with the" Angosat "satellite, we are dealing with the situation," the source said.

TASS does not have an official confirmation of this information.

The source of the agency added that communication with the satellite was lost at the stage of solar battery disclosure panel deployment. 

"After the division with the Fregat upper stage at 06:54 Moscow time everything was regular, the satellite's own orientation system was switched on, telemetry was fully applied, then the solar cells were opened, at this stage telemetry was lost," the source said.
>

 

Bummer for Angola (this would have been their first satellite) ... hopefully it is a temporary glitch and communications will be restored.  If not ... space is hard unfortunately.  

It's a lot harder when you're launch provider suffers a series of solar panel deployment issues, from which Russia has been suffering for almost a decade. Particularly, this is been a problem on Progress and Soyuz missions.

 

It's a combination of an aging workforce where the young Engineers are heading for Europe or the US for better pay, and poor quality control.

Founds this video interesting.  A team at the University of Arizona explain how they create mirror glass for Chile's Giant Magellan Telescope, planned for completion in 2025.  The University has made around 20 mirror glasses for other telescopes, which is located under their football stadium.

 

 

 

Apparently all communications, telemetry, and command/control have been reestablished with Angosat-1. The satellite is reportedly in good health. Wow. Color me surprised.

  • Like 2

He and Crippen were who I would consider to be the "Ultimate Team". Nobody else could have flown that first Shuttle flight with the same level of aptitude, grapefruits and sheer skill level as those two -- because that first Shuttle flight was so close to redline on so many instances that these two Astronauts were the only ones who could have dealt with it.

 

Young was also the Chief of the Astronaut Office from 1974 to 1987, being the longest-tenured Chief of that position. During STS-1's mission buildup and duration he was not required to relinquish that position as it would be his last flight, and training was relatively short.

 

He finally retired from NASA in 2004 at the age of 74, although he would still attend the monday morning briefings for years afterward. :) 

 

Hell of a guy, hell of an Astronaut.

 

(Citation: Wikipedia (John Young) )

Great Lakes bolide

 

Last night about 2008 Eastern time there was a very bright light, then an extremely bright flash followed by an enormous BOOM!! that shook the entire house. 

 

The local news channels were all over it saying it was seen as far away as Chicago,  massed about 1 metric tonne and it registered on seismographs as a 2.0 earthquake.

 

 

 

Edited by DocM

Saw this on the news, I guess a piece of it landed in a residential neighborhood in/near Taylor. We all saw the extremely bright light as it entered the atmosphere  ... how could anyone miss it?

 

I wanna know what its' composition/minerology is. :yes: 

Worth a full read....

 

http://m.aviationweek.com/space/cutting-bureaucracy-meet-cape-canaverals-aggressive-launch-goal

 

Quote

Cutting Bureaucracy To Meet Cape Canaveral's Aggressive Launch Goal

 

Cape laying groundwork for big boost in flight rate

Stepping Up to 48 [launches/year]

The way 45th Space Wing Commander Wayne Monteith sees it, the key to supporting 48 launches a year by 2020 is to remove bureaucratic obstacles such as having customers make reservations for range time at least six months in advance and to invest in new technologies, such as a graphic visualization system to sharpen the accuracy of launch-weather forecasts. 
>
>
Another system ripe for a technological reboot is the Space Wings scheduling tool, which literally consisted of a whiteboard. "Traditionally, if you wanted to get a launch slot on the range, you would plan somewhere between 6-36 months out to get your slot," Monteith says. "The new goal was 90 days, and now most of those requests come in under 60 days. My goal is to get that under 30 days, so a company like SpaceX can come in and say, I want to launch next month and if I have an opening, I want to be able to support that launch."

"They launch on readiness when they are ready to go they want to go," he adds. "Traditionally, we have launched on schedule. We've told our launch provider, 'This satellite will be ready in three years, and that's when you're going to launch. If you're ready early or if were ready early, that doesn't matter.' In order for us to bring business here to the Space Coast, we had to become much more agile and flexible and accommodating. The system has worked since the 1950s and 60s, but that doesn't mean it's going to work for the next 50 or 60 years. You have to adapt, or you become irrelevant."
>

 

  • Like 1

Desire vs. Reality ... and getting the FAA and NASA to cooperate will be an entirely different thing. The FAA are going over everything with a fine-toothed comb, and NASA apparently feels the need to triple-check anything and everything that wants to fly out of the Cape ad nauseam before giving approval Which in if itself can take six months.

 

NASA will be the tough nut to crack on that one. FAA will be okay, I think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • This whole dumb age verification thing needs to die and be replaced by giving parents tools to control devices. Why am I required to plaster my ID all over the internet to prove I'm old enough when parents should be the ones dictating what their kids are doing on their phones. Apple released great set of tools for iPhones coming to iOS 27 that do just that. Why are governments not mandating that kind of control to phone makers to built them into phones. This whole thing is so absolutely idiotic it's wild.
    • Remeber this decade, when the free internet died... tell your grand kids about this, record there reaction and post it on InstaTwitBook.com
    • UK nudity blockers are a looming privacy disaster, we must be able to see the source code by Paul Hill Image via Pexels The UK government, just like many state governments in the US and national governments around the world, has begun going on a bit of a power trip when it comes to digital safety. The major step taken so far is the introduction of the Online Safety Act, which requires users to prove their age to access adult websites (it includes more than this, too). Now, UK PM Keir Starmer is calling on Apple and Google, and presumably other mobile OS makers, to scan phones for explicit images to protect children. This potentially mandatory on-device scanning by vendor-controlled software will create unacceptable harms to individual freedoms and transparency, and introduce massive surveillance risks. In a statement on June 8, the Prime Minister stated that big tech companies, such as Apple and Google, must add features to their platforms, such as iOS and Android, that will detect and block sexually explicit or nude images involving under-18s on phones or tablets. Adults who want to take or send nudes would be required to hand over some form of identification to stop their phone from blocking these pictures, creating unnecessary privacy risks. According to the government, it wants to see these measures implemented within three months; otherwise, the government will introduce legislation to force them to introduce such technology. The legislation will include fines for companies and maybe even criminal liability for tech bosses who do not comply with the measures. In its announcement, the government said that stopping users from taking, sending, or receiving nudes without verifying their age is technically feasible, and pointed to a British firm called SafeToNet, which has made proprietary, closed-source, uninstallable software called HarmBlock and is actively selling a device with it enabled and is working with other OEMs. The fact that this software is closed source is a huge problem because it’s a black box; you do not know what it is doing on your device. The fact that it is unremovable is also a problem because you lose control of a phone that you own. Laughably, the government, just before highlighting SafeToNet, says that companies must introduce such measures “without threatening privacy or collecting any data.” It then says over-18s will still be able to view adult content by providing proof of age… Which sounds to me like data collection. SafeToNet makes some debatable claims about HarmBlock The government’s example software, HarmBlock, is a hugely alarming choice to espouse the virtues of this type of software. SafeToNet claims that HarmBlock is “ethically developed,” but this is the opposite of the truth. This black box software puts digital handcuffs on you if it’s installed in your device, taking away your freedom to control what software runs on your device, as it cannot be removed. It is not even free software, so we cannot inspect the source code to see what it is doing. For all we know, it could be acting maliciously. While that’s unlikely, we can’t verify that it’s not doing that. When Google and Apple do inevitably integrate these features on devices in the UK, they are very likely to be closed-source binaries, which will also be non-auditable. They will also have identity services built into them, which will require at least temporary collection of sensitive identity documents to verify your age. One saving grace for Android users is that this nudity blocker will very likely be implemented within the Google Play infrastructure that’s deeply tied into commercial Android devices. However, anyone with enough determination to throw out Google apps from their phone by flashing a custom ROM could find they regain control over their phone again without these digital handcuffs. Obviously, this is only how I expect Google to implement the feature; if it bakes it into the open-source Android somehow, that would be bad news for anyone looking to escape it. Outside of stripping mobile phone users of their freedom and sovereignty over their devices, these proprietary on-device machine learning or hash-matching solutions cannot be independently audited. This means that hackers could potentially exploit them because security researchers can’t investigate the code, and they could overstep their intended use case and collect even more user data without anybody knowing. We also wouldn’t know if the code is prone to detecting false positives or biased classification, because we can’t see the code. In the government’s announcement, contributing comments from the Internet Watch Foundation keep talking about “on-device protections” as if to say that users don’t need to worry about server-side processing; however, this is misleading, as data could flow from devices for the purpose of updates, remote model changes, telemetry, or server-side matching. We’ve also seen with the Online Safety Act that the government is never content with the laws it introduces; it always wants to expand the controls. If this scanning functionality arrives on devices, it might only block nudes initially, but later governments could pressure vendors for expanded access or use mandated features for other surveillance aims. The introduction of on-device scanners opens the door to massive risks in the future. Once nude blocking becomes normalized, regulators like Ofcom or politicians themselves could push for more controls over people’s devices. Very possible candidates for blocking include hate speech, misinformation, or undesirable political content. Also, there is a chance that once Apple and Google have developed this software, they might attempt to reuse the infrastructure for commercial or foreign requests, putting customers in greater danger. Just the UK's demand for this sets a precedent. What if a dictatorship decides to spy on activists by demanding that Google or Apple implement similar controls? Another concern with this scanning is that it adds compliance costs for businesses looking to get into the mobile operating system space. While Google and Apple dominate the space right now, there are lots of smaller companies creating mobile operating systems too, including community projects with very shallow pockets. How are these smaller competitors supposed to implement sophisticated nudity detectors? Simply put, they can’t. Then the government goes after them, causes them to shut down, and Google and Apple have less competition. Image via Aurora Store For us users who value sovereignty over our technology, this development will force us to seek freedom-respecting alternatives. The simplest path forward will likely be to install a custom ROM on an Android device; however, kicking Google off the phone with its black box nudity blocker could also make it harder to access apps such as banking apps, which tend to need you to pass Google's integrity checks. Thankfully, Google Play Store apps can still be obtained by storefronts such as the Aurora Store, but it just adds to the friction. To be fair to those pushing this measure to protect children, I think it will be reasonably effective, but people will still try to find ways around it, just as they’ve done with age gates on adult websites introduced under the Online Safety Act. In the effort to find circumvention methods, it could lead users to join riskier platforms that introduce new dangers. This effort also diverts resources from proven interventions such as law enforcement cooperation, targeted investigations, education, and support services to broad technical controls that have uncertain effectiveness (due to their newness). If the government is set on introducing such tools, then there ought to be safeguards in place. Any mandated code should be released as free software so that it can be audited, and the binaries should be reproducible builds so that the public knows nothing has been tampered with in the code used to create the binaries shipped out. Ideally, these tools should also be voluntary, opt-in, and even community-run. This would also allow people to have full control over their hardware while allowing parents to flip a switch to turn on these protections for children, with the knowledge that the code being run is doing exactly what it says on the tin, and nothing nefarious, like a black box solution could be doing. The government should also have a narrow legal scope where this technology stays with blocking nudes and not spreading to blocking political opinions, hate speech, and so on. Ideally, any implementation should avoid identity-linked age verification to keep user data safe, and matching should be done locally with no server telemetry to ensure it is truly on-device. While I do understand that stakeholders such as parents want to keep children safe, the potential for abuse with this type of software is colossal. It would entrench black-box surveillance and take away our freedom to use our devices as we want. There is also the acute risk that the government will demand this surveillance be expanded to block other activities, which could be particularly dangerous. If you are in the UK and don’t wish to see these measures implemented, it is still possible to write to your MP, which could lead to some better safeguards being introduced before it’s too late. Once we get more technical information about how this will be implemented, then we will be able to see if de-Googling Android devices will bypass this measure. For anyone with an iPhone, there is zero chance that you’ll be able to take off these handcuffs because Apple doesn’t let you mess with your software.
    • I'm reading the reports as EU rejecting Apple's proposal because Trusted System Agent would be an intermediary offered to third party AI's (this article is also worded as such) but Siri AI itself would not pass this intermediary. This would cause a situation where Siri AI would have more direct system access and offer it an unfair advantage. (speaking from EU regulator perspective here) Apple is citing security issues with doing what EU asked for, and I think this also supports this theory, because truly direct system access like Siri AI would make it impossible to control third party AI's running on the devices and e.g. reign them in via adjustments to Trusted System Agent. So, I _think_ this is the sticking point right now: EU saying they need to be on equal footing as Siri AI, Apple saying they can't be because Apple only trusts their own AI. Apple could of course be leaning a bit extra hard towards this because they're biased in terms of excluding competitors. One method to find an agreement would be to have Siri AI also run through Trusted System Agent and treat it as untrusted. This kind of defensive architecture design (especially when involving an AI) would honestly not be a very bad idea from a sheer engineering standpoint. But then Apple would need to swallow their pride and adapt worldwide due to EU, and make perhaps major updates delaying Siri AI once more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      220
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!