Recommended Posts

I've been hooked on watching these alien conspiracy documentaries. Many of them I don't believe, but I watched one on YouTube last night called Zero Point. it was an interview with mainly one guy and a few others who were involved with US-made craft that were back engineered from alien spacecraft. The guys seemed highly credible to me and went into great detail about the theories of and how field propulsion works. They apparently have had this technology for a long time and it's capable of faster than light travel. Plus field energy would pretty much destroy the world economy which is based on fossil fuels.

 

After watching this, it doesn't seem so outlandish anymore than we've recovered craft and reverse engineered them. What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1367176-zero-point-and-field-propulsion/
Share on other sites

There have been videos and papers on zero point energy and when applied to propulsion, it does make sense, as the faster you go, the more mass is consumed in the process. 
Eg: With a car, whether it be petrol or electric, the faster you go, the more petrol is consumed, or electric power needed from the battery.
So with that in mind, space craft would require massive amounts of energy to travel faster than light, zero point and field propulsion *could* work but to my knowledge anyway, there is no confirmed means to produce it, and it isn't even known to be a thing at this stage anyway (at least publicly). 
If you can link the video in question, it would be easier to pull it apart for the science and see if it what he or she is talking about is or can be backed up, or as most videos like this tend to be, hypothetical. 

27 minutes ago, patseguin said:

I've been hooked on watching these alien conspiracy documentaries. Many of them I don't believe, but I watched one on YouTube last night called Zero Point. it was an interview with mainly one guy and a few others who were involved with US-made craft that were back engineered from alien spacecraft. The guys seemed highly credible to me and went into great detail about the theories of and how field propulsion works. They apparently have had this technology for a long time and it's capable of faster than light travel. Plus field energy would pretty much destroy the world economy which is based on fossil fuels.

 

After watching this, it doesn't seem so outlandish anymore than we've recovered craft and reverse engineered them. What do you guys think?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_propulsion#Spacecraft

We know why electromagnetic propulsion works, we just don't know what to put together to make it work well.

Sure, we could move through space without fuel (aside from starlight + solar panels), we'd just be moving incredible slow and or with an incredibly slow acceleration, especially relative to the vast distances between things.

9 minutes ago, Anarkii said:

There have been videos and papers on zero point energy and when applied to propulsion, it does make sense, as the faster you go, the more mass is consumed in the process. 
Eg: With a car, whether it be petrol or electric, the faster you go, the more petrol is consumed, or electric power needed from the battery.
So with that in mind, space craft would require massive amounts of energy to travel faster than light, zero point and field propulsion *could* work but to my knowledge anyway, there is no confirmed means to produce it, and it isn't even known to be a thing at this stage anyway (at least publicly). 
If you can link the video in question, it would be easier to pull it apart for the science and see if it what he or she is talking about is or can be backed up, or as most videos like this tend to be, hypothetical. 

 

That video was amazing! After watching it I was expecting them to go into great detail about the actual propulsion system in the ARV, with full technical specs and everything. 
The science at the end of the video does seem plausible,  specially how the flux around the craft would create a few thousand volts if not more and its own magnetic field, what I find interesting though is with those plans freely available on the internet, why no one has created a working prototye in their garage and put it on YouTube or something. 
The other thing that I found really interesting was the controls. It was amazingly simple, like too simple and yet, would work perfectly on X, Y and Z axies. 
Impressive find mate! 

On 7/4/2018 at 9:28 AM, Anarkii said:

That video was amazing! After watching it I was expecting them to go into great detail about the actual propulsion system in the ARV, with full technical specs and everything. 
The science at the end of the video does seem plausible,  specially how the flux around the craft would create a few thousand volts if not more and its own magnetic field, what I find interesting though is with those plans freely available on the internet, why no one has created a working prototye in their garage and put it on YouTube or something. 
The other thing that I found really interesting was the controls. It was amazingly simple, like too simple and yet, would work perfectly on X, Y and Z axies. 
Impressive find mate! 

Yeah for sure. I couldn't believe that it only had like 600 views. You are right about the controls though. Very simplistic looking. It's hard to image plopping an interstellar course without a computer or any kind of automation. My guess is that they have made the ARV's with simple controls for "local" traveling. They mentioned being to Mars in only a few minutes. I have always been a bit of a sceptic on ARV's but after watching this video, I am convinced that they have them and the field propulsion. They just can't go public with it because our current world economy would collapse.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!