Recommended Posts

ok, i'm SICK of hearing about the supposed spyware that microsoft includes with windows xp. i am now a paranoid user (sarcasm). someone please show me the light. tell me where it is, what it does, and how i can stop it. please, i want to know. someone tell me exactly what spyware is included in xp.

Edited by gameguy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/134566-spyware-in-windows-xp/
Share on other sites

The only thing I ever heard of was in SP1 it was an ALEXA...run spybot it picks it up and removes it. There are quite a few non-essential programs, error reporting, windows messenger, etc. You may use these though...

check out: http://www.answersthatwork.com/Tasklist_pages/tasklist.htm

to see what processes you're running.

ah man.. i never thought i'd see gameguy making a thread like this

:rofl: it's just that people keep talking about it and i know they're talking nonsense. i am quite knowledgable about windows (edit: at least xp, i forget a lot about win9x :blush:), and to my knowledge, there is NO spyware in xp. however, some things can be interpreted as spyware (sending hardware/network info with bug reports, etc) but those things are either anonymous or there's another explanation for that particular thing.

There are bits it does send. Most of which don't ID you or your PC. Sometimes it will ask, but usually not (most are set to send by default).

All in all, nothing to worry about, but when I had XP, I disabled all of them out of habit. :)

Now I am a Linux user, and my data goes to Linus Torvalds! :pinch: lol

There are bits it does send. Most of which don't ID you or your PC. Sometimes it will ask, but usually not (most are set to send by default).

All in all, nothing to worry about, but when I had XP, I disabled all of them out of habit. :)

Now I am a Linux user, and my data goes to Linus Torvalds! :pinch: lol

This is an excellent example of someone asking for specific answers to the question "what spyware, where is it, tell me exactly", and some idiot spews forth the same old crap "oh, it's there dude..."

Congradulations, thanks for taking a dump in the thread.

Now...would someone be so kind as to answer the question?

I guess it depends what you define as spy ware, if you class bug reports and program crash?s sent to Microsoft as spy ware then most os's do this take linux bug-zilla, that sends bug reports but it doesn?t contain your name or anything like that.

At the end of the day we don?t really know what ms and other company?s really know about us. And you could go mad thinking about it, so look at it this way is it really a problem, granted I don?t like to think that a company such as ms would know so much about me but lets face it people like to think there?s a conspiracy behind things 99% of the time there isn?t.

My view is there?s no real spy ware in xp there might be error reporting tools but nothing that would send anything incriminating.

I hope my post is ok njlouch as I remember last time you posted it wasn?t well thought out, sorry about that im 15 and grated not very bright I did get an E in English on my mocks, so sorry if it doesn?t meet your standards.

Dan

This is an excellent example of someone asking for specific answers to the question "what spyware, where is it, tell me exactly", and some idiot spews forth the same old crap "oh, it's there dude..."

Congradulations, thanks for taking a dump in the thread.

Now...would someone be so kind as to answer the question?

Excuse me, but I was confirming that although WindowsXP does send out some information, it can all be disabled. Some of it is enabled by default, and none of the data personally identifies you or your PC.

The last comment was a simple joke (as it was ridiculously juxtapositioning Linus Torvalds into Bill Gates' position). I think you took it a bit more seriously than you should have.

so... there's only been one example? :huh:

alexa is just doing it's job. for it to be activated, the user must click the "related links" button in IE, which for some reason, i can't find right now :blink: anyway, YOU have to start it, and it's just doing it's job. it looks at the page you're viewing and searches for similar/related websites. if you don't want this functionality, just don't click related links and remove the button. some people use it.

It looks like everyone agrees that there really isn't any true "spying" going on with Windows XP. The bits of data are relatively trivial (unless you specifically give permission to, as in when prompted to send your configuration information along with error data).

The only ones who believe differently are the fringe radicals (who, unfortunately, tend to scream the loudest and most repeatedly).

there is another major spyware in Windows XP, its in WMP9

i have also heard that too. apparently, it connects to the net and sends the information of the media to ms.

also, there was an article on ntfs/neowin, i cant remember, it was about sending all your copy/paste information to them.

We don't know if there is spyware or not in xp without the source so either opinion may be correct

I think that WMP just sends track data out for cddb lookup... maybe. Not like Microsoft would find out that I listen to They Might be Giants very interesting. Now, Vanilla Ice would be a different matter... :blush:

As for saying that you can't tell without the source, that isn't true. A packet sniffer just listens to all traffic, and you can 'tune in' to the ones going to Redmond, if you wanted to. I think that they even make packet sniffer programs that can run in Windows (it requires a different driver that talks to the NIC on a more fundamental and direct level).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 by Razvan Serea Glary Utilities offers numerous powerful and easy-to-use system tools and utilities to fix, speed up, maintain and protect your PC. Glary Utilities allow you to clean common system junk files, as well as invalid registry entries and Internet traces. You can manage and delete browser add-ons, analyze disk space usage and find duplicate files. You can also view and manage installed shell extensions, encrypt your files from unauthorized access and use, split large files into smaller manageable files and then rejoin them. Furthermore, Glary Utilities includes the options to find, fix, or remove broken Windows shortcuts, manage the programs that start at Windows startup and uninstall software. All Glary Utilities tools can be accessed through an eye-pleasing and totally simplistic interface. Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 changelog: Optimized Memory Defrager: Optimized the clipboard cleaning algorithm, increasing speed by 5%. Optimized Wipe Free Space: Optimized the free space wiping algorithm, increasing speed by 8%. Minor GUI improvements. Minor bug fixes. Download: Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 | 27.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Glary Utilities | 32.3 MB View: Glary Utilities Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      217
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!