Falcon 9: Koreasat 5A (mission thread)


Recommended Posts

Falcon 9

Core: B1042.1

Launch Site: KSC LC-39A
Date: October 30
Time: 1534-1758 EDT, 1934-2158 GMT
Stage Landing: ASDS 'Of Course I Still love You'

Payload: Koreasat 5A
Bus: Thales Spacebus 4000B2
Orbit: GEO at 113°E
Mass: 3,500 kg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible as dates after Koreasat 5A are nebulous save for Vandenberg and CRS flights which could fly from LC-40.

 

Also, after the hurricanes they started doing LC-39A FH upgrades on the fly. 

 

Most of the extra launch mount tail masts (hold downs + connections) and some Transporter/Erector additions are already up, and the Rotating Service Structure is skeletonized & nearly ready to come down. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Webcast live

 

That new crossbar at the top of the TEL is part of the changes made for launching X-37B, and it may be useful for Falcon Heavy.

There are another set of crossbars lower down which will be used to help stabilize the top of the Falcon Heavy boosters, but they are smaller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little BBQ going on with the first stage.  Wonder if they're ever going to implement a little fire suppression onto the drone ships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DocM said:

 

 

No offense to this Berger guy ... but this is the definition of the ol' idiom "apples to oranges."  NASA was going to the moon ... NASA landed on the moon a tad over 8 years after Alan Shepard's suborbital flight.  NASA accomplished this in the very infancy of manned-spaceflight ... almost 50 years ago (for the first moon landing).

 

Anyway ... such an odd (and in my opinion very dumb) comparison.  SpaceX's achievements speak for themselves ... not sure what the point of this was.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ that is a much better comparison/factoid.  Now ... I'm curious how much was collectively saved this year by the customers going with SpaceX vs. the other platforms.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two paths to  customer savings...

 

1) the obvious: a reduction in the price of the launch 

 

2) they can usually launch sooner using a Flight Proven™ core, meaning reduced storage costs and they start earning revenue or receiving their mission data sooner

 

Very often #2 is more than enough.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.