• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

F9: SpaceX Mission 1039, code name "ZUMA"

Recommended Posts

Beittil    582

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

Slips to Saturday, Jan 6

 

Upper level winds forecast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
anthdci    218
3 hours ago, DocM said:

Slips to Saturday, Jan 6

 

Upper level winds forecast.

would it put back falcon heavy since they are on different pads?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

Likely as Zuma is a personnel hog. Not necessarily a 1:1 slip ratio though.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

And here we go....

 

Orbit destination is no longer "LEO," just "orbit." Hmmm....

 

Weather now 80%

 

Window: 2000-2200 Eastern (0100-0300 UT)

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    13,744

^ Coverage now live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    13,744

Making it look easy. :)  

Need some infrared cameras for these night time landings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

Smooootthhhhhh....

 

Ninjaed

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

ZUMA, there & back

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

 

Someone tracked S2 all the way to SECO-1. Neat footage of S2 sep and the landing too.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beittil    582

Yeah that John Kraus photo is totally my new background on my phone now :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skiver    1,960
On 06/01/2018 at 11:24 PM, DocM said:

And here we go....

 

Orbit destination is no longer "LEO," just "orbit." Hmmm....

 

Weather now 80%

 

Window: 2000-2200 Eastern (0100-0300 UT)

<snip>

 

2

Could this be something like the Boeing X-37? My head told me launches were always secret but wiki tells us the launch dates so I'm guessing I'm way off here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615
58 minutes ago, Skiver said:

Could this be something like the Boeing X-37? My head told me launches were always secret but wiki tells us the launch dates so I'm guessing I'm way off here.

SpaceX launched one of the two X-37B's last September and it was a very public launch. This is very, very different in that the agency it belongs to won't say so and even minor  leaks are non-existent. 

 

Even NRO claims its birds, giving them the NROL-## ,(NRO Launch) designation before launch and USA-### after they're on station.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

CNBC and WSJ/Dow Jones are running with stories, based on Twitter rumors, that ZUMA either malfunctioned or didn't separate from the F9 upper stage. 

 

The WSJ/Dow Jones story is by Andy Pasztor, who is notoriously anti-SpaceX, and CNBC ran with his story. 

 

Northrop Grumman says we don't comment on classified launches.

 

SpaceX says F9 performed nominally, and so far insider info says the same. 

 

We also have the tweet below by a regular satellite tracker showing F9's S2 where it should have been, when it was supposed to be there, before the planned re-entry over the Indian Ocean.  Strategic Command has also listed ZUMA as USA-280, seeming to indicate it made orbit.

 

There is also independent tracking video of S2's burn, and the LaunchNet callout of fairing separation.

 

Take these rumors with a massive dose of salt until something official comes from N-G or the govt. saying otherwise. 

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/08/highly-classified-us-spy-satellite-appears-to-be-a-total-loss-after-spacex-launch.html

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-spy-satellite-believed-lost-after-spacex-mission-fails-1515462479

 

 

 

Edited by DocM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

More: N-G made the payload adapter, they didn't use the standard SpaceX adapter. If it didn't separate from the upper stage....

 

https://www.wired.com/story/spacexs-top-secret-zuma-mission-launches-today/

 

Quote

>

Veteranaerospace manufacturer Northrop Grumman built the payload, according to a document obtained by WIRED and later confirmed by the company. The company says it built Zuma for the US government, and it’s also providing an adapter to mate Zuma with SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. But that’s where information starts tapering off. 

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

And....an astronomer at Harvard-Smithsonian

 

 

Edited by DocM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+John.    1,395

Would it be possible that, if it did fail to separate due to the custom payload adapter, that SpaceX forced it to come down with S2 as they couldn't control S2 properly?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

The upper stage was programmed to come down after a couple of orbits anyhow, orbital debris mitigation, so if the satellite didn't separate it was coming down as well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skiver    1,960
3 hours ago, DocM said:

The upper stage was programmed to come down after a couple of orbits anyhow, orbital debris mitigation, so if the satellite didn't separate it was coming down as well.

Straight down to a certain leaders house in North Korea? :shiftyninja:

 

What is the likely hood of us finding out whether it was successful or not? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
flyingskippy    167

SpaceX says F9 performed nominally and there was confirmation of fairing deployment. Everything else besides delta v and trajectory is on NG. Maybe they should have gone with SpaceX's payload adapter.....

 

This mission has been so f***ing weird since the get-go. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM    16,615

Statement by Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO of SpaceX,

 

Quote

For clarity: after review of all data to date, Falcon 9 did everything correctly on Sunday night. If we or others find otherwise based on further review, we will report it immediately. Information published that is contrary to this statement is categorically false. Due to the classified nature of the payload, no further comment is possible.  

Since the data reviewed so far indicates that no design, operational or other changes are needed, we do not anticipate any impact on the upcoming launch schedule. Falcon Heavy has been rolled out to launchpad LC-39A for a static fire later this week, to be followed shortly thereafter by its maiden flight. We are also preparing for an F9 launch for SES and the Luxembourg Government from SLC-40 in three weeks.

 

It's looking more and more like (a) the mission went as planned, perhaps a hypersonic or reentry vehicle test or the vehicle pulled a disappearing act, (b) the custom Northrop-Grumman supplied payload adapter failed to separate the vehicle from the upper stage, or (c) the vehicle failed after separation. Pick one.

Edited by DocM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.